User talk:Mesocyclonic93
| Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account. |
| This is Mesocyclonic93's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive | |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
Discussion about Enid and Western Kentucky
Both deserve EF5 personally imo because, Western Kentucky swept off an entire second floor of a two story, well built, brick church, and badly damage the first floor which definitely is EF5. Also Enid swept a well built, and anchor bolted home clean that was constructed to be similar to some of the Moore EF5 homes. ~2026-37036-48 (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- It's not our job to decide that. Tetradisulfate (talk) 19:52, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- What your doing can VERY easily be counted as Vandalism, its not your job to decide what tornadoes get to be an EF5, that's for the NWS. TornadoEF4 (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Changes
please do not add nonsense to articles. There is a discussion on the talk page of Southern Rhodesia, which all the autorevert people have deliberately chosen to ignore. That article(and others) read like they had been written like a small child. There was a profound misunderstanding, that an adolescent could spot the obvious flaw. ~2026-37475-67 (talk) 13:36, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- please read the discussion page. You are effectively vandalising articles. ~2026-37475-67 (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- Have you read the discussion? If not, every revert you make is disruptive. ~2026-37475-67 (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- It seems like you, for the last two days, have been it warring without participating in the discussion you started. I have only made a single edit on any of the Rhodesia pages, and youve been doing way more disruptive editing than I have. At this point I might just report you to WP:ANEW or WP:ANI. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 13:46, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- What exactly is "disruptive"? Correcting an obvious error, that a 12-year-old would laugh at? Just because this preposterous wording has been there for a while, unsourced, doesn't make it Right. ~2026-37475-67 (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- Edit warring is disruptive. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 18:09, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- What exactly is "disruptive"? Correcting an obvious error, that a 12-year-old would laugh at? Just because this preposterous wording has been there for a while, unsourced, doesn't make it Right. ~2026-37475-67 (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- It seems like you, for the last two days, have been it warring without participating in the discussion you started. I have only made a single edit on any of the Rhodesia pages, and youve been doing way more disruptive editing than I have. At this point I might just report you to WP:ANEW or WP:ANI. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 13:46, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- Have you read the discussion? If not, every revert you make is disruptive. ~2026-37475-67 (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For your great work dealing with vandalism and playing sockpuppet whack-a-mole over at Siahkal Mahalleh; and for your consistent anti-vandalism contributions overall. Thank you! AntiDionysius (talk) 12:40, 2 July 2026 (UTC) |
May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase
The RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
A barnstar for you!
| The Original Barnstar | |
| Thanks for helping in the whack-a-mole game of dealing with the troll on February 2024 nor'easter. The more that loser trolls try messing with Wikipedia, the more I want to edit and show appreciation for people still working on this beautiful mess of a collaborative project. Happy Sunday and happy editing! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC) |
The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review - Issue 1 (September 1, 2026)
|
Volume I, Issue 1, September 1, 2026 The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review
This is the first edition for what will hopefully be a monthly newsletter involving Wikipedia's weather articles, including the severe weather and tropical cyclones projects. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject. If you wish to receive or discontinue your subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. Past editions can be viewed here. |
|
Development, Reminders, and Updates
Series of weather topics that need expansion The following articles are the earliest in a series of lists/articles, and including the gap going back to the previous entry in the series. These are articles that need to be written.
Of note, the yearly "Weather of YYYY" could be a useful parent article for every weather article. For a well-written (and well-sourced) example, see this timeline in the Weather of 2023 article. Image of the month Devastating floods, possibly caused by a glacial collapse, hit the China–Nepal border on August 26. These floods destroyed numerous settlements and killed over 1,000 people (with thousands still missing). The above image is a Landsat 9 view of debris flow from the floods.
The following articles were written/published this year. It excludes any of sub-articles within Weather of 2026.
Longtime editors and lurkers might have noticed an uptick in the number of article mergers this year. A discussion in December 2025 talked about articles for fish storms or were otherwise had minor impacts. As Hurricane Noah summarized, "if a storm isn't being discussed after the fact for meteorological notability and impacts were minor or nil, there shouldn't be an article. Since then, 8 featured articles and 76 good articles have been merged. In a recent AFD, Quxyz mentioned their own minimum threshold for a tropical cyclone article (1,000 words and 20,000 bytes).
There are a few ongoing projects that are needed in Wiki-Project weather, separate from any requested articles.
Comments or suggestions? This is the first of what will hopefully be a long-running newsletter. If you have any suggestions or complaints (such as them being in a different order in the section header), click on the previous links or try the newsletter talk page.
|
Testing
Are you intentionally doing edit filter tests? OhNoitsJamie talk 20:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

