Jump to content

User talk:SnowyRiver28

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 hours ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Books & Bytes – Issue 76

Question from Mdmojid (06:39, 11 September 2026)

[edit]

Mdmojid --Mdmojid (talk) 06:39, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question regarding your recent deletion

[edit]

Hey @SnowyRiver28 thank you for your note on my talk page. Earlier today, I attempted to add a short paragraph regarding Thunyiswa Hlongwane of Matiwane to Matiwane. You have reverted my update to an older version of the page, 05:26, 14 September 2026, which has the single line "Inkhosana Thunyiswa Hlongwane was born after the Battle of Mbholompo." The edits that you reverted from, 05:24, 14 September 2026, provides brief about Thunyiswa Hlongwane and provides the following sources:

1) Mqhayi, S.E.K (1937) Umhlekazi U Hintsa [King Hintsa] (PDF) (in IsiXhosa). The Lovedale Press. pp. 8, 15.

2) Gift Ngqondi, ANC Eastern Cape Provincial Communications (April 4, 2021). "ANC EC mourns the passing away of Cde Ncwadi Tunyiswa". ANC Eastern Cape.

3) McLaren, J (1955). A concise Xhosa-English dictionary (PDF). Longman, Green, & Co. p. 188.

4) Izibhalo Ezingcwele [The Holy Bible] (in IsiXhosa) (9th ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Bible Society of South Africa. 1975.

Reviewing the page history for Matiwane shows that I added material. This is contrary to the claim you made on my talk page that I removed material from Matiwane.

Was removing the brief explanation regarding Thunyiswa Hlongwane a mistake on your part? ~2026-49286-01 (talk) 06:07, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @~2026-49286-01, thanks for your message and apologies for the confusion here.
If I recall correctly your edits appeared to me as just being a deletion of the citation with no explanation or added material. This sometimes happens in anti vandalism tools as they can get confused trying to display a whole bunch of consecutive edits to a page in the one diff. I've restored your edit.
Writing an accurate WP:EDITSUMMARY can help make your intention clear to patrollers in future.
Sorry for the mix up! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 10:17, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

List of Sesame Workshop productions

[edit]

Why did you accept that edit (that I undid a while ago btw) from that ip address guy on List of Sesame Workshop productions? It was unsourced nonsense! ~2026-49742-56 (talk) 05:08, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @~2026-49742-56,
My apologies. The edit did not appear to be vandalism or a bad-faith edit at first glance, and I concede I did not check the page's history before accepting the edit. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 08:20, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft article on Meik WIking

[edit]

Hi SnowyRiver 28

Thank you for reviewing the draft.

Your claim that this person does not meet the criteria for inclusion for people and that the sources are not sufficiant is simply incorrect.

This person is New York Times bestselling globally published author of several books. The sources are somes of the world's largest and most repsected media outlets - CNN, The Times, The Guardian, Smithsonian Magazine.

Krullemulle (talk) 08:35, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Krullemulle, thanks for your message.
I'm going to reply on the draft page so everything is in the one place. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 20:55, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I removed your comment from the draft page and pasted it in here as dialogue should be in the talk page; not in the draft.
You commented:
Most of the sources here are do not represent significant, in-depth coverage of Meik Wiking. Instead they cover the Happiness Museum or other subjects associated with Meik Wiking. The Pengiun and CNBC sources are just short profile pages and therefore do not represent significant coverage either. If you have more sources that show that the subject Meik Wiking is notable, and not just the happiness museum or events associated with him, please add them and resubmit. Note that notability is generally not inherited from other subjects that are notable by themselves. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 21:00, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
No, they’re not just brief mentions.
Every source in this article sustains the claim it should sustain.
The Smithsonian and CNN articles sustain the claim that Wiking founded the Happiness Museum.
The Penguin and CNBC References sustain the claims og the books he has published, the number of copies sold and the number of languages translated the books are translated to.
The Times references sustains the fact that Wiking was dubbed the World’s happiest man by said newspaper.
Your interpretation of “indepth coverage” would mean that every subject of a Wikipedia article would need to have a lengthy feature article on the by a major media outlet. That is obviously not the case (The Times article article I have referenced is, however, exactly that) Krullemulle (talk) 09:09, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  1. Smithsonian mag article - a passing mention of the CEO (Meik Weiking) and two quotes from him. The article's focus is on the Happiness Museum, and not on the subject directly. Notability is not inherited from other things people are associated with.
  2. CNN article - again focussed on the museum's opening with quotes from the subject. Same logic as above applies.
  3. TedX page effectively a promotional advertisement of the subject's public speaking. No real value.
  4. The Guardian article - likely SIGCOV.
  5. The Telegraph article - likely SIGCOV.
  6. BBC article - chiefly about work-life balance in Denmark with the subject referenced and quoted alongside others.
  7. Penguin page - the subject's publisher's marketing profile page. Not an independent reliable source.
  8. CNBC page - same as above.
  9. The Times article - paywalled, so I can't see it, though the title suggests SIGCOV.
  10. Public speaking profile page - same as 7 and 8.
After reading all sources in-depth, I concede 4, 5, and (maybe) 9 likely satisfy WP:SIGCOV. I apologise for my blanket comment earlier regarding source quality. I'm going to wait for another reviewer to go over this, but in the mean time there are other issues with the draft that will prevent it being accepted.
  • The {{Short description}} template should be a short single line, not the paragraph currently in it. Something like "Danish happiness researcher and author".
  • There's a raw, unformatted URL at the end of the references section that should be removed.
  • "Links" should be renamed "External links", and I'd suggest reading WP:EXLINK to see if the links currently in the draft are valid inclusions.
Once these are cleaned up, hit resubmit and we'll see what another reviewer's thoughts are. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 11:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for taking a closer look at the sources and acknowledging the significant coverage (SIGCOV) in The Guardian, The Telegraph, and The Times.
Just to clarify: the CNN and Smithsonian Magazine articles are not included to establish overall notability on their own. Instead, as I mentioned earlier, they are simply used to satisfy WP:V regarding the fact that Meik Wiking founded the Happiness Research Institute and the Happiness Museum. Please bear in mind that Wikipedia guidelines do not require sources to be full feature profiles to verify individual structural facts within an article.
Since we agree that the criteria for WP:GNG / WP:AUTHOR are met through the major national media features, there is no basis for holding back the draft based on notability or source quality.
I have cleaned up the issues you mentioned (short description, the raw URL, and the external links section) and will now resubmit the draft for review. Thanks Krullemulle (talk) ~~~~ Krullemulle (talk) 19:07, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from LouisisaPashchees (13:49, 15 September 2026)

[edit]

wikia is better, why is there no visual editor or badges in wikipedia? --LouisisaPashchees (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 September 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: The Balance of Power
    Wikimedia employees unionize, officer departs, The Signpost gains sister on Wiktionary

Your draft article, Draft:Uniform Evidence Law

[edit]

Hello, SnowyRiver28. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Uniform Evidence Law".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:29, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Rosetto92 (13:40, 16 September 2026)

[edit]

I would like to add additional information, links, and an additional page or two related to this page. How do I do so? --Rosetto92 (talk) 13:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Rosetto92, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for reaching out!
You can edit most pages by clicking the edit button in the top right. See WP:START for info on how to edit pages and contribute. If you're planning to add links, make sure to read the WP:EXLINK guideline.
What page were you looking to edit? SnowyRiver28 (talk) 03:44, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Sharkorockia (22:54, 20 September 2026)

[edit]

Heyyyyyyy I just made this account like 2 minutes ago how'd you respond so fast --Sharkorockia (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi! The first welcome message you get is automatically sent by the system, but I'm a real person here to help if you have any questions about Wikipedia! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 07:03, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Arunam thakur on Programming language (05:05, 21 September 2026)

[edit]

ι was created a nr=ew wedsute and new app in persinak ai was worj on every wot=rk and i was pprepare in cooding --Arunam thakur (talk) 05:06, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from JaneBondWriter (22:51, 21 September 2026)

[edit]

Hi There! I'm an author, I've written 10 books about Jane Bond adventures, but of course, the only Jane Bond on Wikipedia is the 1960's version. What I'd like to do is create a disambiguation page for Jane Bond, and add an article about MY Jane Bond. Is this possible? Is it too self serving? The Jane series has been out since 2018, and is well loved by thousands of people. I'm sure people would enjoy having a page on Wiki about my particular Jane. Thanks for any help you might give. Vic (V.R. Tapscott) --JaneBondWriter (talk) 22:52, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @JaneBondWriter, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for reaching out.
It's strongly advised you don't edit, create or interact with topics you're closely connected to. Please read WP:COI for more information.
Writing an article is quite difficult and requires knowledge of a wide variety of Wikipedia protocols and guidelines which can be difficult to grasp as a beginner.
You should also read WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK which contain information about the notability requirements for a book or series to qualify for a Wikipedia article.
If you're persistent, you must declare your COI (instructions in the page I linked above), and create a draft article per the instructions at WP:YFA. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 11:34, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I kinda thought it might be a potential conflict of interest.
However, I AM pretty persistent, and writing is what I do, so I'll probably start reading up on all the things you noted and see what happens.
Are you gonna mentor me on this? :-)
Would a better way to go be to start rattling cages inside the Wikipedia group and see if I can find someone who likes Jane or likes order to take responsibility for it? How does this usually get done? I'd be happy to send eBooks to someone, and all the Jane series are in Kindle Unlimited if people have that option.
Thanks! Hope I'm not being a pest. JaneBondWriter (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Generally, if a topic is WP:NOTABLE enough to qualify for an article, it's better off to simply wait and it will be created naturally by another editor some point in the future. Wikipedia is not for promotional purposes and policies such as neutrality are paramount in cases like this.
Start at WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG and see if you think the series objectively meets those criteria. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Dia2725 on User:Dia2725 (17:17, 22 September 2026)

[edit]

Balance 15750 --Dia2725 (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Diamond

[edit]

Diamond Dia2725 (talk) 17:20, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 76

[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 76, July–August 2026
  • New partnership: The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • New Partnership Manager joins the team
  • Spotlight: TWL page on Meta
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 11:45, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply