Jump to content

User talk:Valereee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 days ago by MusikAnimal in topic This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2026)

Need help and don't know where to find it? Help!

Gourmand Cookbook Award

[edit]

I came across this award reviewing a draft and it appears to be a notable award mentioned in several articles. Thought you might be interested in creating an article. See also es:Gourmand World Cookbook Awards. S0091 (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hm, it has an entry in 8 language wikis. Definitely seems worth investigating, thanks! Valereee (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I've emailed Kowal2701 (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply


WikiCup 2026 September newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 29 August at 23:59 (UTC). Everyone who competed in round 4 will advance to round 5 unless they have withdrawn or been removed. Round 4 was competitive, though slightly less so than round 3. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; six scored over 500; and nine scored over 300. Each of the top five competitors had hundreds of points accumulated from multiple GAs. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 10 featured articles, 11 featured lists, 8 featured-topic articles, 103 good articles, 6 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 11 In the News articles, and they have conducted 170 peer reviews, FA and GA reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2026)

[edit]


Hello, Valereee. The article for improvement of the week is:

Archipelago

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Boy  Ratchet (device)


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article  Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 31 August 2026 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Tech News: 2026-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:51, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2026)

[edit]


Hello, Valereee. The article for improvement of the week is:

One-form (differential geometry)

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Archipelago  Boy


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article  Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 7 September 2026 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Tech News: 2026-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:42, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The scouse matter

[edit]

Hi Valereee! Boy, oh boy! This scouse thing is quite a time suck. Here's my position:

This is merely about the dish article Lobscouse being part or Scouse (food), or the reverse, and a sentence saying "A originated from B". Small potatoes, much like those in that foul, watery sewage known as scouse.

I detest ANI and DRN, and for me, that is a super-last resort.

Three main possibilties:

1. Swanny is right. (I won't read all of his new evidence, so I don't know.) He's done lots of digging, so there's a good possibility of that.
Result: The article ends up as it should.
2. Swanny is wrong.
Result: Involving ANI or DRN or debating for a decade could fix this small matter, but would likely cost hours. Those hours would otherwise be spent improving other articles. Cost/benefit view tells me to walk.
3. Swanny is partly right and we are partly right. It's fuzzy.
Result: So, no big deal.

Pinging @Swanny18:

Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Hey, @Anna Frodesiak! My thoughts about the content are probably conflated with my thoughts about someone who is telling me I don't understand BRD, who is putting up walls of text, and who is refusing to revert themselves when asked by multiple people multiple times. But if you want to just walk away, that's fine, too, I'll take it off my watch. Valereee (talk) 16:59, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry to cut and run. You can make your own decision about what to do. I have the same complaints as you about Swanny's editing on this. And yes, it seems like endless litigation as a way to get his outcome. Not too fair in my view, but that's sort of a loophole in Wikipedia. In the olden days, a zillion others would turn up and consensus would likey go against him in a few days. Now, too few editors, so saying "I'll drag this on as long as possible" works. I don't take it personally. I just think of how to best serve the project. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Good enough for me. Lobscouse + Scouse (food) gets ~280 views a day. Maybe someone else will come along with the energy to deal with the sealioning. Valereee (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Though re: that foul, watery sewage, having made it, I have to say it's actually pretty tasty. :D Valereee (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
This affair has put me off stews forever. :) Anyhow, I'm happy to have it off my books. Now, onward and upward. What to work on? Maybe a UK canal tunnel article. What about you? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm trying to make Madeleine (cake) better. I'm of course baking madeleines today and will likely bake English madeleines Thursday because my OCD made me order dariole pans because there are no free use photos of an English madeleine. Valereee (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Excellent. Enjoy them. I've baked probably 1,000 loaves of bread now in my time. Love it.

Closing thoughts on Swanny: I poured through all his edits and all his talk page posts. I see no history of wiki-lawyering. I see a very constructive, thoughtful, polite editor. This may be a clue that we could be wrong and he's right. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

About three experienced editors misinterpreting policy in the same way, about refusal to revert when asked multiple times by multiple editors, about the value of walls of text? Ehhh. One can be right on content and still be wrong on behavior, and one can be polite and be sealioning. Valereee (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fair points. But it's sort of fuzzy when it comes to whom, policy or guidelines, to what extent, who did what first, extent of wrong behaviour evaluated by subjective editors, all that. When it becomes like the 3 body problem, I can no longer make heads or tails of it.
But I've learned something today: "Sealioning". Quite a nice expression, and a lot nicer than the idea of a dozen editors all prariedogging at the same time. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:49, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: August 2026

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in full Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

An Apology

[edit]

Hello Valereee,

I wanted to apologize for my response to you regarding Crumbl Cookies back in August 2022. In that discussion I made an egregious, and beyond embarrassing claim that the article was deleted - even though it never was. At that time, I had taken a break and during it, I saw several of your edits on the 24th of July where you added a "paid contributions" tag and removed quite a bit of the content. I initially took offense as I have never received payment for any edit I made on this site, and worked on the page not out promotional desire, but through genuine passion, and of course reading articles from reputable news outlets covering the chain. That same passion ended up blinding my better judgement.

It was my first time working on a company-based article. By that point, I figured my 1 year of active editing experience gave me the confidence and knowledge to try it out - silly me. I thought with my hard work, I definitively proved it met WP:NCORP and avoided the pitfalls of so many other company-based articles. I even took inspiration from GAs of companies too. So it was an understatement to say I was shocked my edits were seen as that of someone who uses Wikipedia as a means of promotion. At that point, I thought that it was bound to be deleted or sent back to draftspace. I distanced myself by resuming my break until about a day before I posted my reply. There, I didn't see the article indexed on Google search. In my normal mood, I would've made the rational choice: check if it was still up on Wikipedia. But my frustrated self led me to assume it was already deleted. From there... I think we both know why that's the last time I worked on a company-based article.

Looking back, my response was pretty beyond the pale. From the depths of my heart, I assure you I wrote it not out of malice, but of conviction. Call it a newcomer's complex or something, but I was desperate to prove I understood my edits, that I wasn't just some rookie or someone with a COI. If I rank everything I hate in life, people labeling me or making assumptions about my character that completely mismatch with my self-perception would be among the top. At that moment I felt like I got lumped into that tank of COI-fish, just another editor looking to advertise (another thing I hate too). When I'm in those situations, I end up behaving in ways I normally wouldn't dare to think about. These past four years since, I've worked as hard as I can to show that this instance doesn't represent who I am as an editor nor person.

Once again, I apologize profusely. I'll end this off by addressing another error I made: When I wrote "example #3 on 'Neutral, factual tone' of WP:PUFF", I meant to refer to WP:FLUFF. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@PantheonRadiance, no worries, it was clearly just a misunderstanding! But thank you for circling back, and I hope you've enjoyed editing since. Valereee (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2026)

[edit]
Hello, Valereee. The article for improvement of the week is:

Vancouver International Airport

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: One-form (differential geometry)  Archipelago


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article  Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 14 September 2026 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Tech News: 2026-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – September 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2026).

Administrator changes

added Dclemens1971
readded
removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Speedy deletion criteria G15 has been renamed from "LLM-generated pages without human review" to "Unambiguously LLM-generated pages" and has an additional sign of detection added to it following a RfC.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 16 September 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: The Balance of Power
    Wikimedia employees unionize, officer departs, The Signpost gains sister on Wiktionary

Women in Green's October 2026 Edit-a-thon

[edit]

Hello Valereee:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2026!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2026, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films or organizations created by women) during the event period — and this time, we are extending our focus to encourage more Did You Know (DYK) submissions spotlighting new GA articles about women and women's works. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by the event's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) & Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 05:31, 20 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2026)

[edit]
Hello, Valereee. The article for improvement of the week is:

Train wreck

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Vancouver International Airport  One-form (differential geometry)


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article  Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:09, 21 September 2026 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructionsReply