User talk:Adhgj007
Add topic| This is Adhgj007's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aistis Raudys (December 16)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aistis Raudys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Adhgj007!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nil🥝 08:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Adhgj007, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mathglot and I've volunteered to be your Wikipedia mentor. I'm here for you whenever you need help with Wikipedia. It's great to have you on board to help create this online encyclopedia.
See your homepage for a brief tutorial. Here are a few links you might find helpful:
Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or the Task Center.
Help is available: as your Mentor, you can always find me listed in the "Get editing help" module bottom right on your homepage; there are also additional help links there. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or try the Wikipedia:Teahouse to get help designed especially for new users from a team of experienced volunteers. So go ahead and ask questions — we’re here to help!
Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Mathglot (talk) 09:55, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aistis Raudys (December 16)
[edit]- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aistis Raudys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aistis Raudys (December 16)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aistis Raudys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aistis Raudys (December 17)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aistis Raudys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- I’ve added reliable sources from various articles could you please go deeper into why it was rejected again this time? Adhgj007 (talk) 07:49, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Adhgj007, I assume you have read about Wikipedia's WP:Notability guideline, and the associated guideline WP:NACADEMIC already. Could you please list below the top three references out of the eight currently in the Draft that in your opinion, best demonstrate significant coverage of the topic in reliable sources, or which otherwise demonstrate why the topic is notable, per the WP:Notability guidelines? If you are unable to demonstrate Notability, the draft cannot become an article. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 02:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aistis Raudys (December 18)
[edit]- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aistis Raudys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aistis Raudys has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ortizesp (talk) 17:50, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Are you connected with AAI Labs or Aistis Raudys?
[edit]Hello again, Adhgj007. Can you please tell me if you have a personal or professional connection with AAI Labs, or with Aistis Raudys (or are he)? If so, I need to inform you about certain Wikipedia policies regarding connections to article topics that affect the development of both pages. Please let me know. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:26, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I have a professional connection Adhgj007 (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Okay. To save typing, I will add a standardized message (a template, in Wikipedia parlance) in a new section below this one. It offers certain suggestions, and certain requirements (notably, WP:DISCLOSURE, which you have already complied with). Please read it, and follow the links, to see how this affects you. I take it you are not Aistis Raudys, or you would have said so, correct? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:19, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Writing articles where you have a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Adhgj007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page AAI Labs, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 10:23, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: AAI Labs has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
gilgongo (talk) 13:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Ways to improve AAI Labs
[edit]Hello, Adhgj007,
Thank you for creating AAI Labs.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
please add more sources that is not related to AAI Labs
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ckfasdf}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Ckfasdf (talk) 01:50, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hi i changed some things but then it was also nominated for deletion. could you please review it again? Adhgj007 (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- {{Re|Ckfasdf}}Hi i changed some things but then it was also nominated for deletion. could you please review it again?Adhgj007 (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Help me!
[edit]Hi, I’ve improved an article and it has several maintenance tags. Could someone review it and advise whether the issues are still valid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhgj007 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of AAI Labs
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on AAI Labs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 00:09, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
July 2026
[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Sohom (talk) 07:11, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Administrators: If this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. Admins lifting or loosening such blocks without appropriate authorization may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.
Adhgj007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I was not paid to make the article and I had disclosed a connection before putting it upAdhgj007 (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:37, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note that paid editing is not limited to specific payment for editing. If you are employed by the company, your general salary triggers the Terms of Use requirement to disclose paid editing. 331dot (talk) 19:26, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AAI Labs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Paid editing disclosure
[edit]I disclose that I receive compensation for some of my Wikipedia editing. I will comply with the wikimedia Foundation's paid-contribution disclosure requirements and disclose the client, employer, or affiliation where applicable.
Adhgj007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I understand that I was blocked because of issues related to paid editing and not following Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and disclosure requirements. I acknowledge that I should have been more careful in following Wikipedia’s policies I'm really sorry about that.
I've now added a paid editing disclosure to my user talk page and I intend to comply fully with the Wikimedia Foundation’s paid-contribution disclosure requirements going forward. I understand the importance of transparency and of editing in accordance with Wikipedia’s guidelines. I initially only mentioned a professional connection but I see now that wasn't enough.
If unblocked, I will avoid making undisclosed paid edits, follow conflict of interest policies, and focus on constructive contributions. I respectfully request that administrators consider lifting my block, as I understand the concerns that led to the block and am committed to complying with Wikipedia’s rules in the future.
Thank you for your time and consideration and again I am truly very sorry Adhgj007 (talk) 07:30, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your attempted COI disclosure is too vague to be adequate, and belies the rather focused and promotional nature of your edits to date. signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Paid editing disclosure
[edit]I disclose that I receive compensation for my Wikipedia editing as I am an employee of the company which the Wikipedia was about. I will comply with the Wikimedia Foundation's paid-contribution disclosure requirements and disclose the client, employer, or affiliation where applicable. I will also refrain from using any Artificial intelligence or promotional content in any of my Wikipedia pages as it discredits the content and authenticity.
Adhgj007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I understand that I was blocked because of issues related to paid editing and not fully complying with Wikipedia's conflict of interest and disclosure requirements. I take full responsibility for those mistakes and sincerely apologize. I also want to assure you that I will not use AI-generated, promotional, marketing, or advocacy-style content in any future submissions. In addition, I have updated my paid editing disclosure to ensure it fully complies with Wikipedia's requirements.Adhgj007 (talk) 19:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help.
We don't care if your grammar isn't perfect. We want to be convinced that you understand why you were blocked, and that you will not repeat the same behaviour. An AI cannot convince us on your behalf, especially when it makes false claims like "I have updated my paid editing disclosure to ensure it fully complies with Wikipedia's requirements", when you haven't actually done that. bonadea contributions talk 20:54, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Adhgj007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I sincerely apologize for my actions on Wikipedia until now from not disclosing paid editing properly to using ai generated text in my edits and also using promotional language. I want to also state that I will refrain from doing so from now until the day I make my last edit. The previous editor said I didn't but I actually did update my paid editing disclosure as well[[User:Adhgj007|Adhgj007]] ([[User talk:Adhgj007#top|talk]]) 22:36, 9 August 2026 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I sincerely apologize for my actions on Wikipedia until now from not disclosing paid editing properly to using ai generated text in my edits and also using promotional language. I want to also state that I will refrain from doing so from now until the day I make my last edit. The previous editor said I didn't but I actually did update my paid editing disclosure as well[[User:Adhgj007|Adhgj007]] ([[User talk:Adhgj007#top|talk]]) 22:36, 9 August 2026 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I sincerely apologize for my actions on Wikipedia until now from not disclosing paid editing properly to using ai generated text in my edits and also using promotional language. I want to also state that I will refrain from doing so from now until the day I make my last edit. The previous editor said I didn't but I actually did update my paid editing disclosure as well[[User:Adhgj007|Adhgj007]] ([[User talk:Adhgj007#top|talk]]) 22:36, 9 August 2026 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Hi there! To help us respond to the request, please do the following:
- Review Wikipedia's payment disclosure and conflict of interest policies and guidelines, then explain in your own words how those apply to your block and what you would do differently if unblocked.
- Describe the types of edits you would like to make if you were unblocked.
Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
Hi (@Significa liberdade:) 1.ok from my understanding it's that being paid to make edits isn't necessarily bad or restricted on Wikipedia but it's the fact that I hadn't said anything about it that was wrong. Also the language I used came off more as promotional and that just saying I'm connected to the person doesn't make it ok for me to promote them. 2. What I would do differently if I were unblocked is id make sure to disclose any relationship I have or paid editing first, improve the sources I used so that they're more reliable, make proper edits instead of anything promotional and be open and transparent about everything. Thank you for your time and consideration