User talk:Another Believer
Add topicQuestion
[edit]You made the comment on Draft:WTF!: Wrestling's Trashiest Fighters: This submission is part of a larger effort to get articles about RuPaul's Drag Race episodes restored to the main space. This episode has received in-depth reviews by multiple independent and reliable sources (I've included a few in the table below) and the article is long enough to justify a fork from the season page.
What is the history? In particular, were these episodes previously in article space, and when? Also, has there been discussion at the season article talk pages?
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Robert McClenon There have been several discussions at various venues, including here on my user talk page above, but I think these would offer the most helpful context:
- February 2024: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Archive_39#RuPaul's_Drag_Race,_season_7_episodes
- November 2025: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Archive_41#RuPaul's_Drag_Race_franchise_episodes_and_notability
- November 2025: User_talk:Another_Believer/Archive_57#AfD
- January 2026: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Archive_41#Drag_Race_episodes._Again.
- Yes, many articles were previously in the main space, but I moved them into the draft space voluntarily at the request of others for further development. I have been going through the process of expanding and resubmitting the drafts at AfC. Since November, all ~40 submitted drafts were accepted by uninvolved editors. I'll say little else and let you and others review the discussions and form your own conclusions. I hope these offer helpful context but let me know if you have other questions. Thanks and Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Followup Questions
[edit]Thank you for responding. I saw a discussion at WikiProject Television and tried to respond to it, and I think that at least one editor didn't understand what I was trying to say, and I think that I was incorrectly criticized. I had been looking for what was the consensus at the WikiProject about the RuPaul's Drag Race drafts, and I see that there isn't and won't be a consensus. Unless you ask me to wait, I am about to start accepting the episode drafts, and will let the community decide which of them they think pass episode notability. I was waiting for you to reply at WikiProject Television, but it appears that you are, probably wisely, avoiding involvement in that discussion. Should I go ahead and start accepting the drafts? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Robert McClenon: I do not think it is appropriate for me to have an opinion re: how the drafts should be reviewed, or who should review them. I've made it clear I am going to continue submitting drafts at AfC because I am confident there are many notable episodes, despite a couple other editors saying otherwise ad nauseam and as evidenced by the 40+ drafts accepted thus far. In my opinion, all of these episode entries could be improved to resemble
"And the Rest Is Drag". I don't understand the determination to prevent this from happening. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- My opinion, as I have stated at WikiProject Television, is that the project is divided, so that there is no local consensus, and I would prefer to see the decision about notability made by the community rather than by the lack of a local consensus. As you can see, I have accepted 7 drafts. One is under review by another reviewer. I am not aware of any other episode drafts that are currently waiting for review. If you call my attention to any of them, I will review them. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- You write:
I don't understand the determination to prevent this from happening.
. I think I understand it well enough to know what I am disagreeing with. First, I think that some editors don't like drag. They generally won't say so. Second, I can see that some editors think that we have too manylow quality articles
. I don't think that this category includes the drafts in question, but they may think so. Third, I think that some editors think that episode articles should be a rare exception. We can and do disagree, but I think that is why they are opposed. If they want to know what the community thinks , that is what a consensus process such as AFD is for. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)- @Robert McClenon Thanks for being among the 20 editors who have accepted one or more Drag Race episode drafts. I am pleased to see so many entries restored and I am going to continue expanding and submitting drafts for review. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 16
[edit]Extended content |
|---|
|
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on August 15. Please help translate.
Highlights
Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. If you have feedback or suggestions about the bulletin, let us know at foundationbulletin@wikimedia.org. For questions about the Wikimedia Foundation's work, contact us!
|
Nicky Doll
[edit]Extended content |
|---|
|
Thanks for the note, and fair enough on reverting — I take the point that this follows the drag-performer convention outlined at WP:MOS:GENDERID (see the Conchita Wurst example). I wasn't trying to relitigate the he/she distinction itself, my concern is closer to WP:ASTONISH: a reader unfamiliar with drag-biography conventions can hit "she" a paragraph after "he" with no signpost and assume it's an error or vandalism. Would you be open to a short clarifying clause near the top of the Career section — something like "As is standard in Wikipedia's style for drag performers, he/him is used for Sanchez and she/her for the Nicky Doll persona" — rather than changing the pronoun usage itself? Happy to draft the wording if that's agreeable. — TheUltimateGenealogy--TheUltimateGenealogy (talk) 20:11, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Frequently asked question Why does this article use "she/her" for Nicky Doll but "he/him" for Karl Sanchez? This follows MOS:GENDERID, which specifies that drag performers may use different pronouns for their in-character persona than for their real-life identity. This is standard practice across drag performer biographies on Wikipedia (see also Conchita Wurst).
|
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2026)
[edit]Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Roast in Peace has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:18, 7 September 2026 (UTC)- @Sulfurboy Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:25, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Queen Mama's Kitchen
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Queen Mama's Kitchen has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2026 (UTC)- @HazelAlbertSheriff Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 13:57, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Queen Mama's Kitchen is under review
[edit]
Your good article nomination of the article Queen Mama's Kitchen is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 01:48, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Queen Mama's Kitchen has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Queen Mama's Kitchen has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 03:07, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: International Workers' Day in Portland, Oregon (September 8)
[edit]Extended content |
|---|
|
Draft declined This draft provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Submission is suitable for a Wikipedia article but requires several improvements prior to resubmission. First, break out into subheadings of the major portion by year. It is one large block currently, which is difficult to read. More importantly, and the non-cosmetic reason for requiring resubmission: Provide more context than solely recent events. Include more history e.g. reference by George H.W. Bush presidential administration to Portland Int'l Workers Day (it isn't defamatory and isn't pejorative to GHW Bush nor to Portland organized labor). Include comments by mayor in 2017 event. |
- Sorry for this horrid templating! I tried to excise some of the excesses so it doesn't deface your user talk page!--FeralOink (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: August 2026
[edit]Extended content | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Guild of Copy Editors – September 2026 Newsletter
[edit]Extended content | |
|---|---|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2026 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2026)
[edit]Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Mirisata
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors
[edit]| Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Mirisata at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, 🅑🅰🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅐🅱 05:21, 14 September 2026 (UTC) |
- @Baffle gab1978 Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 12:07, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Mirisata is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 05:07, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Mirisata has been placed
on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 02:46, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Your good article nomination of the article Mirisata has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 03:07, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Super Queen Grand Finale has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 08:13, 14 September 2026 (UTC)- @Sulfurboy Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 12:08, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Statue of Charlie Kirk (McCann) for deletion
[edit]Extended content |
|---|
|
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Charlie Kirk (McCann) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed. |
Administrators' newsletter – September 2026
[edit]Extended content |
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2026).
|
Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 17
[edit]Extended content |
|---|
|
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on August 28. Please help translate.
Highlights
Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. If you have feedback or suggestions about the bulletin, let us know at foundationbulletin@wikimedia.org. For questions about the Wikimedia Foundation's work, contact us!
|
The Signpost: 16 September 2026
[edit]- News and notes: The Balance of Power
Wikimedia employees unionize, officer departs, The Signpost gains sister on Wiktionary
- In the media: Shocking photos may be changed on Wikipedia
The image gallery anyone can edit.
- Disinformation report: Have UN Secretary-General candidates manipulated Wikipedia?
Speaking diplomatically, not all of them.
- Recent research: Google's AI overviews may have reduced search engine referrals to English Wikipedia by 5%
And other research findings.
- WikiConference report: The backwater symbiosis – reflections from Wiki Conference India 2026
The fourth iteration of Wiki Conference India.
- Traffic report: Heaven let your light shine down
The recently deceased dominate while still leaving room for some entertainment.
- Serendipity: Wikipedia Family Mosh Pit
A poem by Mollystarkdean.
- Obituary: Passing of Gobonobo, community leader advocating for women and minorities
Promoter of cultural knowledge and organizer of global cooperation.
- On the bright side: Fantasy video games, hopeful science fiction, and the change of seasons
The Legend of Zelda, Star Trek, and Vivaldi's The Four Seasons.
- Comix: The Adventure of the Unknown Corpse
An elementary case for fiction's greatest detective.
Banana bread for you!
[edit]| Banana Bread | |
| For getting Mirisata to GA status, take some (probably) vegan banana bread! Congrats on the speedy GA! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 03:03, 16 September 2026 (UTC) |
- @Dragonhawk12 Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 03:04, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
New Cascadia Traditional
[edit]Your nomination of New Cascadia Traditional is under review
[edit]
Your good article nomination of the article New Cascadia Traditional is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of New Cascadia Traditional has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article New Cascadia Traditional has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Icepinner Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 02:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- No problem. Keep up the good work! Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 05:43, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Snatch Game (RuPaul's Drag Race season 3) has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 19:20, 16 September 2026 (UTC)- @Sulfurboy Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:24, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
DYK for Dolly Parton as a gay icon
[edit]On 17 September 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dolly Parton as a gay icon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dolly Parton was a gay icon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dolly Parton as a gay icon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Dolly Parton as a gay icon), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Cielquiparle (talk) 00:03, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Cielquiparle Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 00:04, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hey there, thanks for the really great work on this article. I check out the latest DYK most nights when I get home from work, and love finding things like this. CAVincent (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- @CAVincent Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:43, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hey there, thanks for the really great work on this article. I check out the latest DYK most nights when I get home from work, and love finding things like this. CAVincent (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: How's Your Headliner? has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2026 (UTC)- @Sulfurboy Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
A cup of Arabic coffee for you!
[edit]| A nice cup of joe | |
| For getting Queen Mama's Kitchen to GA status, take a nice cup of Arabic coffee! You must be tired after all that work. Also, thanks for the fast responses and all your work in the Portland restaurant niche on Wikipedia. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 03:04, 18 September 2026 (UTC) |
- @Dragonhawk12 Thank you so much! --Another Believer (Talk) 03:06, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Women in Green's October 2026 Edit-a-thon
[edit]
Hello Another Believer:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2026!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2026, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films or organizations created by women) during the event period — and this time, we are extending our focus to encourage more Did You Know (DYK) submissions spotlighting new GA articles about women and women's works. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by the event's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave (talk) & Grnrchst (talk)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
October 2026 meetup in Portland, Oregon
[edit]
Hey Another Believer,
You're invited to the October 2026 meetup in Portland, Oregon! This will be an editing workshop, teaching newcomers how to edit Wikipedia and improve Portland-related articles. (Experienced editors: you are also welcome! Share your expertise with the newbies or stick around for some chatting during the back half.)
Join us either online or at the Northwest Library at 2:00 PM on Saturday, October 3. Please RSVP at the link above, even if you might be interested, so we can know how many people to expect. Hope to see you there!
(To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 01:19, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2026)
[edit] Hello, Another Believer. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Vancouver International Airport • One-form (differential geometry) Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:09, 21 September 2026 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Books & Bytes – Issue 76
[edit]Issue 76, July–August 2026
- New partnership: The Chronicle of Higher Education
- New Partnership Manager joins the team
- Spotlight: TWL page on Meta
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 11:44, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
(This message was sent to User:Another Believer and is being posted here due to a redirect.)








