User talk:Yevrowl

File copyright problem with File:ChernyavskiyDL.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:ChernyavskiyDL.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of CyberBerkut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CyberBerkut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberBerkut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Львівське (говорити) 07:20, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CyberBerkut. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Львівське (говорити) 07:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Final warning to stop edit warring and explain your actions (removing tags, restoring unsourced info, etc.) or I'll have to file a report --Львівське (говорити) 15:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

All the facts are publicly available sources! You are the administrator? Yevrowl (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakra (chess variant)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chakra (chess variant) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

A lot of the material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aurora Police Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Police lieutenant moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Police lieutenant, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Police lieutenant (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RetroCraft314 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lieutenant#Police rank instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Would be more inclined to accept if the page contained more information than the aforementioned section, but either way the lieutenant page isn't terribly long, at least not long enough to justify WP:SPLITTING it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Police lieutenant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Police lieutenant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<RetroCraft314 /> 19:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Yevrowl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <RetroCraft314 /> 19:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Yevrowl! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Police lieutenant has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Police lieutenant. Thanks! AmericanAir88 (talk) 20:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Police lieutenant (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Lieutenant. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Police lieutenant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Police lieutenant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maladolescenza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Loeb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bristol Type 172 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bristol Type 172 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bristol Type 172 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Yevrowl, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Shmuel Kaminetsky have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 11:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Blood and Concrete moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blood and Concrete, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Almaz panel.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Almaz panel.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blood and Concrete and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blood and Concrete, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Battle of Lwów (1941) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Lwów (1941), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Lwów (1941) has been accepted

Battle of Lwów (1941), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Astronomical chess moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Astronomical chess, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Moses Ingram moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Moses Ingram, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yosyf Zisels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astronomical chess has been accepted

Astronomical chess, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yosyf Zisels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Ingram (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON. Needs more external news sources that focus on Ingram's career. Only one role so far (Queen's Gambit), so this would be a redirect to that show. Needs more multiple lead roles on notable productions to meet WP:ENT

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moses Ingram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moses Ingram, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Derman tragedy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derman tragedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derman tragedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Bidon (container) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bidon (container), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bidon (container) (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references. Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bidon (container) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bidon (container), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Blood and Concrete

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blood and Concrete".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood and Concrete (December 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by I dream of horses was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There haven't been any major changes since the last time the draft was declined. I guess that means there are no changes to be made.

I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 06:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MAG Audio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MAG Audio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mys_721tx (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I did notice your objection to the deletion of this article, so I thought I'd leave you a note in regards to it. MAG Audio (widely used abbreviated name MAG) ("widely used" according to what reliable and independent source?), professional acoustic systems ("professional" according to what reliable and independent source?), The company’s products are presented through official distributors in more than 35 countries of the world and used in more than 5,000 installations in over 100 countries. (as confirmed by what reliable and independent source?), ...quickly gained worldwide recognition, ("quickly gained worldwide recognition" according to what reliable and independent source?). And so on from there. Each fact in an article requires a reliable, independent source, and you were talking up this company without in any way providing sources for what you said about it. Going forward, please ensure you provide a citation to a reliable and independent source for each and every factual statement you make in an article. In this case, the unsourced statements amounted to promotional material. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 12:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bidon (container) (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bidon (container) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bidon (container), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

"Acoustic systems" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Acoustic systems. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 1#Acoustic systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Syberia: The World Before for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syberia: The World Before is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syberia: The World Before until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Blood and Concrete

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blood and Concrete".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bidon (container)

Hello, Yevrowl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bidon (container), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bidon (container)

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bidon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by IceWelder were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

One reliable source (and therein only a routine news article) is not sufficient for notability. The Development section is entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IceWelder [✉] 18:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Wikipedia articles need to be based upon sources that show how the subject is notable. This means that the sources must be primarily on the subject, and they must at least briefly describe the subject's main aspects. Ideally, such sources are monographs or equivalent books. Sources that mention the article's subject in a side note, such as the sources provided in this draft, are not sufficient to establish notability.

Please also not that articles in the English language version of Wikipedia should be written in proper English. I find this draft difficult to read because of its mediocre grammar and counter-intuitive syntax. Best regards, --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:REF

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a borderline reject, but only declining for now to give it another chance. The sources cited are not WP:RS (and one doesn't even work), therefore unable to establish notability. Also, too much of the contents, eg. all the biographical details, are unreferenced, which is unacceptable in a WP:BLP article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A review section with at least three or four in-depth reviews in reliable sources would be the easiest way to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

-- Greetings, @Bilorv:! I went through all the sources I could find. The game review is Gamepressure and Rock Paper Shotgun, as well as on Steam. Yevrowl (talk) 13:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Steam is a primary source, and user reviews are user-generated content (not reliable). I read the Gamepressure and Rock Paper Shotgun sources before declining, and I'm doubtful that Gamepressure is reliable, but even if it is this would not be sufficient coverage to show notability. If a topic is not notable, we can't host an article on it (no matter how well written a draft is). — Bilorv (talk) 14:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Alien with a grenade. UFO2: Extraterrestrials first look (in Russian) — Is this review resource okay? Yevrowl (talk) 22:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Based on the sources I have looked at, it is highly unlikely that it will pass the notability threshold. I would consider it a probable permanent fail for WP:GNG but I might be missing reviews from other countries.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sorry, but the sources presented do not establish why this individual is notable enough to merit inclusion in English Wikipedia.

Please present significant coverage about the subject in newspapers, magazines, on television, or academic work cover Dolinsky's contributions.

They can be in any language. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 22:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (February 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 21:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Yosyf Zisels. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Three sources, each cited only once, is nowhere near enough to support the contents; most of the article is completely unreferenced.

Also, the sources appear to consist of two articles and one primary source, which is arguably not enough to establish the notability of the subject beyond doubt.

This draft was earlier declined for lack of sources and unproven notability, and has been resubmitted without addressing either issue. Please ensure that both problems are sufficiently resolved before resubmitting. Thank you.

--

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aurora Police Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Makruk diagram

Nice job on the Makruk diagram template! A few comments: 1. A lighter board color would probably work better to show the white pieces. 2. In the initial position the kings are not in opposition, allowing the mets to attack each other. Kings should be on d1 and e8. --IanOsgood (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for testing the module and helping with advice! Made all the points. Yevrowl (talk) 20:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tombstone Marshal's Office (Arizona)

Hello Yevrowl,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tombstone Marshal's Office (Arizona) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Idaho Falls Police Department

Hello, Yevrowl,

Thank you for creating Idaho Falls Police Department.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

No independent sourcing, no indication of notability. Should be merged into city article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slywriter (talk) 14:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about 2022 in games

Hello, Yevrowl, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Meena, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2022 in games, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 in games.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meena}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Meena • 20:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:HiaShatar diagram

Template:HiaShatar diagram has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky

Hello, Yevrowl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Kramnik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endgame.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidEfraim was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidEfraim (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Frosthaven for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frosthaven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frosthaven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Skipple ☎ 16:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Board games introduced in 2022

A tag has been placed on Category:Board games introduced in 2022 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Carnegie (board game) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carnegie (board game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:V A Ivanenko.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:V A Ivanenko.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alex Spade (talk) 10:37, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Paul Laux (general).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Paul Laux (general).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alex Spade (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky

Hello, Yevrowl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carnegie (board game)

Hello, Yevrowl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carnegie (board game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Australian Defence (chess) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Australian Defence (chess), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Dice:

1-6 https://www.dicegamedepot.com/math-numerals-dice-1-6/

7-12 https://www.dicegamedepot.com/math-numerals-dice-7-12/

13-18 https://www.dicegamedepot.com/math-numerals-dice-13-18/

19-24 https://www.dicegamedepot.com/math-numerals-dice-19-24/

25-30 https://www.dicegamedepot.com/math-numerals-dice-25-30/ Sun2293 (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wang 3300

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wang 3300 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wang3300.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hi Yevrowl! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks, Kj cheetham, noted. Yevrowl (talk) 19:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
• Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to Diana Vitalievna Panchenko. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
• Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from Diana Vitalievna Panchenko to another page. While translation is welcome, this translation appears to be poor quality or machine translation. Wikipedia consensus is that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing. Please only translate pages when you understand both languages; for more guidance, see Help:Translation. Thank you.

(t · c) buidhe 14:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (August 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Already previously rejected, and should not have been resubmitted.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Australian Defence (chess)

Hello, Yevrowl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Australian Defence (chess), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Defence (chess) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Reddit and blogs cannot be used as sources. You may want to merge the content into List of chess openings if you can find some better sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Australian Defence (chess) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ukrainian Military Doctrine

The article Ukrainian Military Doctrine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Polyamorph (talk) 18:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Mark Ginzburg moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mark Ginzburg. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Refs are a mix, illegal ext in body, tone issues, non-encyclopeadic language. Its a mess. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 14:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mark Ginzburg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark Ginzburg. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 20:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mark Ginzburg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark Ginzburg. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 12:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Defence (chess) (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Australian Defence (chess) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Ginzburg (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As has previously been mentioned there are far too many issues. In addition, from a quick look myself some of the sources are unreliable. Decline so the author will take the need to rewrite more seriously.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Ginzburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Ginzburg (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Ginzburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Yevrowl. Thank you for your work on Camp Verde Marshal's Office (Arizona). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Whitehall Township Bureau of Police

Hello Yevrowl, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Whitehall Township Bureau of Police, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehall Township Bureau of Police.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BrigadierG}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BrigadierG (talk) 22:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Ginzburg (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please improve the citations. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Ginzburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Ginzburg (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases, YouTube interviews, random blogs, etc. are not reliable sources for a biography of a living person.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Ginzburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 16:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Australian Defence (chess)

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Australian Defence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Defence (chess) (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Three of the sources are routine listings (one of which is about this line but doesn't even use the term), and the fourth currently times out.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Australian Defence (chess) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Ginzburg (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Ginzburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Ginzburg (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bluethricecreamman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See previous criticism. Not really solved since.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Ginzburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bluethricecreamman (talk) 16:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Defence (chess) (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tesleemah was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous decline reason stands with no major improvement

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Australian Defence (chess) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Ginzburg (March 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please stop wasting the community's time.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lancaster City Bureau of Police logotype.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lancaster City Bureau of Police logotype.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aztech WaveRider

The article Aztech WaveRider has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Australian Defence (chess)

Hello, Yevrowl. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Australian Defence".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 12:14, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 09:06, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Territorial Center of Recruitment and Social Support. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Repeated insertions of unattributed statements in Wikipedia's voice in a WP:CTOP, you have already been informed about this. TylerBurden (talk) 12:22, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Information only from official sources, such as the State Bureau of Investigation, and news agencies accredited in Ukraine, no "commentary" or "point of view". Otherwise, please provide a justification, rather than simply removing material and information from the article at your own discretion. Yevrowl (talk) 19:29, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Do you understand what attribution is? TylerBurden (talk) 10:52, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Please provide specific examples of what was considered a "comment" or "point of view" and was removed on that basis. For each deleted paragraph, if don't mind. Yevrowl (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

We need to understand if you grasp basic WP:NPOV concepts like attribution, so instead of dodging the question, would you mind answering it? TylerBurden (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Yes, read the section, and the principles outlined there resonate. Perhaps could also answer the question? Could please explain why prefer removing instead of following WP:NPOVHOW? Yevrowl (talk) 00:44, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Then I do not understand the repeated attribution issues, we can see about restoring some of the content without those, also why are you misusing MOS:QUOTE for what appears to be dramatic effect? Not only are you risking copyright issues, there seems to be no purpose other than efforts to highlight specific portions you wish to highlight. TylerBurden (talk) 09:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

If you find the quotes redundant and "dramatized", please remove them from the article. But once again, you're diverting the discussion. In fact, to better understand this in the future, hope to read the explanation to the post from 13:15, July 1, 2026 (UTC) in this thread. Yevrowl (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

I do not see what else could be the purpose, and based on you having no defense, it seems to be the case. Please at least try to edit the article objectively so we can avoid further issues. TylerBurden (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

See you're constantly demanding explanations from me without actually stating what my fault is. This is a clear case of WP:GAMING. Yevrowl (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

What? I have already said numerous times you are violating WP:NPOV by failing to provide proper attribution to content, but instead writing on the article in WP:WIKIVOICE. As noted above, this is a WP:CTOP, where standards are higher than usual, so these policy failures matter more than usual. If you can't grasp that, and on top of it now come with bad faith accusations such as WP:GAMING, it seems involving administrators might be the only solution to this, since I see you have now restored your problematic edit. TylerBurden (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Also read MOS:WTW, your non-neutral wording choices on the article is a significant portion of the issues.

Looks like you're adding content to the article not even relevant to the TCR in the first place as well, such as adding claims about suicides in specific military units, makes no sense. TylerBurden (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

But, you're avoiding specifics with generalities and numerous references to the rules... The activities of the TCR and SS are covered by members of the Ukrainian parliament, the Human Rights Ombudsman, media accredited in Ukraine, and Ukrainian government agencies such as the National Police and the State Bureau of Investigation. Do you find this "dramatic"? But this is how the TCR's work is portrayed in WP:RS. And why did you remove the "Conflicts against civilians" subsection? This is regularly publicly reported! The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense announced a reform in this regard.

P. S. Since it's clearly impossible to reach a consensus, propose submitting this dispute to arbitration. Yevrowl (talk) 17:56, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

I assume English is not your first language, because you do not make sense, and it seems like you are unable to edit inline with WP:CTOP standards, as you seem more interested in promoting a narrative than writing a neutral encyclopedia article, this is called WP:TENDENTIOUS editing, and it seems you have been doing this on this specific article since very early 2025. I explained why I removed the subsection, it is not encyclopedic (or even proper English), nor did it contain anything meaningful, it literally contained only arson on cars. How is naming an entire section ″criticism and controversy″ not enough? Once again, it's a WP:CTOP article, the standards can't be this poor. TylerBurden (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Since after a brief pause from this disruption, you are back to doing the same poor quality editing, adding unattributed statements with a WP:BAREREF, you make it pretty clear that you do not understand the issues and I'll therefore give you one final warning here before I create a report on WP:AE. TylerBurden (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

If you feel that the media reports are not entirely neutral in tone, no one is stopping you from making edits, but for some reason you chose WP:HA instead. Yevrowl (talk) 19:45, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

No, calling out disruptive editing in a WP:CTOP is not "harassment". That's a serious accusation of bad faith on top of your problematic edits, which from the report below is apparently not even limited to this one article, but the Ukrainian topic in general. TylerBurden (talk) 11:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

All you do is WP:AAGF, but you still haven't answered any of my clarifying questions. Under no obligation to justify myself to you, so don't see the point in continuing this discussion. Yevrowl (talk) 12:45, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

You are still adding WP:SYNTH to this article with WP:BAREREFS, at the very least, you can use a tool like https://citer.toolforge.org/ to format the references, though the misrepresentation and Wikivoice remains the main issue. TylerBurden (talk) 10:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

You have not given a single example of me distorting information. Yevrowl (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Your edit "On August 9, in Kharkiv, there was an attempt to forcibly mobilize a children’s entertainer, who stated that he was beaten by TCR staff while being transported (bused) and beaten again at the recruitment center when it became clear that, according to his documents, he was eligible for a deferment from military conscription."

What the source actually says regarding this: "Information about the conflict previously appeared in the telegram channel “Kharkiv 1654”. The man said that his car was stopped by a police officer in the Bavaria area.

“I told him that I had all the documents. I said: “I will show you everything, just name the reasons for stopping the vehicle, and I will show you everything”. We talked with him, listed the reasons for the stop. And then a stranger in civilian clothes approached me and started shouting at me. I said: “Calm down, I am obeying the policeman, I will show you everything now”. After that he started beating me, another person in camouflage joined him, and they pulled me out of the car. I told them that everything was fine with my documents: the data was updated, the VLK was passed, everything was fine with me. But they did not listen to me, they simply inflicted bodily harm and tore my clothes. "They beat me at the CCC and the SP, and after they found out that everything was really fine with the documents, it made them so angry that they took me and beat me again," the man claimed."

There's plenty of editorialism here, you are presenting his statements as matter of fact in Wikivoice while the source gives a complete overview of the incident, you're also adding terms like busification.

Do you have any actual defence for continuing to add WP:BAREREFS? TylerBurden (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

The published information about the forced delivery to the TCR and SS (busification) and two beatings clearly follows from the victim’s own statement. Yevrowl (talk) 15:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

I have read the entire thing, there is no use of the term "busification", the statement by the police reads:

"The applicant went to the hospital. After providing the necessary medical care, he was released. Based on this fact, the police began to verify the circumstances set forth in the application. Currently, law enforcement officers are establishing all the circumstances of the incident, interviewing participants and eyewitnesses, and also collecting the necessary materials. Information about the incident has been entered into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations under Part 1 of Article 125 (intentional minor bodily harm) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine".

This is once again your own editorialism, interestingly your own edit included nothing from the police aside from the entry into unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations. It's pretty clear you are only attempting to paint one image here (and on the article in general), contrary to WP:NPOV. TylerBurden (talk) 17:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Was he forcibly taken to a medical examination? Where did he seek medical attention? Where was he beaten twice – on the street, in the hospital, or at the TCR building? That's what the term implies.

This is just your conclusion. However, no one is stopping you from finding other information about this organization and adding it to the article. Yevrowl (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

It's a bit ironic that you talk about conclusions right after making your own WP:OR conclusion, it's very simple, just follow what the references you cite actually say, and summarize them in line with WP:NPOV. If they don't use terms you would like to use, then you're either going to need to skip out on them or find a reference which does. Why are you repeatedly refusing to address the WP:BAREREF issue? TylerBurden (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Color 400 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Color 400 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Color 400 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 12:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Yevrowl. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)