User talk:Aremo Ade
Add topic| This is Aremo Ade's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rybeena (August 30)
[edit]
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Rybeena to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Hello, Aremo Ade!
Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help?
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rybeena (September 1)
[edit]
- evidence that the subject meets the general criteria for inclusion;
- or evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for creative professionals;
- or multiple published secondary sources that cover the subject or their work and:
- provide critical attention: professional reviews, excluding user reviews from the general public;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of a creative work than of a person. If the person is not yet notable, but their work has received multiple in-depth professional reviews, consider writing about the work instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Rybeena to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fido (Singer) (September 1)
[edit]
LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
See the advice page on large language models for more information.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Fido (Singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I noticed that your edit on one of the first articles you worked on appears to have been carried out using a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. For this reason, the use of AI tools for the creation or rewriting of article content, alongside their usage to generate images, sources or comments, save for a few exceptions, is generally prohibited. LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.
As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can , and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:22, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- i write the article i only use ai to turn it to source code cause i still dont know my way around yet Aremo Ade (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Share your perspective in a WMDE user interview
[edit]Hi Aremo Ade, I'm Johannes from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes team. We would like to invite you to participate in our user research to help us learn more about current community needs and wishes.
We are looking for editors who are 18+ years old and willing to do a ~45min video call with our UX researchers about their editing processes. Participation is compensated.
You can sign-up regardless of your experience level or technical knowledge. The interview will be conducted in English and will be recorded. Interview time slots are available every other Tuesday and Wednesday. More information is available on our project page.
Please sign up and choose your time slot if you want to support us: https://greatquestion.co/wikimediadeutschland/gBDkkfeL
P.S. You've been randomly selected to receive this invitation. We won't contact you again unless you'd like to participate. Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 11:20, 22 September 2026 (UTC)