Jump to content

User:Arcticocean

This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello! Contact me by leaving a message at the relevant article talk page or on my user talk page. You can also email me.
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0
I agree to multi-license my contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0, version 2.0, version 2.5, version 3.0, and version 4.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.
Iceberg at Franz Josef Land, Arkhangelsk

About me

[edit]
  • I am one of Wikipedia's administrators. If you have questions, comments, or concerns about my actions as an administrator, please raise them with me. I promise to listen carefully and try to address the problem. As the saying goes, feedback is a gift and even if not entirely correct, it's rarely wrong.
  • Previously, I was a checkuser, appointed from the community to address sockpuppetry and other abuse. I was later elected to terms as an arbitrator, at a time the committee was significantly busier and the time commitment for arbitrators was often excessive. I am less active nowadays, but continue to volunteer regularly as an admin.
  • I am active within the global Wikimedia community, principally as a privacy ombudsperson. You can also contact me on my user talk page at Meta-Wiki.

My frequently-used pages

[edit]

Featured article process contributions

[edit]

Participation in the featured article process is an excellent way to contribute to high-quality content in a supportive capacity. By carefully choosing the articles reviewed, it can also be a good way to improve personal general knowledge and your own writing abilities. The process is welcoming to new reviewers and advice is linked in the section above at 'FA', 'FAC', and 'FAR'.

Featured Article Candidate (FAC) assessments:

Statistics

[edit]
My action Count
Edits 56,015
Deletions 3,436
Revision deletions 201
Suppressions 460
Protections 7,969
User blocks 2,556
Checks 5,370
User unblocks 164
Permission modifications 153
76,324

My recent article edits

[edit]

11 July 2026

6 May 2026

25 April 2026

24 March 2026

20 March 2026

14 March 2026

Useful observations about our community

  1. Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers means to "Treat newcomers with kindness and patience". Many experienced editors use patience, but omit the kindness. As a complex website, Wikipedia has a steep learning curve. Someone vandalising it, or writing draft articles about their business, may be a new editor entitled to the anti-biting policy's benefit. Kindness could require assuming that apparently disruptive edits are an effort to "see how this works". Even if the aggregate effect of this approach is that more time is spent dealing with disruptive users, we pay that price for treating newcomers with kindness.
  2. "I know you may have been taught it's polite to use honorifics, but that isn't necessary on the English Wikipedia. No one will think you're rude if you don't call them sir/ma'am, and doing so risks calling women 'sir'."
    Valereee (talk · contribs), 15:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  3. "Egoboo is… the pleasure received from public recognition of voluntary work."
    – From our article on the term, which I discovered from Newyorkbrad (talk · contribs), 22:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC).
  4. "When I am asked why I have volunteered my time for so long, my answer is simple: I believe in our project. I believe in our vision, that of a world in which every person has free access to the sum of all human knowledge. I believe that our work makes the world a better place every day, and as long as I believe that I will dedicate my time and energy to this project."
    L235 (talk · contribs), 03:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  5. [At the top of a retired user's talk page] "Please use the space below to tell me why you hate my redirects and templates."
    Gurch (talk · contribs), 2018
  6. "Wikipedia would grind to a halt in hours if every editor with a mental illness went on strike."
    Tamzin (talk · contribs) at User:Tamzin/On mental health.
  7. "[Why do I…] keep leaving or retiring, then coming back? … After not editing Wikipedia for a while, I realized that my brain has not been as sharp. Apparently, taking the time to [propose] and make corrections to various aspects of Wikipedia has been stimulating my brain quite a bit. I found that over the past month…, I just have not been as motivated or encouraged to proactively engage in thoughtful conversation or research. …[I]t seems Wikipedia has been a glue… keeping my mind intact".
    Steel1943 (talk · contribs), 2025
  8. Wikipedians don't care if you withhold a donation, or say that you're going to do so. Assuming that they do indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of Wikipedia and the culture of its community. See also: Wikipedia:Not gonna donate.
  9. The Wikipolitician is a type of experienced volunteer, prone to believing that anybody else cares about positions they have adopted or opinions they have previously articulated. You'll see them comment that they have "repeatedly" voted a certain way or supported a certain change. You'll see them comment that they have done so "for a long time", implying a long-standing position. You'll note a belief that if they support something, that suggests it should be done. They are unaware this is an act of self-indulgence and grandiosity, and inevitably they overestimate their true influence or power. Wikipedia is an online community, comprised of volunteers. None of us rank as senior; at best, some of us have considerable experience, and have perhaps been elected or appointed to do particular duties. That does not mean we have a political system, or that people are forming detailed impressions of anyone's personal policies and positions over time. At most, people know who you are and may have some memory of specific situations where you demonstrated some level of skill or competence. That does not excuse you from a duty in each situation to take decisions fairly, dispassionately, and with the minimum possible fuss. Self-marketing obstructs that. Politicians are not needed on Wikipedia.
[edit]
  • MakeRef at Wikimedia Toolforge: generate the right form of citation for a reference, useful for avoiding the need to read Template:Citation/doc, which is surely from one of the circles of hell.
  • IPA is another probable component of the circles of hell, and https://ipa-reader.com will read out any IPA pronunciation fragment for English and the other major western languages.
  • https://www.cereproc.com [dead link], the website for proprietary software, provides a free "voice demo" tool that supports Gaelic pronunciation. From the first slide on the carousel on the homepage, select "Gaelic" as the language and Scottish Gaelic as the voice, then type or paste the Gaelic word or sentence to have it read back accurately.
  • https://dsl.ac.uk is a Scots language dictionary, useful (among many uses) for dealing with works of pre-Union Scotland.