User talk:StormL00ver
Add topicWelcome!
[edit]
Hi StormL00ver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Ari 1600 out 🇺🇲🇭🇳 (talk) 18:29, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. In more detail, please stop misusing the edit request system. It's for editors that lack the technical ability to edit a page due to permissions (or sanctions). If there's a mere content dispute, you need to resolve it with the other editors involved through normal discussion. If that fails, you can try dispute resolution or an WP:RFC, but do not keep opening edit requests. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:35, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi StormL00ver! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Tornadoes of 2026. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Tornadoes of 2026, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 19:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reminder regarding the edit warring policy. I am well aware of the 3RR rules and the importance of consensus. However, consensus on Wikipedia must be built on verifiable, reliable sources, not on personal preferences.
- I have already laid out the official ESSL and ESWD meteorological data on the article talk page, which confirms the 180 mph baseline intensity for this specific event. Blanking or repeatedly removing heavily sourced official data without addressing the core scientific evidence on the Talk page is disruptive.
- I welcome a policy-compliant discussion at Talk:Tornadoes of 2026 to reach a factual consensus based on the actual meteorological reports, rather than edit warring. Let's keep the discussion there. Thanks." StormL00ver (talk) 19:08, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]Hi, how's your day going so far? I hope you're doing well! :) Ari 1600 out 🇺🇲🇭🇳 22:21, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi I'm doing great how about you? I hope you're doing well too :} StormL00ver (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm also doing great! Thanks for asking! Have a nice day! Ari 1600 out 🇺🇲🇭🇳 22:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
File:Storm Cornaro at it's peak intensity.png listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Storm Cornaro at it's peak intensity.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Gert7 (talk · contribs) 19:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Storm Cornaro
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Storm Cornaro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Non references LLM generated content
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. A1-K (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Storm Cornaro
[edit]
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Storm Cornaro, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Storm Cornaro
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Storm Cornaro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Storm Cornaro
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Storm Cornaro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:29, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Malgosha 17:59, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
- Courtesy link missing from notificator user – see here CoryGlee 18:07, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
[edit]
Hello, I'm Sarsenet. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 18:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hurricane Melissa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 22:47, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry I thought 892 mb was Melissa's Landfall intensity.Turns out the hurricane weakened before Landfall StormL00ver (talk) 04:37, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:A radar image.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:A radar image.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:İmage of the Akçamezra Tornado İn Rope Phase.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:İmage of the Akçamezra Tornado İn Rope Phase.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:A image of a tornado.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:A image of a tornado.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
A bird for you!
[edit]
-Ari 1600! 🇺🇲🇭🇳 16:58, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ty ari :) StormL00ver (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
A Duck for you!
[edit]
Ducks promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day much better.
Spread WikiLove by placing a duck on other user's talk pages by adding {{subst:Duck love}} to their talk page.
Happy editing!
AutisticYapper (talk) 03:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- I got a duck a few days ago (sent by Ari who already sent you a mechanical bird lol) so I just figured I'd spread the love around a little lol AutisticYapper (talk) 03:18, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! :D StormL00ver (talk) 06:26, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Request Regarding Akçamezra Tornado Article
[edit]Hi! I just am replying to your request for me to have a look at your Akçamezra Tornado article. It looks really good! The only thing I would consider changing is the scope of the article. I know it is ambitious, but I would actually consider changing the article to cover the entire outbreak. The outbreak produced numerous strong tornadoes and was highly historic and unusual, and I think it is article worthy as a whole. If I were you I would keep the long summary you wrote for the Akçamezra Tornado, and include it as a full summary for the most significant tornado of the outbreak at the bottom of the page, but also include a tornado table of all the other tornadoes in the outbreak. Now that is just my opinion, and obviously it would be a lot of work and you don't have to do it, but there aren't enough international tornado outbreak articles on Wikipedia and you would be setting a really good precedent! Just my two cents :) TornadoInformation12 (talk) 07:24, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips :)StormL00ver (talk) 07:52, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello StormL00ver! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Some popcorn!
[edit]
-Ari 1600! 🇺🇲🇭🇳 has given you some popcorn. Popcorn is crunchy goodness, and is wonderfully delicious!
To spread the goodness of popcorn, you can add {{subst:Popcorn}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.
Cheers! :D -Ari 1600! 🇺🇲🇭🇳 01:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks :D ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 05:42, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of European tornadoes in 2026, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurtsuyu was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Water Vapor From Major Hurricane Lala On 19 August 00.00 To 05.05 UTCgif.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Water Vapor From Major Hurricane Lala On 19 August 00.00 To 05.05 UTCgif.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 Akçamezra Tornado (August 25)
[edit]
- provide significant coverage: discuss the event in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- show lasting significance: analysis published after the initial breaking news has passed, showing historical impact;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the event, such as press releases, the event or organizers own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:2026 Akçamezra Tornado to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Hello, StormL00ver!
Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help?
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 Akçamezra Tornado (August 27)
[edit]
- provide significant coverage: discuss the event in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- show lasting significance: analysis published after the initial breaking news has passed, showing historical impact;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the event, such as press releases, the event or organizers own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:2026 Akçamezra Tornado to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello StormL00ver! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Orphaned non-free image File:Satelite Imagery of TS Dolly on 27 August 14.50 UTC.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Satelite Imagery of TS Dolly on 27 August 14.50 UTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review - Issue 1 (September 1, 2026)
[edit]|
Volume I, Issue 1, September 1, 2026 The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review
This is the first edition for what will hopefully be a monthly newsletter involving Wikipedia's weather articles, including the severe weather and tropical cyclones projects. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject. If you wish to receive or discontinue your subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. Past editions can be viewed here. |
|
Development, Reminders, and Updates
Series of weather topics that need expansion The following articles are the earliest in a series of lists/articles, and including the gap going back to the previous entry in the series. These are articles that need to be written.
Of note, the yearly "Weather of YYYY" could be a useful parent article for every weather article. For a well-written (and well-sourced) example, see this timeline in the Weather of 2023 article. Image of the month Devastating floods, possibly caused by a glacial collapse, hit the China–Nepal border on August 26. These floods destroyed numerous settlements and killed over 1,000 people (with thousands still missing). The above image is a Landsat 9 view of debris flow from the floods.
The following articles were written/published this year. It excludes any of sub-articles within Weather of 2026.
Longtime editors and lurkers might have noticed an uptick in the number of article mergers this year. A discussion in December 2025 talked about articles for fish storms or were otherwise had minor impacts. As Hurricane Noah summarized, "if a storm isn't being discussed after the fact for meteorological notability and impacts were minor or nil, there shouldn't be an article. Since then, 8 featured articles and 76 good articles have been merged. In a recent AFD, Quxyz mentioned their own minimum threshold for a tropical cyclone article (1,000 words and 20,000 bytes).
There are a few ongoing projects that are needed in Wiki-Project weather, separate from any requested articles.
Comments or suggestions? This is the first of what will hopefully be a long-running newsletter. If you have any suggestions or complaints (such as them being in a different order in the section header), click on the previous links or try the newsletter talk page.
|
NHC sources
[edit]Regarding your recent edits to the 2026 PHS, make sure you don’t use the advisories on the NHC main page. This link is for the latest advisory, but this page has the permanent link. Cheers. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1900 Westchester County tornado (2nd nomination)
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1900 Westchester County tornado (2nd nomination) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
G6: Obviously created in error: duplicate nomination to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1900 Westchester County tornado
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can request undeletion. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 10:17, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- {{re|Ks0stm}} yeah 2nd nomination was a technical error ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 10:55, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
A cookie for you! :D
[edit]
Ari 1600 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Have a nice day! -Ari 1600! 🇺🇲🇭🇳⚡ 17:45, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks Ari.Have a nice day!! ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 18:06, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Of course! :D -Ari 1600! 🇺🇲🇭🇳⚡ 20:40, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of European tornadoes in 2026, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint-Georges and Akkoyunlu were added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello StormL00ver! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Hi there, can you fix the reference issue in the draft? Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 01:46, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
- wdm? What is the issue? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 04:01, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
- One of your footnotes is broken. See Draft:List of Turkey tornadoes#cite note-localdate-3. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 04:13, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
- Okay I fixed it ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 11:27, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
- One of your footnotes is broken. See Draft:List of Turkey tornadoes#cite note-localdate-3. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 04:13, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello StormL00ver! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Tornado submission request
[edit]Hey! We both usually edit on the List of European tornadoes in 2026 page. So there were 2 tornadoes in Lithuania, an IF0 and IF1 (check out Extremalus orai Lietuvoje on TikTok for more info on them, he got a ton of info on the tornadoes), and I was wondering if you could add them onto the ESWD database? (They both occured on September 10th) I also know they aren't related to a squall or downbursts so it's very clear this was a tornado. No images of the tornado have surfaced and I believe there arent any at all, but we have damage footage. Thanks in advance. Hjalpingers (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- could you send me the links and the damage photos(if it's possible) ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 16:59, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Sure: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8j5bopV/ | https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8j5Xxum/ (both from a well trusted Lithuanian storm chaser) Hjalpingers (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- which one is the IF1? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:16, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- The ratings on both tornadoes is listed on the wiki since i added them (i did this before and both got added later on) Hjalpingers (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Also I think the one with the IF1 rating should be IF1.5 ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:26, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- for now sure but unless the roof was poorly connected which it probably has a chance of being cuz it's very rusty and old, then idk Hjalpingers (talk) 17:38, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- i also found out the IF0 had IF0.5 strength (listed on one video I sent) Hjalpingers (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Also I realized that I can't make QC0+ outside of Turkey so even if I make these reports it will take a while for them to come ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 18:15, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Time dosent mattera at this point because, now not only if someone tries deleting the events because they're not on ESWD you can serve as proof, but technically now a part of the guidelines are now completely useless since most events get added in a few days after. Oh and btw, any updates on the May 2026 tornado upgrade? Hjalpingers (talk) 18:43, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- I am still waiting for a response from the Quality Control Team ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 18:49, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- good to hear, im guessing this will end up being an IF4, but now im thinking how we will change the little graph? it dosent let you change it to IF4 because apparently it dosent recognize it so we will need to figure out something Hjalpingers (talk) 18:51, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- I am still waiting for a response from the Quality Control Team ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 18:49, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Time dosent mattera at this point because, now not only if someone tries deleting the events because they're not on ESWD you can serve as proof, but technically now a part of the guidelines are now completely useless since most events get added in a few days after. Oh and btw, any updates on the May 2026 tornado upgrade? Hjalpingers (talk) 18:43, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Also I realized that I can't make QC0+ outside of Turkey so even if I make these reports it will take a while for them to come ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 18:15, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Also I think the one with the IF1 rating should be IF1.5 ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:26, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- yo the IF1.5 was in Gruzdziai not Veivirzenai, Hjalpingers (talk) 08:13, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- wait no, tornado did do IF1.5 damage, the time was incorrect tho it's around 7am and the other was 8:20 it's just set at UTC Hjalpingers (talk) 08:15, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Alright so update: Veiverzienai was indeed IF2, background matches up with memory from yesterday as i was in a town so close to where the tornado occurred and the Siauliai is likely IF0.5 Hjalpingers (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- So which one is the IF1.5,IF2 or IF0.5 I might need to delete my report ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 13:07, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- IF1.5/IF2 is the one in Veiverzienai, the IF0.5 (possible IF1) is in Gruzdziai Hjalpingers (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Veiverzienai is the one in Klaipeda County the Gruzdziai is the one in Siauliai County Hjalpingers (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- IF1.5/IF2 is the one in Veiverzienai, the IF0.5 (possible IF1) is in Gruzdziai Hjalpingers (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- What is the IF2 source? I mean the damage indicates an IF1.5 strength ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:13, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- in one bit of the ESWD page on that tornado it mentions something about the IF2 rating in the very bottom, and i did also mention that the rating is uncertain incase if it wasn't the actual rating aswell Hjalpingers (talk) 15:26, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Alright I checked ESWD, a damage indicator says that the damage indicator of max IF scale rating is IF2 which i believe means that basically IF2 damages occured. Proof:
Hjalpingers (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) - While the Damage Indicator of Max IF field indicates localized IF2 damage, the overall official rating in ESWD is IF1.5 (currently at QC0 unverified status).
- According to Wikipedia standards, we should keep the tornado as an IF1.5 (noting it is QC0) and mention the IF2 max indicator in the text. ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:38, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Also it says IF-Scale rating has high uncertainty ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:38, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah and it also is noted that in the original video it says it's an IF1.5 so its also something to note Hjalpingers (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hey, news show that the Veiviržėnai tornado was actually an IF0.5, and the Gruzdžiai tornado was an IF1.5, so im basically saying you switched out the ratings for one another Hjalpingers (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- wait really? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:06, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- yep. i got word from the TikTok poster himself, oh and btw, can you get the ESWD team to maybe check on southwest Plungė in Telšiai County? There's a very visible possible hook echo full of rain where a rain-wrapped tornado couldve snapped trees and went un noticed for all this time. Oh and i think another tornado couldve occured just east of Klaipėda, more closer to Dovilai, i think there was a severe thunderstorm there because overall my radar is showing that it's the worst of every single one. Thanks in advance if one or two actually do become tornadic events. Hjalpingers (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Could you give me some sources or images to work with this possible tornado? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:23, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- lemme send them in rq (this message will contain them because im not sending 2 messages with time diffrences) images:
Hjalpingers (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Radar imagery is very low quality so I don't think it will be possible to add this as a tornado ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 03:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- There is definitely some kind of spin tho ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 03:23, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, especially in Plungė, there def is a hook echo there Hjalpingers (talk) 06:16, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hey dude, noticed the deleted event, so in case if it's not already being checked by quality control, here is everything i have from the tornado.
- Date: September 10th 2026 at 5:25am UTC or 7:25am EEST, southeast of Veiviržėnai, rating is IF0.5, but a local said it was exactly like an IF1 that struck a tiny town nearby in 2022, so keep that in note, meteorologists also said it was like a very weak IF0, damages are farming equipment and backyard damage to a house, and no one was injured. Radar and damages are available but no tornado image has surfaced. Hjalpingers (talk) 11:30, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- so was there 2 tornadoes or 1 ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:09, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- wait never mind, both tornadoes are already in eswd Hjalpingers (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah I noticed it.Sorry for not being able to help much with this tornadoes... ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:21, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Also I found a radar archive could you please tell me when did this rain-wrapped tornado hapened? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:28, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Around 6:25/6:30am on September 10th, just try and search for a Japan shaped storm that extends from Telšiai to Plungė and you'll find it. Hjalpingers (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- wait never mind, both tornadoes are already in eswd Hjalpingers (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- so was there 2 tornadoes or 1 ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:09, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- It's cuz i screenshotted it from desktop mode, just find a meteologix archive player and go to Klaipėda and you'll find them Hjalpingers (talk) 06:15, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- There is definitely some kind of spin tho ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 03:23, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Radar imagery is very low quality so I don't think it will be possible to add this as a tornado ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 03:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- lemme send them in rq (this message will contain them because im not sending 2 messages with time diffrences) images:
- Could you give me some sources or images to work with this possible tornado? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:23, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- yep. i got word from the TikTok poster himself, oh and btw, can you get the ESWD team to maybe check on southwest Plungė in Telšiai County? There's a very visible possible hook echo full of rain where a rain-wrapped tornado couldve snapped trees and went un noticed for all this time. Oh and i think another tornado couldve occured just east of Klaipėda, more closer to Dovilai, i think there was a severe thunderstorm there because overall my radar is showing that it's the worst of every single one. Thanks in advance if one or two actually do become tornadic events. Hjalpingers (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- wait really? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:06, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Alright, but i am gonna guess (probably won't happen) but im guessing that eventually this tornado will be seen, observed and will probably get an upgraded confirmed IF2 rating and a QC0+/QC1 status rating Hjalpingers (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Also it says IF-Scale rating has high uncertainty ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 15:38, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Alright I checked ESWD, a damage indicator says that the damage indicator of max IF scale rating is IF2 which i believe means that basically IF2 damages occured. Proof:
- in one bit of the ESWD page on that tornado it mentions something about the IF2 rating in the very bottom, and i did also mention that the rating is uncertain incase if it wasn't the actual rating aswell Hjalpingers (talk) 15:26, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- So which one is the IF1.5,IF2 or IF0.5 I might need to delete my report ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 13:07, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Alright so update: Veiverzienai was indeed IF2, background matches up with memory from yesterday as i was in a town so close to where the tornado occurred and the Siauliai is likely IF0.5 Hjalpingers (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- wait no, tornado did do IF1.5 damage, the time was incorrect tho it's around 7am and the other was 8:20 it's just set at UTC Hjalpingers (talk) 08:15, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- The ratings on both tornadoes is listed on the wiki since i added them (i did this before and both got added later on) Hjalpingers (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- which one is the IF1? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:16, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- Sure: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8j5bopV/ | https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8j5Xxum/ (both from a well trusted Lithuanian storm chaser) Hjalpingers (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of European tornadoes in 2026, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Değirmenli was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
ESWD stuff
[edit]hey, i submitted a request to ESWD to upload events and access events. if you even can, can you please approve it? 🙏 thanks in advance, cuz im gonna add events for 2021 and 2022 to add and maybe upload in missing events. Hjalpingers (talk) 11:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- I will try to accept it bıt if I can't do it I could send you the reports that are in ESWD ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 12:36, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- yeah but, i could also add events without needing to wait for the event to pop up after asking you, + if i find any damage stuff or more links i can add them myself. it's a bit more convenient and it's also nice. im also thinking that I can add them to a notes app so i can quickly add events. Hjalpingers (talk) 14:15, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
