Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

"WP:RFD" redirects here. For other uses, see WP:RFD (disambiguation).

XFD backlog

V	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Total
CfD	0	68	118	57	243
TfD	0	0	0	54	54
MfD	0	0	0	0	0
FfD	0	0	31	28	59
RfD	0	0	0	47	47
AfD	0	0	0	70	70

Redirects for discussion (RfD) is the place where potentially problematic redirects are discussed. Items usually stay listed for a week or so, after which they are deleted, kept, or retargeted.

• If you want to replace an unprotected redirect with an article, do not list it here. Turning redirects into articles is wholly encouraged. Be bold!
• If you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. For non-controversial cases, place a technical request; if a discussion is required, then start a requested move.
• If you think a redirect points to the wrong target article, this is a good place to discuss the proper target.
• Redirects should not be deleted just because they have no incoming links. Please do not use this as the only reason to delete a redirect. However, redirects that do have incoming links are sometimes deleted, so that is not a sufficient condition for keeping. (See § When to delete a redirect for more information.)

Please do not unilaterally rename or change the target of a redirect while it is under discussion. This adds unnecessary complication to the discussion for participants and closers.

Current and past redirects for discussion (RfD) discussions

Current discussions

Redirects that have been nominated for discussion are indexed by the day on which they were first listed.

• 23 September (Wednesday)
• 22 September (Tuesday)
• 21 September (Monday)
• 20 September (Sunday)
• 19 September (Saturday)
• 18 September (Friday)
• 17 September (Thursday)
• 16 September (Wednesday)

Old discussions

After 7 days, nominations that have finished their discussion period are eligible to be closed following the deletion process.

Before listing a redirect for discussion

Please be aware of these general policies, which apply here as elsewhere:

• Wikipedia:Redirect – what redirects are, why they exist, and how they are used.
• Wikipedia:Speedy deletion – which pages can be deleted without discussion; in particular the "General" and "Redirects" sections.
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy – how we delete things by consensus.
• Wikipedia:Guide to deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand.

The guiding principles of RfD

• The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers will find themselves staring blankly at "Search results 1–10 out of 378" instead of the article they were looking for. If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for the target article, it's a good redirect.
• Redirects are cheap. They take up little storage space and use very little bandwidth. It doesn't really hurt things if there are a few of them scattered around. On the flip side, deleting redirects is also cheap because recording the deletion takes up little storage space and uses very little bandwidth. There is no harm in deleting problematic redirects.
• If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion after at least 7 days, the default result is delete.
• Redirects nominated in contravention of Wikipedia:Redirect will be speedily kept.
• RfD can also serve as a central discussion forum for debates about which page a redirect should target. In cases where retargeting the redirect could be considered controversial, it is advisable to leave a notice on the talk page of the redirect's current target page or the proposed target page to refer readers to the redirect's nomination to allow input and help form consensus for the redirect's target.
• Requests for deletion of redirects from one page's talk page to another's do not need to be listed here. Anyone can remove the redirect by blanking the page. The G6 criterion for speedy deletion may be appropriate.
• In discussions, always ask yourself whether or not a redirect would be helpful to the reader.

When to delete a redirect

Further information: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes and Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving over a redirect

The major reasons why deletion of redirects is harmful are:

• a redirect may contain non-trivial edit history;
• if a redirect is reasonably old (or is the result of moving a page that has been there for quite some time), then it is possible that its deletion will break incoming links (such as links coming from older revisions of Wikipedia pages, from edit summaries, from other Wikimedia projects or from elsewhere on the internet, do not show up in "What links here").

Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones.

Reasons for deleting

See also: Wikipedia:Speedy deletion § Redirects

You might want to delete a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met:

1. The redirect page makes it unreasonably difficult for users to locate similarly named articles via the search engine. For example, if the user searches for "New Articles", and is redirected to a disambiguation page for "Articles" (itself a redirect to "Article"), it would take much longer to get to the newly added articles on Wikipedia.
2. The redirect might cause confusion. For example, if "Adam B. Smith" was redirected to "Andrew B. Smith", because Andrew was accidentally called Adam in one source, this could cause confusion with the article on Adam Smith, so the redirect should be deleted.
3. The redirect is offensive or abusive, such as redirecting "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" to "Joe Bloggs" (unless "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" is legitimately discussed in the article), or "Joe Bloggs" to "Loser". (Speedy deletion criterion G10 and G3 may apply.) See also § Neutrality of redirects.
4. The redirect constitutes self-promotion or spam. (Speedy deletion criterion G11 may apply.)
5. The redirect makes no sense, such as redirecting "Apple" to "Banana". (Speedy deletion criterion G1 may apply.)
6. It is a cross-namespace redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace. The major exception to this rule are the pseudo-namespace shortcut redirects, which technically are in the main article space. Some long-standing cross-namespace redirects are also kept because of their long-standing history and potential usefulness. "MOS:" redirects, for example, were an exception to this rule until they became their own namespace in 2024. (Note also the existence of namespace aliases such as WP:. Speedy deletion criterion R2 may apply if the target namespace is something other than Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help:, or Portal:.)
7. If the redirect is broken, meaning it redirects to an article that does not exist, it can be immediately deleted under speedy deletion criterion G8. You should check that there is not an alternative place it could be appropriately redirected to first and that it has not become broken through vandalism.
8. If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. (Implausible typos or misnomers are candidates for speedy deletion criterion R3, if recently created.) The message template {{subst:not mentioned}} may be useful.
9. If the target article needs to be moved to the redirect title, but the redirect has been edited before and has a history of its own, then the title needs to be freed up to make way for the move. If the move is uncontroversial, tag the redirect for G6 speedy deletion, or alternatively (with the suppressredirect user right; available to page movers and admins), perform a round-robin move. If not, take the article to Requested moves.
10. If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject.
11. If the redirect ends in "(disambiguation)" but does not target a disambiguation page or a page performing a disambiguation-like function (such as a set index of articles). Speedy deletion criterion G14 may apply.

Reasons for not deleting

However, avoid deleting such redirects if:

1. They have a potentially useful page history, or an edit history that should be kept to comply with the licensing requirements for a copy or merge (see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Merge and delete). On the other hand, if the redirect was created by renaming a page with that name, and the page history just mentions the renaming, and for one of the reasons above you want to delete the page, copy the page history to the Talk page of the article it redirects to. The act of renaming is useful page history, and even more so if there has been discussion on the page name.
2. They would aid accidental linking and make the creation of duplicate articles less likely, whether by redirecting a plural to a singular, by redirecting a frequent misspelling to a correct spelling, by redirecting a misnomer to a correct term, by redirecting to a synonym, etc. In other words, redirects with no incoming links are not candidates for deletion on those grounds because they are of benefit to the browsing user. Some extra vigilance by editors will be required to minimize the occurrence of those frequent misspellings in article text because the linkified misspellings will not appear as broken links; consider tagging the redirect with the {{R from misspelling}} template to assist editors in monitoring these misspellings.
3. They aid searches on certain terms. For example, users who might see the "Keystone State" mentioned somewhere but do not know what that refers to will be able to find out at the Pennsylvania (target) article.
4. Deleting redirects runs the risk of breaking incoming or internal links. For example, redirects resulting from page moves should not normally be deleted without good reason. Links that have existed for a significant length of time, including CamelCase links (e.g. WolVes) and old subpage links, should be retained in case there are any existing links on external pages pointing to them. Please tag these with {{R from old history}}. See also Wikipedia:Link rot § Link rot on non-Wikimedia sites.
5. Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways. Evidence of usage can be gauged by using the wikishark or pageviews tool on the redirect to see the number of views it gets.
6. The redirect is to a closely related word form, such as a plural form to a singular form.

Neutrality of redirects

Just as article titles using non-neutral language are permitted in some circumstances, so are such redirects. Because redirects are less visible to readers, more latitude is allowed in their names, therefore perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is not a sufficient reason for their deletion. In most cases, non-neutral but verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{R from non-neutral name}}.

Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:

1. Articles that are created using non-neutral titles are routinely moved to a new neutral title, which leaves behind the old non-neutral title as a working redirect (e.g. ClimategateClimategate → Climatic Research Unit email controversy).
2. Articles created as POV forks may be deleted and replaced by a redirect pointing towards the article from which the fork originated (e.g. Barack Obama Muslim rumorBarack Obama Muslim rumor → deleted and now redirected to Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories).
3. The subject matter of articles may be represented by some sources outside Wikipedia in non-neutral terms. Such terms are generally avoided in Wikipedia article titles, per the words to avoid guidelines and the general neutral point of view policy. For instance the non-neutral expression "AttorneygateAttorneygate" is used to redirect to the neutrally titled 2006 dismissal of U.S. attorneys. The article in question has never used that title, but the redirect was created to provide an alternative means of reaching it because a number of press reports use the term.

The exceptions to this rule are redirects that are not established terms and are unlikely to be useful, and therefore may be nominated for deletion, perhaps under deletion reason #3. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that RfD is not the place to resolve most editorial disputes.

Closing notes

Details at Administrator instructions for RfD

Nominations should remain open, per policy, about a week before they are closed, unless they meet the general criteria for speedy deletion, the criteria for speedy deletion of a redirect, or are not valid redirect discussion requests (e.g. are actually move requests).

How to list a redirect for discussion

STEP I.	Tag the redirect(s).   Enter {{subst:rfd|content= at the very beginning of the redirect page you are listing for discussion and enter }} at the very end of the page. Please include in the edit summary the phrase: Nominated for RfD: see [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]. Please do not mark the edit as minor (m). Save the page ("Publish changes"). If you are unable to edit the redirect page because of protection, this step can be omitted, and after step 2 is completed, a request to add the RFD template can be put on the redirect's talk page. If the redirect you are nominating is in template namespace, consider adding |showontransclusion=1 to the RfD tag so that people using the template redirect are aware of the nomination. If it is an inline template, use |showontransclusion=tiny instead. If you are nominating multiple redirects as a group, repeat all the above steps for each redirect being nominated and specify on {{rfd}} the nomination's group heading from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
STEP II.	List the entry on RfD.  Click here to edit the section of RfD for today's entries. Enter this text below the date heading: {{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName|target=TargetArticle|text=The action you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for that action.}} ~~~~ For this template: Put the redirect's name in place of RedirectName, put the target article's name in place of TargetArticle, and include a reason after text=. Note that, for this step, the "target article" is the current target of the redirect (if you have a suggestion for a better target, include this in the text that you insert after text=). Please use an edit summary such as: Nominating [[RedirectName]] (replacing RedirectName with the name of the redirect you are nominating). To list multiple related redirects for discussion, use the following syntax. Repeat line 2 for N number of redirects: {{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName1|target=TargetArticle1}} {{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectName2|target=TargetArticle2}} {{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectNameN|target=TargetArticleN|text=The actions you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for those actions.}} ~~~~ If the redirect has had previous RfDs, you can add {{Oldrfdlist|previous RfD without brackets|result of previous RfD}} directly after the rfd2 template. If appropriate, inform members of the most relevant WikiProjects through one or more "deletion sorting lists". Then add a {{subst:delsort|<topic>|<signature>}} template to the nomination, to insert a note that this has been done.
STEP III.	Notify users.   It is generally considered good practice to notify the creator and main contributors of the redirect(s) that you nominate. To find the main contributors, look in the page history of the respective redirect(s). For convenience, the template {{subst:Rfd notice|RedirectName}} ~~~~ may be placed on the creator/main contributors' user talk page to provide notice of the discussion. Please replace RedirectName with the name of the respective creator/main contributors' redirect and use an edit summary such as: Notice of redirect discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]. Notices about the RfD discussion may also be left on relevant talk pages.

• Please consider using What links here to locate other redirects that may be related to the one you are nominating. After going to the redirect target page and selecting "What links here" in the toolbox on the left side of your computer screen, select both "Hide transclusions" and "Hide links" filters to display the redirects to the redirect target page.

Current list

September 23

Refuse illegal orders

• Refuse illegal orders → November 2025 United States military video controversy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Current target is WP:RECENTISM. The concept of the obligation/authority to refuse illegal orders long-predates 2025. Consider retargeting to Superior orders or Conscientious objector. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:01, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Superior orders. Refusal is mentioned throughout the page. Conscientious objector is a worse target because it is mostly about refusing conscription, which isn't an illegal order. Jruderman (talk) 08:24, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• You can refuse illegal ordersYou can refuse illegal orders also redirects to the same article. Not sure what to do with that one. Jruderman (talk) 08:26, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  The November 2025 video is the best-known context that exact phrase has appeared in. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 00:37, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Criminal order (international law) as an avoided double redirect of Illegal orderIllegal order. Although this target is little more than a stub, it does provide useful links to various related concepts, and seems preferable to Superior orders which is more about the legal defence (after having committed an illegal order) than about refusal. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:00, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Epicgenius (talk) 01:50, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

The Horrid Lorries

• The Horrid Lorries → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Horrid Lorries → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about these characters at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete this unsourced stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006 before it was BLAR'ed as there was a section about this character at its then target. There was no merge, and no reason to keep attribution. Jay 01:32, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

September 22

None of the above (political party)

• None of the above (political party) → None of This  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• None of the Above Party → None of the Above Direct Democracy Party  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Other "none of the above" political parties exist, such as the None of the Above Direct Democracy Party. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:26, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment - See also None of the Above Party redirect, which also goes to None of the Above Direct Democracy Party. Personally I think None of the above#NOTA party is closer in name than None of This, could disambiguate. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:55, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget both to None of the above, which lists several different political parties with this name, among other stunts. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:01, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:32, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget both to None of the above (disambiguation). I have edited that page to hopefully be more helpful at giving people a quick-glance overview of the various "none of the above" parties/candidates/etc that exist. Maybe it's a little messy so feel free to change it. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk · edits) 20:27, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have listed None of the Above Party officially here and relisted early, so the discussion has enough time after I tag the redirect and notify the relevant talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 22:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Elise Marilyn Jones

• Elise Marilyn Jones → Chloe Cherry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The only reliable sources connecting the name to the subject of the target article are a couple of local news outlets, which seems insufficiently widely published by reliable sources as per WP:BLPPRIVACY, especially given the subject's national fame. Therefore I propose deleting it as a BLP violation. ~Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2026 (UTC) edited 02:48, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Fifth tone

• Fifth tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Fifth-tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

A fifth tone would exist in 30-tone equal temperament, which we do not seem to have content on. The unhyphenated version could refer to Standard Chinese phonology#Neutral tone (and there is the letter Tone five). 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:34, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Agree with nomination. Thank you for doing this. Trumpetrep (talk) 23:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Standard Chinese phonology#Neutral tone as an obscure neologism, with a hatnote to the letter. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Eighth tone

• Eighth tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Eighth-tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 48-TET → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target nor at Varieties of equal temperament. 96 equal temperament contains this (sixteenth tone redirects there too), but 48-TET is only listed and eighth tones are not mentioned. The first of these could also refer to a linguistic tone such as at Pe̍h-ōe-jī#Tone markings. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Although, I think deleting this would be preferable. Trumpetrep (talk) 23:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as an obscure neologism with no common usage among the languages with at least eight tones. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Seventh-tone

• Seventh-tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A seventh tone would exist in 42-tone equal temperament, which we do not seem to have content on. There is also a seventh tone in languages such as Pe̍h-ōe-jī#Tone markings, but that would be spelt without a hyphen. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:18, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Thank you for nominating these. Trumpetrep (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as an obscure neologism. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

27 equal temperament

• 27 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27-tone equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 tone equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 46 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 46-TET → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 47 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Proportions between semitone and whole tone  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 16 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 16-TET → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Temperaments not mentioned at the target, nor at the Varieties of equal temperament which lists various other temperaments. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:08, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete I think this was removed during cleanup of uncited WP:OR and indiscriminate tables at this article and the other one by Trumpetrep (talk · contribs) and myself in June–July 2026. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:16, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

LaundryPizza03, noting that I added two more that I had somehow overlooked. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. It would be a great improvement to remove this content from Wikipedia and deal it with it succinctly in one place. Trumpetrep (talk) 23:14, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Jukude language

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 30 § Jukude languages – speedy delete
• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 31 § Jukude language – delete

• Jukude language → Máku language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not an attested name for the language, and deleted following prior RfD discussion 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 22:34, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Note: The previous RfD was very recent, but had no participation besides the nominator. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:52, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. 14 mainspace pages link to that redirect. Possibly they predate the Jukude language -> Máku language page move in 2021. The Máku language page contains "Jukude" enough times I think it's plausible someone would search that way. I know nothing about this subject, but at the least I can't support deleting it while links to it are still in use. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 22:59, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

It wouldn't be difficult to replace all those links if needed. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:17, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

It's not probable because the name Jukude applies only to the people, and never to the language. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:25, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

External search results on Google, Google Scholar, and Google Books return no non-Wikipedia hits for "Jukude+language". Results for "Jukude" alone yields results that state that this word means "person, human" (eg. ). Rogers, 2001, states:

The speakers of this language referred to themselves as jukude-itse [zokude-itse] ‘people-PL’. It is commonplace to refer to the language as Máku in the linguistic literature, reserving the autonym, consequently, for the cultural group of speakers of this language.

If I understand rightly, -itse marks this word as referring to people, so maybe without the person marker suffix the word is the native word for the language. This redirect is linked to in several articles; maybe the references in one of them can provide evidence for usage of "Jukude language" off-Wikipedia? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:13, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Usage looks to be predominantly in the form of lists. Ticuna–Yuri languages#Language contact and Languages of Brazil#Classification of languages as linguistic or cultural heritage have Portuguese references. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 23:32, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

One of the pages, I've forgotten which, referenced ISBN 978-3-11-025513-3. It makes note "A number of languages have been called Makú, several of which have nothing to do with one another". So we must be careful not to get Máku language and Makú language muddled, as Ctrl+F can ignore diacritics. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 23:52, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

@Scyrme The term "Jukude" is definitely not the native designation for the language. It is the designation for the people though. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:22, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Why "definitely"? You have sources that say so? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 01:31, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

@Scyrme Check the grammars of the language and see if the name "Jukude" is used for the language. I couldn't find anything. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 16:54, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

The closest I found using "Jukude" and not "jukude-itse" (people) was a German source. Note that I have only had success in accessing this link on mobile - desktop browsers just give me an "Access is temporarily restricted" screen - so you can try mobile or find it on another website (what I like about ResearchGate, when it lets me in, is it doesn't require login):

Kolonialitäten und tribale Zonen. Koch-Grünbergs Beziehungen im Feld während der Roraima-Orinoco-Expedition by Ernst Halbmayer (July 2023), Philipps University of Marburg

It reads: "Die Selbstbezeichnung der Gruppe war Jukudeitse und die Sprache Jukude." Which Google Translates to: "The group's self-designation was Jukudeitse, and the language was Jukude." Interestingly, it (or its quoted passages) seems to use the term "Máku" to refer to the people, contrary to the Máku language page:

Drei Porokotó und einen Máku haben er und seine Henkersknechte mit der Rifle erschossen.
He and his henchmen shot three Porokotó and one Máku with the rifle.

Wie Koch-Grünberg festhält: »Die Unterhaltung meiner Leute dreht sich jetzt beständig um die ›wilden Indianer‹, Waiká […], die diese Gegend gerade in der jetzigen Zeit gern zu Überfällen (um Mitternacht) auf die durchreisenden Majonggóng und Máku benutzen sollen« (VII: 10).
As Koch-Grünberg notes: "My men’s conversation now constantly revolves around the ‘wild Indians’—the Waiká […], who are said to favor this area, especially at the present time, for launching raids (at midnight) on the passing Majonggóng and Máku" (VII: 10).

Auch »mit den Arekuna, von denen einzelne bei den Yekuaná leben, kommen Misch-ehen vor; ebenso mit den Máku am Auari« (Koch-Grünberg 1923: 351).
"Mixed marriages also occur with the Arekuna—some of whom live among the Yekuaná—as well as with the Máku on the Auari" (Koch-Grünberg 1923: 351).

I don't know if I've actually contributed anything here, just that it passed the time. Either way, my view remains that if the term "Jukude" is in use and someone might reasonably search it or follow a link using it, we should keep this. Template:R from incorrect name can be used, or Template:R from alternative name if it is less certain that name is incorrect. Template:R from move may also be suitable, although, looking at the history closer, the page only lived there from 2020-12-24 to 2021-03-08.

Only tangentially related, that is interesting this language page's moves were driven by a single user from 2011 to literally today (UTC, yesterday in the Americas). I hope they partake in this discussion. Possibly there is no definitively correct name for this language. Another idea I've just had, is to check the other Wikipedia languages for references. They all start with "jukude", "jukudea", "yukude", or Язык юкуде (which apparently is also yukude). But I have not looked into where they may have got that name from. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

@Here for the one billionth edit AFAIK Koch-Grünberg, who is being discussed here, only called the language "Máku". Here is his book which contains a vocabulary of it. Since the language is called "Jukude" here, I support keeping this but with the caveat of using {{R from incorrect name}}. The only name the language is otherwise called is "Máku" (though with some diacritical variation as "Makú, which is much more ambiguous). The other WP articles were probably moved by kwami per enWP usage rather than due to some reference present in the other WPs. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 13:17, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shocksingularity (talk) 20:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Elon Musk's submarine

• Elon Musk's submarine → Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Musk's submarine → Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This redirect has an interesting history. The page at this title was an article for 11 days in August 2018 (a month after the actual cave rescue occurred), whereupon it was redirected to Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue. After that, FWDekker retargeted it to Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case in 2020; Cewbot retargeted it to Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue & defamation case in 2022 (which Tallungs reverted); I retargeted it to Tham Luang cave rescue in 2025. Last but not least, starting a few minutes earlier, today Moonraker12 tried four different targets: Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case, Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case, Tham Luang cave rescue, and Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk.

As that discussion reveals, we have three different articles on Wikipedia this redirect could possibly target where the submarine was mentioned - Elon Musk, Legal affairs of Elon Musk, and Tham Luang cave rescue - and no consensus on which one to send the reader to. Any thoughts? Duckmather (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• I am leaning retarget to Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case. It looks the best well-written out of the three (albeit not by a wide margin) and provides clear navigation to Tham Luang cave rescue. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 00:11, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
• I'm questioning if this redirect should exist at all. But if it should, the target should be either Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk or Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case.
  I'm leaning towards the latter, because of Musk's narcissism, making himself the central point of the situation. Elon Musk made sure the submarine ordeal was about Elon Musk. It had little to do with the actual Tham Luang rescue. - Manifestation (talk) 08:27, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note I bundled in Musk's submarine as well, as they should have the same target or if one is deleted then the other should be as well. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 16:16, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• I don't think the redirect is necessary. The redirect's title is a misnomer: The linked-to sections aren't about the submarine but about the legal issues surrounding it. The redirect is also not in an appropriate category (I think): It's currently in Category:Redirects to related topics, but it's not so much about a related topic as it's just a phrase you might think of when searching for more information. For which there is no category, afaik. So I think the redirect should be deleted. FWDekker (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's an R from merge, which must be retained for attribution purposes and may not be deleted unless the page history is moved elsewhere first. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Sorry about the mess; I came across this at Wild boar (disambiguation) as a redirect to Tham Luang cave rescue but couldn’t see it there; I intended to redirect this to Legal affairs, but got a clash notice (as Musk’s submarine redirected somewhere else), so I self-reverted. Musk’s involvement with the cave rescue anyway seems pretty minimal (or even negative), so I was considering proposing that section be summarized and merged with Legal affairs as well: The submarine itself (which was actually just some kind of capsule) is about as notable as a kayak absent of the legal fuss that accompanied it, so I suggest the redirect to Legal affairs is appropriate (It is probably worth keeping it for the edit history). OTOH Musks submarine is just duplication, with no incoming links, so if it can be deleted then do that. Moonraker12 (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Currently the most extensive coverage is at Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case and Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk. There may be an opportunity to better consolidate the coverage but I see this as an area where duplication is to be expected. I think it's a coin toss where to target these now. They should certainly have the same target (if neither is deleted). If the coverage is reorganized in the future then the targets may need to change again. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: There's also Elon Musk and the Tham Luang cave rescueElon Musk and the Tham Luang cave rescue, which should be synced to the same target. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  That seems implausible to me as a search target, but may have been linked to at one point? Its hit count had odd spikes in October 2023, and there was a sustained increase in traffic in February 2025. Good find. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 14:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's a more likely descriptive title that would be more suitable for a stand-alone article on the topic if it were ever to be re-created. If consensus were to deem the submarine redirects harmful (I don't think they are, by the way), then an option could be to move the page history to this title and delete the submarine redirects. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case or Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shocksingularity (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

They hit the pentagon

• They hit the pentagon → American Airlines Flight 77  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• They hit the Pentagon → American Airlines Flight 77  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Quote not mentioned in target (there might be a big edit later, but I'm RfD'ing this for now) — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 19:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. This was a practical joke that I made to demonstrate the misuse of editing on Wikipedia to my classmate. Although, I do wonder if it counts, considering there's a Wiktionary entry for the exact phrase referring to this event. AladdinC (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• soft redirect to wiktionary per above. also creating and bundling the version with a capital p (disgusting!!) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 20:20, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

SuMo

• SuMo → Sumo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

per history, it's either a somewhat implausible camelcase redirect, or a less implausible but also sorta niche abbreviation of pokémon sun and moon (seen primarily around smogon circles that don't abbreviate them as "sm"). i'll suggest retargeting back as the path of least resistance consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:03, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Joe Kerr

• Joe Kerr → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California (districts 27–52)#District 40  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 7 § Joe Kerr – retarget to Joseph Kerr (disambiguation)

Political candidate who has ran in 2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California_(districts_27–52)#District_40, 2024_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California#District_40, and 2022_California_State_Senate_election#District_38, neither of which are a primary topic. मल्ल (talk) 16:11, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• retarget back to the dab, essentially per the previous rfd consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:35, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  incidentally, mild opposition to adding this joe to the dab, in absence of an article about him. but that's not too important to this rfd, so eh consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:46, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Christina Gagnier

• Christina Gagnier → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California (districts 27–52)#District 40  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Political candidate who ran in but withdrew from the target election. Previously ran in 2014_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California#District_35. The 2014 election is probably a more primary topic since she actually received votes in it but I think readers would be better off with just the search results. मल्ल (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I would 100% agree to Delete for having withdrawn in 2026. With that being said, there is an argument for going back to 2014 and I would Support that. She was a notable candidate in that race, after all, and advanced to the general election. PickleG13 (talk) 21:57, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Ralstonite

• Ralstonite → Ralstonism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As far as I can see on Google, "ralstonite" is mostly a reference to the mineral and not to the social movement. Likewise, the links from Wikipedia all refer to the mineral and not to the social movement, and one link was removed from Misti because it was pointing at the mineral but became a link to the impertinent social movement. Currently the mineral has no page Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Arthur Dixon (American Politician)

• Arthur Dixon (American Politician) → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California (districts 27–52)#District 34  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Political candidate who has ran in 2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California_(districts_27–52)#District_34 and 2022_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Texas#District_30, neither of which is the primary topic. मल्ल (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I created an original redirect for this candidate, when the 2026 election was ongoing. I did not redirect it to its current destination, which was redirected by User:Ahecht. I don't have much of an opinion here, since the candidate was not particularly notable, but generally redirecting to the most recent election is helpful for readers. PickleG13 (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Perfect Kind of Us

• Perfect Kind of Us → No Angels discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, and I cannot find a connection either from search engines. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 15:25, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, it apparently doesn't exist.

Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 19:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Pretty Girls "Say Hi"

• Pretty Girls "Say Hi" → Em xinh "say hi"  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Self-translated name and therefore implausible as a redirect. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 07:06, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

External search result show this translation was used, albeit rarely, outside Wikipedia before the creation of the article (eg. ).

It was also the title of the article until the nominator moved it recently, and there are still incoming internal links. If the article is going to remain at the current title, Pretty Girls "Say Hi" season 1 should also be moved. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:28, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:05, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Sourcing using the translated name does exist. Even though it's not official, it has enough common usage to be a plausible redirect. मल्ल (talk) 16:22, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Hot Bros "Say Hi"

• Hot Bros "Say Hi" → Anh trai "say hi"  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Self-translated name and therefore implausible as a redirect. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 07:06, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

External search result show this translation was used, albeit rarely, outside Wikipedia before the creation of the article (eg. ).

It was also the title of the article until the nominator moved it recently, and there are still incoming internal links. If the article is going to remain at the current title, Hot Bros "Say Hi" season 1 should also be moved. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:26, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

I wouldn't count that YouTube video as a source. The same phrase is translated differently in other video titles, so these are probably LLM translations provided by YouTube: Hot Bro “Say Hi”, Hot Bros Say Hi, Brother Say Hi. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 18:23, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

I was also concerned these were automatic translations, however, regardless of where it came from, if a reader finds the video with that title they'll look up the show using that translation.

The redirect was newly created, it was created by a move, and there are still incoming links to the new title; these factors make it difficult to judge if people are actually searching this by looking at the traffic stats. Could be better renominate the redirect later if the traffic dies off and stays dead after the incoming links are updated post-move, rather than rushing to delete now on the assumption that no-one would find it helpful. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 00:30, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:05, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Butu language (Central African Republic)

• Butu language (Central African Republic) → Naba language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see any evidence that there is a language called "Butu" in the Central African Republic. Searching Ethnologue reveals that there is a language called "Butu", but it corresponds to the Gamo-Ningi language, which is in Nigeria, not CAR. Trying the Joshua Project or Glottolog reveals no matches. So I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

That would leave a red link at the V&V page that identifies the languages in that source, which was the basis for Ethnologue. It would just have to be recreated. — kwami (talk) 04:37, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

In that case, why not retarget to Gamo-Ningi language (as Ethnologue suggests) instead? Duckmather (talk) 20:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:57, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, unmentioned, no evidence of existence. "That would leave a red link at the V&V page that identifies the languages in that source, which was the basis for Ethnologue. It would just have to be recreated." makes absolutely no sense. No, it wouldn't have to be recreated. A red link in project space is no reason to maintain a bad redirect in main space. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:34, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Evidence of existence has been provided through Ethnologue. The unmentioned problem could just as easily be resolved with an addition to the target article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:43, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I have added the mention. Duckmather (talk) 21:21, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

But it also doesn't resolve the problem that the Central African Republic isn't mentioned, so unless one of y'all can get a copy of Voegelin and Voegelin (1977) and cite that, I still think this redirect is worth deletion because of the wrong-country problem. Duckmather (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Trump TV

• Trump TV → Real News Update  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Something actually called "Trump TV" has been launched, so this redirect is not very useful anymore. Source: (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/22/trump-launches-youtube-channel-amid-boycott-by-us-networks) TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 14:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I would like to wait until later in the week and see if Trump TV turns into an article or if it's just a YouTube livestream that blows over. Agreed that redirect is now unsuitable - someone searching it is unlikely to want the 2017-2020 webcast. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 15:03, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Donald Trump's conflict with the news media for now. If it solidifies, there will be an article on the topic so this discussion will end up being moot. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:09, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Donald Trump's conflict with the news media per Tavix. Funcrunch (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Donald Trump's conflict with the news media#CNN, MS NOW, Politico, where it is mentioned, and add {{R from television program}} and Category:Donald Trump and social media. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 18:10, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

A.M.P.

• A.M.P. → AIM (album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Deletion, nothing links to the page, it's redirecting part of the name of an album track to the parent album, which seems pointless otherwise every abbreviation of every track on every successful album ever would require a redirect page/link and the whole thing would get cluttered up In Vitrio (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to the disambiguation page Amp, where there are multiple articles listed with the acronym AMP. मल्ल (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

5'9"

• 5'9" → Royce da 5'9"  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Yes, his stage name is Royce da 5'9". However, there is no indication that he goes by just "5'9"". Vague and unhelpful, and I don't think we should endorse cutting off 66% off of a stage name to create a redirect. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:51, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to 5 Foot 9? -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:08, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Since he does occasionally refer to himself as 5'9", then this is a plausible redirect for someone to search. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:31, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete or retarget. He does occasionally refer to himself as "5'9"" (or related nicknames like "Nickel Nine") in his lyrics, but not prominently enough that someone would plausibly be searching for Royce by entering "5'9"" alone. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• retarget per Tavix --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Are the self references enough to keep this redirect over retargeting to 5 Foot 9?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

List Of Levels In WarioWare: Smooth Moves

• List Of Levels In WarioWare: Smooth Moves → WarioWare: Smooth Moves  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

no list present. the pre-blar content was unsourced cruft... written... entirely in titlecase... poor grammar be damned, this should be its own csd!! consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 12:07, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Former fancruft. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 12:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete The page's previous incarnation violated WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. I don't think any would argue it should be kept. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:29, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Fire suppression agent FS 49 C2®

• Fire suppression agent FS 49 C2® → Clean agent FS 49 C2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not necessary unlikely to be used Isla🏳️‍⚧ 11:27, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

50 State Quarters® Program

• 50 State Quarters® Program → 50 State quarters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not necessary unlikely to be used Isla🏳️‍⚧ 11:21, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Gemstone ridge

• Gemstone ridge → IMDb  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at or clear connection to target. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 11:19, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. "Gemstone Ridge" is a fictitious Western which appears in an advert for IMDb, but that advert isn't sufficiently notable to appear in our article on the site. Tevildo (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Five Nights at Freddy's: Survival Crew

• Five Nights at Freddy's: Survival Crew → List of Roblox games#Five Nights at Freddy's: Survival Crew  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Football Fusion → List_of_Roblox_games#Football_Fusion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Star Baker → List_of_Roblox_games#Star_Baker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Games not mentioned at target. No history of note. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Top 10 Most Visited Roblox Experiences

• Top 10 Most Visited Roblox Experiences → List of Roblox games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Most Visited Roblox Experiences → List of Roblox games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Draft:Most Visited Roblox Experiences → List of Roblox games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The list mentions visit counts but it is not strictly a page for the most visited Roblox experiences, e.g. if a game gets a lot of visits but is not notable, it will not be mentioned. Not sold on the value of these redirects. They are all tagged as being from page moves. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Card-en-Ciel

• Card-en-Ciel → Inti Creates  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:REDDEAL to encourage article creation. This game is notable and an article is needed, and the target does not talk about the game comprehensively so it is not useful to redirect to. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:33, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

We Are for the Wild Places

• We Are for the Wild Places → We are for the Wild Places  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Deletion of the redirect so the main article can have the correct capitalisation. XlosVSM (talk) 05:09, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Benny Yahu

• Benny Yahu → Benjamin Netanyahu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

no evidence of an established or useful alias Pascuet (talk) 04:19, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Not on yahoo

• Not on yahoo → Benjamin Netanyahu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Appears to be word play, not an established nickname Pascuet (talk) 04:16, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, unable to find any usage. मल्ल (talk) 21:45, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Weird puns aren't within the scope of the purpose of redirects. I did find some usage on social media (eg. Reddit: , ; both examples are hyphenated), but it seems very uncommon. I doubt someone would seriously search this to look up Netanyahu. I assume this is some form of algospeak, but if that is what this is it's not mentioned in that article so could be surprising if someone actually did expect this to redirect to Netanyahu. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:40, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete and WP:DAFTify per the above Duckmather (talk) 02:34, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Western media bias

• Western media bias → Media bias  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target which mentions "West" once. Arguably this couild also be covered under Western media, or better, have a deciated article. Right now we don't have a good article to cover it. Maybe a disambig between the current arget and Western media could be considered, although I am not convinced this is a correct use a disambig. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:18, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Media imperialism isn't quite right, but it's a closely related topic. Leaning towards retargeting there. J947 ‡ ^edits 00:26, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete While individual Western news outlets have shown bias at some times, some drastically more than others, and in varying ways, this redirect implies that the Western media in general has bias, which is more of a conspiracy theory or what a dictatorship might push about the West. I don't think it's proper as a redirect without qualification. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:43, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  Conspiracy theory??? It's just observing a sociological trend. You can find plenty of papers on Scholar discussing Western bias in journalism and the media. Maybe you find these views disagreeable, which is fine, but they generally come organically from academia and left-coded social criticism. Discussing Western bias in the media isn't fringe or some propaganda project of anti-Western regimes. Even Wikipedia has WP:Systemic bias, which notes a bias towards American and European (ie. Western) perspectives and a systemic underrepresentation of the Global South. Of-course it's just an essay, so not formally part of the guidelines and you may disagree with its analysis and interpretations, but it's not fringe nonsense. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:26, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  I realised after writing this reply that the title could be read in two ways, but reading in the broader way just makes "conspiracy theory" an even stranger comparison. It's not fringe to suggest that Western media has at least some systemic biases. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:19, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  This redirect does not say "Western media systemic bias", but "Western media bias", which is more loaded without qualification and suggests a deliberate attempt to manipulate the media. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:22, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete for lack of anywhere helpful to actually redirect to. Looking at all the hits on Wikipedia for "Western bias", none of those pages stood out as good target. Media imperialism isn't the same topic. Eurocentrism (target of Western-centrism) has plenty of coverage of "Western" biases but has very little to say about the media or journalism. News mentions pro-corporate bias in Western media, but not pro-Western bias. Reading it as "[Western media] bias ("bias in Western media") rather than "Western [media bias]" ("media bias favouring the West") broadens the scope to any systemic biases in Western media. The natural target would be Western media, except the critiques of Western media given there does not (yet) include substantial coverage of systemic biases. Search results are probably the best option here until relevant coverage is added somewhere for either interpretation. The ambiguity in the scope of the title doesn't help with picking a target. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

The Engine Inspector

• The Engine Inspector → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete as unhelpful. Even at the time of creation, its then target did not have this character, although there was a section on "Railway Inspectors", which was also removed by the time the target itself became a redirect. Not that this will be a good redirect because of the "The", there is also no engine inspector at List of railway industry occupations if we're looking at an ATD. Jay 02:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

September 21

Krung Thep Maha Nakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayutthaya Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet Mahasathan Amon Phiman Awatan Sathit Sakkathattiya Witsanukam Prasit Bravo A.F.C.

• Krung Thep Maha Nakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayutthaya Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet Mahasathan Amon Phiman Awatan Sathit Sakkathattiya Witsanukam Prasit Bravo A.F.C. → Bangkok F.C.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Clearly implausible misnomer for a football club (substituting "Bangkok" with the city's ceremonial name). — RAVENPVFF · talk · 22:41, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. No links in article space, not mentioned in the target article, zero Google hits other than this redirect and, very obviously, nobody is ever going to type all that into the search box. My first thought was that it was made by somebody taking the piss but a quick look at their other contributions suggests otherwise. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:27, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  let's try getting info from the source~

  @Dancing Hippos so, what's the origin of this name? consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 12:10, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  I looked into the article history and when it was first added by Dancing Hippos back in 2023, it was described as a publicity stunt. The claim needs a citation, but even if verified, I don't think the stunt name would be appropriate for a redirect anyway. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Implausible search term. मल्ल (talk) 04:13, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Becky Lonergan

• Becky Lonergan → List of England women's international footballers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Never played for England at senior level so unclear why this redirect is in place Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:48, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. Probably notable I reckon. Information is scattered between 1993–94 Arsenal L.F.C. season, 1994–95 Arsenal L.F.C. season, and 1995–96 Arsenal L.F.C. season, all of which are accessible from search results. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - she was on the list at the time that I created the redirect. That said, the reference used doesn't seem to support Lonergan actually having an England cap so perhaps removing her was correct. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Te Iringa Marae

• Te Iringa Marae → Kaikohe  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are two marae with this name, this could be a dab page but with only two topics, neither of which have more than a sentence I'm unsure how helpful it'd be. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Te Iringa

• Te Iringa → Ōpōtiki#Marae  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Te Iringa is the name of a locality https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/42436 as well as four different hills. The locality is presumed notable per NGEO and I doubt a marae is the primary topic (it isn't even the only marae with this name!)

Suggest return to red in absence of any suitable target. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Southern Virgin Islands

• Southern Virgin Islands → United States Virgin Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Went many pages deep into a google search, do not see the phrase used. No sourcing as to where the line is drawn. See other RFD below for Northern VIs. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:00, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Roller sports at the 2026 Asian Games

• Roller sports at the 2026 Asian Games → 2026 Asian Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are no roller sports mentioned at the target, so it is not clear if there are any roller sports at the 2026 Asian Games. While skateboarding has previously been categorized as a roller sport, it does not appear to be at this iteration of the Asian Games, thus this should likely be deleted. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 19:06, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

I should have redirected it to this article: Skateboarding at the 2026 Asian Games. Yes, there is skateboarding at the 2026 Asian games. Wil540 art (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I phrased the nomination statement poorly. What I meant to say is that, from my research, at the 2026 Asian Games, skateboarding is not classified as a roller sport. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 02:07, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

This is an interesting point highlighting regional differences. In some countries, skateboarding is grouped into a rollerskate federation. In others, they’re independent. If skateboarding is not a roller sport, what is. Wil540 art (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Skateboarding at the 2026 Asian Games. Signahistar (talk) 10:59, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Northern Virgin Islands

• Northern Virgin Islands → British Virgin Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Northern Virgin Islands appear to refer to BVI as well as St. Thomas and St. John. This is either better as its own article per WP:REDYES, or deleted to prevent confusion. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 18:55, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – Went many pages deep into a google search, do not see the phrase used. No sourcing as to where the line is drawn.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Camille, Louisiana

• Camille, Louisiana → Delcambre, Louisiana  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While it seems that per GNIS this is in Delcambre, it's not mentioned at the target and without a mention it's arguably more confusing to users than it is helpful. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 18:53, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Mozilla Deer Park

• Mozilla Deer Park → Firefox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

really oddly specific project to have found passing mentions of and literally nothing else. the closest i found to info was one paper comparing other mozilla stuff's functions to things deer park also did (which didn't even actually describe what dp did lmao) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Firefox version history#Firefox 1.5, which explains this code name. - Eureka Lott 01:51, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Bibi the Butcher

• Bibi the Butcher → Benjamin Netanyahu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unestablished pejorative epithet for a living person. Delete Pascuet (talk) 17:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• I've seen it used on social media, but that's self-research. The nickname is used in some opinion pieces when you Google it, so Keep (The National Line) (The Salt Lake Tribune]) Pinoccappuccino (talk) 17:52, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, this is libel. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 18:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  It is not libel; libel is a deliberate or negligent publishing of something false. This epithet is an opinion, which people are allowed to have. Our only question is if this is a possible search term. 331dot (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. It's not libel, but we also shouldn't have it if it's not mentioned at the target, per the usual arguments. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:15, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as Bibi is mentioned as his nickname in the lead. The term doesn't need to be included verbatim if it is obvious why it redirects there. plenty of uses of the term and it cannot refer to anyone else. I cannot see a scenario of someone searching this and being confused as to why they ended up where they did. I am not against revisiting this in a few months if pageviews show that this redirect isn't being used. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as {{r from pejorative}}. As Pinoccappuccino notes, it has appeared in the news and on social media so I see no reason to think it wouldn't be plausible, especially as "butcher" is also a very common pejorative with a long and well-established history of use for politicians and officials. Finding examples of such redirects on Wikipedia is trivial (eg. Jamal the Butcher, The Butcher of Beijing, Butcher of Bengal). It's unambiguous and I agree with Traumnovelle that this would not be a surprising target; also not against leaving this open for renomination in a few months if the traffic shows no discernable usage. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 13:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Butcher of Gaza

• Butcher of Gaza → Benjamin Netanyahu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unestablished pejorative epithet for a living person. Delete Pascuet (talk) 17:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, potentially libelous. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Used by the President of Türkiye on national television. (Middle East Eye) (Reuters) Pinoccappuccino (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. "Libelous" isn't so much a concern, but being unmentioned is, as in the previous nomination. That it was used by someone doesn't matter; there has to be something in the target about it. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:16, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Butcher (nickname) this also refers to Antony Blinken and probably others. Its not unambiguous to be a good non-neutral redirect to an individual. Blinken should be mentioned at the target if this is closed as retarget. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Butcher (nickname) LincolnMagnus (talk) 02:25, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Mozilla Firefox's

• Mozilla Firefox's → Firefox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

standard possessive form redirect. check the incoming links of "delete's" to see previous consensus if you feel like it consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I can't see any point in this redirect. People searching will find the right article easily enough without it as Mozilla Firefox already exists as a, rather more plausible/useful, redirect. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:57, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Matthew John Stewart

• Matthew John Stewart → Clara Stewart  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article provides no information on Matthew John Stewart other than the fact that he was married to Clara Stewart. Because of that, I think the redirect is unhelpful and should be deleted LincolnMagnus (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. It mentions that he was a pathologist, that he married her in 1913 and that he died in 1956. That's not much but it is better than nothing. If anybody searches for him then getting redirected here will at least give them something. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Honghe railway station

• Honghe railway station → Mile–Mengzi high-speed railway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Requested action: deletion. For some reason, the (uncreated) article of this railway station redirects to the article of the railway it is on. This is misleading and useless. SpectralIon 01:01, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as mentioned at target and an {{R from subtopic}} or {{R to related topic}}, without prejudice to creation as an article if it is notable. Also add a {{Redirect}} hatnote for Honghe station, a metro station in Chengdu, and a {{Distinguish}} hatnote vice versa. Fork99 (talk) 01:07, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

  My main issue with Honghe being redirected is that 1. No other Chinese high-speed rail station articles (that I have discovered) are redirects to the railway they are on and 2. Many Chinese high-speed rail stations, even for small areas like Honghe, are independent articles. If there was a precedent for this, I would be fine with it. SpectralIon 20:36, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

  This sounds like an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. I've found Wulongquan East railway station and Xinzheng East railway station which redirect to Beijing–Guangzhou high-speed railway, although these are the result of a WP:BLAR (blank and redirect), whereas Honghe railway station has always been a redirect. As someone familiar with Australian railway stations, there are hundreds of similar redirects to their respective railway lines or to the town they are in, I don't know about globally though. Fork99 (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 00:03, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - per Fork99. Wheatley2 (speak to me) (watch me) 02:19, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Fork99. The WP:RCIRCULAR link at the target should be evaluated. It should probably be removed unless this is an {{R with possibilities}}, although if that is the case then maybe this should in fact be deleted per WP:RETURNTORED. But per the current situation, keeping this redirect is reasonable. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:09, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Railway stations are generally notable, and this redirect actively discourages article creation. The target mentions it, but only briefly: in an image caption and the fact that the line terminates there. Better to delete the article. Nyttend (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:00, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. The last 3 !votes make an argument that this should be deleted to encourage article creation, and so far these arguments have not been rebutted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 16:31, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Nostalgia bait

• Nostalgia bait → 2026 is the new 2016  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Search engine results indicate the term is not exclusively connected with the 2026 phenomenon. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:56, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, this could apply to nostalgia for any year from any time. Shocksingularity (talk) 23:36, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Notecardforfree (talk) 08:54, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Glossary of 2020s slang#N I added a preliminary entry to the glossary, which could be expanded later. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:05, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Glossary of 2020s slang#N (or create an anchor and retarget to that) per Miminity. The definition of a slightly different form of the term has been given there, and this redirect could help readers find it. Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Nostalgia#As an advertising tool, which is more pertinent than the glossary entry. Add some mention of the term "nostalgia bait" therein. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'd be fine with this if a mention gets added. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:42, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the newly suggested target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Nostalgia#As an advertising tool per zxcvbnm; seems more pertinent than the glossary entry, which is too short to adequately explain the context. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 22:46, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

I second this. Moonliner72 (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is anyone willing to add a mention to Nostalgia#As an advertising tool?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Glossary of 2020s slang#N, where the term is explained, at least in the short term. I think this serves readers better than retargeting to an article purely about advertising, particularly as the term is not even mentioned there. This is not specifically about advertising, although that is a part of it. In the longer term I think that there is maybe a 50% change that we will eventually have a valid article specifically about nostalgia bait (as a phenomenon) or nostalgia baiting (as a practice) in the future. If we let the glossary entry expand as required then it will become clear if and when that should happen. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Altynbekova Sabina

• Altynbekova Sabina → Kazakhstan women's national volleyball team#Junior  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Sabina Altynbekova → 2018 VTV9 – Binh Dien International Women's Volleyball Cup#Awards  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the first target, nor should it be. Sum total of the text at the second target is an unsourced "Miss Volleyball" and a readymade salt-evading redlink. Any suggestion - let alone a completely unreasoned one, as at the previous rfd - that the latter is in any manner appropriate should be read in the context of the very contentious Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabina Altynbekova. Trivial passing mentions in three other articles. None of the five are in the least suitable as a redirect target from this title. Delete to let search take over. —Cryptic 21:09, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect - Redirect both to 2018 VTV9 – Binh Dien International Women's Volleyball Cup#Awards, as the listing is now sourced. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
  • To one source that doesn't mention the award at all, and another that has less than a sentence about it. Which is beside the point, since you still haven't given any reason why this target is better than any of the other trivial mentions - the search prompted by a redlink would show them all. —Cryptic 00:04, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

    Sabina's win is SOURCED. The redirect was discussed very recently, and was ruled upon as retarget, so this instead of a deletion review, is kind of an abuse of process. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:11, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

    (At least) one of the other trivial factlets is also sourced, and all three are less demeaning, and no more or less appropriate as a target. Deletion review would never in a thousand years endorse the previous rfd, between your entirely unmotivated bare vote - and you have still given no reason to redirect to this target - and the improper non-admin closure, but if you insist we can take it there and leave this dismissive redirect in limbo for another month or so after it inevitably sends it back here. —Cryptic 15:00, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

    I am OK with deletion review. The actual retarget itself was performed by an administrator, which demonstrated that two people did not disagree with the retarget. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:22, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Sabarmati Junction (SBT) railway station

• Sabarmati Junction (SBT) railway station → Sabarmati Junction railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a procedural nomination of behalf of ROLEXMEENA who attempted to RfD this in July but did not edit the daily RfD log. ROLEXMEENA created this as a self-reverted {{R from move}}, see Special:Diff/1363953523. Note that they're blocked for sockpuppetry, but this account is the sockmaster so WP:G5 doesn't apply. Maybe WP:G7, but it's unclear what they wanted. I know G7 isn't usually applied to page moves if the mover wasn't the only contributor to all pages, but this was a self-reverted move over redirect that lasted 18 minutes.

"SBT" is mentioned in the article for what it's worth, so seems plausible. So I don't think WP:G6 applies nor is this recently created for WP:R3. Fork99 (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as plausible and harmless per nom. SBT is mentioned in and without brackets for the station at the target. Jay 15:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Rudy Holiday

• Rudy (Deltarune) → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Rudy Holiday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rudolph Holiday → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Rudy Holiday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rudy Holiday → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Rudy Holiday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirects of a fictional character not mentioned at target. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 05:12, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment He is an actual character in the game, but he is most likely unmentioned in that list because he was deemed not significant enough Mr slav999 (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, but he never had a section to begin with. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 18:32, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget all to List of fictional ungulates#Video games (or create an anchor and retarget to that), where he has an entry. Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:20, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: What do you think of my retarget suggestion, @Organhaver? Chess enjoyer (talk) 21:41, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm more neutral on it. There's no citations in the entry (although unsure if that is even needed) and it's only one very short sentence (but regardless better than the current target). Thank you for asking. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 22:28, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules.

• This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules. → X (social network)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely to be useful for readers to search A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete - not mentioned at target, not a likely search even when its official name was Twitter. PS the creator of this redirect got blocked in 2025, so user Talk page message is unlikely to do much. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

They're only blocked from creating pages, but they haven't edited since April 2025. Fork99 (talk) 04:36, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. The creator made lots of unhelpful redirects that don't make much sense. Almost certainly nobody is ever going to search Wikipedia for that phrase and, if they ever do, they won't find this redirect helpful to them. It's not actively harmful but let's get rid of it for tidiness. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• According to X itself, this is still the message given for deleted postings. (I can't check directly, since it doesn't like my primary browser, and with my alternate wants me to create account and sign in before viewing anything; I refuse.) I'd think anyone who types this into our searchbox is probably looking for our article on Censorship by X. —Cryptic 23:00, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  That just looks like a help page that hasn't been updated since 2017. Although, you raise an interesting point about retargeting, even if "censorship" is a heavy term for a lot of tweets that get removed (e.g. spam and scams). Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to allow more time to discuss the retarget suggestion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:20, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I doubt someone would search this and even if they did I doubt they'd include a full stop at the end. That's not how Wikipedia works, nor a common way to search for things. People don't even consistently use full stops on social media when talking to other humans, why would they do it for a search bar?
  I'm also not persuaded by the Censorship by Twitter suggestion. As far as I know, Twitter was mostly criticised for alledgedly censoring by shadowbanning or account suspensions rather than by deleting posts. Those are both topics mentioned at Censorship by X. Deleting individual posts in a censorious way isn't really mentioned at all. In fact the only time the article mentions deleting tweets is in a section about Russian pressure to do so, with Twitter's initial response instead being to selectively block accounts, only eventually removing content after Roskomnadzor kept up the pressure. Even if a reader was looking for this message in relation to censorship, contrary to Twitter's reputation (or at least my memory of it), the article offers nothing helpful. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 16:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

2-valued morphism

• 2-valued morphism → Ultrafilter#Ultrafilter on a Boolean algebra  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Probably delete. The target is reasonable for 2-valued morphisms specifically in the category of Boolean algebras. I don't see any relevance to 2-valued morphisms generally, nor any reason to believe that as a search term or a link target it should be taken as understood that the category is Boolean algebras. It's true that Google searches currently give this meaning but I expect that's an artifact of the Wikipedia structure.
Disclosure: This redirect was a retarget in lieu of a PROD, so I'm not sure whether RFD or AFD is the better venue. Trovatore (talk) 23:00, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

• As I wrote on the PROD message, this Google scholar query doesn't indicate any substantial use of “2-valued morphism” in the mathematical literature. I agree that it's fine to delete it. The only reason I could see for keeping it is keeping hyperlinks to Wikipedia working, as the page was quite old, but it was also very bad. Jean Abou Samra (talk) 23:11, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm changing my mind from mildly undecided to delete. Jean Abou Samra (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• I just redirected because Jean Abou Samra suggested it in the PROD rationale; no opinion on whether it's an appropriate redirect. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:22, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: PRODed, ineligible for soft deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 00:06, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm changing my mind from mildly undecided to delete. (Sorry for the duplicate comment, forgot that new comments should be added below this one.) Jean Abou Samra (talk) 12:19, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• @Miminity Sorry, I don't understand, what do you mean by "PRODed, ineligible for soft deletion"? Jean Abou Samra (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  This nomination lacks enough participants to establish consensus but there is no one opposing the deletion and it will be treated as an expired PROD thus will be deleted under WP:SOFTDELETE but this was PRODed before thus not eligible for soft deletion. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:35, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  What a bore. This redirect really should be deleted, but no one cares very much, including me. Still I feel some sort of responsibility to follow the process through. What happens if no one comments again? --Trovatore (talk) 20:35, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• This was not a declined PROD. It was simply redirected in lieu of deletion, like an AfD closing as redirect. RfD is perfectly able to delete the redirect left behind in either case. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:06, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  I mean, it is still technically a declined proposed deletion and it just WP:BLARed Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:40, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  For what it's worth, the person who did that doesn't seem to feel strongly about keeping it (see Extraordinary Writ's comment above). --Trovatore (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, or is AfD the better venue?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 14:58, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I suppose procedurally it might be correct to un-BLAR it, then send it to AfD, given that there used to be content there. But this feels a bit silly. No one has said they actively want to keep it, not even the person who removed the PROD. I'll do the AfD if I must, but I think it would make more sense to just delete it as unopposed. --Trovatore (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Multiple variations of Trans Sahara slave trade

• Trans Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Trans sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• SubSahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Subsahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Transsahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Trans-sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Trans-Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Transsaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• TransSaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Subsaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• SubSaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-saharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Dozens of redirects with minor spelling differences by blocked user. See other mass redirect discussions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 9#Eu Commission v Hungary. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 14:27, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

as a heads-up, massxfd can make the process of nomming multiple redirects at once a little easier, and avoid cluttering talk pages consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 14:37, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep most, as despite being made by a blocked editor a lot of these are uncontroversially reasonable spelling variations. It's trivial to find variation in hyphenation between "trans-saharan"/"sub-subsaharan" and "transsaharan"/"subsaharan" on Scholar and Google Books; redirects where this is the only difference are fine and are useful for both searches and internal linking. Variation between "Saharan" and "Sahara" also seems generally fine; eg. "trans-saharan slave trade" and "trans-sahara slave trade" both yield results on Google Books. Searching for "[the] Sahara slave trade" shows that the unprefixed "Sahara" is also plausible variation.

Delete redirects where the hyphen is replaced by a space, as I don't see much evidence that this is common in my external search results and this isn't conventional for English in general. Seems more like an SEO technique than plausible language.

Delete redirects which capitalise Sahara mid-word without a hyphen ("transSaharan", "subSaharan"). These are entirely unnecessary for searching (the search engine ignores case whenever possible and will redirect you even if no explicit redirect exists; try a search for TraNs-SaHaRan sLave trAde) and are worse than useless for linking as they're incorrect but appear in blue, making unintended use easier. I strongly suspect these titles reflect how sometimes hyphens get omitted in, eg, previews extracted from pages on Google Books, even when they're present on the actual page itself. This is something a machine would do. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:24, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Temporal clause

• Temporal clause → Temporal clause (Latin)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I assume the undisambiguated phrase should just point at Adverbial clause. Not sure why that article does not mention the "technical" Latin-derived terms though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:17, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There's a currently open RM that may end up moving the destination article. I don't currently anticipate that the RM result is likely to have any direct effect on this redirect, but it's probably worth noting regardless. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:33, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I notified the RM
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:35, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Boobies (breasts)

• Boobies (breasts) → Breast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Procedural nomination on behalf of @Mechanikin whose attempt did not tag the redirect and placed a malformed section at the bottom of the daily log page. Their original nomination is as follows: Fork99 (talk) 13:26, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Implausible search term, and not more useful than "Breast" as piped link or displayed text. Mechanikin (talk page) 12:46, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

It's a plausible search term. I can type in "boobies" and click "Boobies (breasts)" and get to the right article. If it were deleted, I have to go to booby and then, using the hatnote, booby (disambiguation). And it's a 13-year-old redirect.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 06:28, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:31, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Leaning keep as harmless, given that Boobies in fact points to a kind of bird. BD2412 T 16:06, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Strong delete in the spirit of WP:X1. Absolutely beyond implausible. Someone would have to want to search for "boobies", but for fear that they'd sent to the article about the bird (which already has a hatnote to the dab page), they'd have to manually add in the disambiguator for the proper name. At which point, why wouldn't they have just searched for that in the first place? I mean, come on. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:29, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per BD2412. This is not a Neelix redirect so X1 is irrelevant. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  It might as well be. I think I've pretty well demonstrated how utterly useless this is, while "harmless" isn't really a valid reason to keep. You need to demonstrate some plausible utility too, and no reasonable person can argue that. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – This sounds like a call for an RFC to remove any and all parenthetical disambiguators. Until such a time, this is as valid a search term as any other. When I type in "boobies", three article entries appear: the bird, this topic, and some bracelets. You do not need to type in a disambiguator.. wiki gives it to you.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:09, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: Some people find this useful and it's harmless. I don't see any benefit to deletion. Chess enjoyer (talk) 21:55, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Lean keep. I'm sympathetic to Deacon Vorbis's point, but the all-time traffic since 2015 is >3,600 which shows that counter-intuitively it has seen some use. I suspect this traffic is partly explainable by it being linked somewhere as a a piped link or on a disambiguation page somewhere since the traffic noticeably falls off after January, 2023, when I assume the link(s) was(/were) removed. Even then, the traffic since 2023 is within the margin of error for what I would expect from an implausible redirect since 2015 not 2023, so I'm not convinced the traffic was driven entirely by old internal links that no longer exist. I'm inclined to agree with Chess enjoyer. People have used it before, maybe they'll use it again; what's the benefit to deleting? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 14:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library/Playstation 2 Offical Magazine - UK

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library/Playstation 2 Offical Magazine - UK → Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library/Playstation 2 Official Magazine - UK  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Useless redirect to an obscure subpage in Wikipedia namespace. Go D. Usopp (talk) 12:39, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Physical map

• Physical map → Map#Map types and projections  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous term. I thought of a paper map, incoming links are split between the genomics meaning and the cartographical meaning (a map of the physical territory rather than political borders). Delete or disambig? There's a dab page in the history. See also Political map, which I am not bundling but which is similarly fuzzy. Rusalkii (talk) 22:42, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget - I'm pretty familiar with map terminology, because I just re-wrote the map article (GA, now going thru FAC). The term "physical map" is very rarely used, so it certainly does not deserve an article. Many important sources do not mention it at all:

• The Glossary of the Mapping Sciences published by American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - has no mention of "physical map"
• The ESRI GIS dictionary - has no mention of "physical map"

So what does (did) the term "physical map" designate? The History of Cartography (vol 6 "20th century") does mention it twice on page 107, where it has "...a gradual shift of emphasis from the general political and physical maps to topical maps including more demographic and environmental themes ...". See also p 51. It is clear from the usage in this source that a physical map focuses on topography and the physical surface of the earth, rather than man-made features, particularly political boundaries. Google, FWIW, agrees with that assessment. The modern term for a map that focuses on the physical features is topographic map.

Therefore, the best thing to do is to redirect physical map to topographic map. Noleander (talk) 00:00, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

• From 2003–2012 this was a dab page (link). J947 ‡ ^edits 04:12, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:36, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:45, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Not sure. Noleander's analysis does a good job of analysing solid sources, but when we're talking redirects, we also have to support casual usage that can't be documented, and I suspect that in that setting, "physical map" is used in contrast to electronic mapping, comparable to "snail mail" versus e-mail. (If anyone would study such terminology, it would likely be folklorists and linguists, not cartographers.) Most people will be aware of the existence of topographic maps, but most people will probably not expect this redirect to refer to them. I say "not sure" only because I don't know where we'd cover this sense; Electronic map redirects to Map. Nyttend (talk) 19:42, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 11:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Ben Small (actor)

• Ben Small (actor) → List of Thomas & Friends voice actors#Cast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An actor should not redirect to one role out of many. Either should be an article or a redlink if one can be written, or unlinked if not. Fram (talk) 10:41, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Gentlemen of Railway Board

• Gentlemen of Railway Board → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about these characters at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete as unhelpful, and also because of grammar (there should be a "the" before Railway Board).

This was an unsourced 5 sentence stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006 before being merged to its then target. However the section was removed as part of a mass purge by an IP two years later. Jay 05:35, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Medieval repair

• Medieval repair → Fringe theories about the Shroud of Turin#Medieval repair argument  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Extremely specific example of "medieval repair" does not seem like an appropriate target. ~ A412 ^talk! 05:10, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete. closest plausible target is probably Medieval technology but there are no good targets for this phrase there --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:04, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment As the creator of this redirect, I'm not 100% sure why I made it, over Medieval repair theory, the much more common name in the scholarship in my experience WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 12:29, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I am Adolf Hitler!

• I am Adolf Hitler! → Darth Vader vs. Hitler  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• I am Adolf Hitler → Darth Vader vs. Hitler  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Lyric not mentioned at target, hardly seems unique to target. ~ A412 ^talk! 05:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• ...delete per nom, and as not even the right punctuation in the context of the lyric consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 14:34, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment I bundled I am Adolf Hitler as well. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 17:43, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both. Confusing and unhelpful. Not obvious that it is a lyric. Unlikely that it is a lyric that anybody would search for. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - given how the lyric has stuck around as a meme, I think there is merit to keeping the redirect. The song's page maybe should get an addition talking about such meme usage. (However, given that such meme usage section isn't currently present, this is not a hill I'm willing to die on) LincolnMagnus (talk) 02:30, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Cities' alternative names

• Cities' alternative names → List of names of European cities in different languages  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Just because a city is not European doesn't mean that it can't have an alternative name. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Hm, Category:Alternative place names is the closest to what this term would be looking for, but that cat has no corresponding concept article. ~ A412 ^talk! 05:12, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

English city names

• English city names → List of names of European cities in different languages  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems like a rather strange target. Just because a city is not in Europe doesn't mean that there isn't a name in English. English exonyms provides some non-European examples of city names that are different in English. Lists of cities would be more general, including English names based on endonyms, though on the English Wikipedia, any lists of cities would be presumed to list city names in English. Also, English citiesEnglish cities redirects to City status in the United Kingdom, which doesn't list that many city names, but List of cities in the United Kingdom (of which List of cities in EnglandList of cities in England redirects to) mentions that there are 55 cities in England. Mathguy2718 (talk) 04:57, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak retarget to List of cities in England, maybe? Candidyeoman55 (talk) 16:28, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak delete as ambiguous given a DAB might not make sense given how vague it is. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Toponymy of England, which covers English place names. - Eureka Lott 01:47, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Weenie

• Weenie → Hot dog  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Weenies → Hot dog  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Move Weenie (disambiguation) to the base title; no primary topic. "Weenie" is just as likely to refer to a Vienna sausage. 162 etc. (talk) 03:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Agreed, but wouldn't WP:RM be the usual venue for this sort of discussion? Rosbif73 (talk) 06:19, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Wrong venue: If you want this redirect deleted so you can move the disambiguation page or perform a swap, then you're in the wrong place. Please open a requested move. Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:06, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  More specifically, follow the instructions for a potentially controversial single page move as it's not implausible that editors may dispute that there's no primary topic. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 02:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I bundled Weenies as well. If this does end up resulting in anything other than a WP:WV, it seems better to have these two intrinsically linked redirects discussed together. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 01:56, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

History of Chinese Revolution

• History of Chinese Revolution → Kita Ikki  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Currently redirects to the author of a book titled An Informal History of the Chinese Revolution, but could be ambiguous as someone could think it's a redirect to a Chinese history-related article. ~ lily ^{my tree} ~ 03:57, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Chinese Revolution (disambiguation). Signahistar (talk) 11:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  Yep, that's the page I was looking for. Couldn't find it when doing a quick search before nominating. ~ lily ^{my tree} ~ 14:20, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Chinese Revolution (disambiguation) per @Signahistar LincolnMagnus (talk) 02:31, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Minefield (trunk build)

• Minefield (trunk build) → Firefox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• I think a more applicable target would be Firefox version history? Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:52, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Chris Ahuja

• Chris Ahuja → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California#District 32  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Political candidate in 2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California_(districts_27–52)#District_32 and 2024_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California#District_32, neither is a primary topic. मल्ल (talk) 03:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Generally, it has been my understanding that candidates in a particular district tend to redirect to that election. If they are a perennial candidate, perhaps readers would be better off with the search results, but I would support Keep for 2026 here. PickleG13 (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Jonathan Wagoner

• Jonathan Wagoner → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California#District 26  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. Ballotpedia states that he did not make it onto the ballot and received no votes. मल्ल (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned at target and not on the ballot. Signahistar (talk) 11:05, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Absolutely Delete. When I had created this redirect, he was considered a candidate for the office and listed on Wikipedia here. Since he didn't qualify and is not even mentioned now, there is no argument. PickleG13 (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Malder

• Malder → Zoids#Overview  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Zoid is not mentioned in the target, or anywhere else onwiki. We have Joannes Malder and Van Malder, both redirects to people whose articles spell the surname differently (Malderus and van Maldere, respectively). There is also a smattering of hits for several Van Malders, none of which seem to have more than trivial mentions in the relevant articles. My primary topic by Google hits is the Zoid, followed by assorted miscellany. There is also the unrelated wikt:malder. I don't have a preference between deletion and disambiguation, or retargetting if someone can determine which not-actually-Malder is the primary topic.

Note that there's history which was merged to List of Zoids, see Unmentioned Zoids characters for context. Rusalkii (talk) 04:25, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 01:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 03:39, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Jim Shoemaker

• Jim Shoemaker → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California#District 9  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Political candidate in multiple elections, including 2024_California_State_Senate_election#District_5, 2026_California_State_Assembly_election#District_9, and 2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California_(districts_1–26)#District_9, none of which are a primary topic. Readers would be better off with the search results. मल्ल (talk) 03:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

This makes a lot of sense to me, User:मल्ल. I'll support Deletion for the redirect. Some of these redirects are especially useful when the election is ongoing, but they stop being so important when it's over. PickleG13 (talk) 21:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Sally Ride Space Telescope

• Sally Ride Space Telescope → James Webb Space Telescope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Harriet Tubman Space Telescope → James Webb Space Telescope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Just Wonderful Space Telescope (JWST) → James Webb Space Telescope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Just Wonderful Space Telescope → James Webb Space Telescope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of these at the target, delete –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:16, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Refine all to James Webb Space Telescope § Naming concerns, and preferably expand that section to mention these names. The naming of the telescope was a hot topic due to accusations that Webb was complicit in the Lavender Scare; Sally Ride and Harriet Tubman were put forward as alternatives after whom the telescope could be named, and Just Wonderful Space Telescope was subsequently invented as a backronym by those who objected to the naming. A little more detail can be found at James E. Webb § Controversy about telescope name, but the alternative names are not mentioned there either, and in any case the telescope's article would seem to be a more appropriate target than Webb. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:36, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  But they're still not mentioned, so refining there is still a problem. I'm skeptical that they should be, either...it just feels like excessive minutiae that isn't all that vital to get the main point across. In fact, some (all?) of those were mentioned around the time of redirect creation, but subsequently removed, and I think for good reason. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:26, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  I have expanded the section slightly to include those names and a bit more context. I think there was wide enough reporting in reliable sources of the controversy to warrant a couple more sentences. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 14:37, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Ify

• Ify → Ify Alyssa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ify Alyssa is not the only person whose given name is Ify. The disambiguation page IFY also mentions that ify is ISO 639-3 code for Kalanguya language, but the disambiguation page doesn't mention other people with the same given name, some of whom use "Ify" with quotation marks. Mathguy2718 (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to IFY and add people with the given name there. It needs a bit of beefing up, so there's no cause for two separate dab pages. Maybe IFY should be moved to Ify instead. J947 ‡ ^edits 05:29, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to IFY per J947 --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:38, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Move IFY to Ify and add lowercase name senses. BD2412 T 16:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

September 20

Black Wednesday (2025)

• Black Wednesday (2025) → Liberation Day tariffs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Black Wednesday" is not mentioned anywhere in the target page, or in the related page 2025 stock market crash. I didn't find any sources making the connection. The creator cited in their edit summary

• https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/will-liberation-day-be-a-black-wednesday-stock-market-braces-for-trump-tariffs/vi-AA1C613W which is now a dead link and doesn't appear in the wayback machine, but the url suggests it was speculative
• https://www.euronews.com/business/2024/12/19/stocks-tumble-as-federal-reserves-tilt-triggers-black-wednesday which is an article from 2024 unrelated to tariffs

-- the wub "?!" 22:30, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. I can't find any evidence that "Black Wednesday" is a term used to refer to anything related to this subject. Katzrockso (talk) 03:57, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above editors' findings --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:04, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

N−1

• N−1 → Pocklington n − 1 primality test  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• P−1 → Pollard's p − 1 algorithm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• P + 1 → Williams's p + 1 algorithm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These random snippets of mathematical notation occur in countless places. There is no reason to think that a person putting them in the search bar would be looking for these particular, rather obscure, targets, as opposed to n+1, N-1 Victory, Kawasaki P-1, etc. In the case of n - 1, the title of the article didn't even include this phrase until the redirect creator added it last week. --JBL (talk) 22:30, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

See P − 1 and P+1, which are created by others. Athina241 (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

I would also support deleting those, for the same reasons. --JBL (talk) 17:04, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget N−1 to N1, and P−1 to P1. Both of those disambiguation pages already include "-1" variations. No opinion on P + 1. BD2412 T 13:11, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Dillon Paulson

• Dillon Paulson → Detroit Tigers minor league players#Dillon Paulson  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This player has been out of baseball for several years and is no longer mentioned at target page so it should be deleted. Spanneraol (talk) 22:27, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Really the content should have been unmerged and then the article put up for PROD, but sure delete the redirect now. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:38, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

That's what I would normally do.. but it was just deleted from the source a few years ago by someone else and it's easier to just delete the redirect at this point than go back and search for it. Spanneraol (talk) 02:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Restore and send to AfD. Katzrockso (talk) 03:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

@Katzrockso: Why? Do you think this player is notable? As for procedure, this was an article for less than a day in 2020 and has been a redirect ever since. RfD is the correct deletion venue for this page. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:45, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:45, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:18, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Larr

• Larr → ←  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This apparently means left arrow (see &larr and &Larr), but the target does not mention this, or either Larry Larr or Timothea Larr, or Larr (region). Mathguy2718 (talk) 22:16, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

DABify for the above mentioned surname and region. Could probably stand a mention of left arrow under a see also, at least. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate. BD2412 T 03:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: I have drafted the disambiguation page under the redirect. BD2412 T 12:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• support dab per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:27, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Bhandarā

• Bhandarā → Prasada  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This shouldn't redirect here, but possibly to Bhandara. Given the non-standard diacritic I'd go for delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Bhandarā (with the diacritic on the last vowel) is an element of prasada and is further defined in that article. The dab page Bhandara points readers to the page Prasada. This redirect saves the reader an unnecessary detour, which is why I created it. Ingratis (talk) 15:50, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:52, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Bhandara. That diacritic is not uncommon at all, and is used in ISO 15919 transliterations, along with transliterations for other languages. "I don't see this diacritic often" is not a reason to delete. --ABx11 (she/they) 21:39, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Seems the term has some ties to Prasada (it says in lead "Mahaprasada (also called bhandarā"). Also edit history for Bhandarā shows it was a redirect to Mahaprasada. Also, on disamb Bhandara, I see another related page Bhandara (Hinduism), with mostly not reliable sources. Asteramellus (talk) 13:17, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:38, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 22:15, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Baghar, Cheena

• Baghar, Cheena → Baghar China airstrike  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No evidence the village of Baghar China or Baghar Cheena is spelled with a comma (it's not mentioned that way in either of the two references). The title is also misleading because it suggests that it's located in a place called "Cheena", and we have only one article about a place with that name (Cheena, Pakistan, which is a village located in Punjab, not Khyber Pakhtunkhwa where this incident occurred). So I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 20:26, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

CRUDIV

• CRUDIV → United States Pacific Fleet  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An apparent acronym for cruiser division, it's not mentioned at target. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete seems to be used on a lot of navy articles based on my search. Probably better off a redlink until an expert can write an article about it. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:46, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

HBO Max redirects

• HBO Gold → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• HBO Forever → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• HBO Seed → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Max Forever → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Max Seed → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• HBO Max Seed → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• HBO Gone → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Max Gold (streaming service) → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Max+ → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No mention of any such products/streaming services in article. ScalarFactor (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete all as vandalism, purely made-up material likely just spoofing the names of other existing streaming services. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 20:18, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete all per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:16, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Next Year (song)

• Next Year (song) → Next Year  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should this ambiguous redirect continue pointing to the primary topic, Next Year, when Next Year (Foo Fighters song) is already a viable redirect and the article Next Year (Macklemore song) already exists alongside song redirects for entries listed at Next Year (disambiguation)? Consensus at Talk:Next Year#Requested move 19 September 2026 is in favor of the Foo Fighters song being the primary topic. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 17:36, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the recent discussion at Talk:Next Year#Requested move 19 September 2026, which concluded that the Foo Fighters song is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the title. If that consensus changes, this redirect should be revisited. - Eureka Lott 01:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Judeofascism

• Judeofascism → Far-right politics in Israel  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judeofascism, recreated as redirect targeting Kahanism, where it is unmentioned, retargeted to Far-right politics in Israel, where it is also unmentioned. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:34, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, wikt:Judeofascism says it's "rare" and the only usage quote they have is someone saying it's not a normally used term. ScalarFactor (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Nothing links to it and I can’t imagine what ever could. (Only example of usage on Wiktionary is someone saying it isn’t a word! BobFromBrockley (talk) 21:44, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:03, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Craig Tomashoff

• Craig Tomashoff → Caragh Donley  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of a Craig Tomashoff in the article. I did some research before nominating this and it does not seem like these two people are connected to one another. The article mentions Caragh being trans, however upon checking the sources, Craig's name does not appear to be mentioned anywhere. I also checked Google and did not find anymore information. Delete Gavetheman555 (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Craig Tomashoff was Donley's deadname and what she went by most of her career. Here is her LinkedIn ("Caragh Donley Tomashoff") and her Facebook where she openly posts about coming out and her career. At the bottom of her op-ed with The Huffington Post (I Hid My True Identity For Decades. Here's What Happened When I Finally Revealed Myself At 63.), it states "She’s the author of The Can’t-idates: Running for President When Nobody Knows Your Name.", which a google search will show was written by "Craig Tomashoff" (see ). -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:09, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

This interview with her may also be helpful: "A few years ago, I learned that my biological dad had died before I was born but nobody ever told me. I grew up thinking the stepdad who raised me WAS my biological dad, and since he is the child of Russian immigrants, I just always assumed that made me Russian. However, after digging into all this information (it’ll all be in the book I’m trying to so…reassure me you’ll buy a copy to learn more), it turns out my real dad was from Irish stock. Hence, I wanted an Irish name and Caragh means “friend” or “beloved” in Gaelic. Plus, Donley is my real dad’s last name so I wanted to pay tribute to him that way as well." -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Either delete or mention in the target, readers will be as confused as nom especially given the last names differ as well. I haven't checked whether a mention is merited under WP:DEADNAME - if she went by it most of her career then it seems plausible, but as always we should lean towards excluding it if uncertain. Rusalkii (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• What Rusalkii said. There's probably a good argument that the subject was notable pre-transition, but currently all of the sources are post-transition. We don't surreptitiously deadname people via redirects, but the redirect would be appropriate if her deadname were legitimately included in the target. pburka (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

She won multiple Emmy Awards pre-transition.. would that merit including her deadname? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 13:43, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep. Someone looking for the author of The Can’t-idates: Running for President When Nobody Knows Your Name would type in her deadname. They should be directed to the article that contains the pertinent information on this author. Fits under Template:R from birth name. Katzrockso (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Transactional Link

• Transactional Link → E-commerce  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Web search mostly seems to return results related to Data_vault_modeling#Links. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Electronic payment

• Electronic payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Electronic payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Electronic Payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Electronic Payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• EPayment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• EPayments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E Payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E Payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-Payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-Payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Epayment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Epayments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-payment → Online Banking ePayments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-payments → Electronic funds transfer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Guide to E-payments → Electronic funds transfer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not familiar enough with the subject to know where these should go. The last one is probably not plausible (it was a page title of a subsequently BLARed page for a month in 2006). 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:59, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

No opinion on the rest but delete Guide to E-payments. ScalarFactor (talk) 18:04, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Guide to E-payments and retarget the rest to the same place, but that same place, I can't tell what the broad umbrella term article for this is. Fork99 (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

IPhone 17 Plus

• IPhone 17 Plus → IPhone Air  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the article, and the phone never existed. Technically, the iPhone 17 Plus exists as the iPhone Air; however, the iPhone Air is a new product line, and there's no indication that an "iPhone 17 Plus" exists. Cosmic-840≈ ● ✒️ 14:47, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to iPhone 17#History, where I've added a sourced explanation of why this product does not exist. ~ A412 ^talk! 20:35, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Click-only companies

• Click-only companies → E-commerce  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; Internet based companyInternet based company and dot-com companydot-com company (with variations) redirect to Dot-com bubble#Dot-com company, but that one would not use the term "click-only" either. Likely a somewhat obscure term. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:15, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Hittorff Pavillon

• Hittorff Pavillon → Café des Ambassadeurs#Hittorff Pavillon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Redirects to something that does not exists. See the discussion on Talk:Hittorff Pavillon. - DonCalo (talk) 12:38, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

In department of revenue

• In department of revenue → Taxation in Indiana  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The term isn't mentioned in the target. The term exists online but it doesn't seem to be solely used by Indiana. Suonii180 (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2026 (UTC) Suonii180 (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• I assume it's supposed to be the lowercase of IN (postal code of Indiana) Department of Revenue, like Tx Dept of Criminal Justice or Va Dept of Health. Is the specific phrase actually ambiguous? My searches are only turning up Indiana results, but that may just be because I'm browsing from the U.S. I'm not sure someone searching for, say, Department of Revenue (India) is as likely to use the two-letter abbreviation. If kept, note that Indiana Department of Revenue is instead a redirect to Indiana#Taxation, so we would need to figure out what the best target. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:53, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• My Google results are for both the Indiana and India departments, searching from Australia. Specifically the second result is for dor.gov.in. Fork99 (talk) 20:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Uusikylä

• Uusikylä → Uusikylä, Tampere  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Uusikylä is a district of both Tampere and Lahti. Forgot to check that, and also forgot that moving pages makes a redirect. Moved Uusikylä to Uusikylä, Tampere. "Uusikylä" shouldn't redirect to either one. Nicochele (talk) 08:37, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguate. Neither seem like the primary topic Katzrockso (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

That's what I'm getting at. Shouldn't redirect to either one, because one isn't more important than the other. Nicochele (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguate. Samoasambia ✎ 17:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Ulr

• Ulr → Ullr  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• ULR → Phenylpropanolamine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned, though other articles like Ulrichite and Liberal-Republican Union mention these terms. Mathguy2718 (talk) 06:36, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Also, Ulr is not a valid alternative spelling of the name Ullr. He can be called Ull (without the -r nominative case ending), but not Ulr. Delete that one. -- Supermorff (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguate ULR. Could refer to the targets mentioned in nomination, as well as Université de La Rochelle or Accident management#Uninsured loss recovery. Katzrockso (talk) 04:11, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Iguan

• Iguan → Zoids#Overview  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

We have no content on the Zoid (see Unamed Zoids characters below for context). Our results are mostly for Koni Iguan, though there is also Iguan Dao, a redirect. Google hits are a mix of the Zoid, iguanas, and random things named Iguan; Koni Iguan doesn't come up at least when searching on a device set to English. The only natural redirect topic onwiki is Koni Iguan, so I think I prefer retarget > delete > dab, but I'm unsure enough about retargetting this that I'm sending it to RfD instead of doing it unilaterally. Rusalkii (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 03:22, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Avocado tea

• Avocado tea → Avocado#Leaves  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Avocado leaf tea does appear to be a thing, but there is no information about it at the target. ~ A412 ^talk! 02:14, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

• It's a "thing" and exists, as any non-toxic leaf could be used for tea, but there appear to be only spam refs about it. I suggest it's WP:UNDUE and is sufficient as a redirect to the leaves. Zefr (talk) 02:49, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
• The article included a sentence about avocado leaf tea until June, when the information was removed. - Eureka Lott 15:21, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
• I originally made the redirect when the target discussed avocado tea. But that information was removed, as Eureka Lott mentioned. However, it's easy to find reliable sources that discuss avocado tea. That's why I think the redirect should stay, and information about avocado tea should be provided in the target section. Here's a few sources discussing avocado tea using the leaves of the plant: New York Times, Times of India. And then, completely separate from using the leaves for tea, is the usage of the seeds for tea. That is also reported on: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, and Yahoo! Life. For these reasons, the Avocado article should incorporate these sources for a section specifically for tea that discusses both the leaf tea and the seed tea, and the redirect should be retargeted to that new section of Avocado#Tea--JasonMacker (talk) 14:23, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

  I have made the new section based on the sources that I provided here. So, my position is now Redirect to Avocado#Tea. JasonMacker (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 03:21, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete unless a mention is added to the target. As things currently stand, this redirect is of no use to our readers because they will not find the information they're looking for. We shouldn't mislead readers into thinking we have content on something when we don't. The redirect can be recreated if a mention gets added later. Chess enjoyer (talk) 19:41, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  Retarget to Avocado#Tea per JasonMacker. It's brief, but I imagine the section could be expanded. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:12, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Re-refine to the new Avocado#Tea section that now covers the topic. - Eureka Lott 17:27, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Halloween Jack (comics)

• Halloween Jack (comics) → Loki (Marvel Comics)#Marvel 2099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Mentioned at two different pages, X-Men 2099 and Marvel 2099. Not sure which, if either, to retarget to. Rusalkii (talk) 22:30, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 00:05, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak retarget to Marvel 2099#Villains where the character is mentioned (note that the Marvel 2099 fan wiki notes that this character is mentioned in several works of Marvel 2099 official media, so X-Men 2099 would be worse). Second choice is delete as fancruft Duckmather (talk) 02:16, 13 September 2026 (UTC); amended 02:17, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:32, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Kelly the Crane

• Kelly the Crane → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete this unsourced 5 sentence stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006, before being BLAR'ed as .. Character is already covered in existing page. There was no merge, hence no need to keep attribution. Jay 04:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Graham Place

• Graham Place → Fleischer Studios#Writers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a particularly notable person in the studio. Better off created as an article or deleted than redirected to his workplace. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:14, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Shooting of Charlie Kirk in the neck

• Shooting of Charlie Kirk in the neck → Assassination of Charlie Kirk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Shooting in the neck of Charlie Kirk → Assassination of Charlie Kirk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausibly unlikely, overly specific, (imagine a redirect for "shooting of Abraham Lincoln in the temple). The second one is ungrammatical on top of that. Delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:30, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, completely unnecessary, not useful. Skyshiftertalk 02:47, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, unlikely search term. Suonii180 (talk) 09:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, unlikely search term. Slatersteven (talk) 09:30, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:05, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per all the above. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Él me dice que quiere divertirse

• Él me dice que quiere divertirse → Superestrella  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned at the target. My Spanish is rusty, but it's something like "he tells me that he wants to have fun" I think? I guess it's some random lyric, in which case, delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:25, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

It's part of the lyrics of the song. That's part of the rationale for the redirect. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 01:42, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned at target, we are not a lyrics database. ~ A412 ^talk! 20:42, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:32, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Reekara,

• Reekara, → Reekara  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible trailing comma ~ A412 ^talk! 00:34, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, G6, unambiguously created in error, (moved from Reekara, Tasmania, but accidentally left the comma in before being fixed immediately). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:35, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, it was at this title for about 14 minutes in March, agree it could be deleted as G6. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:26, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

September 19

Felix Felicis

• Felix Felicis → Fictional universe of Harry Potter#Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Fictional potion not longer mentioned at target, with too many passing mentions elsewhere for a retarget option, therefore I suggest a deletion to favour search results. These include real-world songs and a band named after the potion. I suppose this is most strongly associated with the plot of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.

Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Felicis closed as redirect to Magic in Harry Potter in 2007, but the closing admin completed the redirect close without a merge. Magic in Harry Potter itself was merged to the current target in April 2026. I'm not sure when Magic in Harry Potter's mention was removed as it was not present in the diff of its AfD merge notice. The pre-BLAR content was sourced solely to the primary sources, lasting 2 years from 2005. Also note there's no Liquid Luck or Liquid luck (alternative in-universe name). Fork99 (talk) 21:30, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. Signahistar (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince per User:Signahistar and per nom's suggestion on its association with said book. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:01, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Brazil I'm devastated

• Brazil I'm devastated → Lady Gaga  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Brazil, I'm devastated → Lady Gaga  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The quote is a reference to a tweet Lady Gaga made when announcing she was too unwell to perform at a concert but isn't mentioned at the target article and I don't think it's notable enough to add. Suonii180 (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, obscure, unmentioned. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:47, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both. Trivial. Implausible as a search query. Unhelpful to anybody following the redirect. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:52, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:02, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Tiger cat

• Tiger cat → Oncilla  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I propose that this redirect be retargeted to Tigercat (disambiguation). "Tiger cat" could refer to the northern tiger cat, southern tiger cat, eastern tiger cat, or the newly discoverd species Tilcayo. Having the redirect target to Oncilla has the potential to cause confusion, as demonstrated by this revert of an edit I made. Alternatively, Tiger cat (disambiguation)Tiger cat (disambiguation) could be converted into its own dab page, where all the tiger cat species could be mentioned. LightNightLights also suggested potentially converting tiger cat into a broad-concept article. I'm no expert in taxonomy, so I'm open to suggestions from editors who know more about the subject. Zeibgeist (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Tiger cat → Tiger cat (disambiguation) and Split that DAB out of Tigercat (disambiguation) (your "alternative"). Tigercat seems to be used for a made up thing while Tiger Cat is used for the animals according to the top dozen hits on Google search and Google scholar. They are different things. Tiger cat as a overview of this type of animal would be a great idea, but I'd start with the DAB. Johnjbarton (talk) 19:02, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per nom, and maintain current dab page. There are only a few entries at the dab page, of various spacing and capitalization differences, and I think it makes sense to keep them all together. All that are exactly "tiger cat" refer to actual animals, and the dab page could easily be organized to have them grouped in a separate section. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:12, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to disambiguation per nom. Hamilton's football fans thank you. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk)
• Re-target to disambiguation page. Some thoughts:

• It looks to me that the oncilla is only one of the many species partially named "tiger cat". Our article does not even use the unqualified two-word phrase "tiger cat" to refer to the oncilla.
• Tiger quoll uses that phrase, but since others also use the phrase "tiger cat" to describe the newly-identified tilcayo, I am not that convinced that we should re-target to "Tiger quoll".
• This is not strong evidence, but wikt:tiger cat defines the phrase as at least four different species, suggesting that we should re-target to a disambiguation page.
• I am the one who reverted Zeibgeist. I also talked with them in my user talk page.
• As a response, I created the page Tiger cats as a redirect to Tigercat (disambiguation) yesterday. I am perfectly fine with others also discussing that redirect.
• I also support creating a BCA at Tiger cat, but I do not want to give others work that, due to private matters, I likely would not be able to help with.

LightNightLights (talk • contribs) 17:12, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• I came here because I read on the Main Page that Tilcayo was a "species of tiger cat". I was trying to learn its meaning. If it doesn't have a particular meaning, it shouldn't be used as description there. Canadachick (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• support retarget per above to the dab --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:04, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. The article titled "Oncilla" originally referred to "tiger cats" in general; however, the splitting of species has created a slight discrepancy between the article's title and its actual subject matter, leading to ongoing discussion regarding the article's scope and title. --コロネン/Coronene (talk) 01:50, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Internet distribution system

• Internet distribution system → Online shopping  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Internet Distribution System → Online shopping  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. A web search suggests this is related, but not the same as a global distribution system. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:09, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Internet industry

• Internet industry → Online service provider  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This term seems a lot more general, but I'm not sure what the correct target for this would be. Note that Internet industry jargon is an article, though not a particularly sourced one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:58, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Cyberservices

• Cyberservices → E-commerce  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Cyber service → Virtual volunteering  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Neither of the targets mentions this term. Online serviceOnline service redirects to Online service provider, so that might be an alternative. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Vertical online service

• Vertical online service → Online service provider  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Vertical online service provider → Online service provider  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; not clear what "vertical" refers to. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:49, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Video commerce

• Video commerce → E-commerce  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Video ecommerce → E-commerce  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target. Article was apparently BLARed in 2017. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:38, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Serbia and Montenegro men's national under-19 basketball team

• Serbia and Montenegro men's national under-19 basketball team → Yugoslavia men's national under-19 basketball team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I would like to delete this redirect. Serbia and Montenegro, including its former name FR Yugoslavia, have never played any under-19 basketball tournament. Maiō T. (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• This is more of a content issue, than a redirect issue. The target article does mention this team. Also, I just notified of this discussion at the target and creator talk pages. Jay 17:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The mention at the #New national teams section looks like general information about the countries, not their youth basketball teams. --BDD (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I had closed this discussion as delete, but I am instead resisting following a request on my talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:56, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Noting the comment on Tavix's talk page from Jay (talk · contribs): "All the links at the #New national teams section are for the under-19 teams, and that includes Serbia and Montenegro whose under-19 team is a redlink now." That's accurate for the bulleted list at that section. I should have been more specific: I was referring to the prose before that list, which indeed links to general country names, not sports teams of any sort. So I agree with his earlier comment that this is a content issue. My conclusion is still delete, though. Unanswered is the question of whether the country of Serbia and Montenegro ever had such a team. If it did, delete per WP:REDLINK. If it didn't, delete because it never existed. --BDD (talk) 20:29, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  If it existed, which the target says it did, from 1992 to 2006, does it deserve an article, or is this redirect sufficient? If it didn't exist, and the target is wrong, the entry needs to be removed from the target, and this redirect deleted. However, there is an incoming link from FIBA Europe and I tried hard, but couldn't find where it is linked in that article. Jay 08:15, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Runescape quest list

• Runescape quest list → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape quests → RuneScape#Quests  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape clan → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape Videos → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape currency → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runehq → RuneScape#Community  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Red Axe (Consortium) → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I would like to delete these various RuneScape topics better found outside of Wikipedia. Quests are mentioned, and currency in relation to real-world trading. A few of those pages were originally created in attempts to write about RuneScape quests and currency, which is why I'm not keen on keeping them. The Red Axe started as some sort of joke page. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete most. The Red Axe (Consortium) would fall under WP:CSD#G3 as a hoax/joke article and should've been tagged for speedy deletion not blanked and redirected. No reason not to delete.

A few others here also at some time had attempts at (non-hoax) articles, but these were all blanked and redirected so there's no merge history to worry about here. It's safe to delete all these.

However, I would say keep/refine Runescape quests to RuneScape § Gameplay, since this topic is still discussed there. No reason not to assist readers in finding content Wikipedia does have coverage for. (But delete the "list" redirect, as there is no list.) Delete all the rest due to lack of coverage to redirect to.

I did consider if Runescape currency could be kept as it is mentioned in RuneScape, but there's nothing substantial and the relevant content concerns other topics such as monetisation (via RuneCoins, one of several currencies) and anti-cheating policies. Readers looking for info specifically about the currencies themselves would not find what they're looking for, so the redirect isn't helpful. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:46, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all Perhaps they may have had some use in a bygone era where search was bad. Nowadays they are redundant and unnecessary, as search is robust enough to handle things like this. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:16, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Are there other search results that are relevant? If not, deleting Runescape quests is just wasting the reader's time and adding unnecessary friction to navigating Wikipedia. There's no reason to throw out a perfectly fine redirect just because it's bundled with bad ones. Under normal circumstances, nominated by itself it would undoubtedly be kept as the topic is mentioned and redirects are cheap. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:41, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep Runescape quests per Scryme. Delete the rest. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:47, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Runescape quests and Runescape currency as they are mentioned at the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:21, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:43, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Sen's Fortress

• Sen's Fortress → Dark Souls (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

only mentioned in passing, in a sentence that a reader who hasn't played dark souls (me!) wouldn't even notice the absence of. the pre-blar content was fancruft, with only 1.2 reliable sources (pc gamer and kotaku) actually about the damn place, with the rest being irrelevant and/or user-generated. i found maybe one or two usable sources, but i doubt they'd be enough to even warrant a mention in the article due to their nature. will be listing them soon regardless

coincidentally, most info on it was removed from the target shortly after the blar, but i couldn't find any evidence of a merge, so there's nothing to lose here consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:40, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

sauce

• shacknews: top however much list of which sen's fortress is an entry
• gamespot: what the hell are they doing here lmao. early impressions of the place
• pcgamesn: is a coverage-shaped let's play fair game here? i wouldn't say so, but i'll dump this anyway

that's... actually everything noteworthy that i could find consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:52, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep First of all, there is more SIGCOV than that. The article used a section from "You Died", which is a third-party book published by Tune & Fairweather analyzing Dark Souls. It's reliable significant coverage. The level is also featured in Dark Souls: Beyond the Grave, another third-party published reliable source. It's arguably standalone notable, and never went through an AfD process, just one user's personal opinion; I had just not bothered to continue expanding it. There's at least enough to talk about in the game article, and IMO the redirect was done without Wikiquette and without even asking me what the sources were. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:24, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:41, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:21, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• @Zxcvbnm: Are you willing to work on the article further to address notability/sourcing concerns? If so, it would probably be fine to revert the BLAR and draftify. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:31, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  That's fine by me, I can add any additional sources and put it back into mainspace. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:27, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:42, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

College stort

• College stort → University and college sport  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect with no links that is an obscure misspelling of "College sport", which already exists as a redirect. In any old versions of articles that use this link, it would be obvious why it is a red link and where it should point to. Suggest deleting this redirect. Whizz40 (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support, t and p aren't even remotely close on the keyboard, very low chance of this specific typo.

In solidarity, Grilledcheeseisgreat ^✉ 15:12, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: As above, this isn't a plausible typo. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:36, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:22, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Sadist (band) songs

• Enslaver of Lies → Sadist (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Hell in Myself → Sadist (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Desert Divinities → Sadist (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• From Bellatrix to Betelgeuse → Sadist (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Spiral of Winter Ghosts → Sadist (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Reign of Asmat → Sadist (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Perversion Lust Orgasm → Sadist (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Song titles not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. These originally redirected to their respective albums, Above the Light, Tribe (Sadist album) or Crust (album), which were all BLARed in 2021. Delete. Fork99 (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

I see no reason why the albums and their track lists can't be included in Sadist (band). It would be better to add the information there than to delete accurate redirects. BD2412 T 21:55, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:51, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:33, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. I've added the tracklists to the target so they are now mentioned. Katzrockso (talk) 13:27, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

None of the above (political party)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 22#None of the above (political party)

Window Server 2003

• Window Server 2003 → Windows Server 2003  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Is it even this hard to misspell "Windows Server 2003"? Doesn't seem plausible to me or at all. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 01:27, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Someone hearing "Windows Server 2003" spoken out loud could hear it as "Window Server 2003". Steelkamp (talk) 04:50, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 10#Singular "Window" redirects and pages not listed in that discussion (Window 7 etc). But only because of the precedent. I find some plausibility to it. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 04:59, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  I don't think this changes much, but I hadn't realised window server is a redirect that exists and is unrelated to Windows Server. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 15:30, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep I guess 'Windows Server' and 'Window Server' are homophones (ie, both words are pronounced exactly the same, just like 'Time Square' rather than 'Times Square') JuniperChill (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Plausible misspelling from mishearing it. Katzrockso (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Per JuniperChill. I think 'Window 7' is plausible, too, since seven starts with /s/.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 06:03, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per above. That 2023 discussion is just wrong; "Window" is a plausible search term for someone who is unfamiliar with the brand. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk · edits) 20:32, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Deltarune quote redirects

• Kris Get The Banana → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Queen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Here I come San Frandisco! → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Flowery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Here I come San Francisco! → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Flowery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Jarona → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Flowery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Giasfclfebrehber → Deltarune#Chapter 2 – A Cyber's World  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• YOUR TAKING TOO LONG → Deltarune  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirects unmentioned at target. "Jarona" is mentioned in one sentence at Deltarune, but it also looks too minimal to me. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 05:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete giasfclfebrehber as vague (that's the variant from undertale, with the one in deltarune actually being "giasfelfebrehber", but also who cares), and the rest per nom consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:16, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Here I come San Frandisco! And YOUR TAKING TOO LONG are also kinda vague AquaDLTRN (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  Not particularly; I don't believe they are used in any other context other than Deltarune. The Giasfclfebrehber one is vague because it is also used in Undertale (I would assume). Did you want to !vote on this? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 04:02, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  it's part of an impossible ice-e crossword puzzle in deltarune, and ice-e's p"e"zza mascot ice-e's catchphrase in deltarune (allegedly). this doesn't matter at all for this discussion, by the way, as they're both one-off jokes consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:30, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget Jarona to Gerona as a homophone and plausible typo, and Here I come San Francisco! to San Francisco in popular culture. Keep the rest as R from quote/meme. In solidarity, PokemonPerson (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

I would imagine they have to be mentioned in the articles, no? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 17:48, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Not necessarily. There's plenty of redirects like this: Category:Redirects to an article without mention. ArcticSeeress (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep almost all as instances of Template:R from quote (and for some of them, they'd count as Category:Redirects to an article without mention). However, it might genuinely make sense to delete "Here I come San Francisco!" in particular. The rest of them all actually exist as quotes, but the one spelled "-cisco" is a mishearing of a quote (in which the correct version is "-disco"). Paintspot Infez (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Lightner/Darkner redirects

• Lightners (Deltarune) → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Lightner (Deltarune) → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Darkners → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Darkner → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirects minimally mentioned at target (but not defined). 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 05:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Deltarune, I am sure they are relevant to the plot section. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:03, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Well, they also aren't defined there. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:33, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:30, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget. Do they have to be defined? PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

...Not necessarily, but it doesn't make a very useful redirect. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 23:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Frown line

• Frown line → Wrinkle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 06:54, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Added a mention at target, FWIW. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 07:57, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, now mentioned at target. Signahistar (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• keep now that it is mentioned --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:05, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Consortium Book Sales & Distribution

• Consortium Book Sales & Distribution → Ingram Content Group  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:37, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep? Mentioned at source Cxbrx (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's not in the article; we don't link every non-notable company related to any other company. They have been part of several different companies. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:08, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Oliver the excavator

• Oliver the excavator → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Sodor Construction Company  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Oliver the Big Excavator → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target. The Oliver at the target is Oliver the Western Engine, not the excavator. The excavator at the target is Alfie the Excavator. There are mentions of Oliver the excavator in multiple other articles for its voice cast, and retargeting to any of them is not ideal. Delete to favour search results.

This was an unsourced 4 sentence stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006, before it was BLAR'ed as there was a paragraph about this character at its then target. There was no merge, and no reason to keep attribution. Jay 06:15, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom.

In solidarity, Grilledcheeseisgreat ^✉ 22:51, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

CamelCase

• Wikipedia:CAMELCASE → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#General rules  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• MOS:CAMELCASE → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#CAMELCASE  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

WP:CAMELCASE redirects to the top of a section, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#General rules, whereas MOS:CAMELCASE redirects to an anchor in that section, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#CAMELCASE. These ought to be consistent. I would say they should both go to the anchor since that's where use of CamelCase is actually discussed. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:58, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget the first one to the anchor (#CAMELCASE) per nom and Keep for the second one. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:04, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate the 1st as Wikipedia:CamelCase and Wikipedia might be more likely (and what I would expect) and keep 2nd as this deals with CamelCase as opposed to other things like capitalization. In the MOS so it probably isn't ambiguous with the project page but as 2nd choice retarget the 2nd to the same target as the 1st for the same reason. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  A hatnote would be better than disambiguating two pages. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:14, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose disambiguation. The vast majority of projectspace shortcuts are ambiguous; it rarely makes sense to dabify them because that functionally makes them useless. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:54, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Godsy: any opinion on where they should both target? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 04:53, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Lists of school districts

• Lists of school districts → Lists of school districts in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

School districts are not exclusive to the United States, and there is a similar style of page for Canada at List of school districts in Canada. Mathguy2718 (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

• Weak disambiguate per nom. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:07, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
• weak listify or dabify there are at least two entries. There might be more --Lenticel ^(talk) 06:09, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow time for a draft list page or disambiguation page to be created.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 23:36, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguation draft requested Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
• Dab. I've drafted disambiguation text at the redirect. pburka (talk) 20:33, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguate per nom. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:42, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

• Listify. This is going to be a list of lists, so it shouldn't be formatted or tagged as a disambiguation page. Jruderman (talk) 21:13, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

  I agree it should be a list of lists, if anything. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: list or DAB?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:31, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:17, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Listify as a WP:LISTOFLISTS, which would be more fitting than a disambiguation page. The draft has already been tagged as a list. - Eureka Lott 17:39, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Sakai Prefecture

• Sakai Prefecture → Sakai  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sakai prefecture → Sakai  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Created with an edit summary of "alt name" but Sakai was never a prefecture, and no mention in the target page. The redirect seems to have been created by mistake. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:50, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. If it was never a prefecture then this is actively misleading and should be deleted. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

  No objection to the deletion of the redirect. Only for the record/if someone wants to replace the redirect with a proper article, Sakai was a prefecture (-ken), and was actually the most long-lived (or least short-lived) among no longer existing restoration-era prefectures: It existed from 1868 to 1881 (see ja:堺県 or Sakai Prefecture in the NICT Japanese Wiki Corpus; also for the Edo period/loose precursor, cf. Sakai bugyō, but any continuity is less direct than in other cases; unlike some other bugyō successors such as Yamada bugyō/Watarai-fu or Nagasaki bugyō/Nagasaki-fu, it was also never set up as a -fu, but was Sakai-ken from the beginning), at its peak it extended to roughly the Southern half of present-day Osaka and all of Nara until it was merged into Osaka in 1881. But the redirect to Sakai City is indeed off; cities of Japan didn't even exist as such before 1889 (their precursor -ku did, though, since 1878; Sakai-ku was initially part of Sakai-ken until the merger into Osaka). --Asakura Akira (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

• As stated above, Sakai was a prefecture in the late 1800s. That status is also mentioned in the target article, so this seems to me like a keep until Sakai Prefecture is expanded into an article. Dekimasuよ! 03:30, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Since the city and the prefecture do not appear to have been coterminous, I think this is better left as a redlink. A redirect could be misleading readers to conclude the prefecture and the city were one and the same. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:38, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

• That would apply to much of the article, though. Sakai#Feudal period and Sakai#Edo period also deal with entities that are geographically and culturally intertwined but not coterminous with the modern city. Since the article is already at the plain title, I don't think it is a problem for Sakai Prefecture to redirect here, as Sakai City does. Dekimasuよ! 08:50, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'm assuming you are referring to the mentions of other cities in those sections, in which case, that does not seem equivalent to me. The main topic of those sections is clearly the existing city, not a surrounding broader region. (It wouldn't make sense to redirect Hyōgo to Sakai#Edo period just because it is mentioned there, for example). The mention of the prefecture at Sakai#Modern period says that the prefecture included parts of present-day Osaka and Nara Prefectures, so I still think a redlink is best here. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:19, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 23:06, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:30, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep without prejudice to renomination if content is removed. Whether the page should mention the prefecture or not is an editorial decision for the page in question, not RFD. As long as there is mention the redirect is useful. An anchor might me helpful here or section targetting too. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:06, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep, but refine to Sakai#Modern Saki. The redirect aids readers in locating information about the past prefecture. No benefit would be gained from deleting this redirect. Katzrockso (talk) 13:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Morys

• Morys → Lerema  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is currently a {{R taxon with possibilities}} without mention at the target but I'm not familiar with species articles so I'm unsure what should be done exactly.

This needs disambiguation because this is also a given name and surname, held by Morys Wynn ap John, Huw Morys, Morys Bruce, 4th Baron Aberdare, Morys Clynnog, Matthias Morys, Twm Morys, Nicholas Morys, and Daniel Morys (a Polish name so possibly different pronunciation?). From an online search, this appears to be pronounced as Moris/Morris/Maurice, so those should be a see also, possibly along with Pittsburgh Morrys and Mory's. Fork99 (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

• Change to a disambiguation page per nom. The current target Lerema doesn't even mention "Morys" although I assume that it should. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:16, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguation draft requested Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:32, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:14, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:05, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I have drafted the disambiguation page at the redirect. Feel free to make any changes to it, if necessary. LazyLune (talk • edits) 11:01, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Time location

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 27 § Time location – retarget to Instant

• Time location → Instant  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

like the previous rfd, but a fucked up evil version of it where i'll instead suggest deleting as vague per differing definitions of both words in the oddly specific context of this term (with results being primarily mid-sentence, referring to "real-time location sharing" or the time, location, and additional traits of assorted stuff) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:55, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Two distinct words not used together. I don't understand the argument from the previous RfD. As an ATD, I would prefer Time zone, also suggested at the previous RfD. Jay 09:08, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:07, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:05, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, horribly vague. My first thought was Spacetime diagram. When everyone has to struggle so hard to come up with a possible meaning, and no one comes up with the same one, that's a good sign it's a bad redirect. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 05:57, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Pinging participants of previous RfD; @J947 @Scyrme @Hey man im josh @Pppery @Bassie f Katzrockso (talk) 13:17, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Downtown Tokyo

• Downtown Tokyo → Shinjuku  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Pretty vague. Tokyo has many downtowns. SoraNews article is about a place in Chiyoda, this article refers to an incident in Ikebukuro, Toshima, this Asahi Shimbun talks about Chuo, you'll get the point. Retarget to Tokyo itself might be a potential Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:33, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Yamanote and Shitamachi. A direct translation of "Shitamachi" here is "downtown", and the translation is used widely, but the article in question also elegantly covers the other possible meanings. Dekimasuよ! 03:41, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:57, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete: This is a classic "sum of parts"; there is no part of Tokyo actually referred to as "downtown Tokyo", so the "downtown" is an adjective meaning "central". So a redirect is misleading. Similarly, central Tokyo is a redirect to something else (the 23 ku), a page which only includes the word "central" to refer to Ikebukuro as being in "north central Tokyo"; another misleading redirect. These redirects are obviously well intentioned, but not actually helping. I can't be bothered to check if "modern-day Tokyo" or "Tokyo, Japan", or "Tokyo, capital of Japan" redirects to Tokyo, but perhaps you get the point. Imaginatorium (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:04, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Yamanote and Shitamachi as avoided double redirect of Shitamachi. Shitamachi is translated as downtown the translations of Shitamachi and Yamanote should be given in the lead of that article. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:01, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

List Serve

• List Serve → LISTSERV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Listserve → Mailing list#Electronic mailing list  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Listservs → Mailing list#Electronic mailing list  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not entirely sure where this should redirect; the latter two have previously been retargeted from LISTSERV to Electronic mailing list based on incoming links. 1234qwer1234qwer4 06:45, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:03, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Target all to Mailing list#Electronic mailing list. Seems a bit silly not to have all of them in the same place, and probably most users will be thinking of the general concept. Obviously some will want the WP:DIFFCAPS variant with all caps, but many of them will be aware of the capitalisation already, and the rest could be assisted by a simple hatnote in the target section. Nyttend (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:00, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Y !

• Y ! → Yahoo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Y! → Yahoo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Searching Y!, it prompts out YouTube first, so I think this initial is ambiguous. A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. This is Yahoo's brand logo from 2009-2013 C:File:Yahoo-logo (2009-2013).jpg. Katzrockso (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep Y!. That was Yahoo's branding and it is mentioned in the target article.
Delete Y !. The extra space seems spurious and that does not appear in the target article. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:56, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep both. "Y !" is plausible; the exclam mark feels loosely dangling from the speech bubble.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 06:12, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Minor DC Comics alien species and races

• Black Mercy → List of fictional plants#In comics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Martian (DC Comics) → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Parademons → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Thanagarian → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alien races in DC Comics, the article to which they pointed was merged, and entries that didn't have their own articles were left out. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:27, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• If there was a plants section on DC Universe, the Black Mercy would've been added there. I did try to re-add some of the aliens in the aliens' section for DC Universe when they weren't listed, but they were removed by users like @Fiction Fanatic III: and @Rorshacma:. I can't say if Thanagarian and Martian (DC Comics) had their own articles before they were deleted, but Parademon was the victim of an AFD. If anyone wants those articles spared, I suggest that their pages get re-established with the right sources. Any objections? --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:48, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  The old version of Thanagarian was a redirect to a page which was deleted in 2020 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanagar. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:58, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'm sure that was when it talked about what the Thanagarians are like. There has to be some way to get it and the other alien redirects spared in light of what I mentioned in the above. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Black Mercy, which is mentioned at the target. Weak keep Martian (DC Comics); the only description is "White Martians... a subspecies of the Martians", but that's something. Delete the others, which aren't mentioned. --BDD (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment to the above - Martian (DC Comics) would be a good idea to keep since Martian Manhunter is not the only Martian in DC Comics. As for Parademon and Thanagarian @BDD:, me and another user tried to list them on the DC Universe's alien section only to be removed by @Fiction Fanatic III: and @Rorshacma:. I'm sure those brief alien entries would be restored to maintain the redirects unless you want Parademon to be redirected to the New Gods of Apokolips section of the New Gods page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:55, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - They were "removed" because you completely ignored the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alien races in DC Comics that only the entries that were notable, blue-linked entries should be merged. I just had to revert your improper merge again - you may disagree with the consensus at the AFD, but you do not get to arbitrarily ignore it. As for the Redirects in question, if they no longer point to an appropriate target, they should be deleted. This should not be used as a weird workaround to restore content that was previously determined to be non-notable. Rorshacma (talk) 17:09, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

  No, the AfD closure did not mandate the content at the target article and it cannot do that. That's not within the scope of AfD. Katzrockso (talk) 15:09, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Black Mercy - keep per BDD. Martian (DC Comics) - White Martian and Martian Manhunter are articles, and the current target mentions both, the latter only in a template. Martian Manhunter is a Green Martian (It is also at RfD), but not the only one. I think White Martian will be a better target, as it describes well how Whites and Greens were connected, and has comparisons of both. Parademons - retarget to the New Gods section per Rtkat. Thanagarian - retarget to List_of_DC_Universe_locations#Thanagar, the target of Thanagar. Jay 11:42, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

  Well @Jay, that would be considered good targets until worthy sources can help them gain their own articles. The Parademons would've been the redirect to the New Gods of Apokolips section of New Gods. Rtkat3 (talk) 19:48, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider the retarget proposals.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 03:07, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 02:58, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

@Voorts: I can understand a final relist if there was not enough participation. Is that the case here, or was your relist for further consideration of one or more of the entries? If so, which ones? Jay 07:52, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

I was hoping consensus could be reached. Seems close but not there. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:02, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Son (meme)

• Son (meme) → Anthony Mackie  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - {{R from meme}}, unmentioned at target. ScalarFactor (talk) 02:53, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per the previous discussion, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 18#"Son" Meme, I guess I missed this variation or I would have bundled it in. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 07:04, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Completely unhelpful. Anybody following that redirect will be every bit as lost and confused afterwards as they were before. (No objection to speedy deletion.) --DanielRigal (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Will Dunn

• Will Dunn → List of Harry Potter cast members#Epilogue characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are multiple people with this name including a writer and a sportsman, but none with articles. The William Dunn disambig doesn't consider "Will", so that won't be a suitable alternate target. Delete to favour search results.

This was an article though, for 10 days in 2011, before being BLAR'ed. We don't have a page with bios of Harry Potter cast members, so I don't see where the pre-BLAR content can be reused. Jay 13:44, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

• Weak retarget to dab: "Will" isn't explicitly listed at the William page, but it's such a standard nickname that I expect some subset of them are referred to that way sometimes, and the page has "Willie" and similar variants. I was able to find a couple William "Will" Dunns with a quick search, though none notable. No strong objections to deletion, though. Rusalkii (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:05, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note that multiple changes happened at the target post this nomination. It was renamed (before the relist), and the resulting redirect had its target changed (after the relist). So the target in the original nomination is now List of Harry Potter (film series) cast members. Jay 17:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tbhotch also retargeted the original nomination to Harry Potter cast members, which is a DAB
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 02:42, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Silkies

• Silkies → Brownie (folklore)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Plural mismatch with singular form of the word Silkie leading to a full article that also has a disambiguation hatnote Silkie (disambiguation). The disambiguation has no path leading to Brownie (folklore) (where Brownie (folklore)#Silkie exists) and instead leads to Selkie, a different mythological creature entirely --Randomologist2000 (talk) 02:16, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I proposed a move of the chicken article. So I believe it should redirect to the DAB page, but it will have to wait until the move discussion is finished. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:22, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Silkie was moved to Silkie (chicken breed) and Silkie (disambiguation) was moved to Silkie on August 30
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:32, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I would support Retarget now as long as Brownie (folklore) is added to the DAB page (because it currently is not) --Randomologist2000 (talk) 17:05, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:00, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Silkie as {{r from plural}} as it could be the plural of several of the entries there. I have linked Brownie (folklore) § Silkie at Silkie. Please amend the entry in line with MOS:DAB if needed; I'm not entirely sure I understood how to apply MOS:DABSECTION and MOS:DABPIPING to a case like this. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 14:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 02:13, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Vaccinov

• Vaccinov → Smallpox#Eradication  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target or anywhere onwiki. Was redirected here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaccinov, which added a mention, but that was removed. I was mildly surprised that there are *no* mentions of him anywhere, though the main smallpox article probably isn't the place and I can't think where would be. Rusalkii (talk) 23:54, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Smallpox vaccine, with a new brief cited statement there; a source like Isaacs 2020 (Microbiology Australia 41 (4) 168-171) might be usable. I agree it should not point at Smallpox which does not mention Vaccinov. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:39, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:00, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Happy to retarget if a mention is actually added. Smallpox_vaccine#Early_vaccination would probably be the right section? Unsure if it's due weight, would need a more careful analysis of the sources than I feel up to at the moment. Rusalkii (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

September 18

United States current events

• United States current events → News  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The page history of this title is weird. This was redirected by DE-blocked editor, Mhiji, to this latest target prior to this listing. (Not sure why as the target says nothing about this title) Jay spotted this in his listing of United States:Current Events and thought that I list this too. Intrisit (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• See my comment in the below section at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 20#American current events as the same reasoning applies here. Fork99 (talk) 12:06, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
• Also note that there is no RfD tag on the nominated redirect. Fork99 (talk) 12:09, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for highlighting this; I've tagged it now! Seems like I was excited when my lit up about the two titles Jay brought up when he nominated that title here at RfD at the said date that I forgot to double-check whether or not they were tagged! Intrisit (talk) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete like with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 12#British and Irish current events. There was Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 5#Current events redirects some of which were to the News article and some to portals. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:10, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PK2 (talk; contributions) 00:34, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Crouch, Swale. I expanded on my reasoning in the thread above at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 30#American current events. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:42, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:50, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: I don't know which way to go.

• Deleting lets Wikipedia go free without confusing or short articles. No one wants to read any of it since they think it's ridiculous.
• Keeping it gives us the opportunity to expand it into an actual article. It's aiming directly at the purpose of Wikipedia. We need to have sources to do this.

Everyone has their own opinions, and I respect that. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 10:23, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

American current events

• American current events → News  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The page history of this title is weird. This was redirected by DE-blocked editor, Mhiji, prior to this listing. (Not sure why as the target says nothing about this title) Jay spotted this in his listing of United States:Current Events and thought that I list this too. Intrisit (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• A similar redirect Canadian current events was RfDed in 2014 with consensus to retarget to List of years in Canada#Current decade (albeit that section no longer exists), South African current events redirects to 2026 in South Africa (which would need to be updated every year) and Indian current events redirects to Portal:India. Since the US portal doesn't have a current events section, I would suggest a retarget similar to the Canadian or South African redirects. (Also, I assume your RfD wikilink above meant to be to August 12 and not August 19.) Fork99 (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

  I've fixed both now! Intrisit (talk) 10:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete like with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 12#British and Irish current events. There was Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 5#Current events redirects some of which were to the News article and some to portals. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:11, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PK2 (talk; contributions) 00:35, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Crouch, Swale and our handling of several similar redirects. Many current events end up being covered on Wikipedia but in general this is not a repository for such things. Many efforts like Wikinews and region-specific current events portals have been shut down over the years. Sending readers to Portal:Current events is way too broad and not a justifiable WP:XNR. An article on the year (2026 in the United States) is a fairly weak match for "current events" and thsi creates an ongoing maintenance burden, which will be substantial if this sets a precedent for other countries. List of years in the United States is an even less helpful target than the current year. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:42, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:50, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Orphanage Polytechnic College

• Orphanage Polytechnic College → Vocational education  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect left orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Technical Education -- not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:51, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Education in Malappuram district#Polytechnic colleges, where it is mentioned. pburka (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Trying again.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:45, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget per Pburka as WP:ATD --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:26, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Stuffed animals toys

• Stuffed animals toys → Stuffed toy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

ow the my grammar. barely avoids being a g5 via the creator being blocked a year after its creation... or it might still be a g5 if they've been socking since 2010, i'm actually not sure consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 23:41, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Template:Redirect to married name

• Template:Redirect to married name → Template:R from married name  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Template:R to married name → Template:R from birth name  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ],  bundled 00:20, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

"Redirect to married name" is not the same as "Redirect from married name", to which it was retargetted in 2022 by this edit. It was previously redirecting to "Redirect from alternative name". I wished to use this template on redirects from two earlier surnames of a person (best known by her married name) when it was not clear which had been her birth surname, but it makes no sense to use it when it is categorised as a redirect in the opposite direction. I suggest it should redirect either to "Redirect from former name" or (as previously) "Redirect from alt name". PamD 17:31, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to {{R from former name}}, although {{R from alt name}} is certainly a better choice than the current target, which is just not correct. ScalarFactor (talk) 19:04, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Rereredirect the template redirect reredirected to the redirect template it has been reredirected to, to become a template redirect redirected to the redirect template it was reredirected from, per Pam. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC).
  
• Retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 13:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete No current links. I had changed the remaining ones to more relevant {{R from birth name}} and {{R from former name}}.—Bagumba (talk) 05:44, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

  I fear that if it was deleted someone might re-create it for some misguided sort of consistency. PamD 16:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

  WP:SALTing is always possible if items are repeatedly re-created against consensus. —Bagumba (talk) 23:56, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

  There are still incoming transclusions of the abbreviated version: Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:R_to_married_name. Jruderman (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to {{R from birth name}} for consistency with {{R to married name}} (a template redirect with a stable target for 10+ years). Note that {{R to birth name}} is a template redirect to {{R from married name}}. Mathguy2718 (talk) 06:15, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

  Perhaps someone was adopted, and their adopted name (not birth name) is a redirect to their married name, e.g. Nancy DavisNancy Davis → Nancy Reagan. —Bagumba (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

  People can change their name for a variety of reasons, and multiple times. The name someone was using before they changed it on marriage is not always their birthname. PamD 16:33, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It isn't entirely clear where this redirect should target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:39, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to {{R from former name}} (from proposer, deciding on preferred option). PamD 22:33, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. {{R from former name}}, {{R from alternative name}} or {{R from birth name}}? Yeah, I'm not sure either, so no reason to play a guessing game of which the intended/best target is and just delete this thing. Steel1943 (talk) 07:30, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
• I'm also fine with deletion as an unused "Template:Redirect from..." redirect, since that result would also remove the conflict with {{R to married name}}. Mathguy2718 (talk) 01:38, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect per nom to {{R from former name}}. Also, synchronize {{R to married name}} with this rcat template's target. Just about every rcat template has an associated {{Redirect from/to template redirect so I oppose deletion of this rcat. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 02:03, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PK2 (talk; contributions) 00:21, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

• Why don't we just have {{R to married name}} as a standalone template and not a redirect? This way editors don't have to determine or distinguish whether it is from a birth name or some other alternative or former name. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:27, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
• I don't want to close this with a consensus to asynchronise {{Redirect to married name}} and {{R to married name}}. As such I will bundle in the latter redirect if there are no objections. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:07, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To bundle or not to bundle? Either way, final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:31, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

I usually object to bundling so late but I can't fathom any reason why these should be targeted differently. So, support bundling. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

And if that doesn't happen, I think anyone can boldly retarget the other after this closes to keep them aligned. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Make standalone. Some people continue continue using both names (making "R to/from former name" incorrect) and some don't (making "R to/from alt name" questionable). Some have already changed their name, making "R to/from birth name" incorrect. Jruderman (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Make standalone—do not redirect per my earlier suggestion and per Jruderman. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:03, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Bundled in {{R to married name}}. J947 ‡ ^edits 00:20, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I lied last time. Relisting again post-bundling.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:41, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Secretaries Day (film)

• Secretaries Day (film) → Will Gluck#Life and career  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Appears to be a film that never materialized, which we have no content on. Several TV episodes by that name we have articles on, but no movies. Rusalkii (talk) 20:29, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:39, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

TSAR

• TSAR → SAR supergroup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• TSAR supergroup → Diaphoretickes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These redirects should point to the same target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - Retargeting to SAR supergroup is my first instinct, but I notice this will create circular redirects on the SAR supergroup page. Someone with knowledge of the topic should confirm the intended destination of those [[TSAR supergroup|TSAR]] links.

Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

I had the same thoughts. Neither article contains a lot of substantive coverage of TSAR but SAR supergroup is the logical place where this might be expanded. The brief mention at Diaphoretickes § Evolution just says that Telonemia [...] is sometimes resolved as the sister clade of the SAR supergroup, forming the hypothesized TSAR clade. That makes Diaphoretickes an improper target to discuss TSAR on the whole. The circular link at SAR supergroup can either be removed or it can be left as an acceptable circular redirect if editors think this has standalone article potential. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Support retargeting TSAR to Diaphoretickes. TSAR includes groups that SAR does not, and is fully included in Diaphoretickes, the nearest parent clade. Furthermore, its validity is still unknown, as the 'T' often branches with Haptista instead of SAR. The Evolution section at Diaphoretickes covers this information. For these reasons, TSAR redirecting to Diaphoretickes is preferable, and is a surefire way to avoid misleading readers into thinking SAR and TSAR are equivalent. — Snoteleks (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I think I initially misread Diaphoretickes, and did not bother to look at the taxobox. I do think the information could be presented more clearly in the article. I've followed the TSAR discussion from afar and my (limited!) understanding is that it is disputed but still felt to be relevant enough to cover somewhere. This is a bit beyond the scope of RFD but I do think the coverage could be improved while still kept fairly succinct. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

@Myceteae Agreed that coverage should be improved. I have added some more bits of info at Telonemid and will try to add something at Diaphoretickes itself. — Snoteleks (talk) 14:37, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Support. Jako96 (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Target both to SAR supergroup per my reply above. I've notified WP:PROTISTA, WP:ALGAE, WP:PLANTS, and WP:TOL to get input from subject-matter experts and would be open to amending my !vote if there are factors I've not considered. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

I agree with Snotelek that targeting the least inclusive group that contains TSAR is usually the best solution. But TSAR is sort of SAR sensu lato so might be a more natural place to discuss it. It's mentioned in the lede and the article could be reorganised to have a short section on TSAR that could be linked in the redirect. Likewise, Diaphoretickes could have a sections on TSAR/SAR and other component supergroups, but the article isn't organised that way. TSAR is mentioned but seems quite dismissive of the hypothesis. At the moment SAR seems a better target because the issue is addressed in the one paragraph lede.  —  Jts1882 | talk  14:39, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

This was part of the thinking that originally led me favor SAR supergroup. Either target is justifiable and the coverage could be improved in either location to better support these redirects. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Friendship between a female and a female

• Friendship between a female and a female → Female bonding  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Friendship between a male and a male → Male bonding  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible search terms. I get zero search engine results for either of these phrases. ~ A412 ^talk! 07:29, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• I guess these were created in an awkward attempt to provide symmetry to Friendship between a male and a femaleFriendship between a male and a female and Friendship between a female and a maleFriendship between a female and a male, which both redirect to Cross-sex friendship. Jruderman (talk) 20:08, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:28, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Viarailcanada.co.kr

• Viarailcanada.co.kr → Via Rail  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See the section below; similar reasons apply, this is a South Korean domain that according to the Wayback Machine existed off and on between 2007 and 2022. Delete per precedent. Fork99 (talk) 05:56, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Viarail.com.br

• Viarail.com.br → Via Rail  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Similar to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 29#Airfrance.ae, this is/was a country-specific website for Brazil in Portuguese, but worse is that the target isn't an international airline, it's a train operator only within Canada and the US, its official domain being viarail.ca. There's no mention of the website or Brazil anywhere at the target; possibly some sort of targeted marketing campaign? According to the Wayback Machine, this domain existed between 2004 and 2010, and off and on between 2014 and 2022. Delete per precedent. Fork99 (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:36, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

КССР and KCCP

• КССР → Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• KCCP → Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The first redirect is in Cyrillic, and the second redirect is in Latin (looks like inverted faux Cyrillic). This could also refer to the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic and the Crimean Socialist Soviet Republic in addition to the current target of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic (based on ru:КССР), though nothing else located at KSSR could plausibly be referred to as КССР or KCCP. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: There exists a similar redirect in Cyrillic, ҚССРҚССР, which has Ka with descender (Қ) as the first letter as opposed to Ka (Cyrillic) (К). The Ka with descender letter does not appear to be used in Kyrgyz, Russian, Crimean Tatar, or any other relevant languages involved in this nomination except Kazakh, so that redirect is not nominated here despite looking similar. Mathguy2718 (talk) 06:04, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:36, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I think it's safe to say there is a "special affinity" between Russian and these SSRs. One solution would be to simply add Crimean Socialist Soviet Republic to the existing KSSR dab page and retarget both of these there. That might be too outside the box for the dab page guidelines. Another option is to convert the Cyrillic КССР to a separate dab page listing these three SSRs and retarget the Latin KCCP there. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:57, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Sun-Eater

• Sun-Eater → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sun-Eaters → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this alien at the target. There are mentions of multiple characters that are Sun-Eaters on enwiki, but no article I could find that could serve as an alternate target. There is no hyphenated entry at Sun Eater (disambiguation) either. Delete to favour search results. Jay 16:13, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Controllers (DC Comics), where the concept is briefly detailed and can be expanded upon there if deemed sufficient. I'd also like to note there are 39 outgoing links in articles to the singular redirect (including on the Controllers article), so this redirect is providing a use in DC Comics-related articles. Red Shogun412 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Sun Eater (disambiguation). The hyphen isn't sufficient to tell what the reader is looking for. The comic book characters can be added to the dab, if desired. pburka (talk) 21:01, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'd be okay with that. Red Shogun412 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

  I've gone ahead and added the DC creatures to the dab. pburka (talk) 22:23, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Pburka: I'm curious as to why the hyphen wouldn't make WP:SMALLDETAILS apply here, especially since it is the only instance of a hyphen being used for a sun eater, because the redirect is only used for the particular DC topic and isn't being actively confused for anything else on this site. Case in point being the 39 active uses of this redirect as I pointed out above. Red Shogun412 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

  IMO, WP:SMALLDETAILS is a poor guideline. It makes sense for unusual punctuation (e.g. Airplane!), but hyphen vs space is too ambiguous, especially for an obscure term like this. pburka (talk) 18:12, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:10, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• retarget to Sun Eater (disambiguation) per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:31, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:36, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Struck parts of the nomination, as the situation has changed at the dab. Jay 08:25, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Commentary

• The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Commentary → Geneva Conventions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

blar from a technically unsourced synopsis, which was merged in 2018. it's an implausible misformatting of its name that also misses the... subtitle? is that a subtitle, or-

anyway, the best bet would probably be moving to the geneva conventions of 12 august 1949: commentary (the commentaries) without a redirect, and then changing the incoming links accordingly consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:32, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as unnecessary redirect. And why would the nominator suggest moving this redirect to a longer, all-lower-case title? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

  the longer title (which also has a colon instead of a period) is the correct one, as shown in the target. also, check the link, it ain't all lowercase there~

  that aside, the aforementioned merge would get in the way of deletion due to attribution concerns, hence the specific suggestion to move without a redirect instead of deleting this one and creating the correct one consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:49, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. The period should probably be a colon, but otherwise the title is correct. The Commentaries is an alternate name, not a subtitle. See https://www.loc.gov/item/2011525351/ pburka (talk) 15:03, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:09, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Dondero High School A Capella Choir Pop Concert

• Dondero High School A Capella Choir Pop Concert → Dondero High School#Pop Concert  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Merged into the target per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dondero High School A Capella Choir Pop Concert, and then removed by Kowal2701 per Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Archive 2#Orlando Davis. No longer any content on this anywhere onwiki. If attribution must be preserved a dummy edit should be sufficient; the authors are Orlando Davis and a pair of IPs. Rusalkii (talk) 03:20, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

J Dyson & Co. Flatbed Lorries

• J Dyson & Co. Flatbed Lorries → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about the company or its lorries at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete this unsourced 4-sentence stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006 before being merged. However the content lasted only 5 days and was removed (with no explanation). No need to keep attribution. Jay 02:15, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Religious epic

• Religious epic → Epic film#Biblical epics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete unless a suitable alternative target can be found. I'm not convinced that films are the primary topic for religious epic(s). There is no substantive discussion of this subgenre in the target article. Note: I have intentionally not bundled this with Religious epic filmsReligious epic films because there may be a distinct target for the literary genre. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of religious films or Category:Religious epic films. Goustien (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  List of religious films may be suitable although unfortunately the epics are not distinguished in any way. I would object to Category:Religious epic films as an WP:XNR with no justification given that there is an equivalent main space list available to target. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Most epic poetry is religious. It might not be a terrible target. J947 ‡ ^edits 23:36, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  I had the same thought though unfortunately the article does not discuss it. I also wondered if myth/mythology might be suitable. This looks to me like a topic that *could* be discussed on any number of pages but isn't, and is not an exact synonym for any of the various pages though there is substantial overlap. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  There's also Religious text but that's not a great fit. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:25, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Counit

• Counit → Coalgebra#counit  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Co-unit → Coalgebra  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure if there is a primary topic between this and Counit (category theory). 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:45, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• Yeah, it heavily depends on context. I suggest maybe we turn the page into a disambig page; basically editors should not be linking to this page but to more specific targets. —- Taku (talk) 23:51, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguation seems reasonable here. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:14, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguation draft requested. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PK2 (talk; contributions) 00:30, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

• @PK2: Can you provide your rationale for the relist? Jay 19:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

  I relisted this discussion because it hadn't been closed or relisted after seven days like discussions normally are and should be. PK2 (talk; contributions) 01:25, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. There is absolutely no substantial content at the target, which simply identifies a symbol (epsilon) as representing a counit. It doesn't provide a definition for unfamiliar readers nor any further information for familiar readers. Counit (category theory) should be deleted for the same reason, since its target uses "units" and "counits" to define something else rather than discussing counits in themselves; all the target really says about counits is that the terminology comes from universal algebra, which suggests the terminology here is not actually ambiguous, it's just being applied in different contexts. Unhelpfully, universal algebra doesn't even mention this terminology. These redirects aren't any more helpful than the search results, which show similar passing mentions in other articles. This is evidently a gap in Wikipedia's coverage; Returning to red would encourage editors to fill that gap. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:53, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

  If not deleted, then I would suggest retargetting to Tensor algebra § Counit, which seems to actually define what a "counit" is. However, the description there is highly technical so honestly I'm not entirely certain how helpful it would be as target.

  It may be helpful to notify WP:WikiProject Mathematics of this discussion to get the attention of editors with relevant expertise. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

  That article does not define what a 'counit' is but defines the counit that is used to endow the tensor algebra in particular with a coalgebra structure. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:06, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  "A counit" or counits are not defined in themselves; it is the terminology used for part of the data given by a coalgebra or an adjunction, respectively. In the same way as object (category theory) redirects to the definition of a category, since that is the term used for the points/elements in a category. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:04, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: WikiProject Mathematics has been notified.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 01:17, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. A disambiguation is possible I suppose, but it seems to me that the primary concept is already the counit of a coalgebra. Deletion is a bad idea; this is a real term that appears in many sources, and will likely be confusing to many readers who will look to Wikipedia for information about it. The current redirect is perhaps not perfect, but it seems to me that the best alternative is to improve the target article rather than making Wikipedia less functional by deleting the redirect. Sławomir Biały (talk) 06:31, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:24, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Generalized satisfiability

• Generalized satisfiability → Satisfiability  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not described at target, and a web search only shows this in the phrase "generalized satisfiability problem", which is a redlink. Something by this name is described at Schaefer's dichotomy theorem but I cannot tell how appropriate that would be as a target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:43, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Schaefer's dichotomy theorem for the time being, as the article indeed discusses these types of problems (both in the "Original presentation" and the "Modern presentation" sections), but tag as {{R with possibilities}}. Second choice delete to allow for the creation of an article (although you could have also written the article first instead of bringing this up at RfD) Duckmather (talk) 00:16, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Generalized Kahler structure

• Generalized Kahler structure → Kähler manifold  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Mentioned at Generalized_complex_structure#Relation_to_G-structures, which also redlinks Generalized almost Kähler structure, so I am not sure whether this one should be a redirect or a redlink too. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:59, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Foundations of Geometry

• Foundations of Geometry → Foundations of geometry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• The Foundations of Geometry → Hilbert's axioms  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Another book titled The Foundations of Geometry is described at Gilbert de Beauregard Robinson. Probably Hilbert's axioms is still the primary topic for the latter one and a hatnote could suffice, but I am less sure about what to do with the former one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:51, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep Foundations of Geometry as a capitalization variant (though my second choice would be to retarget to the proposed dab). Disambiguate The Foundations of Geometry between the book by Hilbert and the book by Gilbert de Beauregard Robinson and possibly the Foundations of geometry article (though my second choice would be to keep it and hatnote to the book by Robinson instead). Duckmather (talk) 02:43, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Foundations of the Theory of Probability

• Foundations of the Theory of Probability → Probability theory  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The book is cited at the target, but not really described, so Andrey Kolmogorov is probably a better target? 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:40, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Andrey Kolmogorov#Bibliography (where it's mentioned) per nom Duckmather (talk)

Foundations of Constructive Analysis

• Foundations of Constructive Analysis → Constructive analysis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The book is cited at the target, but not really described, so Errett Bishop is probably a better target? 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:35, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Errett Bishop#References (where it's cited in full, although the lead or the "Work" section could also work just as well) per nom Duckmather (talk) 02:46, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Superbalist

• Superbalist → Takealot Group  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No long part of Takealot (was sold to a consortium in September 2024), so redirect no longer valid. Husskeyy (talk) 18:16, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Superbalist is still described in the target page. Redirect doesn't imply ownership, so not invalid. pburka (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

1940 Moldavian Supreme Soviet election

• 1940 Moldavian Supreme Soviet election → 1941 Moldavian Supreme Soviet election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Moldavian Supreme Soviet election, 1940 → 1941 Moldavian Supreme Soviet election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Moldavian parliamentary election, 1940 → 1941 Moldavian Supreme Soviet election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1940 → 1941 Moldavian Supreme Soviet election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article states that the election took place in 1941. Super Ψ Dro 15:35, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep. From when the article was created in 2009 until 2020 the article stated that the election took place in 1940. As far as I can tell, the current sourcing does not verify either date. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:20, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

I just realized I searched for 1940 instead of 1941 in the source document. Searching for 1941 yields: This drive and the holding of the first elections for the Supreme Soviet of the Moldavian SSR on 12 January 1941... -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:26, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Tavix. We can tag with {{R from incorrect name}}. I note the election took place early in the year, in February. If there were a separate election in 1940, I'd be more concerned, but as such, these are apparently plausible mistakes. --BDD (talk) 19:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Rosuuri

• Rosuuri → VTuber  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - unmentioned at target, may potentially be notable under some WP:NCREATIVE guidelines. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. It's not even clear from a quick search if she's best known as a vtuber. pburka (talk) 22:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Ford slogan redirects

• Feel the Difference → Ford Motor Company  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Feel the difference → Ford Motor Company  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Go Further (slogan) → Ford Motor Company  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete - the text of {{R from slogan}} specifies that these should be to an article or section of an article about the slogan - while these are all unmentioned, making them both implausible search terms and unhelpful for anybody who does search for them to find more information. Additionally, creator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. ScalarFactor (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Inaction figure

• Inaction figure → Figurine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

term only mentioned in passing, without a source, referring to its use in another context where the article about it doesn't mention the term, and ignoring other uses for it. no definition on wiktionary, and i haven't found anything actually defining the term to add to the target, so this and the mention should probably be done away with

...also, the term seems to be vague, seeing as uses i've found were largely unrelated, but that's a boring conclusion consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:31, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Full-length

• Full-length → Statue  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

vague as fr*ck consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• What should it target instead then, or are you proposing deletion? Arlo James Barnes (pro-∪nion) 18:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  i wanted to say a dab would also be plausible, but after exactly 12 more seconds of analysis, am torn between deleting and soft redirecting to wikt:full-length consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:55, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, vague, could probably refer to a lot of other things, and certainly no reason to single out a statue among them. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:50, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to wikt:full-length where it's defined. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:57, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Stan Lee's

• Stan Lee's → Stan Lee  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

per other possessive form redirects. pretend i've linked "delete's" here, and told you to check the incoming links for said red link to see the previous consensus, because i'm not in the mood to do that this time consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:20, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete - I don't see any valid reason why this redirect exists, not sure if redirecting to Stan Lee's Lucky Man would be appropriate. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

as with other redirects of that nature, other results including that text string (like stan lee's god woke) would also be obscured consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 23:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete's per the usual rationale and precedent, especially given the existence of article titles starting with "Stan Lee's" that are harder to reach because of this redirect. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:31, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Gorillas in our midst

• Gorillas in our midst → Inattentional blindness  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Inattentional blindness#Invisible Gorilla Test. "Gorillas in our midst" is the name of the original study, but the redirect only points to the page on inattentional blindness instead of the specific section. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This is the (partial) title (with incorrect capitalization) of a paper that this article cites, but doesn't mention. Someone searching for this would be redirected somewhere that doesn't mention this, and likely be left confused as to why. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:55, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  Comment: I don’t think this is necessarily an incorrect capitalization. If you look at the original paper (the archived version linked in the article) you can see that the title is stylized as “Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events”.

  Also the article definitely mentions the exact work described in the paper, even if it doesn’t mention it by that name. I’m not sure if this actually affects whether the redirect is valid, but thought it should be pointed out. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hrm, so it is sentence case, weird. And yes, it certainly does...should the article mention the paper by title? I dunno, but it doesn't currently. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Glebe House (Lincolnshire)

• Glebe House (Lincolnshire) → Glebe House, Easton on the Hill  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, the Easton on the Hill one is not and doesn't appear to have ever been in Lincolnshire. There are 2 listed buildings in Lincolnshire namely one in Coleby, North Kesteven and one in Barton, North Lincolnshire which is still in the ceremonial county. Google returns an assisted living residence in Caistor. It was only at this title for around 11 minutes in 2022. If both of these had articles it should then point back to the DAB page Glebe House but since we don't even have Listed buildings in Coleby, North Kesteven and Listed buildings in Barton, Lincolnshire it can't go back to the DAB, if these articles get created in the future the redirect can be restored and targeted to the DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Kinesis Myofascial Integration

• Kinesis Myofascial Integration → Rolfing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

At this point the only mention of this is in passing at Massage. It does not appear that content from this was merged anywhere. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:45, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: thoughts on the article and talk page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 16:51, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Mpox vaccine

• Mpox vaccine → Smallpox vaccine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm tempted to retarget this to Mpox#Vaccine, but it was recently changed to its current target so I am nominating instead. On one hand, all currently available mpox vaccines are indeed smallpox vaccines. The Smallpox vaccine article does contain a significant amount coverage of mpox vaccination specifically as well as detailed summaries of the individual products. On the other hand, Mpox#Vaccine provides a more concise summary all in one place. I find Mpox#Vaccine more focused and reader friendly. It contains appropriate wikilinks and could be expanded with details found in various parts of Smallpox vaccine. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: Monkeypox vaccine should be created, targeted wherever this ends up, and tagged as {{R avoided double redirect|Mpox vaccine}} —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:51, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
  • @Myceteae: I agree that there should be a separate article on the vaccine, but the disease is at Mpox, so the vaccine should be at Mpox vaccine, with Monkeypox vaccine redirecting there. I have started Draft:Mpox vaccine. BD2412 T 17:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

    @BD2412, I meant Monkeypox vaccine should be created as a redirect and should have the same target as Mpox vaccine, not that an article should be created at Monkeypox vaccine. As an alternative to redirecting both of these, I support converting Mpox vaccine to an article and redirecting Monkeypox vaccine there. I don't see that we need to maintain or move a separate draft. Rather, existing content from Mpox and Smallpox vaccine can be copied with attribution to the existing page, essentially as a combined WP:SPLIT and WP:SECTIONMOVE. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

    The breakout material is a start but it is insufficient, and a bit out of date. Give me about an hour and I'll whip up something world class. BD2412 T 18:06, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

I'd support the original proposal. Bob (talk) 20:14, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

@Robertpedley, I was planning to withdraw this. Technically I can't do this if anyone has expressed an opinion other than 'keep' but BD2412's draft renders this discussion moot since anyone can convert a redirect to an article at any time. My aim with this proposal was to direct readers to the place where there is focused mpox vaccine coverage in one place. A dedicated article that consolidates, updates, and expands coverage that is currently spread over multiple pages achieves this much better than maintaining a redirect to any of the current articles. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Moot since this is an article and no longer a redirect Katzrockso (talk) 21:44, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

If everyone is satisfied with the article, this can be closed now. Cheers! BD2412 T 03:44, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

John Renold Aufenstein

• John Renold Aufenstein → Ryan Seacrest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• John aufenstein → Ryan Seacrest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this name at the target, unclear connection. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:02, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. This was mentioned in the article 20 years ago as an alternate name, but there is no reliable source or any further connections I have found between the two names. Katzrockso (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2019 Moldovan parliamentary election

• September 2019 Moldovan parliamentary election → 2021 Moldovan parliamentary election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nonsense, there was no election in Moldova in September 2019. Super Ψ Dro 15:31, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to 2019 Moldovan constitutional crisis, at which it is explained that a September 2019 election was announced but ultimately did not go ahead. J947 ‡ ^edits 05:27, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget per J947. pburka (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

AARMS

• AARMS → National University of Public Service#Publications  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• AARMS - Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science → National University of Public Service#Publications  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• AARMS – Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science → National University of Public Service#Publications  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science → National University of Public Service#Publications  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• AARMS: Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science → National University of Public Service#Publications  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is definitely a real journal, but it is not mentioned at the target nor anywhere else other than in citations. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 14:30, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment As the template on the redirect says, if you delete AARMS - Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science without also deleting AARMS – Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science, the bot will just re-create it. Please amend your nomination. Anomie⚔ 16:47, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: If not deleted, the broken section link should be dealt with, and variations like the nominated redirects as well as AARMS: Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science and Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science should be tagged with {{R avoided double redirect}}. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:10, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:25, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Bundling Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science. Note that there are a number of other journals that link to National University of Public Service#Publications, a section which as far as I can tell has never existed (I found them via WP:DBR/BSA). I may nominate the rest of them later. Rusalkii (talk) 02:12, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:14, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundling AARMS: Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:03, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete the three with hyphens, dashes or colons, as unwieldy and unlikely. No opinion on the proper journal name or the simple initialism. pburka (talk) 15:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

The Tornadocane

• The Tornadocane → Derecho#Characteristics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Tornadocane → Derecho  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention is made. I propose either deletion, article creation, or editing of the current target to at least mention the term. Edit: the term specifically referred to an instance of a supercell thunderstorm taking on the radar appearance of miniature hurricane, so a redirect to "supercell" would be negligibly more appropriate, though I would argue against it. ZFT (talk) 04:09, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

• The Tornadocane should be bundled in. Note there is a Wiktionary definition at wikt:tornadocane. There doesn't appear to be an article on the North Carolina April 1999 tornado mentioned above, but that would be a suitable target I think if it existed. Fork99 (talk) 11:02, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure how to properly add "The Tornadocane" to this entry/listing; now that I am aware of that page, I think it should be included here.ZFT (talk) 01:09, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled The Tornadocane.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:49, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Alternatively, soft redirect to the Wiktionary entry. ZFT (talk) 04:13, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

In en:wiki, it could be viewed as a Mesoscale convective vortex and in Common as commons:Category:Mesoscale convective vortex Pierre cb (talk) 04:34, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm weakly in favor of a soft redirect to the Wictionary entry as well. A quick search and source seem to most commonly refer to a specific storm that happened on April 15, 1999. Since there was a tornado with a fatality, it could warrant a section at Tornadoes of 1999, though I also found mention of one in 2003. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:02, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

When (exactly) and where was the 2003 storm? ZFT (talk) 07:22, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Per this source it was over the Midwest (vague I know) on July 31, 2003. Though this may have been a mesoscale convective vortex from the description. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

There's a section of an article for that: Tornadoes of 2003#July 21. ZFT (talk) 23:14, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete The Tornadocane and weak soft redirect Tornadocane to wikt:tornadocane. Title case The Tornadocane would seem to refer to a specific event which is not described as such on en-wiki. Tornadocane has no incoming links from articles but it averages 4 hits/month (range: 1–8 over the prior 12 months), indicating fairly consistent low-level search interest. I'm not a big fan of Wiktionary redirects but this is a reasonable alternative to deletion in this case. It doesn't seem, per the discussion above, that WP:RETURNTORED applies here although it is possible that a brief definition/description could be added somewhere. This/these can always be recreated/retargeted in the event that suitable content is added somewhere on-wiki. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:07, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus remains unclear for The Tornadocane
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:58, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Gaslone

• Gaslone → Gasoline  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

missing the i and misplacing the l (or o if you're feeling spicy) don't make for a plausible typo. some miscellaneous social media posts also have the word tossed around, seemingly as a name or misspelling of something else consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 14:24, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, highly unlekly. Would be an R3 if it were new. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:28, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

SS James Baines

• SS James Baines → USS Algol (AKA-54)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article, and the reference say "Barnes" not "Baines" and so I think this redirect is a mistake that should be deleted. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:38, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Temu Obama

• Temu Obama → Hakeem Jeffries#Temu Obama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Pejorative nickname not mentioned anywhere at the target. Delete per WP:RNEUTRAL and WP:BLP. Signahistar (talk) 11:07, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned at the target, and the section that's redirected to doesn't exist either now, or at the time of redirect creation. I don't know if it ever did or not, but either way... –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:31, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Majeur League Baseball

• Majeur League Baseball → Major League Baseball  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Random french word mixed with 2 english word with target having no affinity to french Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:53, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom as an unnatural mix of languages (I will note for the record that Major League Baseball has 1 team from Canada, namely the Toronto Blue Jays, but even though French is spoken in many parts of Canada, Toronto specifically is overwhelmingly an English-speaking city. I'll also note for the record that the actual French-language name for MLB, as covered in frwiki, is fr:Ligues majeures de baseball.) Duckmather (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hey, don't forget the Montreal Expos! Oh wait....too soon? –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:58, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, but seriously, even with a past franchise in Quebec, this isn't the French name of the league anyway, as Duckmather has pointed out. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:58, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirects to Major and minor

• Majeur → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Mineur → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Menor → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Majore → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

None are mentioned at target, but I believe that these are all Romance language words. I find it plausible there might be affinity with music, especially French and Italian, per WP:FORRED, but these aren't mentioned anywhere and are a hassle for false friends/false cognates, as I've just discovered when searching for Minore (which I'm boldly turning into a disambiguation page instead), while looking for Minore, New South Wales. I find it unlikely an English speaker will misspell "major" or "minor" as any of these. Also, Mineur (surname) should be moved to Mineur and add a mention of Mineur (crater). Fork99 (talk) 09:46, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Let’s hope that this won’t become a WP:TRAINWRECK but here is my vote:
  • Listify Menor - a simple wikipedia search yields various people with the surname “Menor”
  • Move Mineur (surname) to Mineur per nom
  • Delete the rest per nom. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Listify as appropriate (as creator of at least some). Yes, they are all translations of major or minor in European languages, and as such in classical music often appear in titles, musical instructions, and such. For that reason they are typically included in music encyclopedias (as redirects), and were once on the Wikipedia:Music encyclopedia topics lists (which is why I created them). But certainly no need to prioritize that meaning to surnames or other uses which are likely more common; in fact as a disambiguation page they are better since the explanation could be clearer than a simple redirect. Rigadoun (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Literary studies

• Literary studies → Literary criticism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Poorly targeted redirect. It seems like that literary studies (Literaturwissenschaft) consists of literary theory, literary criticism, and literary history, and should be converted into an article based on Special:PermaLink/803979457.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 09:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep The current target looks like the best we can do. I considered Literary theory and even Philology. I like that the current target has prominent discussion of its relationship with literary theory. An equivalent to Literaturwissenschaft could be good, but in the meantime, I don't think there's anything wrong with the redirect. --BDD (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate this and Literary science to the three specialities (literary theory, literary criticism, and literary history). pburka (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Gillen’s Siding

• Gillen’s Siding → Moolboolaman  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, also Gillen's Siding (per MOS:') does not exist, and if it did, this should tagged as an {{R avoided double redirect}} of that. This could plausibly be mentioned as there are historic newspaper clippings in trove.nla.gov.au. Fork99 (talk) 07:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, the 1924 railway derailment at Gillen's Siding is the reason I created the redirect. But due to some health issues, I've been unable to put any time into Wikipedia in the last few months. I've made a quick addition of the derailment into the Moolboolaman article so it is linked from there. Kerry (talk) 23:36, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond: sorry to hear that, I believe we've interacted a few times before. Take care :) Fork99 (talk) 00:10, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy keep/withdraw, I don't mind if the closer creates Gillen's Siding per above or I can do it. Fork99 (talk) 08:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Oligo Security

• Oligo Security → Fluent Bit  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target page contains no meaningful information about Oligo Security and is not related to Oligo Security, which appears to be an unrelated company that publishes blogposts about various cybersecurity topics, this being one such topic. ~ A412 ^talk! 06:25, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Quranic epic

• Quranic epic → Epic film#Religious epics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. No mention of (the) Quran or Quranic anywhere in the article, nor spelling variants Qur'an or Koran. The section § Religious epics does not exist. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:55, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of religious films or Category:Religious epic films. Goustien (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  List of religious films may be suitable although unfortunately the epics are not distinguished in any way. I would object to Category:Religious epic films as an WP:XNR with no justification given that there is an equivalent main space list available to target. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:17, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, noting that epic is a wider categorization than films. Islamic literature mentions a couple epic poems, but I don't think they'd be considered Quranic. To include films, I don't think we could get any narrower than Islamic culture, but that's way too general of an article and epic films aren't even mentioned there. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:34, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  I agree it's broader than film, despite my initial rather hasty reply above, and that there can be Islamic epics that are not necessarily Quranic. This also appears to be rather obscure terminology. "Quranic epic" has just 13 hits on Google Scholar and 5 hits on the "Wikipedia Refs" Google search. "Koranic epic" has only 1 hit on GScholar and 4 hits on the Wiki Refs search. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Biblical epic

• Biblical epic → Epic film#Biblical epics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. The section does Epic film § Biblical epics does not exist and there is no mention of biblical or (the) Bible in the article. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:53, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of religious films or Category:Religious epic films. Goustien (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  List of religious films may be suitable although unfortunately the epics are not distinguished in any way. I would object to Category:Religious epic films as an WP:XNR with no justification given that there is an equivalent main space list available to target. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:17, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Epics are mentioned in The Bible in film and Christian poetry. To encompass both I don't think you could get any narrower than Christian culture, but that's too general to support a redirect as epic films aren't mentioned there. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:40, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

RUSHDIE, SALMAN

• RUSHDIE, SALMAN → Salman Rushdie  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. No affinity with all caps. Thepharoah17 (talk) 18:20, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. This is the format sometimes used in scholarly citations, of which he has an affinity for because he is an academic. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:49, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:30, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, an WP:UNNATURAL stylization. Any name can be so written, and a typical reader should be expected to know how to type it normally. And even if they don't, the search engine will find the correct target anyway. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:51, 11 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, It's a no brainer. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's clearly not, since both nom and myself think it should be deleted. Maybe you could expand on why you think it would be good to keep. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:17, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:16, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Useful redirect per Tavix, plausible search due to the academic affiliation Katzrockso (talk) 21:51, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Tajar, Semnan

• Tajar, Semnan → Tazareh, Semnan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see any evidence that there's a place called "Tajar" in Semnan Province, Iran (let alone in the eponymous county or city). There are 4 different places in Iran called "Tazareh", but that's a different term from "Tajar" even when written in Perso-Arabic script. So I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: It is a romanization of the name, as noted in the "Notes" section of the article. By accessing said source and inserting Tajar into the search bar, it brings up a couple of results. LazyLune (talk • edits) 04:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Tiger Moth the Bi-plane

• Tiger Moth the Bi-plane → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. This was an unsourced 2 paragraph stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006. Although the merge-to tag was added, it was removed the same day, as the then target already had a paragraph on it. Nothing was merged, and no reason to keep attribution.

Delete, as the "the" indicates the name of a character. Unless there is an argument that it can refer to the real Tiger Moth biplane. Also, remove the character entry from the Tiger moth disambig page. Jay 03:32, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned at the target. Signahistar (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

SPOC K

• SPOC K → S.P.O.C.K  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot redirect. I don't see evidence the band or anything else at Spock (disambiguation) is referred to by using this spacing. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This will be my last Eubot redirect nomination for now. I got them from the search onlyredirects:intitle:/^[A-Z]{{3,}} [A-Z]$/ hastemplate:"R from alternative punctuation", which finds pages of acronyms/initialisms with 4+ letters split by one implausible space by Eubot. This search covers those pages with 3 letters, which I believe are also implausible but I won't nominate yet, maybe later. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, implausible spacing from a Eubot error. Signahistar (talk) 11:10, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

NKS T

• NKS T → Church of Christ in the Sudan Among the Tiv  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot redirect. Not a plausible spacing of N.K.S.TN.K.S.T. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:34, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

NEW S

• NEW S → N.E.W.S. (Prince album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot redirect. N.E.W.S.N.E.W.S. is now a redirect to News (disambiguation), but nothing there is known as "NEW S". The closest match is New-S, though I personally prefer deletion so a search for "New S" will automatically lead to the correct article. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:30, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

MIL K

• MIL K → Milk (South Korean group)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot redirect. Not a stylization the target uses. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not a stylization the group uses. Signahistar (talk) 11:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

MICU M

• MICU M → Occupation of the Ruhr  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot redirect. "MICUM" is not a plausible variation of M.I.C.U.MM.I.C.U.M. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

FEELINGCALLEDLIV E

• FEELINGCALLEDLIV E → F.E.E.L.I.N.G.C.A.L.L.E.D.L.I.V.E  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot redirect. This redirect in particular is very implausible. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

EMA S

• EMA S → E.M.A.S.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot redirect. Neither the target or anything else located at the disambiguation page EMAS is referred to as "EMA S". Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:16, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

NER D

• NER D → N.E.R.D.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible Eubot creation. Note that NERDNERD is a redirect to Nerd (disambiguation), but that doesn't really matter as nothing at that page uses this term with a strange spacing. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:03, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, I'd almost be tempted to call this a G6/{{db-error}} case as a malfunctioning bot. ScalarFactor (talk) 02:13, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Mathguy2718 It may be worth bundling all of the above Eubot redirects - I think this rationale would apply from me for all of them, personally. ScalarFactor (talk) 03:01, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm hesitant to do so as there are sightly different circumstances for each page, in particular NEW S since the page New-S exists. Mathguy2718 (talk) 03:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Neelix redirects to Difference

• Differedly → Difference  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Differredly → Difference  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Differringly → Difference  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Differingly → Difference  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Differrers → Difference  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Differrer → Difference  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Differer → Difference  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A serious of incredibly unlikely formations from the word "Differ". Canadachick (talk) 01:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete yes, not likely misspellings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swirlymarigold (talk • contribs) 01:38, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete in the spirit of X1. ScalarFactor (talk) 02:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Deletedly, woefully implausible...more good finds. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:54, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: these were removed from the Neelix list here by Ultraexactzz. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:20, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

List of Intel Core processors

• List of Intel Core processors → List of Intel Core desktop processors  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer an accurate name for the target after the move, which distinguishes it from List of Intel Core mobile processors and List of Intel Core desktop processors. Should this be DABified as-is at this title, or retargeted somewhere like Intel Core where these lists could be more naturally linked? ScalarFactor (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate, someone arriving here clearly wants a list. ~ A412 ^talk! 06:27, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Convert to a WP:LISTOFLISTS or retarget to List of Intel processors#See also, which essentially serves the same purpose. - Eureka Lott 19:09, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Monstromart

• Monstromart → Homer and Apu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned at the target, delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:03, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned at target. Signahistar (talk) 11:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, people can gain knowledge on a Fandom wiki instead of this. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Independent thought alarm

• Independent thought alarm → Lisa the Vegetarian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

One brief mention at the target, but it's merely in a quote of a review of the episode. Nothing substantive about it, not fundamental to the plot or described in any detail, so deletion would be best. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:02, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - fictional alarm and not known to be used elsewhere famously. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm an excellent driver.

• I'm an excellent driver. → Rain Man  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, well known quote from the movie, but unmentioned at the target, especially unlikely with punctuation at the end. Wikipedia isn't a repository of movie quotes. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:01, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Immigant

• Immigant → Much Apu About Nothing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, unmentioned at target. And before anyone even suggests it, I'd specifically oppose retargeting "Immigrant", as a random, unlikely typo. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Google Search shows an Immigant Trail Road in Utah. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to immigrant as a plausible typo – as proven by the existence of those hits for "Immigant Trail Road" which unsurprisingly appears to be a typo for Immigrant Trail Road. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  Any letter deletion is a plausible typo, but there are billions of possibilities of these, and making redirects for stuff like this is silly. Why not mmigrant, immgrant, or immigrnt, etc etc? None of these has any claim to be more likely than any other, and it's not unreasonable to expect a user to correct their error here (when the search engine doesn't already catch it, which it usually does). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Jiminy jillikers

• Jiminy jillikers → Radioactive Man (The Simpsons episode)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, unmentioned at target...random catch phrase or something without any clearly defined spelling to boot. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:57, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - not used anywhere else except this one episode. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Annual Gift Man

• Annual Gift Man → Homer's Phobia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, unmentioned at target –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:56, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

School of Hard Knockers

• School of Hard Knockers → Homer Goes to College  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, unmentioned at target –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:53, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - not a real school name or anything else notable at present. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Wiggle Puppy

• Wiggle Puppy → This Little Wiggy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target, connection unclear. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:51, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Not mentioned at target article maybe, but certainly mentioned in target TV episode.

  (Marge and Chief Wiggum watch Ralph run around, barking)
  Marge: Is that normal?
  Chief Wiggum: Yeah, he's just playing "Wiggle Puppy." That's a dog he made up who flies by wagging his tail. I tell ya, that dog has had some amazing adventures.

  —Gimple, Scott M., ed. (1999). The Simpsons Forever! A Complete Guide to our Favorite Family ... Continued. London: HarperCollinsEntertainment. p. 33. ISBN 0-00-653168-7. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Wikipedia is not a repository of TV or movie or book quotes. Every episode of every TV show could have hundreds of lines redirected to it, but we don't do that. This one isn't special enough to even mention at the article, so why should it redirect there? –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:55, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Deacon's immediate above comment. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

LLLP, LLP

• LLLP, LLP → A Moon Shaped Pool  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

According to a Google AI summary, "LLLP, LLP" is a copyright and holding company entity, not a track on or alternate name for A Moon Shaped Pool. Also, this is another case of a redirect without mention. ZFT (talk) 00:28, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: I did a more complex request ("Is "LLLP, LLP" a track on or alternate name for A Moon Shaped Pool (by Radiohead)?") using the same AI (Google AI) and the AI said that it was not an alternative name. This is what the AI said:

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

No, "LLLP, LLP" is not a track or an alternate name for Radiohead’s album A Moon Shaped Pool. Instead, it is the legal business entity and copyright holder established by the band members to handle the rights and licensing for that specific record. [1, 2]

1. 1. What is LLLP, LLP?

Radiohead is famous for setting up a brand new Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) company for nearly every major album release. This strategy helps them manage the financial structures, royalties, and distribution rights independently for each era of their music. [2] When A Moon Shaped Pool came out, the phonographic copyright line (℗) on physical vinyl sleeves, CDs, and streaming platforms was assigned to LLLP, LLP under an exclusive license to their distributor, XL Recordings Ltd. [1, 3]

1. 1. Examples of Other Radiohead Album Companies

The band uses this distinct corporate method regularly:

• Ticker Tape Ltd – A Moon Shaped Pool (touring and alternative structures)
• Dawn Chorus LLP – Pre-release business for A Moon Shaped Pool
• Xurbia Xendless Ltd – OK Computer
• Dead Air Space Ltd – In Rainbows [2]

If you are looking at the fine print on a platform like [Apple Music](https://music.apple.com/us/album/a-moon-shaped-pool/1111577743) or a physical vinyl copy found via marketplaces like [Discogs](https://www.discogs.com/), you are simply seeing the corporate name responsible for protecting the music's copyright. [1, 3] Are you trying to track down a specific unreleased song or b-side from the A Moon Shaped Pool era, or perhaps looking for details on a specific physical edition of the album? Let me know and I can help you find it.

[1] (https://music.apple.com/us/album/a-moon-shaped-pool/1111577743) [2] (https://www.reddit.com/r/radiohead/comments/1jagw2g/radiohead_members_form_new_llp_historically_a/) [3] (https://www.discogs.com/release/36730522-Radiohead-A-Moon-Shaped-Pool)

Since we can't make a redirect to redirect to two separate articles (LLLP and LLP), we have to delete it. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 00:42, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Slightly off topic, but I think this is the first time I've seen someone collapse their own AI-generated text. Fork99 (talk) 12:24, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

SimpleObjects-9ei, please don't use AI in your comments. It's not admissible so it just ends up being useless clutter. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, unmentioned at target, no apparent relevance. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

“

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn

9ec4c12949a4f31474f299058ce2b22a

• 9ec4c12949a4f31474f299058ce2b22a → United States Cyber Command  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This seems quite implausible given that this MD5 hash is a mashup of (and unmemorable) characters. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 00:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, mentioned and sourced at target. Stable since 2010 and still gets views. Signahistar (talk) 11:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: What Signahistar said. --MZMcBride (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

September 17

MOS:OVERCITE

• MOS:OVERCITE → Wikipedia:Citation overkill  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Despite this being a "MOS:" shortcut link, it does not lead to a Manual of Style subpage, nor any editing guideline; rather, it leads to an essay about citations, which may come off as misleading to other readers. In addition, the Manual of Style doesn't appear to cover this concept, so I would suggest deleting the redirect. Since WP:OVERCITEWP:OVERCITE already exists as a valid shortcut link, deleting it MOS:OVERCITE should not cause any problems. LazyLune (talk • edits) 23:20, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete the MOS:OVERCITE redirect to this essay, but keep WP:OVERCITE. Reasons: (1) MOS-namespace links give the impression it is an official MOS guideline; whereas WP-namespace links are understood to include non-binding essays. (2) There is an opposing essay named WP:UNDERCITE (aka WP:Citation underkill) which does not have a matching MOS redirect. (3) The essay WP:OVERCITE contains some questionable guidance that is frequently abused, resulting in removal of good quality citations (and sources) from articles. The essay has some germs of good advice, but it often used in a heavy-handed manner. The "MOS" seal-of-approval should not be associated with this essay. Noleander (talk) 23:54, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. Fairly indifferent on this one, but if it is deleted, there are a handful of incoming links that should be updated in that case. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:58, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Question Do we know how many MOS-namespace redirects link to essays? If the answer is, say, "under 5" that is an indication that MOS-namespace should not be used to link to essays, and perhaps all five could be deleted (after proper notification). On the other hand, if there are dozens of MOS redirects to essays, maybe a broader discussion (RfC?) should be used to determine if they should be prohibited. Noleander (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not sure whether those types of redirects are common or not. I happened to found this one while I was viewing Wikipedia:Citation overkill. To my knowledge, "MOS" shortcut links should only be redirected to Manual of Style subpages or guideline pages to prevent them from being misleading.

  As for having a broader discussion, I would be in support of that, if that were ever to take place. LazyLune (talk • edits) 00:42, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Agreeing with Noleander on this one. A bit of research may be necessary. That said, it's only had 71 pageviews in the past year, so probably not the end of the world. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:36, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: @Noleander: @Deacon Vorbis: For clarity, I was using the shortcut link as a reason to delete "MOS:OVERCITE", not "WP:OVERCITE". LazyLune (talk • edits) 00:10, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  @LazyLune -I believe my comments above are consistent with your proposal. Is my wording confusing or ambiguous? I can reword it if it is confusing. Noleander (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Noleander: I noticed the part listed below, and I thought you may have misinterpreted my nomination:

  Delete the MOS:OVERCITE redirect to this essay, but keep WP:OVERCITE. LazyLune (talk • edits) 00:17, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Bernard B. Jacobs

• Bernard B. Jacobs → The Shubert Organization  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The subject is not mentioned at the target. The only mention of the name "Bernard B. Jacobs" at the target page is actually for the theater named after him. Epicgenius (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Bernard B. Jacobs Theatre. Signahistar (talk) 11:27, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Support Retarget - 13 years later! If I recall correctly, the redirect made the most sense at the time because of Jacob's sizable role in the modern manifestation of the SO as it exists today. Looking at that page, it definitely needs some attention (which should include more information on Jacobs' tenure as head of the company). For now, the redirect to his namesake theater seems appropriate. Mistamystery (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

ЯЕD SQЦАЯЕ

• ЯЕD SQЦАЯЕ → Red Square  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Highly implausible search redirect, 'typo' or misnomer. No one is going to search up 'ЯЕD SQЦАЯЕ' to look for Red Square. In solidarity, Kristi ☎️ 19:06, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, WP:R#D8. This had an odd period of elevated traffic from 2021-2023. Not sure why, but it was probably linked somewhere, maybe as a joke that didn't get caught and reverted until January 2024. Either way, I doubt this is actually helpful to anyone. Jokes aren't within the scope of the purpose of redirects. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:27, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per above. "JAJED SQCAJAJE" does not mean anything in any language and no affinity to all caps, RED SQUARE does not exist. Unless there's any evidence this stylisation is used anywhere. Fork99 (talk) 21:21, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Also, according to a Unicode analyser tool, D, S and Q are Latin letters and the rest are Cyrillic. Fork99 (talk) 21:38, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT. Duckmather (talk) 21:44, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: It's extremely obvious why this redirect is implausible. This is NOT an appropriate redirect from a modification. (Unrelated: I was reading Pseudolocalization and it came to my mind that this looks familiar) — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 00:20, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, pseudo-cyrillic should only be used in the (very very unfortunate) case that a reliable source used it. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:05, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget, to Faux Cyrillic. --Ric36 (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

While that wouldn't be a surprising target, this particular example isn't mentioned there, it's not linked anywhere, and there's no evidence it's searched often. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:08, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:36, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Aquinas 101

• Aquinas 101 → Thomistic Institute  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While this is certainly a notable offering of the Thomistic Institute, it is not mentioned at the target and thus shouldn't exist as a redirect unless a mention is added. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 17:00, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Big West

• Big West → Macross  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per Japanese Wikipedia, they did more than Macross, they were doing other series also… SBF2004 (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget back to Big West Conference, which is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Comment: now this is confusing bwc is a sports league while the big west im referring to is a advertising and planning and production company. SBF2004 (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Big West Conference. From what I can glean from the current target (which isn't much), the full name is Big West Advertising, not just "Big West", so there's no SMALLDETAILS case either way. So on the one hand, we have a dedicated, lengthy article on the sports conference (which is likely much more primary anyway), versus an article about a media franchise with a few brief mentions about its owner/sponsor/???, which as pointed out in the nomination, has other properties besides this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:48, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

You can unlock any door, if you only have the key.

• You can unlock any door, if you only have the key. → The Secret of NIMH  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Phrase not used in article. ScalarFactor (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

@TheEleventhProvince:, was this the tagline for the trailer/ad? Halbared (talk) 17:18, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, unmentioned, unlikely search term. Even if it were mentioned (whether as a quote or a tagline or whatever it is), it's unlikely to merit a redirect. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:35, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

That's what Nicodemus's amulet said in the movie. TheEleventhProvince (talk) 23:38, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Add it to the article. Halbared (talk) 21:11, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

atomy

• Atomy → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomies → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomie → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (fae) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (fay) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (fairy) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (faery) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (faerie) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

rub your eyes on wikt:atomy to see that none of its definitions would necessarily narrow it down to fairies. so... uh... soft redirect to that? consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 13:25, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• support wiktionary soft redirect per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:11, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
• Very weak retarget to Wiktionary. The obvious target is Skeleton (undead) - the word is used in this sense by Shakespeare, Dickens, and Smollett, among others - but we don't mention it on that page. Tevildo (talk) 23:39, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not sure Skeleton (undead) would be the most obvious target since the other definition, 'mote, speck', is more common; it's ambiguous and could also probably target Particle (which the disambiguation page at mote links to for this sense of the word). According to my external search results (eg. ) Shakespeare used it in this sense too, and the glossaries in the top results don't even mention the "skeleton" sense. Wiktionary provides Shakespeare quotes for both definitions, suggesting it was ambiguous even then. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 08:11, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• My guess is that this has come from 1.4.57 of Romeo and Juliet, where the chariot of the fairy Queen Mab is said to be "Drawn with a team of little atomies". As far as I can tell, this passage doesn't imply that "atomy" refers to fairies themselves. The OED lists the following definitions of "atomy": "An atom, a mote", "A diminutive or tiny being; a mite", "A skeleton", "An emaciated or withered living body, a walking skeleton", and "Chiefly in the work of Dickens: a spindly or skeletal thing". The Wiktionary page lists all of these meanings. I don't see a whole lot currently mentioned on Wikipedia that the term could refer to: Mnogotochie (rap group) are apparently the progenitors of an album titled Atomy zsoznaniya, but this merely seems to be because "atomy" is the Russian word for "atoms", and I suspect the mention of an "Energy Atomy School" at List of schools in Iran involves a typo or an error, as I'm unable to find anything about such a school. Other appearances of the word are either using it in one of the senses listed by the OED, or are referring to "atoms" in another language. Given all of this, I think retargeting to the Wiktionary page is a reasonable enough solution. – Michael Aurel (talk) 04:33, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  Those mentions in the list about Iranian schools intended to mention the Atomic Energy Schools maintained by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. The Farsi for "Atomic Energy" is انرژی اتمی enerži atomi, which sounds like "energy atomy". I've amended the list. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:23, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for confirming that suspicion, and fixing the issue. – Michael Aurel (talk) 05:35, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget Atomy and Atomies to Wiktionary, delete Atomie; atomie is not mentioned on the Wiktionary page. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 10:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate between the various uses, which seems to be at least particle and skeleton (or skeleton (undead)). Atomy (fae) also exists, which could be added as well. It's preferable to stay local where feasible. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:29, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Good catch, now bundled. --BDD (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I meant that the usage related to fae could be added to the disambiguation page, but while we're here: Atomy (fairy), Atomy (fay), Atomy (faery), and Atomy (faerie) also redirect to Fairy. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:41, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:33, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Ope, several others besides the one Tavix flagged. I don't think this will be a WP:TRAINWRECK hazard, as we're really just looking at two items: with and without a fairy-specific disambiguator. N..b., The term does not appear at Fairy. --BDD (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  i would actually suggest un-bundling them if that's possible, since those are two different cases consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 16:36, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I think it's worth having eyes on both types, since we don't mention the term on Fairy either. There is a brief entry at List of legendary creatures (A). We could have a separate discussion--my point is just as things stand, the (fae) etc. redirects are also ripe for RfD. --BDD (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. I just noticed that while most of these have little traffic, atomy has a lot of traffic. The all-time total is >65,000 since 2015. I somehow doubt this due to readers looking for an obscure, very archaic word meaning either skeleton or mote (or, apparently, also fairy according to these redirects). I think there's something we're overlooking here.
  A quick external search for "Atomy" overwhelmingly brings up a South Korean brand/chain called 'Atomy' in English. There seems to be no coverage here on ~enwiki, but it does have an article on ~kowiki: Atomy. I'm still undecided, but my intuition is there's a WP:RETURNTORED situation here. I'm unsure if there are other meanings of the word that we're missing which would explain the high traffic. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 17:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

For what it's worth, there is history that could be restored, although it'd need some work. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:40, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Not sure how that would help. That article in the history is still about diminutive fairies or fairy-like beings (in Shakespeare), whereas I think the traffic is coming from various sources including possibly for the South Korean multinational company which appears to be a notable gap in coverage. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:10, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Gotcha. I misunderstood which use you wanted the WP:RETURNTORED for. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:15, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Patti Ryan

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Landphoon

• Landphoon → Derecho  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention is made. I propose either deletion, article creation, or editing of the current target to at least mention the term. ZFT (talk) 04:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

• There is a Wiktionary definition at wikt:landphoon. I found some Australian news sources using this term, usually putting it in quotation marks: The New Daily article Courier Mail article ABC News article. Fork99 (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the comment of Fork99
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:07, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• It's not clear that these terms are synonymous. The links found by Fork99 do not seem to use the word "derecho", so they don't demonstrate synonymy. Wiktionary also doesn't mention that landphoons are synonyms with derechos, and defines them as tropical depressions over land whose satellite signature resembles that of a typhoon, however derecho doesn't mention anything about them having typhoon-like radar signatures. It does mention that One derecho developed a radar signature resembling that of a cyclone..., but "one" implies this is unusual not definitive of derechos. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:32, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: Landphoon had an article at that title prior to September 2007, but it was deleted at AfD. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:44, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

  I've notified Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones of this RfD to hopefully get input from editors better informed about meteorology and tropical cyclones. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:41, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

  I WP:BOLDly changed the Wiktionary definition to be more in line with what the current redirect target implies. ZFT (talk) 04:23, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  @ZFT: I might suggest changing it back or to something else. From the two Australian articles I could read (the second of the three is paywalled), they seem to be referring to tropical systems of one form or another, including a monsoonal low and a system sustained by the brown ocean effect, while the current Wictionary definition is more along the lines of a mesoscale convective vortex. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  I restored the old definition while also keeping the new one; how's that? ZFT (talk) 05:16, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• I see a few routes, but none of them are it remaining as a redirect to derecho. It could be turned into a disambiguation for derecho, brown ocean effect, and other terms including specific "cases". Landphoon could also be simply redirected to brown ocean effect, which seems to be the most common usage of the term based on a Google Search and others' comments in this thread. The redirect could also just be deleted due to how colloquial the term is. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 12:20, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  There are some unreliable references connecting landphoon and derecho that I have found. This Wikipedia article refers to a specific derecho as a landphoon. There are also a couple uses of it on social media to variably refer to BOE or derechoes, depending on the context. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  Could retarget to a visible anchor at the mention in Tornadoes of 2003:

  The derecho itself produced a very intense mesoscale convective vortex, and at times, the entire squall line was wrapped into it, creating a "super-derecho", also known as a landphoon.

  This seems to be the closest thing Wikipedia currently has to an explanation of the term. There's also a mention at International Cloud Experiment but this does not explain what a "landphoon" is beyond describing the one mentioned as "record-breaking tropical typhoon". – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:43, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  I don't understand why you link to WP:BARTENDER, since these suggestions (disambiguate, retarget, delete) are all appropriate for discussing here at RfD rather than at another venue. Disambiguation pages aren't just lists of related topics, they're articles which could share the same title. Even if the brown ocean effect is relevant to landphoons, these terms are definitely not synonymous. Brown ocean effect doesn't mention "landphoon" so would likely be a surprising target. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:30, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  There are several outcomes I can see, none of which are massively preferable, but the current option is not acceptable. If you disagree with my analysis of multiple possible solutions, that is fine. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Template:Family Guy books

• Template:Family Guy books → Template:Family Guy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This template was redirected due to a lack of actual pages falling under its scope Emcgonigle (talk) 02:41, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Actually, this template (the nominated redirect) was merged into the target page by the nominator: , . The nominator then made this nomination about half an hour later: . Mentioning this since this there may be attribution concerns or suggestions to restore the template and send it to WP:TFD instead. Steel1943 (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:20, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Steel1943's research. We can't delete this because it's been merged and because the parent template covers Family Guy books this is a valid redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:03, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

2nd Armored

• 2nd Armored → 2nd Armored Division (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 4th Armored → 4th Division  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 5th Armored → 5th Division  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 6th Armored → 6th Armored Division (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 10th Armored → 10th Armored Division (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 12th Armored → 12th Armored Division (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 13th Armored → 13th Armored Division (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The targets of these partial title match redirects are too specific, as there are armored brigades, armored regiments, etc. Delete all to avoid confusion and defer to search and encourage users to enter a more specific term. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:31, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2026_August_28#3rd_Armored, where 3rd Armored was deleted without objection. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:07, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: 4th Armored and 5th Armored were formerly disambiguation pages: , . Steel1943 (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Epicgenius (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Countershock

• Countershock → Defibrillation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

per wikt:countershock, it's not a concept exclusive to use of the zappy bricks, though that's probably close enough to the primary topic that a soft redirect to wiktionary only might be the slightly better option here, so consider this a weak nom consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 13:24, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Thank you, that would indeed be an improvement that would optimize in this case. As the creator of the redirect (created in 2016), I fully support consarn's proposed improvement. Namely, please provide one of those soft redirects to Wiktionary for this term, instead of redirecting to defibrillation, which is merely one major category of activity where countershock is relevant. Thank you. Quercus solaris (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Can someone remind me about WP's process on this point? (IANAL, including wikilawyering.) I intend to change the page to use {{Wiktionary redirect}} if there are no objections here within a certain time frame. How many days must pass before a bold move is made? Thx. Quercus solaris (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Never mind — there are no stakes anyway: I will do that, and if anyone imagines that it needs to be undone, then they can click a button to undo it. Quercus solaris (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  xfdcloser is a pretty neat tool for this process, which i'll recommend having regardless just because of how versatile it is, though as i mentioned in the summary when undoing the soft redirection, closing this should be left to an uninvolved editor consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 20:04, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep/weak delete, but do not retarget to wiktionary. The various mentions are all related to the current target, so there's certainly nothing else to reasonably target. The only other search hits are for a handful of sources published by a "Countershock Press". That being said, I wouldn't mind seeing this go altogether, but if it has to stay, it should stay where it is. As almost always, Wikt redirects are actively harmful and should almost never be used. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:44, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  admittedly not seeing what would make this one harmful tbh consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 00:17, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

List of Yoshi series enemies

• List of Yoshi series enemies → Mario (franchise)#Major characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Yoshi Series Enemies → Mario (franchise)#Major characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Yoshi series enemies → Mario (franchise)#Major characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Yoshi Series enemies → Mario (franchise)#Major characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Yoshi enemies → Mario (franchise)#Major characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target is not synonymous with the redirect. For one, the characters in Yoshi (video game series) are fundamentally different, including different villains and enemies that are not present in the Mario series. Also, I am not finding any clear target that has a subtopic of Yoshi (video game series) to target this, meeting readers will not find what they were looking for on Wikipedia at the present time. (Note: List of Yoshi series enemies was an article () until it was WP:BLARed in 2007.) Steel1943 (talk) 12:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 14:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Lord Ravenous

• Lord Ravenous → Mugen (game engine)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

loving the fanfic, very edgy, 10/10 wrist cuts. still unmentioned and unnotable, though

so was this dork a grappler or something? consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:53, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete as non-notable in-universe character. Also checked character's gameplay in youtube, very edgy indeed. --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  ow the edge consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:25, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

MUGE N

• MUGE N → Mugen (game engine)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

go home eubot, you're drunk consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:49, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep no compelling evidence on either side. This seems like a joke nomination to me, and that should wait. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 14:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  the more formal way to put it would be "malformed eubot creation", but that's boring. views also reflect how implausible this "stylization" is consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 14:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, Mugen is often stylized as an acronym (MUGEN or M.U.G.E.N.), but it doesn't actually stand for anything. All caps with a space before the last letter is arbitrary and WP:UNNATURAL. ScalarFactor (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, G6, bot error. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:50, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I'm going to nominate a bunch of these implausible spacing variants created by Eubot (I already nominated one). Eubot created many implausible redirects while it ran; one type is acronyms/initialisms with only a space between the second-last and last letters. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above as unlikely misspelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:55, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Advanced Potion Making

• Advanced Potion Making → Fictional universe of Harry Potter#Magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Fictional textbook fairly significant to the plot of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, but is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. This was a 3.5 line unsourced stub created in July 2005 and BLARed in November 2005. I have repaired the attribution from a merge to Hogwarts subjects via a dummy edit attributing the creator and the second revision by a different user. All other edits in between this and it being BLARed only added categories, links, a stub template, a merge template, changed templates and removed a word, so I haven't attributed them. I also have no idea why this was conflated as being a course/class/subject offered at Hogwarts in the pre-BLAR content. Delete. Fork99 (talk) 10:39, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

- -;

• - -; → Emoticon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete due to not being listed/mentioned at Emoticon or List of emoticons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-50069-98 (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

- -;;

• - -;; → Emoticon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete due to not being listed/mentioned at Emoticon or List of emoticons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-50069-98 (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

List of modern wars

• List of modern wars → List of wars: 2003–2019  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• List of recent wars → List of wars: 2003–2019  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• List of Recent wars → List of wars: 2003–2019  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I suppose these could now target List of wars: 2020–present, but as with #List of armed conflicts in 2021, there are also wars that began before 2020 and are either still ongoing (List of ongoing armed conflicts) or ended recently. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget list of modern wars to Modern warfare#Modern wars. There is broad debate about what constitutes modern warfare; there is no concise and broadly agreed definition, but most scholars define it using technological or tactical criteria rather than by a specific timeframe, and most go back to WWII if not WWI. Regarding the lists of recent wars, the word "recent" is ambiguous; I suggest disambiguate and list at least the last three decades. Carguychris (talk) 21:45, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget List of modern wars to Modern warfare#Modern wars, disambiguate List of recent wars, delete List of Recent wars. I agree with User:Rusalkii above, but List of Recent wars is an improbable miscapitalization. --Bsherr (talk) 13:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:58, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

@1234qwer1234qwer4: do you agree with the proposal to retarget and disambiguate? voorts (talk/contributions) 03:29, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Targeting all to Modern warfare#Modern wars as suggested below seems fine to me. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:26, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget all to Modern warfare#Modern wars. Disambiguation that would distinguish between modern and recent wars feels like a fool's errand. Both List of wars: 2003–present and List of ongoing armed conflicts are linked prominently at Modern warfare#Modern wars. --BDD (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget all to Modern warfare#Modern wars, agreeing with BDD. Note that List of wars: 2003–present was split into List of wars: 2003–2019 and List of wars: 2020–present so I updated the proposed target. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:17, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Thoughts on the new retargeting proposal?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:23, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Refine per above. Given the adjective not specifying they are current or non-contemporary modern history. Dudzcar (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Red Squad (Star Trek)

• Red Squad (Star Trek) → Star Trek#Starfleet Academy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. I think there's probably a decent target among the scattering of mentions we have onwiki, but I'm not sure which on is most appropriate. Input from someone more familiar with this in the context of the series would be helpful. Rusalkii (talk) 08:44, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• There's a mention at Redshirt (stock character) that might be appropriate. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:18, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Valiant (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine), which describes Red Squad as an elite squadron of Starfleet cadets. Signahistar (talk) 11:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Prince Yasuhito

• Prince Yasuhito → Emperor Nakamikado  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Might also refers to Yasuhito, Prince Chichibu Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:38, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

I think it might be better to redirect "Prince Yasuhito" to "Yasuhito"Yasuhito, Prince Chichibu as well, because Yasuhito redirects to Yasuhito, Prince Chichibu.Alternatively, I think it would be fine to turn it into a disambiguation page. --オルドルボントン (talk) 08:00, 1 September 2026 (UTC)--(correction)--オルドルボントン (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I created a hatnote at Emperor Nakamikado addressing the RD. No need to bring an issue to RfD if it can be fixed uncontroversially like this. It is also not clear from your nomination what action you are suggesting - do you want to delete or retarget? ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:52, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:45, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:13, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, hatnotes are fine. SnowFire (talk) 13:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• keep per the hatnote fix --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:58, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Kinggoldchains

• Kinggoldchains → Tyga  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unsourced and unmentioned in article. ScalarFactor (talk) 17:51, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

The edit summary when this was made states that this is his Soundcloud name. Looking on Soundcloud I found: soundcloud.com/kinggoldchains. The URL has the account name as Kinggoldchains, while the displayed name is "Tyga" with a "Verified" check mark. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 17:59, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. This is a username Tyga used for his social media accounts for years (Instagram archive). Here's an article in Vice talking about it, for some reason. ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep per ArcticSeeress and tag with R from alternative name. I've added a mention in the article. मल्ल (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - is there a policy on social media handles as redirects? Also I don't think it's accurate to add "Kinggoldchains" as a nickname. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 17:46, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

solidification

• Solidification → Freezing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Solidifying → Freezing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Solidified → Freezing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Solidifies → Freezing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Solidifications → Freezing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

refers to the act of turning non-solid stuff into solid stuff (i could never have guessed!). freezing is one method of doing it, and a plausible synonym for some other methods, but far from the only one for either case. thus, considering incoming links, those might be better off soft redirected to wikt:solidization or retargeted to solidify
also i guess it's apparently a synonym for processes that create crystals specifically? oddly specific, but sure consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 16:46, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to solidify, where these variants are already combined, listing The verb form of solidification with freezing and deposition listed as subitems thereof. Wiktionary is also already linked there. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 16:54, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Linking to a disambiguation page would also be helpful in that it would discourage overlinking basic common words in articles that are simply using these terms in the obvious sense, "to make solid", rather than referring to a specific phase transition like freezing or deposition. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 17:08, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Solidify per above. Very sensible result. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:16, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget the first to Solidify. I'd prefer to delete the others, all of which were created by Neelix. For those who don't know the name there was once a bespoke speedy deletion criterion (WP:X1) for the many thousands of frivolous redirects he created. Grammatical variations of words like this were common among them. Even though that cleanup work was declared complete years ago, I still look upon the remnants with great skepticism. --BDD (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per above. All of these except solidifications are common terms that receive regular traffic, so they're valid redirects despite being Neelix creations. I wouldn't object to deleting solidifications in the spirit of WP:X1, but I also don't want to unnecessarily prolong this discussion. - Eureka Lott 19:23, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Push Push (Lady Lightning)

• Push Push (Lady Lightning) → Bang Camaro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Song title not mentioned anywhere else (see note below) on Wikipedia, this was a 2 line unsourced stub created in May 2008 and BLARed to its album Bang Camaro (album) 4 days after creation. Note that the second revision was an attempted WP:A1 speedy deletion which the creator got rid of. The revision immediately prior to the BLAR was an attempted PROD citing "Not notable enough for a separate entry; see WP:SONG". The album no longer has an article since 2020. Fork99 (talk) 12:45, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. Until which time this song is mentioned on the band's page (or the album is recreated), this redirect is unhelpful and an unlikely search term given the relative lack of notoriety. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 15:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note I misread the article and this is actually mentioned at the target at Bang Camaro#Television, however it is unsourced. Fork99 (talk) 23:45, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the unsourced mention found by the nominator?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:57, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. I've added a citation. pburka (talk) 19:32, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 06:56, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Seems fine to keep now to me, but I believe I can't withdraw this due to the delete !vote above. Fork99 (talk) 02:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  FWIW, El cid's delete vote was conditional ("Until which time this song is mentioned on the band's page..."). pburka (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Uncle Festerman

• Uncle Festerman → John Fetterman  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can't see the use of this redirect, but perhaps this is a US politics reference I'm not getting. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:18, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to fictional Uncle Fester, who also used the pseudonym Festerman. pburka (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. It is a common nickname for John Fetterman. See wikt:Uncle Festerman. Enix150 (talk) 03:20, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:54, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 06:56, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Zuunian

• Zuunian → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this alien at the target. There are mentions of multiple characters that are Zuunians on enwiki, but no article I could find that could serve as an alternate target. Delete to favour search results. Jay 05:45, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

• There is no information on the DC Universe because two of the editors are abiding by the consensus to only list aliens who have articles following the AFD discussion about the List of aliens in DC Comics. I'm just letting you know that @Jay: --Rtkat3 (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:53, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 06:56, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

C7m

• C7m → Discrimination based on skin tone  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This numeronym does not seem to be used outside of Wikipedia. Jruderman (talk) 06:40, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Unless we are both missing something, does not appear to be any connection. Page history does not provide any clues. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:19, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, some sort of neologism? Not seeing this used in any related sense online. ScalarFactor (talk) 16:27, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above editors' findings. I'm also mostly seeing links to guitar or piano chords on my search --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per the above. The chord is "Cm7" (see Minor seventh chord), on-line references to it as "C7m" mistaken. Tevildo (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. No idea about the current target. Top results for just "C7m" by itself are dominated by pages about an MSI laptop.
  When searched with music-related keywords ('chord', 'guitar', 'jazz') I was able to find many examples of C7M (major chord), which in the pages I saw was contrasted with Cm7 (minor chord). I don't agree that the online references to it are mistaken. It seems just be an informal conventional among jazz musicians, probably to more clearly differentiate the abbreviations by sight. Examples also appear in Google Scholar and Google Books results so evidently it also appears in publications not just online. The same convention is used for other chord, E7M, D7M, etc. A lot of the Google Scholar results were in Portuguese or mentioned Brazil, so this convention may be more common there.
  I don't think treating this redirect as a synonym for C7M is appropriate; the music-related pages I saw consistently used a capital M (WP:SMALLDETAILS), and music doesn't dominate the search results so I don't think we can assume what readers would be searching for here. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Anchor Podcasts

• Anchor Podcasts → Spotify#Acquisitions, podcasting and exclusivity deals  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. Two trivial mentions elsewhere onwiki, both on pages of podcasts distributed by them, no worth retargetting to. Rusalkii (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

OLADELE SOLOMON

• OLADELE SOLOMON → Solomon Oladele  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Oladele Solomon → Solomon Oladele  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirects from a sort name, except one is in all caps making it useless for linking per WP:ALLCAPS. Both are also missing the comma. The all caps was the original title of the article back before 1 September 2008. Both are left behind after moves which eventually fixed the title. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 06:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, we don't do this. One of these (it doesn't matter which) can be moved to Oladele, Solomon, which would be the correct sortname. BD2412 T 12:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 12:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:18, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Tapia, Andres de

• Tapia, Andres de → Andrés de Tapia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A redirect from a sorting name, except the name is incorrectly partitioned. The correct title is de Tapia, Andres. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 06:02, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment - ehh dunno really ifl I've seen this sort of partitioning before? have also seen de Tapia, Andres ofc so maybe both are ok? not too sure on this. - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 06:10, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

The "de" is unambiguously part of the surname. It's equivalent to partitioning "Leonardo da Vinci" as "Vinci, Leonardo da" instead of "da Vinci, Leonardo". – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes exactly!, I've seen both styles used in authoritative sources (bio dictionaries, scholarship in general really - and on WP too ofc), so I'm not sold on one being incorrect and the other correct, they both look and are acceptable afaik :/ - would say keep rdr in that case - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Product tracing

• Product tracing → Blockchain#Supply chain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Could also refer to Produce traceability? 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Could also refer to package tracking as well. I'd disambiguate. Shocksingularity (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on dabifying?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:11, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to the disambiguation page Tracing, which is sufficient enough that a new disambiguation page doesn't seem needed. --Bsherr (talk) 23:18, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:53, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment neither the current target nor either of the suggested targets are currently mentioned at the tracing dab page. Thryduulf (talk) 10:54, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Search results seem the best we can do at the moment. Later, a broad-concept article is probably possible without resorting to WP:SYN. --BDD (talk) 20:00, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: per BDD. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:26, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to traceability, which looks to be the general overview article on the topic. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:12, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per Tavix. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:28, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A new target has been suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Shelley Peter

• Shelley Peter → Peter Shelley  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A redirect from a sorting name, but it's missing the comma. No incoming internal links. The all time traffic is just the sort all redirects eventually accumulate just by existing. The correct sorting name title would be Shelley, Peter. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 05:51, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, not an actual sorting name. BD2412 T 12:09, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Honeymoon Lake

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Date redirects to Armenian parliament attack

• 10271999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27101999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 10 27 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 10/27/1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 10-27-1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 10 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27-10-1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27/10/1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• October 27, 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• October 27 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 October 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 October, 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible, not seeing any indication that date alone is a reasonable way to refer to this event. ScalarFactor (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete the “27 October, 1999” one as incorrectly formatted date, weak delete 10271999 and 27101999. Neutral on the rest as I found Public Radio of Armenia article. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:59, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I think they'd be plausible if they included "attack" or "shooting", but not as raw dates. ScalarFactor (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all: no indication that the date alone is used in English to refer to this event. Note that we do have redirects for these dates with the word "attack(s)" appended, and those should of course be kept. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep October 27, 1999, October 27 1999, and 27 October 1999. The lead sentence of the article makes it clear that the event is referred to by the date alone in Armenia. Accordingly, keep these dates as viable search terms, since simply October 27 is taken. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Dictionnary.com

• Dictionnary.com → Dictionary.com  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is not the name of the website - {{R from misspelling}} should ideally not potentially mislead people into going to typo-squatted domain names. ScalarFactor (talk) 04:13, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak delete per nom and per similar Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 7#Pubishersweekly.com. Dictionnary exists with some articles using this misspelling (Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles, Multiple sclerosis, Double liability, Prostitution in Ethiopia), which should probably be fixed. I think this is plausible due to wikt:dictionnary stating that this is an obsolete spelling and a misspelling influenced by French dictionnaire. But I find the misleading typo-squatted domain name more of a concern, as this domain name redirects to some random spam blog website at the moment and not the intended actual Dictionary.com. Fork99 (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as misleading since dictionnary.com is a parked domain Duckmather (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:58, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

List of Backrooms characters

• List of Backrooms characters → Backrooms (web series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Tagged as {{R with possibilities}}, but no such list exists at target. ScalarFactor (talk) 03:51, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Could Backrooms (film)#Cast be a potential retarget? Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:53, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Too ambiguous, and not a framing of a subject that currently exists. There are no reliable sources suggesting that "Backrooms characters" is a defined group that is specific to the film or to the web series. Linking to one or the other would imply that that's the list of characters, so to speak. A cast happens to function as a list of characters, but that's not its intended function here. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:21, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete as extremely vague even from the title. no list seems to have existed, and what can be defined as "a character" in the "backrooms" is subject to a lot of possible interpretations that all veer into fancruft territory, the least crufty being "are we talking about the backrooms themselves or media related to them in general?", with "do we include the reddit thread about the throngler and scrindonguloder?" at the cruftiest end, and "what about the poolrooms?" somewhere in between

if a list does end up existing eventually, it'll obviously require a disambiguator to match the thing it's a list of characters of, so this will serve no purpose then either consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:53, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep there is currently a list being worked on at Draft: List of Backrooms characters. The franchise is expanding and there will be need for a list. Redirect is mostly a place holder while the draft is being finished. I don’t want someone to start a list in the mainspace, when there is already a draft in draft space. That’s what happened with the article Kane Parsons. There was already a draft that preceded it called Draft:Kane Pixels, but someone later made the current version in mainspace without checking draftspace first. Then the draft was useless after that and turned into a redirect. I don’t want a repeat of that. There are also reliable secondary sources available for the characters in the film and web series, I will add those later. There is no harm in keeping the redirect. Leave redirect as is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purple Vortex (talk • contribs) 15:16, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Ricky Martin Forthcoming new studio album

• Ricky Martin Forthcoming new studio album → A Quien Quiera Escuchar  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. There is nothing "new" about the target. This page, originally created in 2009, has history but it doesn't look useful as it looks promotional, has Spanish text, only contains one dead link, is badly outdated as of 2026, and contains other issues that make it unsuitable for restoring. The current target was released in 2015, which is by no means "new". Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:58, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Also a poorly formatted title. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 15:13, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Hasn't been forthcoming for almost a decade. Steel1943 (talk) 18:37, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Champion the Bull

• Champion the Bull → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete this unsourced 2 paragraph stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006, before being BLAR'ed. The edit summary did say ..in accordance with merge request, but that was only to redirect to the target as per the merge request. No need to keep attribution. Jay 02:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Ampora

• Ampora → MS Paint Adventures#Homestuck  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Both MS Paint Adventures and Homestuck contain no usages for the term "Ampora". At the same time, Ampora is an ancient Christian see that has no article on Wikipedia. Pages like Heriberto Bodeant, when mentioning Ampora, are redirecting to MS Paint Adventures. ―Eduardogobi (talk) 06:10, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget for now to List of Homestuck characters#Eridan Ampora, where the character is mentioned. If you wish to disambiguate this with the Christian see, go write the article first. Duckmather (talk) 04:31, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget. per above. The link targets should probably be changed to Titular Bishopric of Ampora in the meantime to avoid confusion. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 13:58, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate I've drafted one. The titular see surely has more long-term significance than the webcomic character, and neither has their own article anyway. --BDD (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 01:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• dabify per BDD --Lenticel ^(talk) 13:49, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

September 16

Soviet Union at the 2025 Summer World University Games

• Soviet Union at the 2025 Summer World University Games → Individual Neutral Athletes at the 2025 Summer World University Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible, considering the Soviet Union has not existed since 1991. This is the only redirect starting with "Soviet Union at the 2", which is rather unsurprising. Mathguy2718 (talk) 23:55, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I could see this being justified for the first event in a recurring series after 1991 (for example Soviet Union at the 1992 Summer Olympics -> Unified Team at the 1992 Summer Olympics would be a useful redirect IMO), but not decades later. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:26, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:G5 as a creation of a sock with no substantial edits by others. Fork99 (talk) 10:52, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  SPI case archive. Fork99 (talk) 10:54, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  WP:G5 would only apply to creations made after 04:30, 29 May 2026, which is when the master account Tintin-tintine was blocked. This redirect was created before then, at 09:32, 28 July 2025. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  My bad, I have struck my comment. I did not check the timestamps that closely and just assumed that because it was a sockpuppet rather than a sockmaster, it was eligible. Fork99 (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Implausible redirect. Enough time has passed since 1991 that retargeting this to another former Soviet country who sent athletes there, such as Georgia or Ukraine, would also not make sense. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 16:45, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Medical colleges in Russia

• Medical colleges in Russia → List of medical schools in Japan#Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Medical Colleges in Russia and Former Russian States → List of medical schools in Japan#Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Medical Colleges and Universities in Russia and Former Soviet Russian States → List of medical schools in Japan#Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• List of Medical universities in the former Soviet Union → List of medical schools in Japan#Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Medical Universities in Russia and Former Soviet Russian States → List of medical schools in Japan#Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Medical universities in the former soviet states → List of medical schools in Japan#Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Medical universities in the former Soviet Union → List of medical schools in Japan#Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This makes no sense whatsoever. Mathguy2718 (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget at least (1) to List of medical schools in Russia. The others can probably go there as well, given the navboxes at the bottom. J947 ‡ ^edits 23:59, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget the very first one to List of medical schools in Russia, neutral on the others. Base on the history, Xqbot seems to have a stroke in 2010 and retarget the all of these redirects to the Japan one. This might be the funniest bot bug I ever seen. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:09, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget the first one to List of medical schools in Russia. The others should definitely not be kept as is, and should probably be deleted as an WP:XY situation between List of medical schools in Europe and List of medical schools in Asia. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:18, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Lists of medical schools is a potential target for the USSR titles (can click through to Europe/Asia sublists). Do these redirects get a lot of hits? Jruderman (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Fairywinkle

• Fairywinkle → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

just... look at the pre-blar content. can we call this a g3? consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 13:37, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to List of The Fairly OddParents characters where several characters are listed as having the surname "Fairywinkle". – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 13:45, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 22:55, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to List of The Fairly OddParents characters: Per Scyrme. This is by far the most sensible target for this redirect. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 16:42, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• retarget per Scyrme --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:26, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

20,000 BC in art

• 20,000 BC in art → Art of the Upper Paleolithic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 30,000 BC in art → Art of the Upper Paleolithic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 40,000 BC in art → Art of the Upper Paleolithic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not plausible, and the art is not dated with the precision of a year. Originally created as articles but no content was merged into the target. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/15,000 BC in art was also recently closed as delete, not redirect. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:14, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget all: Per nom. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 14:33, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  I was suggesting deletion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Gommeh, the nominator is not suggesting to retarget, so "retarget per nom" makes zero sense. Can you please explain or reconsider? -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:29, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Why did I put retarget... I meant delete all. (Perhaps I was looking at the discussion below this one, which is a request for retargeting, and wasn't thinking right... Lol.) In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 16:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to where?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 19:46, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

I think the consensus here is to delete.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 06:19, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 06:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Contemporary AI

• Contemporary AI → Large language model  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Vague; large language models are not the only contemporary form of AI. ~ A412 ^talk! 01:45, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Too vague to be useful. pburka (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to AI boom. I can easily imagine a reader searching this looking for the current state of AI, which has been a topic for many decades, even thought it might not feel like it. I'm often skeptical of time-sensitive redirects, but this one should be good for a while. --BDD (talk) 00:29, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 03:27, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 19:41, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to AI boom: Per BDD. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 16:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• retarget per BDD --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

BYD Atto 4

• BYD Atto 4 → BYD Seal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. No mention of the redirect as an alternative vehicle name. Inpops (talk) 17:15, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: the Seal is apparently marketed as the Atto 4 in some markets, per . A mention should probably be added to the target article. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Establishment redirects

• Establishmental → Establishment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Establishingly → Establishment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Establishedly → Establishment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I propose deleting these three Neelix redirects from incredibly unlikely search terms. None even have a Wiktionary entry. Canadachick (talk) 17:09, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, in the spirit of WP:R#D8. Though all words are, in a sense, made-up, these are especially contrived. Traffic stats are indistinguishable from typical background traffic that all redirects collect just by existing, so there's no evidence readers are actually using these redirects. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:33, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Deletional/deletingly/deletedly respectively in the spirit of WP:X1. Fork99 (talk) 12:34, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: They were removed from the Neelix lists by Legacypac here and here. The edit summary for Establishmental was rare but ok word. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:13, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Lincoln Park, Chicago

• Lincoln Park, Chicago → Lincoln Park (Chicago community area)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Lincoln Park per Talk:Lincoln Park (Chicago community area)#Requested move 5 August 2026. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:04, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy retarget per RM no reason to discuss ambiguity again. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:1AM

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Tom Tipper

• Tom Tipper → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target. There are mentions in other articles though I do not see any as an ideal primary target. There are mentions of a Tom Tipper / Thomas Tipper at Beer in Sussex and Music of Sussex about a Newhaven brewer on whom a song was also written. Delete to favour search results. I thought about a disambig, but could not come up with an entry for the brewer.

This was an unsourced 2-paragraph stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006. It was merged to its then target, but trimmed over time, and subsequently removed, before it became a redirect itself. No reason to provide attribution. Jay 07:09, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I re-added Tom Tipper to the target article. Based upon the diff you provided, I do not see any reason for the character's removal from the list, and so I conclude that it was done accidentally (after all, the edit was meant to add other minor characters to the list). Accordingly, I think the redirect is now sensible. I do not think the other mentions of Tom Tipper are significant enough to warrant a DAB or hatnote. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:15, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

University college entrance program

• University college entrance program → University and College Entrance Preparation Program  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Page was moved with rationale "The original title was of something completely different with no sources, leading me to believe it was all hallucinated", which suggests that this is not the name for anything and should be deleted. University and college admission is a possible retarget, but this is a fairly implausible search term. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:17, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Riseguide

• Riseguide → List of educational software  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RiseGuide. ~ A412 ^talk! 14:46, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom, and as apparently vague. for whatever reason, most results i got referred to assorted guides of games with "rise" at the end of their names, like monster hunter rise (my beloved), with results related to this riseguide specifically being of the "oi dat's a scam" and "oi dat's ai slop" varieties (though not numerous or substantial enough to warrant a mention), along with a completely unrelated report on studies about how them darned youths prefer spreading open their facebooks over spreading open a vagina consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 16:25, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nom. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 16:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 06:46, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Trattoria Records

• Trattoria Records → Cornelius (musician)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete: Only mentioned in discography of target page so nothing is learned from this redirect. No other valid targets with any further information. Apparently not notable so I don't see a reason to keep for the history or anything. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 08:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. The label has almost 300 releases and has signed other artists besides Cornelius; not only should it be covered on Cornelius's page more expansively, but it might be worthy of restoration as an article. This was probably thoughtlessly redirected when it should have been merged, like so much other record label content. Chubbles (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Chubbles would you be willing to convert it back to an article then? If there's a valid article that's fine, but I don't think it's appropriate for a redirect or merge target because the label is a separate entity from Cornelius (he didn't found it or anything, he was just signed to it). The currently existing redirect doesn't help anyone because all they learn from Cornelius' page is that some of his albums came out on that label. You could learn that from Discogs or anywhere else, but Wikipedia is dedicated to substantial biographical information, not facts better suited to a database. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:21, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  From what I can tell, Cornelius founded the label, but it may well be worthy of a separate article that I will not be able to contribute to in the next several days (I am traveling). I see no reason that a merge couldn't happen here as well. Chubbles (talk) 23:44, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Katniss

• Katniss → Sagittaria  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Katniss Everdeen is the clear primary topic. Page views for Katniss Everdeen vastly outweigh views for Sagittaria (see the graph), even before taking into account that "katniss" is just one of many alternative names for Sagittaria. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 07:44, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose: Katniss isn't just one of the alternative names, but one which is used multiple times in the page. Search results for "katniss" produce the character second, so anyone searching for that can easily find what they're looking for, and even if they happen to land on the plant's article anyway, the hatnote is sufficient. Unsurprising that the page views weigh in favor of a fictional character from a popular franchise over a random plant species, but that shouldn't be the only determining factor when there's other value in keeping this redirect as is. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 08:53, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:SMALLDETAILS. The character has a last name, and anyone looking for information about that specifically should be reasonably expected to both know it, and include it in a search. If they don't know it, or they're just too lazy to enter it, the hatnote at the current target gets them there. I also don't buy the pageviews argument in a vacuum, since it doesn't tell us how many had to click through the hatnote instead. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  I don't agree that readers should be reasonably expected to ... include it in a search. That would be true if "Katniss" were a common given name, but it isn't (or wasn't until the books/films briefly made it a popular baby name). According to Ancestry.com, the name "Katniss" is a 21st-century creation, suggesting it wasn't ever used as a personal name prior to the publication of the Hunger Games. Ancestry.com isn't the most reliable source, but I wasn't able to find anything that contradicts this.

  Regardless, readers may reasonably think it was wholly made up for the books, like many names of fictional characters in sci-fi settings are, especially if they aren't aware of the plant or only know it by another name. In that context, it's reasonable for readers to expect the first name would be enough. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 00:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Katniss Everdeen with a hatnote to the plant. I agree the character is the primary topic.
  Regarding the pageviews, while it's true that it's difficult to tell how many of the views for Sagittaria were clicking through the hatnote, if you look at the all-time stats for Katniss itself, there's an obvious trend of gradual decline over time since 2015. The most plausible explanation for this is that the traffic for Katniss reflects the declining cultural relevance of the Hunger Games. I really doubt these stats are reflecting trends in interest for the plant. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 00:19, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: the Hunger Games character gets more page views, sure, but I fail to be convinced that she has enough long-term significance to be primary for her given name alone. And while this wasn't a common given name prior to the publication of the series, there are other potentially notable people with the name or nickname  – and even an orca with a mention on wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosbif73 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Light Dragon

• Light Dragon → The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom#Plot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should this redirect to Princess Zelda instead? (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:47, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

The term could also refer to the Vickers Light Dragon, though I have no opinion in this RfD. Fathoms Below (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom § Plot has more information and context than Princess Zelda currently does. A Google search seems to show that the Tears of the Kingdom character is by far the primary topic, although a hatnote for the Vickers Light Dragon may be appropriate. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk · edits) 15:23, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:00, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Pegasus the Cart Horse

• Pegasus the Cart Horse → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete this unsourced 2 paragraph stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006 before being BLAR'ed. No reason to keep attribution. Jay 05:14, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ScalarFactor (talk) 04:08, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Imladris (convention)

• Imladris (convention) → Polish speculative fiction#Fandom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Notable event (SF convention) that has a pl wiki article. It is just namedropped in the current target article. It might be better of as WP:RED. _{Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here} 03:55, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:18, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Antitau

• Antitau → Tau (particle)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A web search shows a lot of results related to anti-tau drugs as well. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:21, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep the hyphenated version seems to explicitly refer to the drugs while the former refers to the specific particle. — Knightoftheswords(talk) 04:33, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Have you checked https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22antitau%22? 1234qwer1234qwer4 09:03, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:40, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:36, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep and add a {{redirect}} hatnote for the drugs. I don't think a disambiguation page would be appropriate as "antitau"/"anti-tau" is only a partial title match for the tau inhibitor topic. Main page Google results are overwhelmingly for the antiparticle, but Google Scholar and Google Books bring up plenty of results for the drugs so a hatnote is warranted. Practically, a hatnote would be no worse than a disambiguation page for any readers looking for antitau drugs as they'd be 1 click away from what they're looking for in either case. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 00:36, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Which article should the differently hypenated "anti-tau" (which does not currently exist) point at in your opinion? 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:20, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Antitau and anti-tau should share the same target, namely the antiparticle. I don't think the hyphen makes a difference here. The hyphenated and unhyphenated forms are used interchangeably in both the physics and biological/medical contexts. (eg. anti-tau in a physics paper, antitau in a biochemistry paper) – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 16:44, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Jon Key

• Jon Key → List of Harry Potter cast members#Creatures  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are multiple people with this name including a politician, a designer and a musician, but none with articles. Delete to favour search results. This was an article though for some months in 2017, which was BLAR'ed as redirect to avoid spending editors' time at WP:AFD as he does not (appear to) remotely meet WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO. If there are objections, then please revert per WP:BRD. Will notify original author. Jay 02:33, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to John Key (disambiguation). Add any "Jon Key" instances to the See also section there. BD2412 T 23:12, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:36, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. None of the entries at the disambiguation page have that name, and none of the people called 'Jon Key' mentioned in the nomination have articles to link there in its "see also" If any of them, like the politician, are notable this is a case of WP:RETURNTORED. The single passing mentions of "Jon Key" in the giant table at List of Harry Potter (film series) cast members and the table at List of Wizarding World cast members don't warrant a redirect or being listed at the disambiguation page. There are passing mentions of other people called "Jon Key" in various other articles (eg. Peter Sewally, Cambridge University Lightweight Rowing Club, 2012 Southend-on-Sea Borough Council election). It's best to let the search bar handle this, so these mentions can all be found rather than being hidden by the existence of the redirect. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 00:50, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note that multiple changes happened at the target post this nomination. It was renamed (before the relists), and the resulting redirect had its target changed (between the relists). So the target in the original nomination is now List of Harry Potter (film series) cast members. Jay 17:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Z match

• Z match → Antenna tuner  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The concept is no longer covered at the target article and the only semi-relevant mention is at Yaesu FT-817, but that would not be a helpful target Casablanca 🪨^(T) 20:08, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Impedance matching, which will cover the use on the FT-817 article. Tevildo (talk) 20:17, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:55, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:44, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Impedance matching per Tevildo. A bit opaque if you don't know the subject matter—which I don't—but I see "impedance (symbol: Z)", hence Z matching? I buy it. --BDD (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:25, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Citadel (comics)

• Citadel (comics) → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information at the target. As per Citadel (disambiguation), this is a fictional alien empire in the DC Comics universe (and not the name of a comic). This used to be an article from 2006 which was deleted by PROD in 2019 as Fails WP:GNG. Suggest deletion, and if there is support, I volunteer to remove or unlink the incoming links. Jay 08:57, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom. in this time, some wonk already unlinked and removed sections referring to the citadel, like in this case consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 13:06, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
• Perhaps redirect to Omega Men where the Citadelians are prominently described. older ≠ wiser 13:44, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'm good with that. Searching with "citadel", a generic word, I could not find any suitable articles. "citadel comics" had not helped as well. I didn't know of "Citadelian", and there was no such redirect, so I missed this. Jay 11:11, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on the retargeting proposal?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:49, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak delete I think it would make more sense to create Citadelian as a redirect to Omega Men. I searched citadel Marvel and found a few Marvel places with "citadel" in the name. None have a better claim to this title, but there's no history to this redirect, so creating something unambiguous sounds like a cleaner solution. --BDD (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:24, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Godzilla's death

• Godzilla's death → Godzilla vs. Destoroyah  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Death of Godzilla → Godzilla vs. Destoroyah  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Too vague. As far as I can remember, Godzilla died many times. There are even have two ScreenRant listicles about it (here, here) Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:06, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

My defense: I know that Godzilla died in other films in the franchise, but the reason that I created this redirect was because this film was highly advertised as the film that Godzilla dies in. Even CNN reported on it back when most of the Heisei era films haven’t released in the United States! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:53, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep I didn't see anything relevant from a quick scan of Godzilla. Based on the film's advertising, I can certainly imagine a reader trying to remember which exact film contained this plot point. --BDD (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:24, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Assisting an offender

• Assisting an offender → Assisting offender  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While these two terms are very similar they have very different meanings (almost antonyms) such that I was very suprised (and a bit confused) to arrive at the target article. "Assisting an offender" (at least in UK law) is a criminal offence whereby a person intentionally helps another person avoid arrest or prosecution, knowing or believe the latter has commited a serious crime. An "assisting offender" is a convicted criminal who actively assists the authorities to prosecute another person. There are lots of mentions of the term in aritclespace, but the only actual content I've found about it so far is Criminal Law Act 1967#Part I – Felony and misdemeanour (scroll down to "Section 4"). With an anchor that might make a suitable target, but ideally we'd have something more specific. Thryduulf (talk) 10:41, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• How about Accessory (legal term) or Aiding and abetting? --BDD (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hmm, it's definitely not Aiding and abetting as that occurs only before or during a crime while assisting an offender only happens after a crime. Accessory is covered by different statue in the UK (Criminal Law Act 1967 vs Criminal Law Act 1977) and feels different somewhow. I think the difference is that an accessory, in English law, commissioned the crime and/or was present at the scene of the crime while someone who assists an offender did/was neither. I'm not sure this distinction exists in US law? I need to think more on this when I'm awake. Thryduulf (talk) 01:11, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

  After thinking and some more research it seems that "Assisting and offender" and "Accessory after the fact" are essentially the same thing, in the UK former is a statutory offence that effectively replaced the latter common law offence. If there was some content about this at the Accessory (legal term) article then that would make a good target, it isn't UK specific though as there are offences by this name in at least Barbados and Hong Kong, possibly Ireland and New Zealand too (searching brought up a lot of South Africa-related hits, but it seems not to be the name of a specific offence there). Thryduulf (talk) 13:12, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 03:10, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Accessory (legal term). A more explicit mention would be beneficial but not mandatory IMO. There's a lot of discussion of assistance already, the offender part is implied, and at the end, there's already "assists the offender" in a US context. --BDD (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Accessory (legal term). That article uses "assist", "assists", and "assistance" throughout, including the opening sentence; it would not be a surprising target. It seems straightforward that someone who assits an offender is an accessory to the offense, which, as far as I can tell, is consistent with what the article says. While it seems in England and Wales "assisting an offender" is legalese that is narrowly a synonym for "accessory after the fact", this would make it {{r from subtopic}}, since an accessory after the fact is still an accessory. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 01:15, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Accessory after the fact is already a redirect to Accessory (legal term), in case it matters. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 01:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Soviet invasion of Lithuania

• Soviet invasion of Lithuania → Soviet occupation of the Baltic states (1940)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Maybe better to point at Occupation of the Baltic states given the 1944 re-occupation. This is also where Soviet invasion of the BalticsSoviet invasion of the Baltics redirects (as well as Soviet invasion of the Baltic statesSoviet invasion of the Baltic states, which I just created in accordance). 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:11, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: The military occupation happen in 1940 and I think that article should be improved to describe events up to the annexation in greater detail. "Occupation of the Baltic states" is a more comprehensive article giving a better overall picture, but perhaps we shouldn't redirect there solely on this basis. I have some material on this subject, so maybe some day I'll expand that article. --Mindaur (talk) 08:34, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Soviet occupation of Estonia

• Soviet occupation of Estonia → Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic#Soviet occupation of Estonia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Soviet occupation in Estonia → Occupation of the Baltic states  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These should have the same target. Similar redirects for Lithuania redirect to Occupation of the Baltic states (while Soviet occupation of Latvia is a disambiguation page since there are separate articles for the 1940 and 1944 occupations). 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Note that Occupation of Estonia exists as a disambiguation page, though Occupation of Latvia is a disambiguation page separate from Soviet occupation of Latvia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:05, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

...and Soviet-occupied Estonia is another dab page. (Along with Soviet-occupied Latvia and Soviet-occupied Lithuania. Having three separate pages for the Latvia-related phrases seems a bit too redundant.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:15, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

ClassicalMusicOnly

• ClassicalMusicOnly → Classical music  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• ClassicalMusicOnly.com → Classical music  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The only mention of this random website was an inappropriately-added external link, which I have removed, so delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:37, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete; not a helpful redirect. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:06, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Per nom; there is a decent chance this was promotional in nature but I'm not 100% sure. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 15:41, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:23, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Nestar

• Nestar → Gravastar  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer any mention at the target (I removed it), so delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:19, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• This could be retargeted or disambiguated: Nestar Systems is an article, and Nestar Sakalowski is a redirect to Niescier Sakałoŭski (though that spelling isn't mentioned at the target). SevenSpheres (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• I'd be okay with a retarget to Nestar Systems (much more reasonable than the person's name)...missed that during the nomination. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:18, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Oh, and after some more digging, it seems to be a "locality" in Spain, see es:Nestar, but I don't know what sort of geographical division that means exactly. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:33, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Nestar Systems. Google Scholar and Google Books yield zero hits for "Nestar Sakalowski", and main page Google results are clearly contaminated with results influenced by Wikipedia. The redirect is a result of a move to "correct spelling of name". It's unclear where the spelling "Nestar" came from as its not a romanisation from the original Belarusian and doesn't match the titles of any of the Wikis available in the languages menu. It may be from an akanye pronunciation (but not spelling) of the Russian Нестор "Nestor", but that's just a guess. Either way, it's wrong so is a less preferable target to the correct Nestar Systems. If an article for the Spanish topic is written, Nestar can be converted into a disambiguation page. Until then, Nestar Systems seems to be the only suitable target on ~enwiki. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 01:48, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Nestar Systems with no prejudice on the creation of a dab in the future in case the Spanish article is translated here per Scyrme --Lenticel ^(talk) 06:50, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Obelisk biology

• Obelisk biology → Obelisk (biology)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, as essentially an RDAB, similar to why we don't have "virus biology", "jupiter mythology", etc. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:13, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: I suppose you could say this is nonsensical. Obelisks are not living things, and the title of this redirect suggests they (as in the buildings) have some sort of biological aspect to them when they do not. (And this is coming from a guy who's surprised he passed his high-school biology class...). In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 15:44, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. I actually think virus biology would be a fine redirect, as it's a valid title of a topic; I'm surprised it and similar redirects like biology of viruses don't already exist. (Virions aren't living things, but virocells are; it's trivial to find sources talking about "virus biology" or the "biology of viruses", regardless of views on whether viruses are alive.) Regardless, "obelisk biology" is more like "protein biology", which is just a string of keywords, than "virus biology" or "cell biology", which are plausibly topic titles. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 02:19, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

La Plan

• La Plan → Planet of the Apes (novel)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this at the target...it's not the French title, or anything apparently related –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:00, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I haven't read Planet of the Apes, and I am not familiar with the media franchise either. Perhaps La Plan is somehow significant to one of the movies, TV shows or comics? If so, then we should retarget accordingly; if not, we should delete. Either way, I'd want to get more opinions from people who are more familiar with Planet of the Apes than I am. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 15:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Wood Age

• Wood Age → Stone Age  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of a "Wood Age" at the target, whatever it even refers to exactly, but it's not this in any evident way to the reader –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:59, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, the term and it's relationship to the Stone Age is not made up but has been used by such sources as the 2021 book The Wood Age, How One Material Shaped the Whole of Human History, and the 2023 Discover magazine article "What Evidence is there for a Wood Age to Rival those of Stone-Bronze-and Iron?". Seems a valid redirect, and arguably may become a stand alone article at some point. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:38, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's not valid if there's no discussion of this as an idea at the target. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:49, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  This one seems obvious, as the term "Wood Age" describes the same era of prehistory as the Stone Age but isn't a household word because wood from that era has rotted away while stone artifacts are still extant. Editors have nominated so many of these things for deletion how about throwing this one back? The sources hopefully address your concern "whatever it even refers to exactly". Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:00, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Redirect idea: Wood. The main argument against using 'Wood Age' as a redirect to 'Stone Age' is that it never ended and extends across all recognized ages - humanity has been within a Wood Age from the start and it cannot be placed within a certain time frame. This argument has merit, and even though the Stone Age comprises 99% of human existence, and may seem a logical redirect target, reliance on wood as an essential natural tool has never ended. All the more reason for the term to become a stand alone article at some point. Pinging Deacon Vorbis and BDD, does redirecting to Wood make sense given at least some good sources which use the term 'Wood Age'? Randy Kryn (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Sorry, I actually really don't like that! Without anything relevant about the idea of the Wood Age, it would come across as extremely condescending. Imagine:

  Reader: "What's the Wood Age?"

  Wikipedia: "Oh, wood? Well, wood is a material from trees..."

  We can just about guarantee the reader will be confused and/or disappointed.

  If the Wood Age is meant to be synonymous with human history, we might consider Anthropocene, but it suffers from the same lack of mention as the other places I checked. --BDD (talk) 15:57, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  I generally agree with this assessment, and I'll also add that this seems to be the idea/slogan/whatever of a single author, not widely accepted or used, so even a mention like "So-and-so proposes all of human history as a 'Wood Age'..." or some such would still be quite WP:UNDUE, especially since this doesn't seem to be so much an "Age" as we tend to think of them, but rather just a reminder of wood's importance as a material throughout all of human history. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:42, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. WP:REDLINK, as there's clearly something to do this, but it's not an idea we seem to discuss, and the current target asks readers to make a leap. I checked some other places like Human history, Pleistocene, Pliocene, and Prehistory. Among them, there are a few one-off mentions of wooden objects, but nothing to make them a reasonable target currently. --BDD (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:REDLINK. Checked the websites linked above. I think we might have a potential article in the future. --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:00, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

September 15

Ninety One plc

• Ninety One plc → Ninety One Limited  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Page should not redirect to an article related to the South African entity. It should go to its own article, or a new article about the group company. But for now, be deleted. Husskeyy (talk) 10:29, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Valid {{r from related topic}}. Paradoctor (talk) 22:30, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

WCFA

• WCFA → World Christian Fundamentals Association  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The initials could also be a possible search term for WCFA-LP. JTtheOG (talk) 21:55, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

I added a hatnote to the World Christian Fundamentals Association page. Does that help? Toastable (talk) 01:01, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

I changed it to a {{Redirect}} hatnote to avoid a WP:NOTAMBIGUOUS removal but otherwise have no opinion on whether this should be kept. Fork99 (talk) 01:21, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate. I have drafted one below the redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  I think this is a good idea. Thanks Toastable (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate, as there's three entries on the drafted one. ScalarFactor (talk) 04:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Bam 83

• Bam 83 → Bam Adebayo's 83-point game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This term not found in article: Googling suggests it is not used. PamD 15:43, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment This isn't a phrase, but can be a search term, possibly in line with {{R from related word}}: This redirect might be a good search term ...—Bagumba (talk) 07:39, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Seems like a made-up, unlikely neologism. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:14, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep I imagine its a useful search term, sometimes people type lazy Kyethepie21 (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Kobe 81

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Vladdy Daddy

• Vladdy Daddy → Vladimir Putin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a known nickname for this individual. Possibly a vandalism creation by a known LTA. In solidarity, Jalen Barks (Woof) 20:14, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• Concur ~ Nothing from the regional alternative press, this seems unnecessary. Augmented Seventh (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Not inherently vandalistic and used often enough to have several Urban Dictionary entries. My only concern is that it might be too ambiguous to redirect to Putin specifically. Mx User (talk) 22:29, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep. It's known well enough to have been mentioned in multiple mainstream sources, though I also agree with Mx User that it might be too ambiguous to redirect to Putin.

• https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/news-centre/stories/2022/opinion-from-vladdy-daddy-to-fake-tiktoks-how-to-guide-your-child-through-ukraine-news-online
• https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/vladdy-daddy-please-no-war-gen-z-posts-russia-ukraine-tensions-2022-02-14/
• https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-15/gen-z-using-tiktok-instagram-to-discuss-russia-ukraine-tensions/100831956

WHD (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 20:07, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, unmentioned at the target, and no apparent reason to do so. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:48, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  Being unmentioned at the target is only half of a deletion rationale Katzrockso (talk) 03:43, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's shorthand for the more long-winded explanation that if you already know whom it refers to, you're likely looking for more information about the nickname specifically, and since there is none, this is misleading. And if you don't, it's potentially confusing. Is this a real nickname? Is it just something someone on WP made up? Is there any further significance to it? Again, misleading and confusing. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:41, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This appears to be connected to Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (a baseball player), based on this result that gives 1,240 hits. It seems to be a nickname he goes by, though unmentioned (it does mention "Vladdy", though). There does also seem to be a connection to Vladimir Putin, based on these results. But regardless of where someone gets this term from and inputs it into Wikipedia for some reason, the current target isn't helpful. They are probably not looking for general information like Vladimir Putin's name in Cyrillic letters, or that he was the Prime Minster of Russia from 1999 to 2000 and 2008 to 2012, or that he was born in what is now Saint Petersburg. Even if readers didn't get this term from something baseball-related, the current target would waste them time (especially on mobile, where ctrl-f doesn't exist) trying to figure out where this is mentioned (it isn't). But if deleted, we're telling readers content about "Vladdy Daddy" doesn't exist, which is kind of accurate since it's not used in any articles (and we don't explain this term), and they don't have to read a 25,000+ word article for essentially nothing that is helpful. Mathguy2718 (talk) 00:43, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep — it's a fairly known nickname, so per norm, it should stay. Nutella lover • [ chat│supervise ] 06:29, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I wouldn't say that's the norm, and it doesn't address the concerns raised by myself and others. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 07:05, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above. Too vague to prove it's solely about Putin --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:17, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Alpahbet

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn

Unmentioned Goosebumps short stories

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Untitled Tommy Wirkola film

• Untitled Tommy Wirkola film → Thrash (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect has no incoming links. The film is now named so is not a likely search term, the redirect serves no purpose. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 16:35, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:15, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Although there is no consensus as to the pageviews threshold for deletion under WP:UFILM, this had 48 hits in the 90ish days before the RFD nom. Regardless of what I think, that's too high for the RFD community's comfort, especially if there are no other problems with this redirect such as other Tommy Wirkola projects in the works with which this could cause confusion. It would be safer to check again in ≈‍3 months and renominate if views have dropped substantially. But keeping track of these for the sake of repeat nominations isn't the best use of time. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Or are the pageviews a result of this RFD and from being listed at NPP which is where I came across this redirect. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:31, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Masoor

• Masoor → Lentil#Types  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Variety name not mentioned in the target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:14, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment. There is wikt:masoor. May or may not be worth a mention in the target. ~2026-48840-63 (talk) 14:32, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:15, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Bursty star formation

• Bursty star formation → Cosmology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I propose deleting this, because although there's some relevance to physical cosmology per the article linked in the edit summary , it's not mentioned on either page. The creator is globally blocked, so I haven't notified him. Canadachick (talk) 18:14, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, DrBogdanSpam. No information about this at the target (now or at redirection creation time too, I think). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:54, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: This term is mentioned in a few articles like Quenching (astronomy). In Infinity Galaxy it's linked to Starburst region, though the exact term isn't mentioned there. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:07, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

It shouldn't be deleted then. It should be redirected either to Starburst region or somewhere else. Canadachick (talk) 16:16, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Earth Studies

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Karate!

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Refuse illegal orders

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 23#Refuse illegal orders

Antinationalism

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Bowser's Castle

• Bowser's Castle → Super Mario  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bowser’s Castle → Mario (franchise)#Bowser's Castle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure what to do about this one. Neither target article seems to mention anything substantial about the subject of this redirect. In addition, the article Bowser also seems to not include specific information about the subject of this redirect in a way that would satisfy a reader researching this term. However, looks like this redirect had an article here that was WP:BLARed in 2008: . Steel1943 (talk) 12:10, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. It shows up as a stage in Mario Kart 64 (and probably other MK games too), where there's a brief mention, but nothing substantial. Ditto as the final level of Super Mario World, and probably other Mario games too. I don't think we can keep these at either target, so lean delete unless anyone else has a better idea at least. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:23, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete, essentially as a sort of hacky way to return to red. bowser has had different castles in pretty much every piece of media since his debut and childhood, outright churning through them in some games (such as new soup), and his children tend to follow suit with castles of their own, so the term hardly narrows it down. if any one castle, set of castles, or the general concept manages to have some coverage found to at least warrant a mention (or even an article), it might then be a somewhat good idea to recreate this, but i haven't found anything specific or substantial enough at the moment consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 15:55, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Karate badges

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Final Fantasy mythos

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Draft:Moon Island Road

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Draft:Nose-horned mammal

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Final Fantasy Union

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Austerity (economics)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Cará

• Cará → Yam (vegetable)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned in article, seemingly no affinity per WP:RLOTE. ScalarFactor (talk) 23:40, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom (I found no other good target onwiki) Duckmather (talk) 00:17, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Taro. Then hatnote with Template:Redirect-synonym to Yam (vegetable). Cará is discussed at Taro#Brazil. --Bsherr (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the suggested retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Say Wallahi Bro

• Say Wallahi Bro → IShowSpeed  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Phrase not used in article. ScalarFactor (talk) 03:36, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Way too vague and appears to be a non-notable meme, I'm personally familiar with the alternative romanisation of the Arabic والله as "Wallah", meaning something like "I swear to God" as there is a significant Arab diaspora in Australia where I'm from. Wallah on en-wiki is unrelated and wikt:wallah#Etymology 2 does have a definition of its borrowing into English but not in conjunction with asking someone else to say the word. Fork99 (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as simply isn't at target, non-notable also. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 12:51, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:02, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Just notified of this discussion at the target. Jay 11:43, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Bluebell the Cow

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Can't Wait To Be With You

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Dry yeast

• Dry yeast → Nutritional yeast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Dried yeast → Baker's yeast#Difference between instant and active dry yeast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems like this can refer both to active and inactive yeast. Could retarget to Yeast, though that provides less information. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:10, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

• comment would targeting to Baker's yeast#Difference between instant and active dry yeast with hatnote in the section pointing to yeast and nutritional yeast suffice? --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:10, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:05, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Do "dry" and "dried" yeast carry different meanings?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 00:45, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete What is the purpose of redirects like these? I would think the most likely case is that someone wants to know about "dry yeast", perhaps having seen the phrase somewhere, and wonders whether dry yeast is really something special, rather than merely an SOP, yeast that happens to be dry. WP has no information that will help them. It does not have an article "Dry yeast", or possibly "Dry and wet yeast". So the most helpful response by WP would be to say "Sorry, we confess ignorance". Is anyone seriously suggesting that it helps to redirect somewhere, anywhere, so the readers can try to puzzle out for themselves what the answer to their original question was? Imaginatorium (talk) 08:32, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:02, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Point both to the Baker's yeast article, which contains the term. That there isn't an article that provides extensive detail on the subject is not a rationale to not have a redirect. Katzrockso (talk) 03:41, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Bulstrode (Thomas the Tank Engine)

• Bulstrode (Thomas the Tank Engine) → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bulstrode the barge → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters#Non-rail vehicles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bulstrode the coal barge → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target. There are minor mentions at two other articles - in the plot of a book Toby, Trucks and Trouble, and in an episode Thomas & Friends series 4, and I don't see either as an alternate or suitable target.

Bulstrode the barge was created first, in May 2005, as an unsourced 4-liner that lasted only 3 minutes before it was BLAR'ed. Bulstrode (Thomas the Tank Engine) created the following month, lasted an year, although it was an unsourced stub, and was BLAR'ed as well. Its then target already had a section that had been independently written, so this was not a merge. Delete in the absence of a suitable target. Jay 03:54, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Update: An anon added a mention at the target yesterday. Although unsourced and with no blue links, I'm not tagging it with {{citation needed}} because most of that list page is unsourced anyway. Jay 13:33, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment, the character is a minor antagonist who only appears in one episode in the original tv series from over 30 years ago. Do we need redirects for every one off character in a tv/book franchise that has around the same amount of minor characters as Pokemon species? The Thomas & Friends fictional universe is incredibly detailed, how much should be covered in a general purpose encyclopedia instead of the dedicated Thomas wikis (of which there are dozens)?. There has been a successive trend of more deletions around Thomas content over the years as WP:NFICTION has been revised. Ultimate Norman (talk) 12:19, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Remains mentioned.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 00:56, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Budget cut

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 14 Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 13 Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 12

Template:Wikipedia community