User contributions for TompaDompa

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

19:5519:55, 24 September 2026 diff hist +395 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: Reply. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
19:4219:42, 24 September 2026 diff hist +256 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: The question is how you assess the reliability of the source, for the material it is intended to be used, in the context it is intended to be used. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
19:2719:27, 24 September 2026 diff hist +300 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: So what is your position? Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
19:0219:02, 24 September 2026 diff hist +209 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: If you disagree with the specifics of my assessments, by all means present your own and how they differ. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
18:4918:49, 24 September 2026 diff hist +541 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: Reply. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
18:3618:36, 24 September 2026 diff hist +134 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: Try reading what I already wrote. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
18:2818:28, 24 September 2026 diff hist +295 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: Not what I said, not what happened, not what WP:OWN is, and I think you know all of that. And yes, not covering the area at all in the WP:LEAD of this article is probably the best outcome. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
18:0518:05, 24 September 2026 diff hist −770 Portuguese Empire As per the talk page, restoring the status quo ante. Objections have been raised to this level of detail here in the first paragraph of the WP:LEAD, WP:ONUS applies, and so on. No objections from me if somebody wants to take it a step further and remove the remaining area estimate here. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
18:0218:02, 24 September 2026 diff hist +3,320 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: Reply. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

18:5118:51, 23 September 2026 diff hist +487 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: End of my comment lost in edit conflict, now fixed. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
18:4918:49, 23 September 2026 diff hist +4,606 Talk:Portuguese Empire →RfC: Maximum territorial extent of the Portuguese Empire: different sources: Comment. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
17:4417:44, 23 September 2026 diff hist +142 N Wikipedia:ASPECTWEIGHT Creating redirect. current Tags: New redirect 2017 wikitext editor
17:1917:19, 23 September 2026 diff hist −770 Portuguese Empire Restoring status quo while the matter is under discussion (see talk page). This is very obviously an inappropriate level of detail to get into about differing area estimates in the first paragraph of the WP:LEAD anyway, especially considering that the body of the article does not cover differing area estimates whatsoever. Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
15:2515:25, 23 September 2026 diff hist +1,210 Talk:Portuguese Empire →Sourcing the Portuguese Empire’s maximum area: scope/definition: Reply. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
15:2515:25, 23 September 2026 diff hist −416 Portuguese Empire The standard metric when quantifying the territorial extents of historical polities is area controlled, not area claimed (or even area recognized). Rein Taagepera also happens to be the world's foremost expert on that specific subject, and the cited source is a peer-reviewed scientific article specifically on that subject—just about the WP:BESTSOURCE we could get for something like this. We don't necessarily have to give a figure at all here, but if we do Taagepera's is the one to use. Tag: Undo
15:0615:06, 23 September 2026 diff hist 0 List of fastest-grossing films Undid revision 1376267485 by ~2026-51105-78 (talk): Outright misrepresentation. current Tag: Undo
13:0513:05, 23 September 2026 diff hist +209 Portuguese Empire Undid revision 1376299724 by ~2026-51317-59 (talk): Hence "the area under its control" rather than "area claimed". Tag: Undo

18:3318:33, 22 September 2026 diff hist +1 Time machine Tweak. current Tag: Visual edit
18:3318:33, 22 September 2026 diff hist +4 m Time machine Italics. Tag: Visual edit
15:4315:43, 22 September 2026 diff hist 0 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: Rather backwards to mention highest gross of 2026 in the US and Canada before highest gross of all time in the US and Canada. Tag: Visual edit
15:4115:41, 22 September 2026 diff hist 0 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: The worldwide all-time performance should be mentioned first, not last. Tag: Visual edit
15:3615:36, 22 September 2026 diff hist −54 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: Mea culpa; the source called it "foreign". Tag: Visual edit
15:3415:34, 22 September 2026 diff hist −8 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: This archived version from early August does not verify anything, since it has Brand New Day at number 3 in the US and Canada (and nothing at all worldwide or outside of the US and Canada). Tag: Visual edit
15:3215:32, 22 September 2026 diff hist +54 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: Of these three datapoints, this one is not supported by the cited sources. Was some other source intended to be cited? Tag: Visual edit
15:2215:22, 22 September 2026 diff hist +98 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →United States and Canada: Context. Tag: Visual edit
15:1815:18, 22 September 2026 diff hist +16 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →United States and Canada: It would be astonishing if it did not rank in the top ten in its seventh and eighth weekends after six weekends at number one. Tag: Visual edit
15:1615:16, 22 September 2026 diff hist +19 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: "In other territories" is unclear and ambiguous. Tag: Visual edit
15:1515:15, 22 September 2026 diff hist −238 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: There is no reasonable justification for mentioning this twice in as many paragraphs. If it is to be included in the other paragraph, it needs to be removed from this one. Tag: Visual edit
15:0015:00, 22 September 2026 diff hist +347 List of fastest-grossing films Undid revision 1376170822 by ~2026-51006-53 (talk): No explanation for removal given either here or on the talk page. Has this been resolved, and if so how? Tag: Undo
10:5110:51, 22 September 2026 diff hist −464 Pluto in fiction →Later depictions: Thank you for your contribution. However, examples should come from sources on the overarching topic—in this case, Pluto in fiction. current Tags: Manual revert Visual edit
10:5110:51, 22 September 2026 diff hist +613 Talk:Time machine →Response to reverts by TompaDompa: Reply. current Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

19:2219:22, 21 September 2026 diff hist −4 Time machine Reinstate some copyediting. Tag: Visual edit
19:2119:21, 21 September 2026 diff hist +49 Time machine Undid 3 revisions from 1375884866 until 1375885330: Better the way it was. Tag: Undo

11:3611:36, 20 September 2026 diff hist −104 List of box office records set by Star Wars: The Force Awakens Not needed now. current Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
11:3411:34, 20 September 2026 diff hist +256 List of box office records set by Star Wars: The Force Awakens →United States and Canada: Update. Tag: Visual edit
11:3111:31, 20 September 2026 diff hist +217 List of box office records set by Star Wars: The Force Awakens →United States and Canada: Update. Tag: Visual edit

23:5823:58, 19 September 2026 diff hist +76 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →United States and Canada: Probably worth linking this, even if another section of the same article is linked in the preceding paragraph/subsection. Tag: Visual edit
23:5123:51, 19 September 2026 diff hist +31 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →United States and Canada: Worth mentioning what the previous record was. Tag: Visual edit
23:3923:39, 19 September 2026 diff hist +67 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →United States and Canada: Link. Tag: Visual edit
23:3823:38, 19 September 2026 diff hist +19 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →United States and Canada: That it was in the top 10 in weekend 7 and 8 is much less informative than that it was number 2 in weekend 7. We don't need to mention every weekend if there isn't anything in particular to mention about that weekend. Tag: Visual edit
23:3323:33, 19 September 2026 diff hist +21 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: This paragraph is about the worldwide performance. Adding subheading for clarity. Tag: Visual edit
23:3223:32, 19 September 2026 diff hist −69 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: As before, it is redundant to state that it is the highest-grossing film of 2026 in the United States and Canada when it is the highest-grossing film in the United States and Canada period, "in other territories" is unclear and ambiguous, and "worldwide" is not needed when the other qualifiers are omitted. Tag: Visual edit
23:2923:29, 19 September 2026 diff hist −181 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: Repeated information. This should be mentioned once in this section, not twice. The alternative is to remove it from the →United States and Canada: subsection. Tag: Visual edit
23:2623:26, 19 September 2026 diff hist −46 Spider-Man: Brand New Day →Box office: This is redundant. It is the highest-grossing film in the United States and Canada, full stop. Tag: Visual edit
07:4007:40, 19 September 2026 diff hist −32 Fictional planets of the Solar System Undid revision 1375673445 by Ibrahim ahmed hamed (talk): This seems very tangential. current Tag: Undo

19:2219:22, 18 September 2026 diff hist −5 Mars in fiction →Moons: Copyediting. current Tag: Visual edit
19:1819:18, 18 September 2026 diff hist 0 Mars in fiction →Moons: Restructuring. Tag: Visual edit
19:1519:15, 18 September 2026 diff hist +73 Mars in fiction →Moons: Add invisible comment. Tag: Visual edit
19:1319:13, 18 September 2026 diff hist +126 Mars in fiction →Moons: Expand. Tag: Visual edit
19:0819:08, 18 September 2026 diff hist +38 Mars in fiction →Moons: Tweak. Tag: Visual edit

24 September 2026

23 September 2026

22 September 2026

21 September 2026

20 September 2026

19 September 2026

18 September 2026